What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

monsanto (2 Viewers)

A friend of mine sent me this this morning: Scary

Not sure if it mentions Monsanto, but it's all in the same ballpark.

The government and politicians are all in the back pocket of these companies.

 
The Svalbard Global Seed Vault, or the Doomsday Vault as the media have nicknamed it, was officially opened on February 26, 2008, to serve as the ultimate safety net for one of the worlds most important natural resources.

The world's seed collections are vulnerable to a wide range of threats - civil strife, war, natural catastrophes, and, more routinely but no less damagingly, poor management, lack of adequate funding, and equipment failures. Unique varieties of our most important crops are lost whenever any such disaster strikes: securing duplicates of all collections in a global facility provides an insurance policy for the worlds food supply.

The Seed Vault is an answer to a call from the international community to provide the best possible assurance of safety for the worlds crop diversity, and in fact the idea for such a facility dates back to the 1980s. However, it was only with the coming into force of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, and with it an agreed international legal framework for conserving and accessing crop diversity, that the Vault became a practical possibility.

http://www.croptrust.org/main/arcticseedvault.php?itemid=211

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXW_vzQppGI

 
Last edited by a moderator:
<!--quoteo(post=12936085:date=Feb 20 2011, 09:41 PM:name=Foosball God)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Foosball God @ Feb 20 2011, 09:41 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=12936085"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=12935667:date=Feb 20 2011, 07:49 PM:name=GreatLakesMike)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GreatLakesMike @ Feb 20 2011, 07:49 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=12935667"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->

<a href="http://colesville.patch.com/articles/whats-genetically-modified-alfalfa-got-to-do-with-organic-food-everything" target="_blank">http://colesville.patch.com/articles/whats...food-everything</a><!--QuoteEnd--</div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

This doesn't really explain anything. In fact it makes it sound like more and more people are looking to get away from genetically engineered alfalfa so in effect that should strengthen organic farms. If you don't want genetically engineered crop then don't use the modified seeds. What am I missing here?

<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

There's several silly comments in that article, but the end of it is the gist of your answer. Alfalfa like many other plants can fertilize a good distance when the bloom coincides with a breeze. I don't have figures but with a decent breeze I'm pretty sure a crop a half mile from another can cross fertilize. This puts the <i>round up ready proprietary gene</i> in a crop that didn't want it or pay for it. Both sides get upset.

Big Ag says you have to pay for that cool gene that lets you spray poison on your plants without killing them. In Canada they spot sprayed people's crops without permission just to see if their cool gene had drifted to neighboring crops. If the crop they sprayed without permission lived, they had the gene and got sued, if it died, well, it died for no good reason.

Small farmer says BS. I never wanted that gene on my land and I never asked for it. You turds should pay to have it removed. And so it goes.

Now add organic certification into the mix and you have a big problem. Farmer Joe is getting a 40% bonus on his crop because it can be fed to cows and the milk is organic. But if the GMO gene gets into his crop it's no longer organic,and not only will he lose the bonus, he may end up without a contract at all and just a bunch of mulch. You could say buy fresh organic seed every year but most organic certs require the land to be free of non organic approved pesticides, insecticides, fertilizers and PLANTS for a given number of years before certifying. So he loses certification to boot.

There's a ton more to this story, and it is rarely reported fairly. I expect Monsanto to do wonderful things in the future and while I hate their business practices, I have no fear of genetic engineering properly applied to the modification of agriculture. I know folks growing Monsanto's drought tolerant seed on a beta level in the Mojave. If they can modify that crop to produce with very little water in 115 degree heat, that's going to help a lot of hungry people who <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vN7ehccspao" target="_blank">Sam Kinnison used to yell at.</a>
Thanks. I didn't realize there was a lot of airborne cross pollenization going on. It does seem ridiculous that big agriculture could sue if the act of nature spread their seed to people who didn't "pay for them".
Alfalfa and soybeans are self pollinated. Hence the pretty little colored flowers to attract insects to do the job.

Corn is cross pollinated and seed companies will detassel sweet corn patches half a mile from their seed corn production fields.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I know of only two ways to control weeds, tillage or herbicides. (You can burn them but that doesn't do the crop much good)

With tillage the soil is loosened and the risk of wind and/or water erosion is greatly increased. Past generations would plow the field and the disc twice and harrow before planting. Then 1 or 2 rotary hoeings and 2 or 3 passes with a cultivator. The soil was constantly loosened from April until late June or early July.

