Could you elaborate? Did he say to start, to compete to start, to party, to retire, what?![]()
Not sure I like that.
to start.makes no sense to bring a 37-year-old QB onto a four-win team.Could you elaborate? Did he say to start, to compete to start, to party, to retire, what?![]()
Not sure I like that.
Why can't Garcia beat out Gradkowski?That would hurt Galloway's value next year. Visions of Gradkowski underthrowing an open Galloway by ten yards last year come to mind.
Doesn't show a whole lot of confidence in spleenless-boy, does it.to start.makes no sense to bring a 37-year-old QB onto a four-win team.Could you elaborate? Did he say to start, to compete to start, to party, to retire, what?![]()
Not sure I like that.
That's not what I was implying. I was referring to how Garcia's deep arm is not much stronger than Gradkowski's.Why can't Garcia beat out Gradkowski?That would hurt Galloway's value next year. Visions of Gradkowski underthrowing an open Galloway by ten yards last year come to mind.
Gotcha.That's not what I was implying. I was referring to how Garcia's deep arm is not much stronger than Gradkowski's.Why can't Garcia beat out Gradkowski?That would hurt Galloway's value next year. Visions of Gradkowski underthrowing an open Galloway by ten yards last year come to mind.
![]()
Not sure I like that.
You can't link a TV broadcast.![]()
Not sure I like that.
![]()
really?![]()
Not sure I like that.
![]()
Gruden is on the hot seat. If he doesn't win in 2007, he's gone. Bruce Allen (GM) is Gruden's puppet and will be canned as well if the Bucs don't do a 180.
I don't think his seat is nearly as 'hot' as some people do -- the Glazers are known to be Gruden supporters and if they really wanted to can him they would've just done it this offseason. Assuming he's able to get to 8-8 next year I think he'll be back. If he goes 4-12 again, they'll probably be forced to can him. But I don't think that'll happen.Gruden is on the hot seat. If he doesn't win in 2007, he's gone. Bruce Allen (GM) is Gruden's puppet and will be canned as well if the Bucs don't do a 180.Ok, this is the last straw. All the NFL owners should be lined up and shot! Just how bad has the culture of "Win Now" become. Gruden wins a Chanmpionship for the one laughing stock Bucs and just a few short years later he is on the hot seat?
![]()
Galloway was able to put up decent stats with Gradkowski. I'm sure he'll be fine with Garcia, if it happens.That would hurt Galloway's value next year. Visions of Gradkowski underthrowing an open Galloway by ten yards last year come to mind.
In general I'd agree with you. I also believe Gruden is a quality head coach. Unfortunately he isn't very good at talent evaluation and that shortcoming is killing him as a coach. The team talent level has dropped each year that Gruden has been in Tampa.Gruden is on the hot seat. If he doesn't win in 2007, he's gone. Bruce Allen (GM) is Gruden's puppet and will be canned as well if the Bucs don't do a 180.Ok, this is the last straw. All the NFL owners should be lined up and shot! Just how bad has the culture of "Win Now" become. Gruden wins a Chanmpionship for the one laughing stock Bucs and just a few short years later he is on the hot seat?
![]()
decent but not as good as he would have with a QB with a real deep arm. I believe there were at least 2 or 3 long TDs left on the table last year - 150 and 2 is almost an entire tier at WRGalloway was able to put up decent stats with Gradkowski. I'm sure he'll be fine with Garcia, if it happens.That would hurt Galloway's value next year. Visions of Gradkowski underthrowing an open Galloway by ten yards last year come to mind.
I agree, but Garcia would make up for it with more intermediate passes.decent but not as good as he would have with a QB with a real deep arm. I believe there were at least 2 or 3 long TDs left on the table last year - 150 and 2 is almost an entire tier at WRGalloway was able to put up decent stats with Gradkowski. I'm sure he'll be fine with Garcia, if it happens.That would hurt Galloway's value next year. Visions of Gradkowski underthrowing an open Galloway by ten yards last year come to mind.
He won with Dungy's teamGruden is on the hot seat. If he doesn't win in 2007, he's gone. Bruce Allen (GM) is Gruden's puppet and will be canned as well if the Bucs don't do a 180.Ok, this is the last straw. All the NFL owners should be lined up and shot! Just how bad has the culture of "Win Now" become. Gruden wins a Chanmpionship for the one laughing stock Bucs and just a few short years later he is on the hot seat?
