Banger
Footballguy
It depends on the tender placed on Turner, could be a 2nd or a 1st or a 1st and 3rd. SD could also deal him for a player/picks.What would a team have to give up to get Turner?
It depends on the tender placed on Turner, could be a 2nd or a 1st or a 1st and 3rd. SD could also deal him for a player/picks.What would a team have to give up to get Turner?
that's assumed by many but I don't know if they will. I could see AJ dangling him out there for a 1st. I think they may get a 1st from someone, a 1st and 3rd they won't get any takers. AJ is very shrewd at cap/player management and the bottomline will be the juggling act of getting a present value draft pick or insurance for one year and a compensation pick when he leaves as a FA.The Chargers will put the highest tender on him. This is an 8 page thread, I'm pretty sure there's one discussion that has happened 6-10 times.
If Tomlinson ends up on the cover of Madden next year, the Chargers will keep Turner.Otherwise, trading him for Jerricho Cotchery (and a pick?) would be all right.
I think Tomlinson's a lock for the Madden cover.I'd hate to see them trade for a receiver, I think Jackson, Parker and Floyd can get it done (maybe McCardell if he comes back). I'd like to see them trade for draft picks going forward, not necessarily 2007 picks, but a couple of years down the road. Or is that not possible in the NFL?I've heard not only in this forum but elsewhere as well that LT has been offered the cover of Madden and he has turned it down multiple times. It is not like the folks at EA Sports can just put a player on there without asking for permission first. Lt has been asked about it and he says he has declined the Madden cover because it is more of an individual thing singling one player out and he always has said his success is from being part of a team. So unless the entire SD Chargers team in on the cover I doubt you will see LT on the cover of Madden. Sorry for the hijack but thought that needed to be clarified.If Tomlinson ends up on the cover of Madden next year, the Chargers will keep Turner.Otherwise, trading him for Jerricho Cotchery (and a pick?) would be all right.
I just hope that continues for the rest of LaDainian's career.I've heard not only in this forum but elsewhere as well that LT has been offered the cover of Madden and he has turned it down multiple times. It is not like the folks at EA Sports can just put a player on there without asking for permission first. Lt has been asked about it and he says he has declined the Madden cover because it is more of an individual thing singling one player out and he always has said his success is from being part of a team. So unless the entire SD Chargers team in on the cover I doubt you will see LT on the cover of Madden. Sorry for the hijack but thought that needed to be clarified.If Tomlinson ends up on the cover of Madden next year, the Chargers will keep Turner.Otherwise, trading him for Jerricho Cotchery (and a pick?) would be all right.
He secretly fears the Madden CurseI've heard not only in this forum but elsewhere as well that LT has been offered the cover of Madden and he has turned it down multiple times. It is not like the folks at EA Sports can just put a player on there without asking for permission first. Lt has been asked about it and he says he has declined the Madden cover because it is more of an individual thing singling one player out and he always has said his success is from being part of a team. So unless the entire SD Chargers team in on the cover I doubt you will see LT on the cover of Madden. Sorry for the hijack but thought that needed to be clarified.If Tomlinson ends up on the cover of Madden next year, the Chargers will keep Turner.Otherwise, trading him for Jerricho Cotchery (and a pick?) would be all right.
Fixed.He secretly smartly fears the Madden Curse

When was he asked about the Madden cover? Who asked him about it? Was it in an artical? Do you know where this information can be found?I've heard not only in this forum but elsewhere as well that LT has been offered the cover of Madden and he has turned it down multiple times. It is not like the folks at EA Sports can just put a player on there without asking for permission first. Lt has been asked about it and he says he has declined the Madden cover because it is more of an individual thing singling one player out and he always has said his success is from being part of a team. So unless the entire SD Chargers team in on the cover I doubt you will see LT on the cover of Madden. Sorry for the hijack but thought that needed to be clarified.If Tomlinson ends up on the cover of Madden next year, the Chargers will keep Turner.
Otherwise, trading him for Jerricho Cotchery (and a pick?) would be all right.
http://www.nj.com/sports/ledger/index.ssf?....xml&coll=1Clearly, the Jets need to support Pennington with a better running game, as they finished 20th in rushing offense. Mangini declined to say whether he views Leon Washington or Cedric Houston as the potential feature back. According to league insiders, the Jets are expected to pursue the Chargers' Michael Turner, a restricted free agent.
