Is too early to say that we should be looking at center in the draft? What are drafting like 28th?
So after the last 2 games, does Minnesota try to resign Darnold?
So after the last 2 games, does Minnesota try to resign Darnold?
If he's willing to compete for the backup job.So after the last 2 games, does Minnesota try to resign Darnold?
So after the last 2 games, does Minnesota try to resign Darnold?
Please, God know.So after the last 2 games, does Minnesota try to resign Darnold?
Yes but it’s an easier convo for them now as they have leverage with JJ and a little less hot market competition for his services
Oh man, I'm so sorry. It's not your fault. It's not your fault. It's not your fault.Most of my comments are just jokes fueling the flames of history. In my mind I know none of that history matters moving forward but I also know expecting the worse and not letting your guard down with hope makes it easier to accept the disappointment.I can't tell you to stop thinking that way. But I will tell you that the sooner you can find a way to stop thinking that way, the better off you'll be. (
Unfortunately, I got my hopes. I fully expected the Vikes to win last night even though I should have known the bright lights were just too big for Darnold. He was seeing ghosts again and KOC got completely out coached. That was probably the most disappointing thing of the entire night. I didn't expect that.Oh man, I'm so sorry. It's not your fault. It's not your fault. It's not your fault.Most of my comments are just jokes fueling the flames of history. In my mind I know none of that history matters moving forward but I also know expecting the worse and not letting your guard down with hope makes it easier to accept the disappointment.I can't tell you to stop thinking that way. But I will tell you that the sooner you can find a way to stop thinking that way, the better off you'll be. (
They should just franchise tag him. Run it back next year to see if he can do it again and let JJM develop with a fully healthy year. It's wouldn't have long term ramifications and they have the cap space to do it easily.So after the last 2 games, does Minnesota try to resign Darnold?
I say no. It may be a step backwards but JJM needs the experience of play and I would not want to see him go two full seasons without starting.They should just franchise tag him. Run it back next year to see if he can do it again and let JJM develop with a fully healthy year. It's wouldn't have long term ramifications and they have the cap space to do it easily.So after the last 2 games, does Minnesota try to resign Darnold?
That was obvious for the last two games. But nothing changed. I was really disappointed in KOC as he was definitely outcoached yesterday.I do think the play calling did him no favors. After the first series there should have been more screens to the RBs and quick slants to try and offset the pass rush and get the ball out of his hands quicker.
This season doesn't count for him not starting. He was injured. Why not go into next year with the same plan they had this year? If JJM outperforms Darnold and earns the job over him then great...he starts. It could be game 1, after the bye or maybe he's not ready all year. He is young. No need to rush things. Give JJM a full, healthy year to develop. This was a lost year for him. Don't rush him next year just because he lost this year.I say no. It may be a step backwards but JJM needs the experience of play and I would not want to see him go two full seasons without starting.
That was obvious for the last two games. But nothing changed. I was really disappointed in KOC as he was definitely outcoached yesterday.I do think the play calling did him no favors. After the first series there should have been more screens to the RBs and quick slants to try and offset the pass rush and get the ball out of his hands quicker.
The injury changes the plan. I just don't think you can have a guy not play for that long of time. Skills erode of they're not used.This season doesn't count for him not starting. He was injured. Why not go into next year with the same plan they had this year? If JJM outperforms Darnold and earns the job over him then great...he starts. It could be game 1, after the bye or maybe he's not ready all year. He is young. No need to rush things. Give JJM a full, healthy year to develop. This was a lost year for him. Don't rush him next year just because he lost this year.I say no. It may be a step backwards but JJM needs the experience of play and I would not want to see him go two full seasons without starting.
I franchise tag to Darnold doesn't hurt the future cap situation. It's one year. Just run it back and let development continue with a healthy year.
I am not saying Love is a top 5 QB but sitting him for multiple years seemed to have turned out ok. JJM is still very young (21/22) and has time. Another year of development....this time with being able to physically participate isn't a bad thing and could benefit him. This was a lost year for him. Let him learn some. Rushing QB's isn't always the best way to go......it is the great debate for sure.The injury changes the plan. I just don't think you can have a guy not play for that long of time. Skills erode of they're not used.