![]()
Not nearly as much as my man Calvin Johnson is going to ruin galloway with Garcia at the helm. Garcia will feed CJ the ball.That would hurt Galloway's value next year. Visions of Gradkowski underthrowing an open Galloway by ten yards last year come to mind.
Garcia hit some deep ones to Stallworth last year but Philly has an EXCELLENT offensive line. If the TB OLine doesnt show a great deal of improvement, I would not expect the same production out of Garcia in TB as he achieved in Philly.I agree, but Garcia would make up for it with more intermediate passes.decent but not as good as he would have with a QB with a real deep arm. I believe there were at least 2 or 3 long TDs left on the table last year - 150 and 2 is almost an entire tier at WRGalloway was able to put up decent stats with Gradkowski. I'm sure he'll be fine with Garcia, if it happens.That would hurt Galloway's value next year. Visions of Gradkowski underthrowing an open Galloway by ten yards last year come to mind.
Yup. That's why, in theory, Garcia should do well in Tampa.Does TB run a west coast offense?
Sigmund Bloom said:decent but not as good as he would have with a QB with a real deep arm. I believe there were at least 2 or 3 long TDs left on the table last year - 150 and 2 is almost an entire tier at WRCapella said:Galloway was able to put up decent stats with Gradkowski. I'm sure he'll be fine with Garcia, if it happens.Sigmund Bloom said:That would hurt Galloway's value next year. Visions of Gradkowski underthrowing an open Galloway by ten yards last year come to mind.
Have you ever seen a guywith no spleen throw a really deep ball ?Simms has one of the best deep arms in the league, and you saw what Joey did with him at the helm.
Hi cappy,Why unsure?Worried he's got too little left?Philly was a fluke?Not strong enough arm?JCapella said:![]()
Not sure I like that.
hey joe -- I just don't think it makes sense for a four win team to bring in a 37-year-old QB -- he's clearly not the guy of the future there, so why pay him 4.5M a year to take snaps away from a guy who could be, or to be a backup?if they went 9-7 or even 8-8 last year and the QB play was spotty, I could see it -- maybe then you could make the argument they could compete in the NFC with better quarterbacking -- but a four win team usually isn't going to improve enough for it to go deep in the playoffs, so this really doesn't make sense to me. just a lot of money for a guy for a guy who has no future here.Hi cappy,Why unsure?Worried he's got too little left?Philly was a fluke?Not strong enough arm?JCapella said:![]()
Not sure I like that.
If healthy, and with an upgraded Oline and a young/revitalized pass-rush, they can make the playoffs. I think that's the thinking.hey joe -- I just don't think it makes sense for a four win team to bring in a 37-year-old QB -- he's clearly not the guy of the future there, so why pay him 4.5M a year to take snaps away from a guy who could be, or to be a backup?if they went 9-7 or even 8-8 last year and the QB play was spotty, I could see it -- maybe then you could make the argument they could compete in the NFC with better quarterbacking -- but a four win team usually isn't going to improve enough for it to go deep in the playoffs, so this really doesn't make sense to me. just a lot of money for a guy for a guy who has no future here.Hi cappy,Why unsure?Worried he's got too little left?Philly was a fluke?Not strong enough arm?JCapella said:![]()
Not sure I like that.
well gosh darn, that shouldn't be a problem to fix. who needs that?upgraded Oline and a young/revitalized pass-rush,
The 2005 Jets were worse than the 2006 Bucs or the 2003 Steelers, and they both made a huge leap when they finally added a good quarterback. Galloway's window is closing, and I have to think Clayton and Cadillac would be better with a real QB. Alstott is making his big emotional run like Curtis and Bettis (although Bettis came back for one last one last try). And it seems like Gruden would do better with a veteran QB.hey joe -- I just don't think it makes sense for a four win team to bring in a 37-year-old QB -- he's clearly not the guy of the future there, so why pay him 4.5M a year to take snaps away from a guy who could be, or to be a backup?if they went 9-7 or even 8-8 last year and the QB play was spotty, I could see it -- maybe then you could make the argument they could compete in the NFC with better quarterbacking -- but a four win team usually isn't going to improve enough for it to go deep in the playoffs, so this really doesn't make sense to me. just a lot of money for a guy for a guy who has no future here.
not a Garcia hater. Bucs were not good at qb. I think they should let it ride with Simms and see what they have.For all the Garcia haters...do you think the Bucs were good at QB? If not, who should they have gone after instead of Garcia?