Meanwhile, Chargers RB Michael Turner (80 carries, 502 yards, two TDs) remains on the Jets' radar as a possible replacement for Martin. But the fourth-year pro is a restricted free agent and early word out of San Diego is that the Chargers are expected to put a first-round tender offer on him.
Thus, whichever team signs him to an offer sheet must give the Chargers a first-round pick if San Diego doesn't match. The Jets, of course, could trade for Turner, who worked with offensive coordinator Brian Schottenheimer in San Diego.
Since the season ended for the Jets there is speculation nearly everyday in the papers that Turner is on their radar, whether is various reports speculation or coming from the organization is unclear. After thinking about it a while I don't know why the Jets wouldn't go after him with their 1st round pick. Yes, they will probably try the trade route 1st but if that produces nothing I think it's conceivable that they go after Turner with their 1st. I know traditionally teams won't give up their 1st in such a situation but I can't really remember a backup that has shown as much potential as he has nor a situation that the fit is so good. Also, there's a huge difference between being at the top of the 1st and the 26th pick in the 1st. Realistically, who can they get there in the draft with as little risk as Turner has. Last year John McCargo was selected by the Bills at the 26th spot. A year or two ago, didn't the Jets trade out of nearly the same spot in the 1st round for Doug Jolley and a 2nd rounder?Beyond the Turner talk in the Giants thread, now that it's the day after the day after, Turner talk is resurfacing among the Jets as well. Still sounds like mere beat writer speculation though.
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/487048p-409979c.html
http://www.nj.com/sports/ledger/index.ssf?....xml&coll=1Clearly, the Jets need to support Pennington with a better running game, as they finished 20th in rushing offense. Mangini declined to say whether he views Leon Washington or Cedric Houston as the potential feature back. According to league insiders, the Jets are expected to pursue the Chargers' Michael Turner, a restricted free agent.Meanwhile, Chargers RB Michael Turner (80 carries, 502 yards, two TDs) remains on the Jets' radar as a possible replacement for Martin. But the fourth-year pro is a restricted free agent and early word out of San Diego is that the Chargers are expected to put a first-round tender offer on him.
Thus, whichever team signs him to an offer sheet must give the Chargers a first-round pick if San Diego doesn't match. The Jets, of course, could trade for Turner, who worked with offensive coordinator Brian Schottenheimer in San Diego.
That was 2 full seasons ago.So why didnt the jets just keep Jordan if they are so interested in Turner?ALso, If Brian Schott leaves, does the interest in Turner die down?
He has been asked twice IIRC, 2000 and 2002 I think. I could be wrong about the years, but I do know he has been asked, and like the previous poster said, feels like his OLinemen are just as big of a part of him rushing as he is.When was he asked about the Madden cover? Who asked him about it? Was it in an artical? Do you know where this information can be found?I've heard not only in this forum but elsewhere as well that LT has been offered the cover of Madden and he has turned it down multiple times. It is not like the folks at EA Sports can just put a player on there without asking for permission first. Lt has been asked about it and he says he has declined the Madden cover because it is more of an individual thing singling one player out and he always has said his success is from being part of a team. So unless the entire SD Chargers team in on the cover I doubt you will see LT on the cover of Madden. Sorry for the hijack but thought that needed to be clarified.If Tomlinson ends up on the cover of Madden next year, the Chargers will keep Turner.
Otherwise, trading him for Jerricho Cotchery (and a pick?) would be all right.
I don't think so. I'm sure he's expressed his feelings about him and if it made sense to the Jets to acquire him with Shotty on the staff their feelings probably wouldn't change just because Shotty leaves. Shotty wouldn't be making the decision he would only be adding his input.So why didnt the jets just keep Jordan if they are so interested in Turner?ALso, If Brian Schott leaves, does the interest in Turner die down?
Uhhhh, Curtis Martin led the league in rushing that season.....Also keep in mind that the JEts have Washington's 2nd rd pick which is very high as well - so in theory they could spend their #1 on Turner and still have a very high 2nd to work with. If they feel Turner is the goods it is worth the risk IMO.So why didnt the jets just keep Jordan if they are so interested in Turner?ALso, If Brian Schott leaves, does the interest in Turner die down?
my thinking exactly. The Jets are really the only legit suitor IMO.Uhhhh, Curtis Martin led the league in rushing that season.....Also keep in mind that the JEts have Washington's 2nd rd pick which is very high as well - so in theory they could spend their #1 on Turner and still have a very high 2nd to work with. If they feel Turner is the goods it is worth the risk IMO.So why didnt the jets just keep Jordan if they are so interested in Turner?ALso, If Brian Schott leaves, does the interest in Turner die down?
