Rove!
Footballguy
The white people are probably more likely to do it by manipulating the system, so there's that...And there are some black people that want to steal my stuff. Probably some white people too.
The white people are probably more likely to do it by manipulating the system, so there's that...And there are some black people that want to steal my stuff. Probably some white people too.
I think we should lock up anyone who's not Norwegian/German/Swiss/French or Dutch/Hungarian/Irish - American.The white people are probably more likely to do it by manipulating the system, so there's that...
Thank you Andy.This is unequivocally true.
Come on guys, we're simply not going to kick people out or place them in an arbeitslager...err I mean internment camp...because of their race or creed.
Stop and think for a minute.
'where have you gone, Delano Roosevelt/our nation turns it's lonely eyes to you'I think we should lock up anyone who's not Norwegian/German/Swiss/French or Dutch/Hungarian/Irish - American.
says who?Sadly for Trumpkins doesn't look like this guy was mooslim.
Don't you live in Minnesota? How is locking up anyone who isn't white going to have any effect on you?I think we should lock up anyone who's not Norwegian/German/Swiss/French or Dutch/Hungarian/Irish - American.
Then maybe my wife and I can get some alone time.
Heard he was just a guy with a few priors, carry on. Elect trump and this will all stop overnight. My bad.says who?
I do disagree, but the issues raised (I think originally by Riversco last night and then defended by several others) were internment and mass deportation. Restricting immigration is also wrong IMO but not on the same level.IF we seriously discuss anything remotely close to internment camps then the America we want to protect won't exist anymore. We are and must be better than that. But changes to immigration? I don't see anything unAmerican about that at all. We can still be everything that the founding required us to be with an iron clad border and strict immigration rules. Whether or not we should do that is a policy question, not a fabric of our being question. To me. I know some disagree.
few priors or not, what does that have to do with him being a Muslim?Heard he was just a guy with a few priors, carry on. Elect trump and this will all stop overnight. My bad.
I was going to say that post IS the racial makeup of MN.Don't you live in Minnesota? How is locking up anyone who isn't white going to have any effect on you?
No, you misunderstand. They have to have that EXACT ethnic makeup. I expect my children of Norwegian/German/Swiss/French/Dutch/Hungarian/Irish-Americans to be world overlords someday.I was going to say that post IS the racial makeup of MN.
Although we got a lot of Somolian Muslims here. Whole neighborhoods very close to downtown would be wide open for new condos!!!
He yelled Allah Akbar and is from Tunisia which is 99% Sunni Muslims, where are you getting your info?Sadly for Trumpkins doesn't look like this guy was mooslim.
The Hungarian part probably prevents you from a high position in the Fourth Reich.No, you misunderstand. They have to have that EXACT ethnic makeup. I expect my children of Norwegian/German/Swiss/French/Dutch/Hungarian/Irish-Americans to be world overlords someday.
Once they unify "their" people I mean.
Well, that part is from my wife and it's pre-'44 Hungarian so I think we're probably in.The Hungarian part probably prevents you from a high position in the Fourth Reich.
The news implied that he was just a thug, not a mooslim.few priors or not, what does that have to do with him being a Muslim?
Sadly for Trumpkins doesn't look like this guy was mooslim.
Heard he was just a guy with a few priors, carry on. Elect trump and this will all stop overnight. My bad.
Someone has a fascination it seems.The news implied that he was just a thug, not a mooslim.
Now I patiently wait for people to call for muslim clerics to condemn this act strongly.
There is nothing wrong with restricting immigration. The purpose of a state of any configuration is the adminitration, in however the people want that administration, of the country as a whole. The logistics of administration include the movement of people. There is a reason why citizenship is important. There is a reason why there are rules about travel within a country such as speed limits, hazardous materials transport and the myriad of other rules and regulations that must be followed for travel. Allowing free unfettered access to our systems and institutions creates administrative nightmares. When you couple that with the very real problem of culture clashes and the inability of local areas to absorb influxes of people, the basic societal structure can get damaged.I do disagree, but the issues raised (I think originally by Riversco last night and then defended by several others) were internment and mass deportation. Restricting immigration is also wrong IMO but not on the same level.
So your attitude on this issue is instead of trying to find the correct solution, we need to focus on being politically correct & defining american vs unamerican actions. That attitude is a great way to get the public so fed up that they elect the first radical candidate they get.Shamrock it's not a question of like or dislike. I honestly think deportation and/or internment of Muslims is unamerican. It's just wrong.
Clearly true. White western Christian powers have oppressed and killed Muslims for half a millenia. The nra has made weapons of death more available than books for those disillusioned with their unjust place in life to get.[Obama]Clearly, this is the fault of white, racist, Christian, NRA member, police officers.[/Obama]
Same as day one guy.Just heard about this, come on here and ...
we are talking about internment camps??? Really?
