This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
But you have no problem believing that Trump went from 62.9M in 2016 to 74.2M in 2020. Are you guys trying to tell me that Trump gained 12M more votes in 2020 while losing 130 counties when compared to 2016? I think the media should look into this, because it looks like a statistical impossibility to me.
Hi Stealthycat.
I never even mentioned the word conspiracy my friend. They're just questions or posting the facts, I'll leave the interpretations to the intellectuals to discuss.
Forcing mask orders and people inside and ordering churches shut and everyone locked up and only able to watch the news, total control of every major urban city and the ability to strongly influence the vote in ways that are never going to hold up in a Court, more folks shoulda joined us in taking the sands of the beaches here in Florida when they ordered them shut over the 4th of July last year, I stepped foot out there but many cowered and stayed indoors, and continue to wear masks when they ride bicycles outdoors when we all know you cannot catch the CV-19 that way but people were so scared thru the media and frightened by many non-science based proclamations and accusations.
You seem happy and content.Forcing mask orders and people inside and ordering churches shut and everyone locked up and only able to watch the news, total control of every major urban city and the ability to strongly influence the vote in ways that are never going to hold up in a Court, more folks shoulda joined us in taking the sands of the beaches here in Florida when they ordered them shut over the 4th of July last year, I stepped foot out there but many cowered and stayed indoors, and continue to wear masks when they ride bicycles outdoors when we all know you cannot catch the CV-19 that way but people were so scared thru the media and frightened by many non-science based proclamations and accusations.
-I'm not looking to change your mind Sabe, the Russia hoax was a terrific crybaby routine that lasted until they could jump on the Covid and turn it into a political battle and millions of folks in this country were forced into poverty over it. Not the MoPs of the world of course, our lives have gotten nothing but better to be perfectly honest but it doesn't change my opinion to how things unfolded where I reside.
Don't be mad Sabe, I won't be speaking much about this, I usually just read along from the cheap seats, I know my lane around here.
I try not to let my feelings dictate the polling numbers. I generally just go off the actuals.
I like that she just dismisses the haters. At least she has a deeper voice than Snyder had. That guy was like listening to a cartoon.
The main reason for the disparity in mail-in voting between Republican and Democrat voters was two-fold: For months before the election GOP leaders, Trump in particular, told their followers that mail-in voting could not be trusted while Democrat leaders encouraged their voters to vote by mail. Secondly Republicans have a much larger proportion of voters that viewed the pandemic as just another flu (or an outright hoax) and so were less concerned about voting in person than Democrat voters.
State percentage of voters who voted in 2020- 68%
Snyder? He has been gone for over 2 1/2 years. You don`t like Snyders voice, and people say Whitmer looks like Kaitlyn Jenners twin if you want to go there.
Trump was even more popular in 2020 ......... Biden wasn't and isn't
No. Legal. There have been countless lawsuits, all with the same result. And even if the state of MI violated election laws, the people that voted, voted in accordance with the laws at the time.
Not sure what your definition of far right is. Do you think the judge is far right? Or made a bad ruling here?
I'm confused. Are you saying you disagree with the judges ruling, or that you're simply unaware of it?
I am not disagreeing with the judges ruling for I don't know enough about it.
if the "law" was illegal - which is what this sounds like here - then they didn't vote legally and in accordance with the law.
If sometime in the future something is made illegal, but you followed the letter of the law while doing whatever you did, you didn't commit any crime.
You don’t know what you’re talking about or what this is even about. Benson issued guidance on signature matching for absentee applications, the judge says she didn’t use the proper procedure when issuing this guidance and clerks do not have to adhere to that guidance in the future. It doesn’t prove that anyone voted illegally, or that anyone voting by mail did so fraudulently. There isn’t even a claim that there were signatures that were asked to be disqualified that were accepted based on the guidance.BladeRunner said:
Some did, certainly. No one is claiming that all votes were illegal or invalid. But it's clear form the judges ruling that Bensons guidelines were illegal - and those guidelines had a direct effect on the count of valid votes.
I disagree with that assessment. In fact there is no claim that it affected anything, simply that she didn’t go through the proper process in issuing the guidance.
I believe it absolutely affected the count - indeed that was the whole purpose. But we'll just agree to disagree.
No one is even claiming that it affected the count. I won’t beat a dead horse, I’m fine with seeing it different ways.
It's far more likely that election officials in red districts simply ignored the Secretary's "guidelines," then used their own made-up (illegal!) standards to judge signatures, then pretended to be hamstrung by the toothless "guidelines" in order to get a favorable court ruling from a sympathetic judge.
