What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Merriman suspended for steroids (1 Viewer)

I imagine part of his argument is that he has taken the same OTC supplement for x years and had no positive test. However, the batch that he is now taking (which are not FDA regulated), was tainted. If he can prove through an independent lab that this is the case, I think he will have a strong argument.
Again, if the supplement he was taking wasn't on the NFL's approved supplement list, I don't think that arguement is going to carry any weight. There's a reason that the NFL has an approved supplement list, after all- and that reason is because there's no way of knowing what's in the unapproved supplements.NFL: Only take supplements on the approved list, because unapproved supplements are unregulated and you don't know what's in there.

Merriman: I took an unregulated supplement, and there was something in there that wasn't supposed to be!

NFL: :ptts:

 
NFL: Only take supplements on the approved list, because unapproved supplements are unregulated and you don't know what's in there.

Merriman: I took an unregulated supplement, and there was something in there that wasn't supposed to be!

NFL: :ptts:
Poor effort at a Wheelhouse-style comic. Let's try to spruce it up a bit, shall we?NFL: Only take supplements on the approved list :thumbup: , because unapproved supplements are unregulated :yucky: and you don't know what's in there. :X

Merriman: I took an unregulated supplement :banned: , and there was something in there :obc: that wasn't supposed to be! :wall:

NFL: :ptts:

 
Sauerbraun?
He was cut after serving his suspension wasn't he? Maybe 2 weeks ago?
The suspension was for Ephedra (a weight-loss supplement), not the steroids which he was linked to in 2003. He never had any punishment from the Steroids thing, except for being subject to increased testing.But yes, Sauerbrun was cut, and is currently unemployed trying to land another job. He says he's trying to get another job so that he can punt so well that Denver will want to bring him back. He seems really broken up over the suspension and like he really REALLY wants to come back to Denver to make it up to the team, so much so that he's talking about how he wants to sign a contract for the rest of this season with anyone and then try to come back with Denver next year, still.Not that that means anything, I just found it interesting how much he seems to love playing for Denver. Or maybe it's just a guilty conscience and a desire to make amends or something. I don't know. It's bizarre.
 
http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/nfl/...5094224,00.html

The steroid that a lawyer for San Diego Chargers linebacker Shawne Merriman said was found in Merriman’s urine cannot be legally obtained in the United States.

The lawyer, David Cornwell, said the steroid nandrolone ended up in Merriman’s system from a tainted supplement. But under NFL rules, players are responsible for positive tests regardless of the products they take.

Nandrolone has been banned in supplements since 1990, and precursors to it, such as 19-norandrostenedione, have been prohibited since January 2005. Nandrolone’s precursors could be found in old supplements or in products from other countries where the product is not banned, according to drug-testing experts.

Merriman, 22, was the 2005 defensive rookie of the year and has become a pass-rushing force for the Chargers, with 15 ½ sacks in his first 21 games as a pro. He is still playing while appealing a four-game suspension for his violation of the league’s substance-abuse policy. A hearing has been scheduled for Nov. 7.

"I don’t think there’s a player in the National Football League that doesn’t use nutritional supplements," Cornwell told reporters earlier this week. "They don’t realize that they’re playing Russian roulette with their career. You have manufacturers out there that are putting bullets essentially into the canisters for these supplements, and they’re not being held accountable."

Cornwell refused to name the supplement or the manufacturer in Merriman’s case, and he would not say whether it was on the list of league-certified products.

The use of largely unregulated over-the-counter supplements is so widespread that the NFL certifies as free of prohibitive substances five products made by Experimental and Applied Sciences Inc., of Golden, Colo. The products include bars, drinks and powders marketed under the Myoplex brand.

Adolpho A. Birch 3d, who oversees the NFL’s drug testing, said players would be held accountable for positive tests regardless of the supplements they took.

"The league provides tested supplements that are assured they are not tainted," Birch said. "If you choose to take another supplement, you do so at your own risk. If you take a supplement that is not certified under the program, you and you alone are responsible for the consequences of the result."

He added: "We say that the products under our certification program have been tested for accuracy of labeling and purity and will not result in a positive test."

If the supplement in Merriman’s case contained nandrolone, the manufacturer would be in violation of federal law, said Dr. Gary I. Wadler, an associate professor of medicine at New York University who also works with the World Anti-Doping Agency.

"They are not supposed to have that in a dietary supplement," Wadler said. "The only way to get the drug legally is through a legitimate prescription for a disease in a bona fide patient-doctor relationship."

