What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Michael Pittman (1 Viewer)

simmonjm

Footballguy
Hey guys I was wondering if anyone had any insight on when Michael Pittman may return. He could potentially be valuable down the stretch. Also how do you see him fitting in that crowded backfield with Graham and Bennett.

 
Just picked him up. I expect him to back week 12. Look at the playoff schedule:

9 vs Cardinals

10 Bye

11 at Falcons

12 vs Redskins

14 at Texans

15 vs Falcons

16 at 49ers

17 vs Panthers

Looks like a good RB #2 option for the playoffs

 
Just picked him up. I expect him to back week 12. Look at the playoff schedule:9 vs Cardinals 10 Bye 11 at Falcons 12 vs Redskins 14 at Texans 15 vs Falcons 16 at 49ers 17 vs Panthers Looks like a good RB #2 option for the playoffs
He's only a good #2 option in 20 team leagues. WHy would Tampa go back to using this guy more than Graham when Graham has shown he can shoulder the load....and do it well?
 
sounds like Pittman might be ready to play again in week 11. what is the prognosis on his impact? does he get the 3rd down role, split carries with Graham, or have no impact at all?

 
sounds like Pittman might be ready to play again in week 11. what is the prognosis on his impact? does he get the 3rd down role, split carries with Graham, or have no impact at all?
When he comes back and he's 100%, he will be the starter. He was when he was hurt, and Graham has not shouldered the load, he beat the Lions up and has shown why he's been a #3 for a few years. He's good, as in average.Michael Bennett won't cost them much, since he looks not so good.I would grab Pittman if you have a spot to give. JMHO
 
Last edited by a moderator:
When he comes back and he's 100%, he will be the starter. He was when he was hurt, and Graham has not shouldered the load, he beat the Lions up and has shown why he's been a #3 for a few years.
I don't know where you got all this from, but it's basically completely wrong.
 
When he comes back and he's 100%, he will be the starter. He was when he was hurt, and Graham has not shouldered the load, he beat the Lions up and has shown why he's been a #3 for a few years.
I don't know where you got all this from, but it's basically completely wrong.
Pittman will get 3rd down duties and a few series, but a full starting role is laughable.
 
When he comes back and he's 100%, he will be the starter. He was when he was hurt, and Graham has not shouldered the load, he beat the Lions up and has shown why he's been a #3 for a few years.
I don't know where you got all this from, but it's basically completely wrong.
Pittman will get 3rd down duties and a few series, but a full starting role is laughable.
why - he looked to be the starter before he got hurt? Graham hasn't looked bad but Gruden strikes me as a coach that likes to go with the proven veteran if healthy.
 
When he comes back and he's 100%, he will be the starter. He was when he was hurt, and Graham has not shouldered the load, he beat the Lions up and has shown why he's been a #3 for a few years.
I don't know where you got all this from, but it's basically completely wrong.
Pittman will get 3rd down duties and a few series, but a full starting role is laughable.
With RB's getting knocked out weekly, and with Pittman having some time off from constant pounding, I wouldn't discount Pittman entirely.Any many league people are picking up "XMAN Do" in Houston, Ryan Grant in GB and Michael Bush in OAK. It's not a stretch to think Graham could wear out from the pounding he's just beginning to grow accustomed to.That being said, would you be shocked if he was a hot waiver pickup in 3 weeks? The shark move is to pick up waiver wire values a week or two early.That would be this week or next.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Beggin4Par said:
One said:
Capella said:
softball said:
When he comes back and he's 100%, he will be the starter. He was when he was hurt, and Graham has not shouldered the load, he beat the Lions up and has shown why he's been a #3 for a few years.
I don't know where you got all this from, but it's basically completely wrong.
Pittman will get 3rd down duties and a few series, but a full starting role is laughable.
With RB's getting knocked out weekly, and with Pittman having some time off from constant pounding, I wouldn't discount Pittman entirely.Any many league people are picking up "XMAN Do" in Houston, Ryan Grant in GB and Michael Bush in OAK. It's not a stretch to think Graham could wear out from the pounding he's just beginning to grow accustomed to.That being said, would you be shocked if he was a hot waiver pickup in 3 weeks? The shark move is to pick up waiver wire values a week or two early.That would be this week or next.
Correct,And I can tell you that when Pittman gets back, he'll be the man with great confidence.I did state when he is 100%, he'll be the starter. That may not be week 11.I get great TB info.
 
softball said:
Maik Jeaunz said:
sounds like Pittman might be ready to play again in week 11. what is the prognosis on his impact? does he get the 3rd down role, split carries with Graham, or have no impact at all?
When he comes back and he's 100%, he will be the starter. He was when he was hurt, and Graham has not shouldered the load, he beat the Lions up and has shown why he's been a #3 for a few years. He's good, as in average.Michael Bennett won't cost them much, since he looks not so good.I would grab Pittman if you have a spot to give. JMHO
Bennett may not get more chances, but to say "he looks not so good" is a mistatement. How can he not look good when in two games with a new team, in a new offense, where he barely knows the plays or the players he is:5/43 and a TDWhy wouldn't you give a guy like that more chances now that he is getting to know the offense better?
 
