What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Maurice Jones-Drew is the bust of 2007 (1 Viewer)

:cabbagepatchdance: for MJD !!

I like 4 carries, 72 yds rushing (1 TDs) / 2 catches, 19 yds receiving with 8 mins to go in the 2nd.

 
I was fortunate enough to pick him up lastw eek when some moron dropped him in my league. I started him with full confidence. Last season he won me my league

 
No doubt he's a good player, but he's still a weak option this season unless Taylor gets hurt. He just doesn't get enough carries to be relied on.

 
No doubt he's a good player, but he's still a weak option this season unless Taylor gets hurt. He just doesn't get enough carries to be relied on.
While I agree this season will be up and down for MJD, you see what Barber does similar limited carries.
 
No doubt he's a good player, but he's still a weak option this season unless Taylor gets hurt. He just doesn't get enough carries to be relied on.
While I agree this season will be up and down for MJD, you see what Barber does similar limited carries.
Yea, but there's a big difference there. The Cowboys have a better offense and Barber gets more of the goal line work than MJD does. Drew will hit a home run here and there, but since you can't predict when that's going to happen, he's not a great option in most leagues.
 
I'm a MJD owner and am pumped about these 2 good games. That said, I'm still concerned and think he'll have erradic production due to the low number of carries he's seeing. He HAS to make big plays to put up decent points. Good days arne't good enough, he'll have to break at least 1-2 big time plays. Hope the trend continues with MJD getting more carries than Fred.

 
Im not jumping on the MJD "must start" bandwagon just yet, but take note MJD is getting in the groove at the same time Taylor is starting to get wear and tear

 
I'm a MJD owner and am pumped about these 2 good games. That said, I'm still concerned and think he'll have erradic production due to the low number of carries he's seeing. He HAS to make big plays to put up decent points. Good days arne't good enough, he'll have to break at least 1-2 big time plays. Hope the trend continues with MJD getting more carries than Fred.
Exactly. I just hope that Del Rio has finally realized that MJD gives JAX a better chance to win. MJD carries need to rise a bit, but I think they are finally implanting the type of offense they did last year.
 
I'm a MJD owner and am pumped about these 2 good games. That said, I'm still concerned and think he'll have erradic production due to the low number of carries he's seeing. He HAS to make big plays to put up decent points. Good days arne't good enough, he'll have to break at least 1-2 big time plays. Hope the trend continues with MJD getting more carries than Fred.
Exactly. I just hope that Del Rio has finally realized that MJD gives JAX a better chance to win. MJD carries need to rise a bit, but I think they are finally implanting the type of offense they did last year.
All signs are pointing to a good second half from Jones-Drew. With Indy coming up next week, we could see a big week from the NFL's smallest running back. In 2 games against the Colts in 06, Jones- Drew racked up 300 yards and 3 TDs.
 
Ilov80s said:
Swampy said:
fflnut said:
I'm a MJD owner and am pumped about these 2 good games. That said, I'm still concerned and think he'll have erradic production due to the low number of carries he's seeing. He HAS to make big plays to put up decent points. Good days arne't good enough, he'll have to break at least 1-2 big time plays. Hope the trend continues with MJD getting more carries than Fred.
Exactly. I just hope that Del Rio has finally realized that MJD gives JAX a better chance to win. MJD carries need to rise a bit, but I think they are finally implanting the type of offense they did last year.
All signs are pointing to a good second half from Jones-Drew. With Indy coming up next week, we could see a big week from the NFL's smallest running back. In 2 games against the Colts in 06, Jones- Drew racked up 300 yards and 3 TDs.
Colts run d in the regular season last year was alot different then the run d in the playoffs/this year.
 
AnonymousBob said:
schooner44 said:
Really? How that crow taste?
It's two great games. After four bad ones. It's still a bit premature to be climbing up on that high horse.
How so? The title of the thread is, "Maurice Jones-Drew is the bust of 2007." He's a Top 10 RB in my league right now. Even if he's just average for the rest of the season there is no way that he's "the bust of 2007." Calling for crow isn't the least bit premature considering the topic of this thread.Steven Jackson...now we're talking bust of 2007.
 