Individuals can inject themselves with an oil that includes nandrolone, but that has not been a popular method for 20 years, Wadler said. Such an injection kept the steroid in the body for up to a year and would not be the preferred choice of an athlete subjected to frequent testing.

Dr. Donald H. Catlin, the director of the Olympic drug-testing laboratory at UCLA, which also handles testing for the NFL and other organizations, said positive tests for nandrolone across all sports peaked in 2001.

"Out of the 40,000 tests we do a year, there were 56 cases of nandrolone across all our tests in 2001," he said. "They started to pick up in the late 1990s."

He said there were 28 positive tests last year.

Catlin said people should be cautious when buying over-the-counter supplements.

"You can buy them at a very reputable store, and you can buy them off the Internet, and they may be made anywhere," he said. "There are a lot of people out there. This is a big business. There are a lot of people that prey on athletes."

Cornwell challenged the league over how the information about Merriman’s drug test became public. He said that someone working for the league violated confidentiality provisions of the drug-testing policy by leaking the information and that that person could face a $500,000 fine. Greg Aiello, a spokesman for the NFL, declined to comment.

The NFL administers about 10,000 tests for performance-enhancing drugs to about 1,800 players a year. Each player is tested at least once a year, but most are tested multiple times. Players are selected randomly for testing, about seven players per team each week during the season. Each player may be tested as many as six times during the off-season.

Since 1989, when the NFL’s testing for performance-enhancing drugs began, about 60 active players, and about 60 players who retired or were cut before their results were determined, have tested positive. So far this year, four or five players have tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs, Aiello said.

In comparison, Major League Baseball began testing for performance-enhancing drugs in 2003. Through Sept. 25, two major league players had tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs this season. In 2005, 12 tested positive.
 
The use of largely unregulated over-the-counter supplements is so widespread that the NFL certifies as free of prohibitive substances five products made by Experimental and Applied Sciences Inc., of Golden, Colo. The products include bars, drinks and powders marketed under the Myoplex brand.
What the crap has the NFL been doing since they adopted their substance policy!!? It's crazy that only five products from one manufacturer (EAS) have been certified for player use. No wonder these guys are getting popped left and right for positive tests. There must be a larger certified product base for players to draw from! I'm familiar with EAS and they do make great products but there are also several other credible US manufacturers that are big enough financially to get involved in this.
 
The use of largely unregulated over-the-counter supplements is so widespread that the NFL certifies as free of prohibitive substances five products made by Experimental and Applied Sciences Inc., of Golden, Colo. The products include bars, drinks and powders marketed under the Myoplex brand.
What the crap has the NFL been doing since they adopted their substance policy!!? It's crazy that only five products from one manufacturer (EAS) have been certified for player use. No wonder these guys are getting popped left and right for positive tests. There must be a larger certified product base for players to draw from! I'm familiar with EAS and they do make great products but there are also several other credible US manufacturers that are big enough financially to get involved in this.
NFL player becomes free advertising by using the product. I believe the NFLPA expects companies to approach them and not vice versa
 
The guy can spin this any way he wants, he is piad millions to perform at a high level, and he cheated. I hate when these guys armed with all the knowledge in the world regarding supplements play the ignorance card. Look at the guy, he is friggin roid head. Check out Corey Maggette of the Clippers for another example.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The guy can spin this any way he wants, he is piad millions to perform at a high level, and he cheated. I hate when these guys armed with all the knowledge in the world regarding supplements play the ignorance card. Look at the guy, he is friggin roid head. Check out Corey Maggette of the Clippers for another example.
He's obviously way too talented not to do 'roids :rolleyes:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From another board: Supposedly Merriman without knowledge of it took a supplement that had nandralone in it. What merriman might do is take the supplement to the NFL to be tested.(I don't know what the "without knowledge of it" modifies -- he didn't know he took the supplement, or he took a supplement that he didn't know had nandrolone in it. Probably the latter.)
I find it very hard to believe that nandrolone would be accidently included in a supplement. It is a Schedule III controlled substance and is not legal for sale in the US. The other issue is that nandrolone is only commercially available as an injectable steroid. There are no oral versions available. You used to be able to buy oral supplements containing the hormone precursor for nandrolone (19-norandrostendione) but this substance like Ephedra is no longer legal for sale in the US. And because the liver can only convert small amounts of 19-nor into actual nandrolone, it may not even trigger a positive test. So it is possible, although not probable, that Merriman used a supplement that contained 19-nor which allowed him to test positive for the metabolites of nandrolone. However, I think it is virtually impossible that he accidentally ingested the actual hormone nandrolone. Some foreign athletes have tried to use the excuse that they ingested beef from cattle treated with nandrolone, but that doesn't fly either because US cattle are not treated with nandrolone. And the injested beef would likely not contain enough of the hormone or it's metabolites to trigger a positive test. The most likely scenario is that Merriman was injected with Deca Durabolin. IMO, Deca is the ultimate anabolic steroid. It gives great results with very few side effects and the gains are mostly permanent after you stop taking it. Even women can tolerate Deca. The only drawback is that it's easy to test for and nandrolone stays in the system much longer than testosterone based steroids. Also keep in mind that Deca is extremely easy and cheap to obtain in Mexico which is right across the border from San Diego. You can walk into any Pharmacia, flash some American dollars, and walk out with a duffle bag full of the stuff.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wow, I've never seen a highlights video drop the ball so badly when it came to song selection. The *ONLY* choice of music for a Shawn Merriman Highlights Video should have been "Guerilla Radio" by Rage Against the Machine.
The obvious choice for the music in the video would be "Lights Out" by POD from the Testify album. Seeing how POD is a San Diego based band this makes even more sense.
 