Now it's either no-till or one pass with a field cultivator. Roundup and other non selective systemic herbicides have allowed this change. 1pt to 1 qt/ acre is used as a burn down and a second application is made a month to 6 weeks later to control the next flush of weeds.

Sometimes a half rate of a soil applied herbicide is mix with the first application to help control grass weeds and a broad leaf herbicide is added to the second.

What roundup has allowed the farmer to do is get better weed control while using less of the other herbicides. Also roundup, once it hits the soil is tightly bound to the soil particles and there is little chance of ground water contamination. Roundup also is one of the least toxic herbicides, it has the lowest warning level on it's label, you can buy the stuff at Wal-Mart.

Is it a carcinogen? I don't know, but I know it's safer than some of the other herbicides on the market. If it's a choice between soil erosion and roundup I'll take Roundup.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank You Monsanto for giving me food and a full plate of meat raised on those products ;)

No Monsanto Hate Here :no:

Just enjoying my food :no:

Ckev
Ignorance is bliss. Meanwhile, your taxes are higher thanks to environmental remediation of PCBs that Monsanto created. There are at least 20 people in the NY State environmental department alone whose jobs are to deal with PCB remediation. Each person costs the taxpayer about $100k a year in salary and benefits. Monsanto won't pay for the cleanup - it's up to the taxpayer. Fine upstanding corporation, Monsanto.
Hire some mexicans. Shotty cost control.
 
:goodposting: zeamax. I still think Monsanto is the devil for other things, but it is nice to see information on the other side.
I have no love for Monsanto. It's interesting that this environmental opposition tends to surface when patents expire as it has with RR soybeans. Believe the same thing happened with freon back when Dupont's patent was running out and surprise guess who had a replacement product. If this is incorrect on the freon I hope someone sets me straight.
 
the administration is parting the red sea of environmental protection laws to pave the way for mega corporations.

just like like they did for fracking.

 
Organic farmers and our food supply have a huge environmental hazard to contend with compliments of the U.S. government – chemtrails. Chemtrails are chemical or biological agents deliberately sprayed at high altitudes for purposes undisclosed to the general public in programs directed by various government officials. These sprays pollute the soil, water and air while compromising the health of humans, animals and plants. But wait – Monsanto has developed seeds that will weather the effect of the sprays, creating a tidy profit for the corporation while organics suffer.
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/chemtrails-killing-organic-crops-monsantos-gmo-seeds-thrive/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiQbdm88k4A

 
Anger over the "Monsanto Protection Act" is growing like an herbicide-resistant weed, fueled by news the rider was anonymously added to a U.S. budget bill in an apparent favor to biotech firms. The measure has made unlikely allies of Tea Party and environmental groups, inspired more than 250,000 people to sign a petition opposing it, and even prompted the head of the Senate Appropriations Committee to retroactively disavow it.
http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/politics/blogs/what-is-the-monsanto-protection-act

 
American farmers are feeling the effects of a concentrated seed industry. Seed options are diminishing while prices increase at historic rates. A new report by the Farmer to Farmer Campaign, Out of Hand: Farmers Face the Consequences of a Consolidated Seed Industry, uses industry sources, government data, and personal interviews with farmers and seed industry representatives to document the consequences of concentration in the seed industry.

http://farmertofarmercampaign.com/

 
The Center for Food Safety (CFS) is a national non-profit public interest and environmental advocacy organization working to protect human health and the environment by curbing the use of harmful food production technologies and by promoting organic and other forms of sustainable agriculture. CFS uses legal actions, groundbreaking scientific and policy reports, books and other educational materials, market pressure and grass roots campaigns through our True Food Network. CFS's successful legal cases collectively represent a landmark body of case law on food and agricultural issues.

http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/

 
Organic Seed Growers & Trade Association et al. v. Monsanto was filed in federal district court in Manhattan, NY, on March 29, 2011, on behalf of 60 family farmers, seed businesses and agricultural organizations and challenges Monsanto’s patents on genetically engineered (GE) seed. This landmark lawsuit also seeks Court protection for family farmers who, through no fault of their own, may have become contaminated by Monsanto’s patented GE seed and find themselves accused of patent infringement.

http://www.osgata.org/

 
After the incredible success of the grass-roots “March Against Monsanto” last Saturday, which saw over 2 million protesters in more than 50 countries worldwide, the march founders now plan to keep the momentum going by organizing more events to continue to educate the public on Monsanto and genetically modified foods.

http://www.march-against-monsanto.com/

 
Organic farmers and our food supply have a huge environmental hazard to contend with compliments of the U.S. government – chemtrails. Chemtrails are chemical or biological agents deliberately sprayed at high altitudes for purposes undisclosed to the general public in programs directed by various government officials. These sprays pollute the soil, water and air while compromising the health of humans, animals and plants. But wait – Monsanto has developed seeds that will weather the effect of the sprays, creating a tidy profit for the corporation while organics suffer.
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/chemtrails-killing-organic-crops-monsantos-gmo-seeds-thrive/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiQbdm88k4A
Relentlessly rising greenhouse-gas emissions, and the fear that the earth might enter a climate emergency from which there would be no return, have prompted many climate scientists to conclude that we urgently need a Plan B: geoengineering.