Didnt they sign Simms to an extension? How much do they have invested in Simms?not a Garcia hater. Bucs were not good at qb. I think they should let it ride with Simms and see what they have.For all the Garcia haters...do you think the Bucs were good at QB? If not, who should they have gone after instead of Garcia?
so spend the cap money elsewhere basically? Garcia's not breaking the bank is he?not a Garcia hater. Bucs were not good at qb. I think they should let it ride with Simms and see what they have.For all the Garcia haters...do you think the Bucs were good at QB? If not, who should they have gone after instead of Garcia?
Colin,There's little reason for Garcia to leave Philly if he'd go somewhere else to be the backup. Philly's offense suited him (obviously), and he's said he'd come back there.Now, I agree that Garcia is likely gone from Philly with AJ's new deal. AJ would have been the #2 guy last year if he had signed / been available before Garcia came in, but that's not how it worked out.Look for Feeley as the 2 in Philly and a new young arm to come in at 3. Garcia to another WCO makes the most sense, but I'm struggling to find a starting job for him. As for Garcia's deep ball, he has it (he threw a deep ball to Stallworth that flew 60 yards against the Saints IIRC in the playoff game), but he needs time and a burner that breaks free. He won't nail a location that far away, but everyone knows his strengths are mobility and short passes.Tampa isn't a bad fit, but I think Simms is the starter there. Garcia might go to Houston to try to start, as Oakland is drafting Russell and Favre is back in Green Bay. Not sure where else he could go.Simms as the 1 and Garcia as the "gritty Vet who can come in and win." I think it's a good fit, honestly.As I said last season, Simms should be a fine NFL starter and fantasy option. I disliked him greatly in college, but he has all the physical tools to be a good QB. Gruden is a good coach for him to be working with to try and make the leap.
no, but let's be real -- gruden signs this guy, he's playing him.so spend the cap money elsewhere basically? Garcia's not breaking the bank is he?not a Garcia hater. Bucs were not good at qb. I think they should let it ride with Simms and see what they have.For all the Garcia haters...do you think the Bucs were good at QB? If not, who should they have gone after instead of Garcia?
yea, they re-signed him but it's not a backbreaking deal or anything.Didnt they sign Simms to an extension? How much do they have invested in Simms?not a Garcia hater. Bucs were not good at qb. I think they should let it ride with Simms and see what they have.For all the Garcia haters...do you think the Bucs were good at QB? If not, who should they have gone after instead of Garcia?
I'd have to believe Simms goes into camp the #1 guy...if Garcia starts it'll probably be because he earned it?no, but let's be real -- gruden signs this guy, he's playing him.so spend the cap money elsewhere basically? Garcia's not breaking the bank is he?not a Garcia hater. Bucs were not good at qb. I think they should let it ride with Simms and see what they have.For all the Garcia haters...do you think the Bucs were good at QB? If not, who should they have gone after instead of Garcia?
This Bucs team has real holes at OL, DL, safety and potentially LB next year. They also had a top-5 pick at RB that didn't run hard last year and was outplayed by Mike Pittman when he had his shot to start the last two games, behind the same oline (albiet, Pittman had the luxury of playing with Rattay, who was competent). I don't think this Bucs team is any better than 8-8 with solid QB play next year. Too many holes need fixing (especially on defense) and I think with an early pick this year and four picks in the first 70 of the draft, they should be focused on 08. I know that's not going to happen, because Gruden's job may be on the line, and really, who wants the "we're focused on next year" mentality a year before it happens, but I really fail to see how this team is a contendah in 2007. So, I don't think they need to be giving valuable snaps to a QB pushing 40.The 2005 Jets were worse than the 2006 Bucs or the 2003 Steelers, and they both made a huge leap when they finally added a good quarterback. Galloway's window is closing, and I have to think Clayton and Cadillac would be better with a real QB. Alstott is making his big emotional run like Curtis and Bettis (although Bettis came back for one last one last try). And it seems like Gruden would do better with a veteran QB.hey joe -- I just don't think it makes sense for a four win team to bring in a 37-year-old QB -- he's clearly not the guy of the future there, so why pay him 4.5M a year to take snaps away from a guy who could be, or to be a backup?if they went 9-7 or even 8-8 last year and the QB play was spotty, I could see it -- maybe then you could make the argument they could compete in the NFC with better quarterbacking -- but a four win team usually isn't going to improve enough for it to go deep in the playoffs, so this really doesn't make sense to me. just a lot of money for a guy for a guy who has no future here.