After that season he was also a 32 year old RB with around 16,500 total yards on his tires. Anyone expecting him to continue along like that was fooling themselves.Uhhhh, Curtis Martin led the league in rushing that season.....So why didnt the jets just keep Jordan if they are so interested in Turner?ALso, If Brian Schott leaves, does the interest in Turner die down?
HERMAfter that season he was also a 32 year old RB with around 16,500 total yards on his tires. Anyone expecting him to continue along like that was fooling themselves.Uhhhh, Curtis Martin led the league in rushing that season.....So why didnt the jets just keep Jordan if they are so interested in Turner?ALso, If Brian Schott leaves, does the interest in Turner die down?
Not only that but, Lamont Jordan should have been spelling Martin for years prior. There would be games where Martin's Cut back technique wasn't working and Jordan was plowing for yards and Herm would sit Jordan so Martin can get his accolades.lack of vision by the Jets.That was 2 full seasons ago.So why didnt the jets just keep Jordan if they are so interested in Turner?ALso, If Brian Schott leaves, does the interest in Turner die down?
Great take on the matter, Banger, and I fully agree. I think the bottom line, as ever, is dollars and cents. I think a trade is more likely a better scenario if they want Turner, although NFL trades are not all that common, so it may be for naught.Since the season ended for the Jets there is speculation nearly everyday in the papers that Turner is on their radar, whether is various reports speculation or coming from the organization is unclear. After thinking about it a while I don't know why the Jets wouldn't go after him with their 1st round pick. Yes, they will probably try the trade route 1st but if that produces nothing I think it's conceivable that they go after Turner with their 1st. I know traditionally teams won't give up their 1st in such a situation but I can't really remember a backup that has shown as much potential as he has nor a situation that the fit is so good. Also, there's a huge difference between being at the top of the 1st and the 26th pick in the 1st. Realistically, who can they get there in the draft with as little risk as Turner has. Last year John McCargo was selected by the Bills at the 26th spot. A year or two ago, didn't the Jets trade out of nearly the same spot in the 1st round for Doug Jolley and a 2nd rounder?Beyond the Turner talk in the Giants thread, now that it's the day after the day after, Turner talk is resurfacing among the Jets as well. Still sounds like mere beat writer speculation though.
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/487048p-409979c.html
http://www.nj.com/sports/ledger/index.ssf?....xml&coll=1Clearly, the Jets need to support Pennington with a better running game, as they finished 20th in rushing offense. Mangini declined to say whether he views Leon Washington or Cedric Houston as the potential feature back. According to league insiders, the Jets are expected to pursue the Chargers' Michael Turner, a restricted free agent.Meanwhile, Chargers RB Michael Turner (80 carries, 502 yards, two TDs) remains on the Jets' radar as a possible replacement for Martin. But the fourth-year pro is a restricted free agent and early word out of San Diego is that the Chargers are expected to put a first-round tender offer on him.
Thus, whichever team signs him to an offer sheet must give the Chargers a first-round pick if San Diego doesn't match. The Jets, of course, could trade for Turner, who worked with offensive coordinator Brian Schottenheimer in San Diego.
This will be his 4th year and has had a total of 157 carries which is about a 1/2 season of work but has put up a gaudy 6.0 ypc and 5 td's. Turner has already had the advantage of being on the practice field, in the film room, off season training and in real NFL games as opposed to any rookie that they may select at that spot (i.e. Bush). It will probably take him 1/2 season to get up on the blocking, speed, etc. of the NFL game and even then I don't think he will end the player that Turner is now.
The only issue in my mind is the salary aspect of the situation and what it will cost to obtain him. The Jets are $28 mill under the cap and will probably make a run at Samuels which will cost some cash as well as signing Cothery and a few others long term. If they do miss out on Samuels I would definitely think that a move for Turner is more probable. I see this as an extremely good fit because 1) the Jets supposedly have interest 2) they have cap room 3) they have a 1st and 2 2nds 4) their 1st rounder is in the perfect spot, and 5) they have a definite need for a feature RB.
