I love how a handful of posters on this thread have called anybody who agrees with the notion that Vick could be displaced one way or another an "idiot", "moron", or "crackhead".
If guess the Shark pool should just post more "Should LT2 be the #1 Pick?" threads. Way to be excellent to one another Footballguys.
ask yourself if Jim Sorgi should replace Peyton Manning? i'm positive you would call anyone who does agree with that statement "idiots, morons and crackheads" because this debate is tantamount to the Mike Vick vs. Matt Schaub one. MIke Vick had 24 td's and only 8 interceptions when he was 22 years old. Please digest that before criticizing him for not being able to read nfl defenses. Last year he rushed for 900 yards (3rd most ever for a qb) and led his team to the nfc championship (something manning has done only once with much more talent: marcus pollard, edgerrin james, marvin harrison, Tarik Glenn, jeff saturday, reggie wayne, dallas clark, brandon stokely.)
Calling Mike Vick "stupid" or "dumb" for not being able to read nfl defenses is ludicrous, let alone racist.
If you do not see my point you fall under one of the following categories: "idiots, morons or crackheads"