Graham has impressed the Tampa heads. He did well against Jacksonville last week. He will have another good game this week. 120 total yards a TD most likely. Pittman will probably get around 8 total touches per game when he comes back. Maybe as high as 12. It shouldn't detract from Graham all that much. In fact, I see it as beneficial as Graham will be spelled from time to time keeping him fresh until the end of the game. Remember, Graham isn't taken out of the equation simply because they are down by a significant margin. The dude can catch the ball.

 
Graham has impressed the Tampa heads. He did well against Jacksonville last week. He will have another good game this week. 120 total yards a TD most likely. Pittman will probably get around 8 total touches per game when he comes back. Maybe as high as 12. It shouldn't detract from Graham all that much. In fact, I see it as beneficial as Graham will be spelled from time to time keeping him fresh until the end of the game. Remember, Graham isn't taken out of the equation simply because they are down by a significant margin. The dude can catch the ball.
Very few RBs catch the ball as well as Pittman.
 
Hello...

Buccaneers | Pittman a game-time decision

Fri, 2 Nov 2007 15:15:18 -0700

Roy Cummings, of The Tampa Tribune, reports Tampa Bay Buccaneers RB Michael Pittman (ankle) participated in practice Friday, Nov. 2. He is listed as questionable for Week 9 and will be a game-time decision.

 
Hello...Buccaneers | Pittman a game-time decisionFri, 2 Nov 2007 15:15:18 -0700Roy Cummings, of The Tampa Tribune, reports Tampa Bay Buccaneers RB Michael Pittman (ankle) participated in practice Friday, Nov. 2. He is listed as questionable for Week 9 and will be a game-time decision.
:goodposting: thank goodness for steroids!
 
i think he could be a good play but i would have to drop a guy like joe E to do so- and i feel like others are in this sort of position as well...and although he is more proven for sure, his situation is less favorable than a Joe E-type..at least in my opinion...any thoughts on his value or who you guys would need to drop to get him?

 
I just picked him up off the waiver wire....and am quite happy about it.
Why? He's the second string RB on the team. Graham has shown he can shoulder the load. I wouldn't be too thrilled with him unless you have very poor options on your team.
 
I just picked him up off the waiver wire....and am quite happy about it.
Why? He's the second string RB on the team. Graham has shown he can shoulder the load. I wouldn't be too thrilled with him unless you have very poor options on your team.
Say it enough and you'll start to believe it. Graham has been good, because that's what he is.Pittman is better, which is why Caddy was the starter, Pittman the backup and Graham 3rd String. You most definitley own Graham.Anon. Bob:I have someone I know well close to the team.
 
softball said:
EdwardCat said:
PSILOCYBIN said:
I just picked him up off the waiver wire....and am quite happy about it.
Why? He's the second string RB on the team. Graham has shown he can shoulder the load. I wouldn't be too thrilled with him unless you have very poor options on your team.
Say it enough and you'll start to believe it. Graham has been good, because that's what he is.Pittman is better, which is why Caddy was the starter, Pittman the backup and Graham 3rd String. You most definitley own Graham.Anon. Bob:I have someone I know well close to the team.
Now I remember why I have you on ignore.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
EdwardCat said:
PSILOCYBIN said:
I just picked him up off the waiver wire....and am quite happy about it.
Why? He's the second string RB on the team. Graham has shown he can shoulder the load.
You are correct from a stat angle. You are incorrect from a WIN angle.Gruden has won a SUPER BOWL with Pittman as his primary back. I don't think he has forgotten that, nor should we IMO. We'll see...but I will stick by my opinion that Pittman will play a big part in the Bucs O going forward.
 
EdwardCat said:
PSILOCYBIN said:
I just picked him up off the waiver wire....and am quite happy about it.
Why? He's the second string RB on the team. Graham has shown he can shoulder the load.
You are correct from a stat angle. You are incorrect from a WIN angle.Gruden has won a SUPER BOWL with Pittman as his primary back. I don't think he has forgotten that, nor should we IMO. We'll see...but I will stick by my opinion that Pittman will play a big part in the Bucs O going forward.
I believe Pittman will play a part. There is no doubt about that. He always has. I just don't see him regaining the starting role.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top