Wow, I've never seen a highlights video drop the ball so badly when it came to song selection. The *ONLY* choice of music for a Shawn Merriman Highlights Video should have been "Guerilla Radio" by Rage Against the Machine.
The obvious choice for the music in the video would be "Lights Out" by POD from the Testify album. Seeing how POD is a San Diego based band this makes even more sense.
Rage Against the Machine > POD. Plus I'm sure more people are familiar with Guerilla Radio.
 
Playing defense

Shawne Merriman, who knows he's being called a cheater and a liar, says he's using the appeal process to try to protect his reputation.

October 27, 2006

Shawne Merriman acknowledged he used to jump to conclusions when news surfaced that a professional athlete was being accused of taking a performance-enhancing substance.

Cheaters, he thought to himself.

Now people are saying the same thing about Merriman, and he doesn't like it. After recently testing positive for steroids, he's being called a cheater and a liar, even as he claims the test results are due to him taking a nutritional supplement that, unbeknownst to him at the time, was tainted by the manufacturing company.

Merriman has been told he has a slimmer chance of winning his appeal than I do of being invited to the Spanos estate for Thanksgiving dinner – which is, not at all. But he's fighting the finding because he wants, if nothing else, to prove he never knowingly took an illegal substance. And that the only thing he's guilty of is ignoring the league's – and the team's – constant reminders that supplements are known to be tainted and players who use nonlicensed brands will get neither sympathy nor breaks if they test positive.

“I want people to see that I didn't knowingly do anything wrong,” Merriman says. “I don't want anybody who has come across me to think that I'm a cheater of the game. I don't believe in that. Even in other sports, I was always upset when things came out like that. I looked at them as cheaters of the game, and I'm being viewed in the same light now.”

The toughest fight for Merriman might still be ahead of him. He knows some people will always look at him as a cheater. But others are reserving judgment until he serves his suspension and returns to the field. They want to see if he still will play at the level that earned him a trip to the Pro Bowl and the league's Rookie Defensive Player of the Year award last season.

“If he isn't as good, people are going to say it's because he's off the juice,” a player from another team said, echoing the sentiment of a half-dozen other players who spoke on the condition their names not be used. “He has to be just as dominant, otherwise the stain of testing positive will never come off.”

Merriman chuckles at the idea of increased pressure.

“That's definitely not one of the things I'm worried about, that I won't do enough,” he said. “I've been playing this way my entire life, so that's definitely not going to be a problem. Honestly, I've dealt with things a lot worse and overcome things a lot worse. That really doesn't bother me. From Day 1, my concern was that I didn't want to be a distraction to the team.”

Merriman, who'll play the next two weeks while awaiting his hearing, is so conscious of not hurting the team further that he acknowledged he might drop his appeal if a ruling isn't announced before the Nov. 12 game at Cincinnati. The reason: If the judgment goes against him, he would have to begin his four-game suspension by Nov. 12 to be eligible to play the last of the Chargers' two games against the division-leading Broncos.

“To be honest, I'm going to do whatever's best for the team,” he said. “At the same time I can't let people think these bad things about me. I've got to show people I've done nothing wrong, knowingly. My teammates have been very supportive, telling me to do what I need to do. But I will always do what's best for the team.”

Merriman's presence is critical to the team achieving its ultimate goal of winning a championship. He led the club in sacks last season and ranks second this year with 5 1/2. He may not be worried about a slippage in future play, but a lot of fans and players on other clubs are curious to see how he'll perform.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top