AnonymousBob said:
schooner44 said:
Really? How that crow taste?
It's two great games. After four bad ones. It's still a bit premature to be climbing up on that high horse.
How so? The title of the thread is, "Maurice Jones-Drew is the bust of 2007." He's a Top 10 RB in my league right now. Even if he's just average for the rest of the season there is no way that he's "the bust of 2007." Calling for crow isn't the least bit premature considering the topic of this thread.Steven Jackson...now we're talking bust of 2007.
That really shows how BAD the RBs are this season. Based on two games MJD jumps into the top-10. Is LT the number 1 because of this past week?If the Jags get the lead and Freddy sits out, MJD will be a great play, but as long as the game is close Freddy is still getting featured, and MJD is an afterthought. Until that changes, teams will be hard pressed to rely on him.I don't think he's the bust of 2007, as there were RBs drafted higher that have done worse, but I still say MJD went too high for the role he plays right now.
 
AnonymousBob said:
schooner44 said:
Really? How that crow taste?
It's two great games. After four bad ones. It's still a bit premature to be climbing up on that high horse.
How so? The title of the thread is, "Maurice Jones-Drew is the bust of 2007." He's a Top 10 RB in my league right now. Even if he's just average for the rest of the season there is no way that he's "the bust of 2007." Calling for crow isn't the least bit premature considering the topic of this thread.Steven Jackson...now we're talking bust of 2007.
I agree that SJax is now more of a bust than MJD, but frankly MJD did nothing to help a fantasy team win games until these past two weeks. If the rest of your team is decent you may have won some games, but in the two leagues that I am in both MJD owners are going to be 2-4 after this week and MJD had a lot to do with those records.If they end up going on a run and making the playoffs thanks to MJD then nothing to complain about with the guy. But to this point, two good games do not a good season make.
 
AnonymousBob said:
schooner44 said:
Really? How that crow taste?
It's two great games. After four bad ones. It's still a bit premature to be climbing up on that high horse.
How so? The title of the thread is, "Maurice Jones-Drew is the bust of 2007." He's a Top 10 RB in my league right now. Even if he's just average for the rest of the season there is no way that he's "the bust of 2007." Calling for crow isn't the least bit premature considering the topic of this thread.Steven Jackson...now we're talking bust of 2007.
I agree that SJax is now more of a bust than MJD, but frankly MJD did nothing to help a fantasy team win games until these past two weeks. If the rest of your team is decent you may have won some games, but in the two leagues that I am in both MJD owners are going to be 2-4 after this week and MJD had a lot to do with those records.If they end up going on a run and making the playoffs thanks to MJD then nothing to complain about with the guy. But to this point, two good games do not a good season make.
I have him on my team and did fine. But, I also get points for return yards, which puts a nice floor on his points in most weeks.Anyway, him having a "good season" wasn't the point of this thread. The topic was that not only was he bust, but he was "the bust of 2007." I don't really see how that will be the case.
 
That really shows how BAD the RBs are this season. Based on two games MJD jumps into the top-10. Is LT the number 1 because of this past week?If the Jags get the lead and Freddy sits out, MJD will be a great play, but as long as the game is close Freddy is still getting featured, and MJD is an afterthought. Until that changes, teams will be hard pressed to rely on him.I don't think he's the bust of 2007, as there were RBs drafted higher that have done worse, but I still say MJD went too high for the role he plays right now.
How many JAX games have you watched?Game is close MJD is an afterthought?MJD is the only big play weapon they have. When they're losing, Freddy is on the sidelines. When it's close, they mix them both in. When they have a big lead, MJD is taken out of the game. When JAX was in a tight game with Denver, MJD got the ball A LOT (5+ carries inside the 10, 2 of the last 3 series). Pretty sure you've yet to even see a JAX game, let alone multiple games. Because you're pretty much completely wrong.
 
Wouldn't call him a bust, but he was useless the first 3 games of the year. Might be overrated again after this weeks game.

Taylor sat the 2nd half here with the lead. No need to risk further injury. If I could get a consistent WR option like Fitz, I'd do it in a heartbeat.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have him on my team and did fine. But, I also get points for return yards, which puts a nice floor on his points in most weeks.Anyway, him having a "good season" wasn't the point of this thread. The topic was that not only was he bust, but he was "the bust of 2007." I don't really see how that will be the case.
You are right, without question.However when this post was originally created he was pretty easily the bust of 2007. This is exactly why naming people a huge bust or a huge success is better served to be done at the end of the season.
 