If he's willing to compete for the backup job.So after the last 2 games, does Minnesota try to resign Darnold?
If he's willing to compete for the backup job.So after the last 2 games, does Minnesota try to resign Darnold?
Does it make sense though to have JJ making less than $5 million and his back-up making $50 million?
Feels like $50 million get you some O-line help.
Is Franchise the only tag he's eligible for? I'd honestly be a little worried he signs it on the spot and no other team values him near that salary + trade pick cost of a franchised player - and the Vikes become stuck. JMHO only way Darnold stays is if the other staring options are less appealing, for any reason, than taking a chance staying in MN.They should just franchise tag him. Run it back next year to see if he can do it again and let JJM develop with a fully healthy year. It's wouldn't have long term ramifications and they have the cap space to do it easily.
Why would they be "stuck"? They have plenty of cap space to absorb one year of the Franchise Tag for next year. It gives them a year to see if this year was a fluke (I think he is fine in the regular season but can't handle the spotlight of big games) while allowing a super young JJM a healthy year to develop and be ready. If JJM outplays Darnold they can move to him at some point next year just as the plan was to do this year. I don't see this as any type of risk.I'd honestly be a little worried he signs it on the spot and no other team values him near that salary + trade pick cost of a franchised player - and the Vikes become stuck
I say "stuck" because I don't believe Darnold should be the sure starter over JJM the entire 2025 season. Ideally he would be only part of the season, and we get on with our QBOTF plan, taking advantage of the cap benefits of doing it well (I think they have, being a JJM believer).Why would they be "stuck"? They have plenty of cap space to absorb one year of the Franchise Tag for next year.
If so as a backup.. 2 year deal $15-20 Mil. any team that wants to pay him more can have him. He is NOT the future.So after the last 2 games, does Minnesota try to resign Darnold?
Another concern is the age of the team. IIRC they're the second oldest.
Almost the entire defensive backfield could be turned over (save Metellus).
The interior of both lines needs work.
It was a shocking regression for Sam. I know the guys were covered well and that pocket collapsing all night, but why can't he learn to throw it in the dirt to avoid a sack or two? Whoever said the playoffs would reveal whether or not they'd keep him was correct - very doubtful they will now.
The most concerning thing for me the last two weeks was KOC looking outsmarted.
The game plan had been for JJ to start this year. There might have been some talk of wait and see, but I believe they were ready to cut the cord and let JJ fly.This season doesn't count for him not starting. He was injured. Why not go into next year with the same plan they had this year? If JJM outperforms Darnold and earns the job over him then great...he starts. It could be game 1, after the bye or maybe he's not ready all year. He is young. No need to rush things. Give JJM a full, healthy year to develop. This was a lost year for him. Don't rush him next year just because he lost this year.I say no. It may be a step backwards but JJM needs the experience of play and I would not want to see him go two full seasons without starting.
I franchise tag to Darnold doesn't hurt the future cap situation. It's one year. Just run it back and let development continue with a healthy year.
The idea being that the contract would be that of a backup.If he's willing to compete for the backup job.So after the last 2 games, does Minnesota try to resign Darnold?
Does it make sense though to have JJ making less than $5 million and his back-up making $50 million?
Feels like $50 million get you some O-line help.
The idea being that the contract would be that of a backup.If he's willing to compete for the backup job.So after the last 2 games, does Minnesota try to resign Darnold?
Does it make sense though to have JJ making less than $5 million and his back-up making $50 million?
Feels like $50 million get you some O-line help.
I look at guys like Geno Smith and Baker Mayfield who turned their careers around, and I think both those guys are better than Darnold, and didn't have a 1st round QB waiting in the wings.
Honestly, probably let him walk and get a comp pick might be the best option. Maybe you can tag and trade, but I doubt they get more than a 2nd or 3rd rounder, and that has some risks.The idea being that the contract would be that of a backup.If he's willing to compete for the backup job.So after the last 2 games, does Minnesota try to resign Darnold?