Geoengineering — the deliberate, large-scale intervention in the climate system to counter global warming or offset some of its effects — may enable humanity to mobilize its technological power to seize control of the planet’s climate system, and regulate it in perpetuity.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/27/opinion/geoengineering-our-last-hope-or-a-false-promise.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

 
American farmers are feeling the effects of a concentrated seed industry. Seed options are diminishing while prices increase at historic rates. A new report by the Farmer to Farmer Campaign, Out of Hand: Farmers Face the Consequences of a Consolidated Seed Industry, uses industry sources, government data, and personal interviews with farmers and seed industry representatives to document the consequences of concentration in the seed industry.

http://farmertofarmercampaign.com/
All the farmers I talk to are raving about the new seed options, I guess at 7.00 a bu corn and 14.00 bu beans you can afford to pay more if it yields more. I tell you now farmers are more worried about land prices 10,000 acre in sw MN then they are about seed costs.

 
grateful zed said:
Organic farmers and our food supply have a huge environmental hazard to contend with compliments of the U.S. government – chemtrails. Chemtrails are chemical or biological agents deliberately sprayed at high altitudes for purposes undisclosed to the general public in programs directed by various government officials. These sprays pollute the soil, water and air while compromising the health of humans, animals and plants. But wait – Monsanto has developed seeds that will weather the effect of the sprays, creating a tidy profit for the corporation while organics suffer.
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/chemtrails-killing-organic-crops-monsantos-gmo-seeds-thrive/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiQbdm88k4A
Relentlessly rising greenhouse-gas emissions, and the fear that the earth might enter a climate emergency from which there would be no return, have prompted many climate scientists to conclude that we urgently need a Plan B: geoengineering.

Geoengineering — the deliberate, large-scale intervention in the climate system to counter global warming or offset some of its effects — may enable humanity to mobilize its technological power to seize control of the planet’s climate system, and regulate it in perpetuity.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/27/opinion/geoengineering-our-last-hope-or-a-false-promise.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Yeah this sounds like a spectacularly bad idea. We don't even fully understand the system they are advocating we take control of.

 
One of the big issues I have with Monsanto is with their Roundup Ready seeds. You can buy the seed, grow it and harvest it at a considerable cost, and sell the seeds, but you can't plant those seeds that you have grown. Something just isn't right about that.
I don't have an issue with that aspect of it, I understand why they've positioned their patents that way. Farmers know going in that it's illegal to perpetuate it when they buy it. What really bothers me is the way it infiltrates other farmer's crops (contaminated farm equipment, blowing out during transportation, etc.) and once Monsanto has a positive sample they sue the living hell out of the innocent farmer. I wish instead of Monsanto being able to crush the farmers who were contaminated through no fault of their own that the farmers would be able to sue Monsanto for contamination. With each crop they genetically modify they've created a virus that will eventually (not if, but when) infiltrate every seed strain.

 
http://www.naturalcuresnotmedicine.com/2013/07/illinois-illegally-seizes-bees.html#pAeOR08K2tFhOUSR.99

Natural Cures Not Medicine on Facebook: www.facebook.com/naturalcuresnotmedicine

The Illinois Ag Dept. illegally seized privately owned bees from renowned naturalist, Terrence Ingram, without providing him with a search warrant and before the court hearing on the matter, reports Prairie Advocate News.

Behind the obvious violations of his Constitutional rights is Monsanto. Ingram was researching Roundup’s effects on bees, which he’s raised for 58 years. “They ruined 15 years of my research,” he told Prairie Advocate, by stealing most of his stock.

A certified letter from the Ag Dept.’s Apiary Inspection Supervisor, Steven D. Chard, stated:

“During a routine inspection of your honeybee colonies by … Inspectors Susan Kivikko and Eleanor Balson on October 23, 2011, the bacterial disease ‘American Foulbrood’ was detected in a number of colonies located behind your house…. Presence of the disease in some of your colonies was confirmed via test results from the USDA Bee Research Laboratory in Beltsville, Maryland that analyzed samples collected from your apiary….”