AnonymousBob said:
schooner44 said:
Really? How that crow taste?
It's two great games. After four bad ones. It's still a bit premature to be climbing up on that high horse.
Are you just talking trash about MJJ just to talk.I have seen MJJ play 5 games this year. Did he play his bye week on a diffren team??This shows you do not follow him very closely and just want to bash the man.BTW I traded him away last week thinking I was selling high.I was wrong
 
AnonymousBob said:
schooner44 said:
Really? How that crow taste?
It's two great games. After four bad ones. It's still a bit premature to be climbing up on that high horse.
How so? The title of the thread is, "Maurice Jones-Drew is the bust of 2007." He's a Top 10 RB in my league right now. Even if he's just average for the rest of the season there is no way that he's "the bust of 2007." Calling for crow isn't the least bit premature considering the topic of this thread.Steven Jackson...now we're talking bust of 2007.
jackson got hurt, so at least you know not to start him. MJD can get you 25 or get you 5, have fun with that. and he was alot worse than average the first 3 games.
 
Really? How that crow taste?
It's two great games. After four bad ones. It's still a bit premature to be climbing up on that high horse.
How so? The title of the thread is, "Maurice Jones-Drew is the bust of 2007." He's a Top 10 RB in my league right now. Even if he's just average for the rest of the season there is no way that he's "the bust of 2007." Calling for crow isn't the least bit premature considering the topic of this thread.Steven Jackson...now we're talking bust of 2007.
I agree on all counts. The guy is now in the top 10. He may have done so based on two big games, but he's there. Could we see him regress? Maybe. But when he gets the opportunity he does well with it. Unless the OC had been the manager of a bed and breakfast the year prior I can't see them cutting his opportunities after what he has done with them. It's going to be a fun ride from here on out. Houston, Indy and TB are the next 3 games for the JAgs. Those are going to be big tests of what MJD can do.
 
That really shows how BAD the RBs are this season. Based on two games MJD jumps into the top-10. Is LT the number 1 because of this past week?If the Jags get the lead and Freddy sits out, MJD will be a great play, but as long as the game is close Freddy is still getting featured, and MJD is an afterthought. Until that changes, teams will be hard pressed to rely on him.I don't think he's the bust of 2007, as there were RBs drafted higher that have done worse, but I still say MJD went too high for the role he plays right now.
How many JAX games have you watched?Game is close MJD is an afterthought?MJD is the only big play weapon they have. When they're losing, Freddy is on the sidelines. When it's close, they mix them both in. When they have a big lead, MJD is taken out of the game. When JAX was in a tight game with Denver, MJD got the ball A LOT (5+ carries inside the 10, 2 of the last 3 series). Pretty sure you've yet to even see a JAX game, let alone multiple games. Because you're pretty much completely wrong.
Are you serious? Yes I've seen plenty of JAX games. Maybe your MJD-love blinds you to the truth, but he is the second option, and both of his breakouts have come after the Jags have been well ahead in their games. This past week both his TDs, and the majority of his rushing yardage was accumulated AFTER Taylor was out of the game. 6 of his 12 carries came AFTER Taylor was out of the game.My point is, you can't expect him to do this every week, because unless they are well ahed and Taylor is getting rested, MJD isn't going to get a ton of carries.Ugh... nevermind. It's :yes: How many games has MJD cost you? Did you even bother starting him this week?
 
That really shows how BAD the RBs are this season. Based on two games MJD jumps into the top-10. Is LT the number 1 because of this past week?If the Jags get the lead and Freddy sits out, MJD will be a great play, but as long as the game is close Freddy is still getting featured, and MJD is an afterthought. Until that changes, teams will be hard pressed to rely on him.I don't think he's the bust of 2007, as there were RBs drafted higher that have done worse, but I still say MJD went too high for the role he plays right now.
How many JAX games have you watched?Game is close MJD is an afterthought?MJD is the only big play weapon they have. When they're losing, Freddy is on the sidelines. When it's close, they mix them both in. When they have a big lead, MJD is taken out of the game. When JAX was in a tight game with Denver, MJD got the ball A LOT (5+ carries inside the 10, 2 of the last 3 series). Pretty sure you've yet to even see a JAX game, let alone multiple games. Because you're pretty much completely wrong.
Ugh... nevermind. It's :fishing: How many games has MJD cost you? Did you even bother starting him this week?
You're wasting your time man. Same argument people trying to convince others in June/July.Drew will be splitting with Taylor. If they can't accept that, it's on them. Yet again.
 
