This news was filed from todays practice
I read the same report last week, and i can't find it on rapid reports today.. I'm not calling you out, just wondering why so? Please provide link... or maybe it was just a glitch that showed up from last week to today and was removed.This news was filed from todays practice
exactly-- purely speculation based on last weeks shoulder contusion.. the writer is speculating Mendenhall has slowed down his pace due to the shoulder, but it could just as easily be from a bad matchup or simply the ebbs and flows of a season. I doupt you find any RB that doesn't have some games with lower avg than the few games before when he was going off... Afterall, othewise Mendehall would be on pace for 2500 yds.Maybe this guy got lucky hit the nail on the head, but there is really no real factual news to be seen here IMOSpeculation. He didn't run tentatively. He just had no room to run once Adams was out. Nothing to see here.
If we subtracted all of Barry Sanders' long runs he would suck.I think Pit will wind up in more of an RBBC than is currently evident. Tomlin stated publicly last week that he wanted to cut down on his carries, and sure enough, there were critical redzone situations vs. Miami where Mendenhall was nowhere to be found. After owning him since mid-season last year, it gets frustrating seeing him come off the field for passing downs, as well as having no role whatsoever in the 2-minute offense. Were it not for his 50 yard TD in overtime, he's RB15 in my league. With that, he's RB10.I traded him for Roddy White today.Edited a typo
Yeah, but if you take away White's tds where does he rank?Mendenhall was on pace for the 3rd most carries in Steelers history and Tomlin said he was gonna work in Moore and Redman a little more so not to wear down Mendenhall. He'll still get his 20 carries/game.elbowrm said:I think Pit will wind up in more of an RBBC than is currently evident. Tomlin stated publicly last week that he wanted to cut down on his carries, and sure enough, there were critical redzone situations vs. Miami where Mendenhall was nowhere to be found. After owning him since mid-season last year, it gets frustrating seeing him come off the field for passing downs, as well as having no role whatsoever in the 2-minute offense. Were it not for his 50 yard TD in overtime, he's RB15 in my league. With that, he's RB10.I traded him for Roddy White today.Edited a typo
First off I don't think that's a bad deal if it's PPR.... BUT, the concept behind that thinking is really, really bad.elbowrm said:I think Pit will wind up in more of an RBBC than is currently evident. Tomlin stated publicly last week that he wanted to cut down on his carries, and sure enough, there were critical redzone situations vs. Miami where Mendenhall was nowhere to be found. After owning him since mid-season last year, it gets frustrating seeing him come off the field for passing downs, as well as having no role whatsoever in the 2-minute offense. Were it not for his 50 yard TD in overtime, he's RB15 in my league. With that, he's RB10.I traded him for Roddy White today.Edited a typo
I'm curious - what concept, and why is it really, really bad? Yes, it's PPR, and it's hard to discuss trades in a vacuum, but what's so bad about thinking that the market is overvaluing a player and acting on it?First off I don't think that's a bad deal if it's PPR.... BUT, the concept behind that thinking is really, really bad.
Moore between the 20s and Redzone Redman in the Redzonejimmyd9989 said:Who would be Mendenhalls handcuff incase he went down? Moore or Redman? My waivers are tomorrow I want to pick either one up.
I think it would be a RBBC approach, but I believe Redman would get more opportunities than Moore IMHO.Moore between the 20s and Redzone Redman in the Redzonejimmyd9989 said:Who would be Mendenhalls handcuff incase he went down? Moore or Redman? My waivers are tomorrow I want to pick either one up.
The if he didn't do this or that concept. I don't like playing that way. That being said I don't think Mendy for White is a bad deal at all in PPR.I'm curious - what concept, and why is it really, really bad? Yes, it's PPR, and it's hard to discuss trades in a vacuum, but what's so bad about thinking that the market is overvaluing a player and acting on it?First off I don't think that's a bad deal if it's PPR.... BUT, the concept behind that thinking is really, really bad.
What concept would that be?First off I don't think that's a bad deal if it's PPR.... BUT, the concept behind that thinking is really, really bad.elbowrm said:I think Pit will wind up in more of an RBBC than is currently evident. Tomlin stated publicly last week that he wanted to cut down on his carries, and sure enough, there were critical redzone situations vs. Miami where Mendenhall was nowhere to be found. After owning him since mid-season last year, it gets frustrating seeing him come off the field for passing downs, as well as having no role whatsoever in the 2-minute offense.
Were it not for his 50 yard TD in overtime, he's RB15 in my league. With that, he's RB10.
I traded him for Roddy White today.
Edited a typo
the concept or 'reasoning' behind taking away plays in order to point out that a player is not very good, only "lucky" is a concept that is used very often while not being accurate at all. Take away anyone's biggest plays and they will invariably have less points. If I take away every Desean Jackson TD over 50 yards, the guy stunk last year. Makes no sense. Most of the time you draft these guys with the expectation that they will break off some big plays.I'm curious - what concept, and why is it really, really bad?First off I don't think that's a bad deal if it's PPR.... BUT, the concept behind that thinking is really, really bad.
Were it not for his 50 yard TD in overtime, he's RB15 in my league. With that, he's RB10