Since the season ended for the Jets there is speculation nearly everyday in the papers that Turner is on their radar, whether is various reports speculation or coming from the organization is unclear. After thinking about it a while I don't know why the Jets wouldn't go after him with their 1st round pick. Yes, they will probably try the trade route 1st but if that produces nothing I think it's conceivable that they go after Turner with their 1st. I know traditionally teams won't give up their 1st in such a situation but I can't really remember a backup that has shown as much potential as he has nor a situation that the fit is so good. Also, there's a huge difference between being at the top of the 1st and the 26th pick in the 1st. Realistically, who can they get there in the draft with as little risk as Turner has. Last year John McCargo was selected by the Bills at the 26th spot. A year or two ago, didn't the Jets trade out of nearly the same spot in the 1st round for Doug Jolley and a 2nd rounder? This will be his 4th year and has had a total of 157 carries which is about a 1/2 season of work but has put up a gaudy 6.0 ypc and 5 td's. Turner has already had the advantage of being on the practice field, in the film room, off season training and in real NFL games as opposed to any rookie that they may select at that spot (i.e. Bush). It will probably take him 1/2 season to get up on the blocking, speed, etc. of the NFL game and even then I don't think he will end the player that Turner is now. The only issue in my mind is the salary aspect of the situation and what it will cost to obtain him. The Jets are $28 mill under the cap and will probably make a run at Samuels which will cost some cash as well as signing Cothery and a few others long term. If they do miss out on Samuels I would definitely think that a move for Turner is more probable. I see this as an extremely good fit because 1) the Jets supposedly have interest 2) they have cap room 3) they have a 1st and 2 2nds 4) their 1st rounder is in the perfect spot, and 5) they have a definite need for a feature RB.

If the Giants didn't have the recent trade history with SD I think some kind of trade may be more likely. They also may want to give Jacobs a shot this year to see how he does in a feature role. I'm assuming you meant Norwood in Atl. He may or may not be a feature guy but they've got a lot more problems with a new HC, getting Vick straightened out, their defense is a mess, etc.As a Johnny-come-lately to this thread, I'm sorry if this is a repeat, but it seems like there's only a few teams that would be candidates to give up a 1st for Turner right?
[Good potential
NYJ - Only problem is that they're AFC.
NYG - Would turner fit in with a pass catching role?
Atlanta - Dunn is 32 and Harrison may not be a feature back.
GB - Good fit.
NYG - I can't see Jacobs as the featured back. Just can't. I agree with the "trade history" bit too.ATL - Yes, I meant Norwood.If the Giants didn't have the recent trade history with SD I think some kind of trade may be more likely. They also may want to give Jacobs a shot this year to see how he does in a feature role. I'm assuming you meant Norwood in Atl. He may or may not be a feature guy but they've got a lot more problems with a new HC, getting Vick straightened out, their defense is a mess, etc.As a Johnny-come-lately to this thread, I'm sorry if this is a repeat, but it seems like there's only a few teams that would be candidates to give up a 1st for Turner right?
[Good potential
NYJ - Only problem is that they're AFC.
NYG - Would turner fit in with a pass catching role?
Atlanta - Dunn is 32 and Harrison may not be a feature back.
GB - Good fit.
I've read that GB plans on resigning Green and Morency has been a relatively good fit.
On the Giants I agree with you and don't think Jacobs is a featured back but there seem to be a lot on the board who do, and I'm not sure what the Giants will do. Jacobs is obviously the bruiser so they may opt more for a "lightning" type back. Turner is probably more like Jacobs than a scatback IMO, he really runs hard and is pretty physical.NYG - I can't see Jacobs as the featured back. Just can't. I agree with the "trade history" bit too.ATL - Yes, I meant Norwood.If the Giants didn't have the recent trade history with SD I think some kind of trade may be more likely. They also may want to give Jacobs a shot this year to see how he does in a feature role. I'm assuming you meant Norwood in Atl. He may or may not be a feature guy but they've got a lot more problems with a new HC, getting Vick straightened out, their defense is a mess, etc.As a Johnny-come-lately to this thread, I'm sorry if this is a repeat, but it seems like there's only a few teams that would be candidates to give up a 1st for Turner right?
[Good potential
NYJ - Only problem is that they're AFC.
NYG - Would turner fit in with a pass catching role?
Atlanta - Dunn is 32 and Harrison may not be a feature back.
GB - Good fit.
I've read that GB plans on resigning Green and Morency has been a relatively good fit.
GB - Green is old and Morency isn't the answer. IMO anyway.
Rumor has it that the Giants are interested in Ahman Green and that is logical considering they have Brandon Jacobs. This may open the GB talks that you put down as a good fit. Atlanta has Norwood, therefore I see The Jets and GB as the best candidates.As a Johnny-come-lately to this thread, I'm sorry if this is a repeat, but it seems like there's only a few teams that would be candidates to give up a 1st for Turner right?