That really shows how BAD the RBs are this season. Based on two games MJD jumps into the top-10. Is LT the number 1 because of this past week?If the Jags get the lead and Freddy sits out, MJD will be a great play, but as long as the game is close Freddy is still getting featured, and MJD is an afterthought. Until that changes, teams will be hard pressed to rely on him.I don't think he's the bust of 2007, as there were RBs drafted higher that have done worse, but I still say MJD went too high for the role he plays right now.
How many JAX games have you watched?Game is close MJD is an afterthought?MJD is the only big play weapon they have. When they're losing, Freddy is on the sidelines. When it's close, they mix them both in. When they have a big lead, MJD is taken out of the game. When JAX was in a tight game with Denver, MJD got the ball A LOT (5+ carries inside the 10, 2 of the last 3 series). Pretty sure you've yet to even see a JAX game, let alone multiple games. Because you're pretty much completely wrong.
Ugh... nevermind. It's :rolleyes: How many games has MJD cost you? Did you even bother starting him this week?
You're wasting your time man. Same argument people trying to convince others in June/July.Drew will be splitting with Taylor. If they can't accept that, it's on them. Yet again.
But if while splitting time with Fred (as he did last year) he finishes top 10 (as he did last year) are we idiots for putting him in our lineups? MBIII spits time and puts up pretty good stats. Just because he splits time doesn't mean he shouldn't be on a roster. Me, I'm going with him every week from here on out. I can't rely on Rudi/Watson right now (maybe in a week or two) and Cedric is, well, Cedric. So, LT and MJD is it for me. Hopefully when MJD has a down game (and he will) LT will shoulder the load for me and secure the win....
 
That really shows how BAD the RBs are this season. Based on two games MJD jumps into the top-10. Is LT the number 1 because of this past week?

If the Jags get the lead and Freddy sits out, MJD will be a great play, but as long as the game is close Freddy is still getting featured, and MJD is an afterthought. Until that changes, teams will be hard pressed to rely on him.

I don't think he's the bust of 2007, as there were RBs drafted higher that have done worse, but I still say MJD went too high for the role he plays right now.
How many JAX games have you watched?Game is close MJD is an afterthought?

MJD is the only big play weapon they have. When they're losing, Freddy is on the sidelines. When it's close, they mix them both in. When they have a big lead, MJD is taken out of the game. When JAX was in a tight game with Denver, MJD got the ball A LOT (5+ carries inside the 10, 2 of the last 3 series).

Pretty sure you've yet to even see a JAX game, let alone multiple games. Because you're pretty much completely wrong.
Are you serious? Yes I've seen plenty of JAX games. Maybe your MJD-love blinds you to the truth, but he is the second option, and both of his breakouts have come after the Jags have been well ahead in their games. This past week both his TDs, and the majority of his rushing yardage was accumulated AFTER Taylor was out of the game. 6 of his 12 carries came AFTER Taylor was out of the game.My point is, you can't expect him to do this every week, because unless they are well ahed and Taylor is getting rested, MJD isn't going to get a ton of carries.

Ugh... nevermind. It's :rolleyes:

How many games has MJD cost you? Did you even bother starting him this week?
Drew had more carries and touches than Taylor when Taylor saw his last carry (and time) of the game. Drew was already on his way to a very good game at that point.He scored on his 52 yard TD against KC in the middle of the 2nd quarter when the score was 3-0. How were the Jags well ahead at that point?

He scored on a 7 yard TD yesterday against the Texans when the score was 16-9. How were the Jags well ahead at that point?

In what way is Taylor "featured," and Drew an "afterthought?" You realize that Drew has had more touches than Taylor in 2 out of their 5 games, and in one of their other 5 games Drew and Taylor had the exact same amount of touches, right? So, Maurice Drew has either equaled or had more touches than Taylor in 3 out of Jacksonville's 5 games, yet Taylor is the "featured" one and Drew is an "afterthought?"

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just traded MBIII and D-Bowe and recieved Jones-Drew and Chambers. I hoping Jones-Drew does what he did last year, but my team stinks so I need a hail mary.