Ingram can prove his bees did not have foulbrood, and planned to do so at a hearing set in April, but the state seized his bees at the end of March. They have not returned them and no one at the Ag Dept. seems to know where his bees are.

The bees could have been destroyed, or they could have been turned over to Monsanto to ascertain why some of his bees are resistant to Roundup. Without the bees as evidence, Ingram simply cannot defend against the phony charges of foulbrood.

Worse, all his queens died after Kivikko and Balson “inspected” his property, outside of his presence and without a warrant.

Of note, Illinois beekeepers are going underground after Ingram’s experience and refuse to register their hives, in case the state tries to steal their private property on phony claims.

Read more at http://www.naturalcuresnotmedicine.com/2013/07/illinois-illegally-seizes-bees.html#FMYr7oUl7DLdJPAO.99

 
Organic farmers and our food supply have a huge environmental hazard to contend with compliments of the U.S. government – chemtrails. Chemtrails are chemical or biological agents deliberately sprayed at high altitudes for purposes undisclosed to the general public in programs directed by various government officials. These sprays pollute the soil, water and air while compromising the health of humans, animals and plants. But wait – Monsanto has developed seeds that will weather the effect of the sprays, creating a tidy profit for the corporation while organics suffer.
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/chemtrails-killing-organic-crops-monsantos-gmo-seeds-thrive/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiQbdm88k4A
Relentlessly rising greenhouse-gas emissions, and the fear that the earth might enter a climate emergency from which there would be no return, have prompted many climate scientists to conclude that we urgently need a Plan B: geoengineering.

Geoengineering — the deliberate, large-scale intervention in the climate system to counter global warming or offset some of its effects — may enable humanity to mobilize its technological power to seize control of the planet’s climate system, and regulate it in perpetuity.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/27/opinion/geoengineering-our-last-hope-or-a-false-promise.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Yeah this sounds like a spectacularly bad idea. We don't even fully understand the system they are advocating we take control of.
Lotsa Chicken Little up in there.

 
In Washington state they are trying to pass Initiative I522 to require labeling of GMOs.

Monsanto, Dow, Dupont, and Bayer are pouring in millions to fight it. However, I think it will pass.

 
Thousands took to streets across the world’s cities on Saturday to protest the use of GMO products, with Giant Monsanto being the main target. Over 50 countries have been taking part in the march for world food day, and across 47 different US states.

http://rt.com/news/monsanto-march-berlin-protest-115/
Have these people decided which couple billion people they want to die in exchange for no more GMOs?
Why do a couple of billion people need to die?

 
Thousands took to streets across the world’s cities on Saturday to protest the use of GMO products, with Giant Monsanto being the main target. Over 50 countries have been taking part in the march for world food day, and across 47 different US states.

http://rt.com/news/monsanto-march-berlin-protest-115/
Have these people decided which couple billion people they want to die in exchange for no more GMOs?
gmo have never been proven to increase yield, they just make someone money.

 
Thousands took to streets across the world’s cities on Saturday to protest the use of GMO products, with Giant Monsanto being the main target. Over 50 countries have been taking part in the march for world food day, and across 47 different US states.

http://rt.com/news/monsanto-march-berlin-protest-115/
Have these people decided which couple billion people they want to die in exchange for no more GMOs?
:bs:
Do some research on Norman Borlaug, my friend.

 
Thousands took to streets across the world’s cities on Saturday to protest the use of GMO products, with Giant Monsanto being the main target. Over 50 countries have been taking part in the march for world food day, and across 47 different US states.

http://rt.com/news/monsanto-march-berlin-protest-115/
Have these people decided which couple billion people they want to die in exchange for no more GMOs?
:bs:
Do some research on Norman Borlaug, my friend.
link?

 
Thousands took to streets across the world’s cities on Saturday to protest the use of GMO products, with Giant Monsanto being the main target. Over 50 countries have been taking part in the march for world food day, and across 47 different US states.

http://rt.com/news/monsanto-march-berlin-protest-115/
Have these people decided which couple billion people they want to die in exchange for no more GMOs?
:bs:
Do some research on Norman Borlaug, my friend.
Elaborate your point.

 
In Washington state they are trying to pass Initiative I522 to require labeling of GMOs.

Monsanto, Dow, Dupont, and Bayer are pouring in millions to fight it. However, I think it will pass.
omg, what has the world come too.
Its hard to find people against transparency in labeling. I understand why BigAg and chemical companies producing GMOs are against it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top