Very little chance
Denver & Oakland - No way he gets traded in-division. Plus Oakland's not giving up a #1 overall.
Baltimore - The Chargers main AFC competition?
Luke warm
Houston - Probably aren't giving up the #8 pick.
Cleveland - Not going to give up a #3/4.
Tennessee - RB is a concern, but other holes should be addressed with the #1
Detroit - How bad was Jones' injury? And if Martz stays, he's not a Martz type back.
Good potential
NYJ - Only problem is that they're AFC.
NYG - Would turner fit in with a pass catching role?
Atlanta - Dunn is 32 and Harrison may not be a feature back.
GB - Good fit.
That's what I'm thinking. Plus, once you trade for him, you've gotta sign him to a deal. There'll be two Peterson/Lynch drafting teams that won't be looking for a back.I think if the Chargers demand a 1st, teams will say, no thanks, we'll sign him next spring for free.When was the last time someone traded a 1st round pick for a 3rd year running back? I seem to remember that in recent times a second round pick has been tough to get even for proven players.
This is probably more for the Giants RB thread, but Coughlin was on the Mike and The Mad Dog show last night and the question turned to Jacobs replacing Tiki. Coughlin said that Jacobs "is the front runner" and they have "every confidence in him". While things can change, that to me looks like the Giants wouldn't be interested in Turner.One thing not mentioned that could also play into Turner's situation is if the Chargers go all the way and win the Super Bowl. If they do, they may be more willing to let MT go. If not, they may want that insurance for another run next year.On the Giants I agree with you and don't think Jacobs is a featured back but there seem to be a lot on the board who do, and I'm not sure what the Giants will do. Jacobs is obviously the bruiser so they may opt more for a "lightning" type back. Turner is probably more like Jacobs than a scatback IMO, he really runs hard and is pretty physical.NYG - I can't see Jacobs as the featured back. Just can't. I agree with the "trade history" bit too.ATL - Yes, I meant Norwood.If the Giants didn't have the recent trade history with SD I think some kind of trade may be more likely. They also may want to give Jacobs a shot this year to see how he does in a feature role. I'm assuming you meant Norwood in Atl. He may or may not be a feature guy but they've got a lot more problems with a new HC, getting Vick straightened out, their defense is a mess, etc.As a Johnny-come-lately to this thread, I'm sorry if this is a repeat, but it seems like there's only a few teams that would be candidates to give up a 1st for Turner right?
[Good potential
NYJ - Only problem is that they're AFC.
NYG - Would turner fit in with a pass catching role?
Atlanta - Dunn is 32 and Harrison may not be a feature back.
GB - Good fit.
I've read that GB plans on resigning Green and Morency has been a relatively good fit.
GB - Green is old and Morency isn't the answer. IMO anyway.
Need met availability when the Patriots got a #1 for Deion Branch when they shouldn't have. So stranger things have happened.My opinion is that the Chargers should keep him and extend the career or LT in the process. I'm a HUGE proponent of teams using the #2 back to keep the #1 guy as fresh as possible towards the end of the season.When was the last time someone traded a 1st round pick for a 3rd year running back? I seem to remember that in recent times a second round pick has been tough to get even for proven players.
Yeah, thanks Seattle from the whole rest of the AFC. I find it unlikely that something like that goes down again any time soon. The Chargers may have to deal Turner for whatever they can get next year in order to somewhat control where he lands - I really don't think they want to see him end up in the AFC, particularly Baltimore, Denver or the Jets.I know it's going to sound homerish, but they do have a couple of guys on the practice squad in Perkins and Gross who could somewhat fill Turner's shoes if he left.Need met availability when the Patriots got a #1 for Deion Branch when they shouldn't have. So stranger things have happened.When was the last time someone traded a 1st round pick for a 3rd year running back? I seem to remember that in recent times a second round pick has been tough to get even for proven players.
I think the jets early second(from wash) would be good enough for Turner, and would be a nice deal. They move past the learning curve of the NFL, and turner is pretty fresh and chomping at the bit to be the feature back. If im the jets and can swing this, I go for it without hesitation.I think 1st, 2nd, and tuner is really better than a 1st, 2nd and 2ndWhen was the last time someone traded a 1st round pick for a 3rd year running back? I seem to remember that in recent times a second round pick has been tough to get even for proven players.