I think we must do both. We need to find better solutions to this issue (I don't think there is one "correct" solution) and at the same time we need to remember who we are.So your attitude on this issue is instead of trying to find the correct solution, we need to focus on being politically correct & defining american vs unamerican actions. That attitude is a great way to get the public so fed up that they elect the first radical candidate they get.
I disagree for pretty much the same reasons, my post was just Ameri-centric. And I'm really beginning to wonder at this point if France isn't ready to explode into what amounts to a cultural civil war because of this.Sorry Yankee, I should have clarified- I meant that restricting immigration from Misdle Eastern countries as a reaction to terrorism is IMO wrong.
Who do you suggest we deport?The fight you are fighting Tim, avoiding deportation, might have already been lost at this point.
This is why we should not restrict immigration from Muslim Nations so we can join in this cultural civil war.I disagree for pretty much the same reasons, my post was just Ameri-centric. And I'm really beginning to wonder at this point if France isn't ready to explode into what amounts to a cultural civil war because of this.
I'm not sure what you're expecting from me. I will NEVER support mass deportations. I will NEVER support any candidate who promotes mass deportation. If Hillary Clinton came out for this tomorrow I would end my support for her a minute later. That's it. Period.Tim, we might be faced with 2 options here:
1. a moderate candidate concedes that the current situation just doesn't work and has to deport people.
2. no moderates step forward with anything that solves the problem, and a radical gets elected. This radical goes WAY BEYOND deporting people and make a whole lot of ugly changes.
Those might actually be the only two options we get here.
I don't want to deport anyone, nor am I smart enough to make those decisions. But realistically, it may now be too late to prevent it.Who do you suggest we deport?
So you'd be ok with helping someone get elected that supports not just mass deportations, but internment camps and scarlet letters before you'd give a little on the issue? That just doesn't make sense to me.I'm not sure what you're expecting from me. I will NEVER support mass deportations. I will NEVER support any candidate who promotes mass deportation. If Hillary Clinton came out for this tomorrow I would end my support for her a minute later. That's it. Period.
Mass deportations are technically considered a cruel and inhuman crime against humanity in the UN charter. The combination of northern Europe pushing back, Brexit, the moron that GOP is going to nominate here and the growing unrest in France is going to ultimately crush the UN on itself if this keep moving in that direction. This is why after Brexit I posted about my concerns about NATO and to Hillary Clinton's credit last night she specifically talked about needing NATO to work together to deal with this "problem."I don't want to deport anyone, nor am I smart enough to make those decisions. But realistically, it may now be too late to prevent it.
I understand it's tempting to want to get rid of these kind of people, but we can rise above our basest temptations and protect their first amendment freedoms.I don't want to deport anyone, nor am I smart enough to make those decisions. But realistically, it may now be too late to prevent it.
Say what?So you'd be ok with helping someone get elected that supports not just mass deportations, but internment camps and scarlet letters before you'd give a little on the issue? That just doesn't make sense to me.
What is the point of posts like this? And others saying ban trucks or bringing up libs will try to make this about gungun control?[Obama]Clearly, this is the fault of white, racist, Christian, NRA member, police officers.[/Obama]
To be clear.Say what?
Not sure how I could be more clear about this...
I don't think so.To be clear.
Opposition to deportations (at this point) CAN lead to something MUCH worse. Electing Le Pen. You have to look a couple moves ahead.
So, accept deportations, because something worse might come?
No thanks.
Plus wasnt this guy a French Citizen pretty much making this argument null and voidSo, accept deportations, because something worse might come?
No thanks.
Good post but impossible.You could deport but its a waste of time
If you want a sea change, you need to really get a core of what ideaology is forging this stuff.
Whats very disconcerting to me with the past handful of attacks and I'm including Orlando, is that these attackers had seemingly stable family lives and jobs. That should be be purpose enough in this life. I get how you get a 16 year old kid with no prospects and all the testosterone to do this stuff.
I DO NOT get how you get men with families in their late 20s/30s on board.
Someone, or more than one, is filling their heads with some pretty sweet nothings to get them to throw their existence away for such nonsense.
Our focus needs to be breaking up or altering that message
No.So, accept deportations, because something worse might come?
No thanks.
And I supported it yesterday and I support it even more today. That was easy.I'm not sure what you're expecting from me. I will NEVER support mass deportations. I will NEVER support any candidate who promotes mass deportation. If Hillary Clinton came out for this tomorrow I would end my support for her a minute later. That's it. Period.
Im not a Clinton supporter.This runs counter to almost all Clinton supporter's views right now...