 
In what way is Taylor "featured," and Drew an "afterthought?" You realize that Drew has had more touches than Taylor in 2 out of their 5 games, and in one of their other 5 games Drew and Taylor had the exact same amount of touches, right? So, Maurice Drew has either equaled or had more touches than Taylor in 3 out of Jacksonville's 5 games, yet Taylor is the "featured" one and Drew is an "afterthought?"
looks like Taylor either equaled or had more touches than Taylor in 3 out of Jacksonville's 5 games, to me :shrug:
 
In what way is Taylor "featured," and Drew an "afterthought?" You realize that Drew has had more touches than Taylor in 2 out of their 5 games, and in one of their other 5 games Drew and Taylor had the exact same amount of touches, right? So, Maurice Drew has either equaled or had more touches than Taylor in 3 out of Jacksonville's 5 games, yet Taylor is the "featured" one and Drew is an "afterthought?"
looks like Taylor either equaled or had more touches than Taylor in 3 out of Jacksonville's 5 games, to me :thumbup:
Nevermind that at the point Taylor retired for the night, he had more carries than MJSD had touches (9 to 8)... but let the MJD hypers continue to be blinded. They'll be back complaining that the coach sucks when MJD reverts to weeks 1-3 form.
 
In what way is Taylor "featured," and Drew an "afterthought?" You realize that Drew has had more touches than Taylor in 2 out of their 5 games, and in one of their other 5 games Drew and Taylor had the exact same amount of touches, right? So, Maurice Drew has either equaled or had more touches than Taylor in 3 out of Jacksonville's 5 games, yet Taylor is the "featured" one and Drew is an "afterthought?"
looks like Taylor either equaled or had more touches than Taylor in 3 out of Jacksonville's 5 games, to me :thumbup:
Nevermind that at the point Taylor retired for the night, he had more carries than MJSD had touches (9 to 8)... but let the MJD hypers continue to be blinded. They'll be back complaining that the coach sucks when MJD reverts to weeks 1-3 form.
C'mon Switz. All carries aren't equal - you know that. Key 3rd downs, goal line, etc. MJD was on the field a lot more last week. Even on plays he didn't touch the ball, he was in pass patterns or blocking. Taylor had some good runs, especially early, but MJD is the difference maker in that offense. And it was great to see the other Jones take much less of a role. It's going to be hard to sit this guy from here on out.
 
In what way is Taylor "featured," and Drew an "afterthought?" You realize that Drew has had more touches than Taylor in 2 out of their 5 games, and in one of their other 5 games Drew and Taylor had the exact same amount of touches, right? So, Maurice Drew has either equaled or had more touches than Taylor in 3 out of Jacksonville's 5 games, yet Taylor is the "featured" one and Drew is an "afterthought?"
looks like Taylor either equaled or had more touches than Taylor in 3 out of Jacksonville's 5 games, to me :popcorn:
Nevermind that at the point Taylor retired for the night, he had more carries than MJSD had touches (9 to 8)... but let the MJD hypers continue to be blinded. They'll be back complaining that the coach sucks when MJD reverts to weeks 1-3 form.
crystal ball? you will disappear and neglect to own up to your man-hate for MJD once/if he continues to shine....
 
In what way is Taylor "featured," and Drew an "afterthought?" You realize that Drew has had more touches than Taylor in 2 out of their 5 games, and in one of their other 5 games Drew and Taylor had the exact same amount of touches, right? So, Maurice Drew has either equaled or had more touches than Taylor in 3 out of Jacksonville's 5 games, yet Taylor is the "featured" one and Drew is an "afterthought?"
looks like Taylor either equaled or had more touches than Taylor in 3 out of Jacksonville's 5 games, to me :pickle:
Nevermind that at the point Taylor retired for the night, he had more carries than MJSD had touches (9 to 8)... but let the MJD hypers continue to be blinded. They'll be back complaining that the coach sucks when MJD reverts to weeks 1-3 form.
wow. Fred Taylor was good in his prime. he's past his prime. Drew had a rocky start to the season. he's starting to come alive. the offense was sluggish and they were adapting to a QB change made days before the season started. :shrug:they got CREAMED by the Titans in week 1 and people wrote off their season as a total loss. now they're 4-1.let's let the season develop a bit before saying Drew is a do-nothing pedestrian RB.thanks
 
To whom it may concern:

Admit it, you were wrong about MJD, he really is the beast that you called hype. Every RB can struggle if the team struggles, but you chose to jump ship and scream bust and now want to hate in hopes it will make your assessment come true somehow......... But hes not and the sooner you give in, the better off you'll be.