Possible, I think the Chargers would ask for a few extra goodies along with the 2nd round pick though.I think the jets early second(from wash) would be good enough for Turner, and would be a nice deal. They move past the learning curve of the NFL, and turner is pretty fresh and chomping at the bit to be the feature back. If im the jets and can swing this, I go for it without hesitation.I think 1st, 2nd, and tuner is really better than a 1st, 2nd and 2ndWhen was the last time someone traded a 1st round pick for a 3rd year running back? I seem to remember that in recent times a second round pick has been tough to get even for proven players.
I don't think either Perkins or Gross will ever be a #2 RB in the NFL. (Sproles might be, though.)I know it's going to sound homerish, but they do have a couple of guys on the practice squad in Perkins and Gross who could somewhat fill Turner's shoes if he left.
You're probably right, but Gross in particular looked good to me in preseason, I'd like to see more of him before making that determination. I don't know that Sproles is MJDish enough to depend on him should LaDainian miss a significant number of games.I don't think either Perkins or Gross will ever be a #2 RB in the NFL. (Sproles might be, though.)I know it's going to sound homerish, but they do have a couple of guys on the practice squad in Perkins and Gross who could somewhat fill Turner's shoes if he left.
I don't.I think the jets early second(from wash) would be good enough for Turner
well then they may have to play against him 2x a year if he gets held onto this year and becomes an UFA....im sure they would love that. I really dont see anyone giving a #1 for himI don't.I think the jets early second(from wash) would be good enough for Turner
I don't think it matters one way or the other. LT is gonna get his carries regardless of who the backup is.LT owners? Do we hope that Turner goes? just curious.I don't have Turner on my roster. I do have Sproles on IR and Kay Jay Harris. Think they draft a rb?
It's possible but I assume you're talking about the Broncos since KC already is set at RB and oak doesn't make any moves that make any sense. Any specualtion as to what DEN is going to do with their RB situation two years from now is kind of a joke. If they were still in the playoffs right now I wouldn't even know their RB situation this weekend, let alone two years from now. In general they've given low-ball offers to FA RB's in the past and even this year seemed pretty content with Bell/Dayne/Bell(before Dayne missed time due to injury) and didn't make much of an effort to acquire any RB despite the fact people were SURE they were going to draft one in the first or at the very latest the second round. Somebody will offer Turner a lot of $ and it may even be SD if something happens to Tomlinson.harryhood said:well then they may have to play against him 2x a year if he gets held onto this year and becomes an UFA....im sure they would love that. I really dont see anyone giving a #1 for himBoltBacker said:I don't.harryhood said:I think the jets early second(from wash) would be good enough for Turner
I think an early 2nd rdr for Turner will do it also. I believe they will tender him a 1st rdr, and then trade him leading up to the draft for an early 2nd (if they cant get a late first).harryhood said:I think the jets early second(from wash) would be good enough for Turner, and would be a nice deal. They move past the learning curve of the NFL, and turner is pretty fresh and chomping at the bit to be the feature back. If im the jets and can swing this, I go for it without hesitation.I think 1st, 2nd, and tuner is really better than a 1st, 2nd and 2ndGr00vus said:When was the last time someone traded a 1st round pick for a 3rd year running back? I seem to remember that in recent times a second round pick has been tough to get even for proven players.
I also think a 2nd round pick is all they are going to be able to get for Turner. I don’t think the Chargers will be satisfied with a 2nd rounder so they won’t trade him.I think an early 2nd rdr for Turner will do it also. I believe they will tender him a 1st rdr, and then trade him leading up to the draft for an early 2nd (if they cant get a late first).harryhood said:I think the jets early second(from wash) would be good enough for Turner, and would be a nice deal. They move past the learning curve of the NFL, and turner is pretty fresh and chomping at the bit to be the feature back. If im the jets and can swing this, I go for it without hesitation.I think 1st, 2nd, and tuner is really better than a 1st, 2nd and 2ndGr00vus said:When was the last time someone traded a 1st round pick for a 3rd year running back? I seem to remember that in recent times a second round pick has been tough to get even for proven players.
What did the Jets get for Morton when he went to Washington?When was the last time someone traded a 1st round pick for a 3rd year running back? I seem to remember that in recent times a second round pick has been tough to get even for proven players.
Morton was not really a RB - more of a Kick Return specialst - think Jets got a 5th rder.I agree on two fronts - I think the Jets will offer the best deal with Wash 2nd rder - and I also think that won't be enough for SD and they will hold onto him.What did the Jets get for Morton when he went to Washington?When was the last time someone traded a 1st round pick for a 3rd year running back? I seem to remember that in recent times a second round pick has been tough to get even for proven players.