Monday Night Football - Injury News (1 Viewer)

[Andy Hicks]

Post any updates here

QB

Tony Romo – Questionable

RB

Mike Sellers – Questionable

Daniel Young – Questionable

Felix Jones – Questionable

WR

Brandon Banks – Probable

Dez Bryant – Questionable

TE

Chris Cooley – Probable

PK

David Beuhler - Questionable

 

[Bankerguy]

Romo and Dez will play per Michael Lombardi.

 

[Banger]

Romo and Dez will play per Michael Lombardi.

but how effective will Dez be?

 

[kyoun1e]

Romo, Dez, Romo, Dez...what about Felix?

Amazing to me how little news there is on this front vs. Romo/Dez.

 

[Bankerguy]

Romo, Dez, Romo, Dez...what about Felix?Amazing to me how little news there is on this front vs. Romo/Dez.

I guess because he played after the injury and practiced this week. He will play and no Austin.

 

[Joe Summer]

Jones was "back at practice" on Friday but it did not state whether he would play: http://cowboysblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2011/09/cowboys-wr-dez-bryant-rb-felix.html

 

[Bankerguy]

Jones was "back at practice" on Friday but it did not state whether he would play: http://cowboysblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2011/09/cowboys-wr-dez-bryant-rb-felix.html

Yeah, not sure he is a great start option fantasy wise.

 

[Grady Wilson]

Still have time to decide between Romo and Sanchez, I suppose.

 

[Native]

Romo and Dez will play per Michael Lombardi.

Great news.

 

[stbugs]

Still have time to decide between Romo and Sanchez, I suppose.

I am rolling with Sanchez in two leagues. You probably drafted just like me and Romo was the last of the real good QBs and Sanchez has a great matchup in week 5 during Romo's bye. In one league, I have already lost Manningham, Charles, Gates, Foster and Bryant (last week), so at 0-2, it really isn't going to matter. In the second, I need actual points and I just can't take the risk of no points from Romo or one bad hit. If healthy, no way I would sit Romo, but a donut is too high a risk seeing as Sanchez has been almost as good as Romo.

 

[Barry]

Still have time to decide between Romo and Sanchez, I suppose.

I am rolling with Sanchez in two leagues. You probably drafted just like me and Romo was the last of the real good QBs and Sanchez has a great matchup in week 5 during Romo's bye. In one league, I have already lost Manningham, Charles, Gates, Foster and Bryant (last week), so at 0-2, it really isn't going to matter. In the second, I need actual points and I just can't take the risk of no points from Romo or one bad hit. If healthy, no way I would sit Romo, but a donut is too high a risk seeing as Sanchez has been almost as good as Romo.

Dec 8 2004

 

[stbugs]

Still have time to decide between Romo and Sanchez, I suppose.

I am rolling with Sanchez in two leagues. You probably drafted just like me and Romo was the last of the real good QBs and Sanchez has a great matchup in week 5 during Romo's bye. In one league, I have already lost Manningham, Charles, Gates, Foster and Bryant (last week), so at 0-2, it really isn't going to matter. In the second, I need actual points and I just can't take the risk of no points from Romo or one bad hit. If healthy, no way I would sit Romo, but a donut is too high a risk seeing as Sanchez has been almost as good as Romo.

Dec 8 2004

I assume this is a reference to some game, but I hope Grady did what I did and rolled with Sanchez. 369 yards passing and 3 TDs? Way more than I would have ever expected and he was one replay reversal from 4 TDs. Romo may do better, but the odds are against it.

 

[Grady Wilson]

Still have time to decide between Romo and Sanchez, I suppose.

I am rolling with Sanchez in two leagues. You probably drafted just like me and Romo was the last of the real good QBs and Sanchez has a great matchup in week 5 during Romo's bye. In one league, I have already lost Manningham, Charles, Gates, Foster and Bryant (last week), so at 0-2, it really isn't going to matter. In the second, I need actual points and I just can't take the risk of no points from Romo or one bad hit. If healthy, no way I would sit Romo, but a donut is too high a risk seeing as Sanchez has been almost as good as Romo.

Dec 8 2004

I assume this is a reference to some game, but I hope Grady did what I did and rolled with Sanchez. 369 yards passing and 3 TDs? Way more than I would have ever expected and he was one replay reversal from 4 TDs. Romo may do better, but the odds are against it.

I did roll with SAnchez as well. I'm hoping it's going to give me the win, but my opponent has Wayne left and I'm only ahead by 13 points in a PPR league, so I don't like my chances. And yes, I have no idea what Dec 8, 2004 means nor has anything to do with this discussion.

 

[stbugs]

Still have time to decide between Romo and Sanchez, I suppose.

I am rolling with Sanchez in two leagues. You probably drafted just like me and Romo was the last of the real good QBs and Sanchez has a great matchup in week 5 during Romo's bye. In one league, I have already lost Manningham, Charles, Gates, Foster and Bryant (last week), so at 0-2, it really isn't going to matter. In the second, I need actual points and I just can't take the risk of no points from Romo or one bad hit. If healthy, no way I would sit Romo, but a donut is too high a risk seeing as Sanchez has been almost as good as Romo.

Dec 8 2004

I assume this is a reference to some game, but I hope Grady did what I did and rolled with Sanchez. 369 yards passing and 3 TDs? Way more than I would have ever expected and he was one replay reversal from 4 TDs. Romo may do better, but the odds are against it.

I did roll with SAnchez as well. I'm hoping it's going to give me the win, but my opponent has Wayne left and I'm only ahead by 13 points in a PPR league, so I don't like my chances. And yes, I have no idea what Dec 8, 2004 means nor has anything to do with this discussion.

Maybe he doesn't like people talking about their teams. I don't try to do that, but I thought it was interesting that you were deciding the same thing and with injuries I think it is good to see what people are thinking and who they are plugging in instead. It happens in every injury thread. I hope you got good info from me telling you I was starting Sanchez over Romo.

 

[Grady Wilson]

Still have time to decide between Romo and Sanchez, I suppose.

I am rolling with Sanchez in two leagues. You probably drafted just like me and Romo was the last of the real good QBs and Sanchez has a great matchup in week 5 during Romo's bye. In one league, I have already lost Manningham, Charles, Gates, Foster and Bryant (last week), so at 0-2, it really isn't going to matter. In the second, I need actual points and I just can't take the risk of no points from Romo or one bad hit. If healthy, no way I would sit Romo, but a donut is too high a risk seeing as Sanchez has been almost as good as Romo.

Dec 8 2004

I assume this is a reference to some game, but I hope Grady did what I did and rolled with Sanchez. 369 yards passing and 3 TDs? Way more than I would have ever expected and he was one replay reversal from 4 TDs. Romo may do better, but the odds are against it.

I did roll with SAnchez as well. I'm hoping it's going to give me the win, but my opponent has Wayne left and I'm only ahead by 13 points in a PPR league, so I don't like my chances. And yes, I have no idea what Dec 8, 2004 means nor has anything to do with this discussion.

Maybe he doesn't like people talking about their teams. I don't try to do that, but I thought it was interesting that you were deciding the same thing and with injuries I think it is good to see what people are thinking and who they are plugging in instead. It happens in every injury thread. I hope you got good info from me telling you I was starting Sanchez over Romo.

Yes, I did. Thanks for the help.

 

[th3f00l]

Romo (ribs) went through Sunday's walk-through, as did Felix Jones and Dez Bryant, Fox's Jay Glazer reports.