 
In what way is Taylor "featured," and Drew an "afterthought?" You realize that Drew has had more touches than Taylor in 2 out of their 5 games, and in one of their other 5 games Drew and Taylor had the exact same amount of touches, right? So, Maurice Drew has either equaled or had more touches than Taylor in 3 out of Jacksonville's 5 games, yet Taylor is the "featured" one and Drew is an "afterthought?"
looks like Taylor either equaled or had more touches than Taylor in 3 out of Jacksonville's 5 games, to me :shrug:
Very true. I never said anything differently. Neither of them is "featured" at the moment nor an "afterthought."
 
In what way is Taylor "featured," and Drew an "afterthought?" You realize that Drew has had more touches than Taylor in 2 out of their 5 games, and in one of their other 5 games Drew and Taylor had the exact same amount of touches, right? So, Maurice Drew has either equaled or had more touches than Taylor in 3 out of Jacksonville's 5 games, yet Taylor is the "featured" one and Drew is an "afterthought?"
looks like Taylor either equaled or had more touches than Taylor in 3 out of Jacksonville's 5 games, to me :shrug:
Very true. I never said anything differently. Neither of them is "featured" at the moment nor an "afterthought."
While I am an MJD fan I own both and right now this situation is in flux. It has by no means stabilized to really support either argument. MJD had two good games after 3 bad ones. Neither trend makes a season. I like arguing this kind of stuff just as much as the next guy (as many of you know) but we just can't make the argument either way just yet. The Jags will be playing on Monday night this week. That should give all a better idea of what we are dealing with. It also give Taylor an extra day off to rest that injury. I say we table till next Tuesday....
 
In what way is Taylor "featured," and Drew an "afterthought?" You realize that Drew has had more touches than Taylor in 2 out of their 5 games, and in one of their other 5 games Drew and Taylor had the exact same amount of touches, right? So, Maurice Drew has either equaled or had more touches than Taylor in 3 out of Jacksonville's 5 games, yet Taylor is the "featured" one and Drew is an "afterthought?"
looks like Taylor either equaled or had more touches than Taylor in 3 out of Jacksonville's 5 games, to me :shrug:
Nevermind that at the point Taylor retired for the night, he had more carries than MJSD had touches (9 to 8)... but let the MJD hypers continue to be blinded. They'll be back complaining that the coach sucks when MJD reverts to weeks 1-3 form.
What are you talking about?If you are talking about the Houston game, then your stats are a little off. Fred Taylor had more carries than Drew had touches when Taylor "retired" for the night? Interesting. Taylor had 6 carries the entire game (not 9). He had four carries in the first half (2 less than Drew) and 2 at the beginning of the 3rd Quarter. He had 7 touches for the game. At the point that Taylor retired, Drew had 6 carries (all in the 1st half). He also had 7 touches at that point.Do you just throw #### at the wall and see what sticks or where do you get your stats from?
 
Really? How that crow taste?
It's two great games. After four bad ones. It's still a bit premature to be climbing up on that high horse.
How so? The title of the thread is, "Maurice Jones-Drew is the bust of 2007." He's a Top 10 RB in my league right now. Even if he's just average for the rest of the season there is no way that he's "the bust of 2007." Calling for crow isn't the least bit premature considering the topic of this thread.Steven Jackson...now we're talking bust of 2007.
That really shows how BAD the RBs are this season. Based on two games MJD jumps into the top-10. Is LT the number 1 because of this past week?If the Jags get the lead and Freddy sits out, MJD will be a great play, but as long as the game is close Freddy is still getting featured, and MJD is an afterthought. Until that changes, teams will be hard pressed to rely on him.I don't think he's the bust of 2007, as there were RBs drafted higher that have done worse, but I still say MJD went too high for the role he plays right now.
Denial's a b¡tch isn't it?Let it go.
 
The guy that owns MJD in my league is 0-6, after four bad games he benched him, his seasons over, I hope other MJD owners are doing better.

 
The guy that owns MJD in my league is 0-6, after four bad games he benched him, his seasons over, I hope other MJD owners are doing better.
I'm 5-1 with him. Lost a game by a point. First time I started him was last week though. I have him in a dynasty league and have been able to rely on other players to this point. With LT on a bye this week he's going again on Monday night for me. I can see if you've been relying on this guy all season you would be in the tank...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top