Does it make sense though to have JJ making less than $5 million and his back-up making $50 million?
Feels like $50 million get you some O-line help.
I look at guys like Geno Smith and Baker Mayfield who turned their careers around, and I think both those guys are better than Darnold, and didn't have a 1st round QB waiting in the wings.
What are the MIN options?
1) Tag him. What's that cost... $40 million, more?
2) Match offers from others. Might be about the same. Some might view last night's game as more of an indictment on the O-line than Darnold. Overall his body of work for 2024 was really good.
there's ZERO chance he gets below $20 millionIf he's willing to compete for the backup job.So after the last 2 games, does Minnesota try to resign Darnold?
Does it make sense though to have JJ making less than $5 million and his back-up making $50 million?
Feels like $50 million get you some O-line help.
There is ZERO chance that Darnold gets anywhere near $50 million...I don't think anyone gives him $20 million...I hope the Vikings go with Jones as their backup at something 10 or less. He has mobility similar to McCarthy so the gameplan wouldn't change much if McCarthy had to sit.
there's ZERO chance he gets below $20 millionIf he's willing to compete for the backup job.So after the last 2 games, does Minnesota try to resign Darnold?
Does it make sense though to have JJ making less than $5 million and his back-up making $50 million?
Feels like $50 million get you some O-line help.
There is ZERO chance that Darnold gets anywhere near $50 million...I don't think anyone gives him $20 million...I hope the Vikings go with Jones as their backup at something 10 or less. He has mobility similar to McCarthy so the gameplan wouldn't change much if McCarthy had to sit.
Maybe you can tag and trade, but I doubt they get more than a 2nd or 3rd rounder, and that has some risks.
Jones is absolutely fine as a backup. He is far from terrible.Maybe you can tag and trade, but I doubt they get more than a 2nd or 3rd rounder, and that has some risks.
Couple salient points here
Probably better off trying to work out a 2-3 year mid-market deal, say the in Geno Smith (3 yr, $75m) / Baker Mayfield (3 yr, $100m) range. No more than $25-33M per year. Make it a 2 year deal, or laden it with incentives he won't hit if JJM becomes the starter.
- the franchise tag for a QB in 2025 will be $41.325M
- if they put a qualifying tag on Darnold, they have the option to either match another offer he gets from another team, or not match and receive the next two 1st round picks from the team signing him.
Also, be grateful Darnold saved the franchise from giving him a big bag if he had played well in one big game. SEE JONES, Daniel - one playoff win and they screwed themselves.
Speaking of which, no they should not tender an offer to their Practice Squad QB. He is turrible.
IMO, road games look "easier" than home.. Glad it isn't reversed.Vikings 2025 Opponents
Home: Bears, Lions, Packers, Eagles, Bengals, Ravens, Commanders, Falcons
Away: Bears, Lions, Packers, Browns, Cowboys, Giants, Steelers, Seahawks, Chargers.
Notables: No international game for the Vikes 2025. We somehow play the Seahawks on the road AGAIN. Seems like a yearly occurrence, Unbelievably tough home schedule.
Where do you come up with this stuff? You should be in the booth somewhere filling announcers with these tidbits.The Vikings still haven’t had a QB start all games in a season for consecutive years since 16 game expansion in 1978
The Minnesota Vikings have never had a quarterback start all 16/17 games in two consecutive seasons
The last time they had a quarterback start every game in two consecutive seasons was in '72-73 with Fran Tarkenton, but that was before the schedule expanded to 16 games in 1978.
Assuming Darnold doesn’t next year, we are looking at 53+ years before it happens.
Less than ideal. I wonder if any other team can say the same thing? This certainly does not explain the Vikings championship futility, but it is an interesting metric.The Vikings still haven’t had a QB start all games in a season for consecutive years since 16 game expansion in 1978
The Minnesota Vikings have never had a quarterback start all 16/17 games in two consecutive seasons
The last time they had a quarterback start every game in two consecutive seasons was in '72-73 with Fran Tarkenton, but that was before the schedule expanded to 16 games in 1978.
Assuming Darnold doesn’t next year, we are looking at 53+ years before it happens.