LHUCKS
Footballguy
from game to game, not year to yearI disagree on Schaub. He's inconsistent??? Hasn't he finished top 8 for the last two years?
from game to game, not year to yearI disagree on Schaub. He's inconsistent??? Hasn't he finished top 8 for the last two years?
Finley was on pace for 1200 yards after four games last year...not sure why everybody is afraid of him a. He's ranked anywhere from 4-6 on average and his ADP is beyond the 6th round.I don't get the Finley hate.QB-VickRB-Cant think of anyoneWR-NicksTE-Finley
It isn't hate. I love his upside but 4 games is an awfully small sample size to be prorating and there are plenty of weapons for Rodgers to find in GB. I think he will have a good year but of the top TEs I think he has the ability to bust more than the others.Finley was on pace for 1200 yards after four games last year...not sure why everybody is afraid of him a. He's ranked anywhere from 4-6 on average and his ADP is beyond the 6th round.I don't get the Finley hate.QB-VickRB-Cant think of anyoneWR-NicksTE-Finley
Love Nicks...it wouldn't shock me if he was the #1 WR this year...guy is a beast.Here's my list...QB - Manning (Still a great QB but with the neck issues and his age he's due for a slight dropoff. He may still crack the top 5 but he's no lock to do soRB - Turner - Looked slow the 2nd half of last year. I just don't see the burst with him anymore.WR - Larry Fitzgerald - love that talent but not the team. I really think the Eagles pulled a fast one on the Cards and somehow convinced them Kolb is a legit NFL QB. Not impressed with him at all and because of that Fitz suffers.TE - Vernon Davis - Like Fitz...love the talent but hate the QB situation.QB-VickRB-Cant think of anyoneWR-NicksTE-Finley
I don't have a problem with the reasoning for these, but Fitz will likely have a better QB situation. The question is how much better. It will be interesting to see his ADP going forward.Love Nicks...it wouldn't shock me if he was the #1 WR this year...guy is a beast.Here's my list...QB - Manning (Still a great QB but with the neck issues and his age he's due for a slight dropoff. He may still crack the top 5 but he's no lock to do soRB - Turner - Looked slow the 2nd half of last year. I just don't see the burst with him anymore.WR - Larry Fitzgerald - love that talent but not the team. I really think the Eagles pulled a fast one on the Cards and somehow convinced them Kolb is a legit NFL QB. Not impressed with him at all and because of that Fitz suffers.TE - Vernon Davis - Like Fitz...love the talent but hate the QB situation.QB-VickRB-Cant think of anyoneWR-NicksTE-Finley
...to me both White and Witten are pretty much guaranteed to not be duds. I don't think either of these guys are ones that will win you a league, but I think they are both good pieces that are locks to not totally kill you (as I see possible with Schaub and Charles). I would not take White as the 2nd WR off the board nor would I take Witten as the 1st or 2nd TE off the board (so I agree they are overvalued) but I think they are both very safe picks to not be duds.For me on the WR side that I think that most overvalued of the top group is Jennings as was noted before. For TE, I have a tough time picking apart any of the top 5 (Gates, Clark, Witten, Finley, Davis) as being overvalued, but I suppose based on where I have seen them drafted I would say Gates is the one I would consider the most overvalued, only because he is getting older, Jackson should take some of those targets away and I have this fear of injury due to the last half of last year. That said, he was on such a tremendous pace early last year that I don't blame people for jumping early, I am just not willing to do so.I don't know why all the fantasy sites and/or magazines are afraid of doing this analysis...avoiding duds in the early rounds is a key to winning your league.
I can get on board with that...I agree that White and Witten have relatively high floors...my problem with respect to their rankings is their ceiling....to me both White and Witten are pretty much guaranteed to not be duds. I don't think either of these guys are ones that will win you a league, but I think they are both good pieces that are locks to not totally kill you (as I see possible with Schaub and Charles). I would not take White as the 2nd WR off the board nor would I take Witten as the 1st or 2nd TE off the board (so I agree they are overvalued) but I think they are both very safe picks to not be duds.
I started a thread exposing Jennings several months ago, so we're on the same page there. Gates, when healthy, is the best FF TE and there isn't really a close second IMHO...just depends on your risk appetite regarding him.For me on the WR side that I think that most overvalued of the top group is Jennings as was noted before. For TE, I have a tough time picking apart any of the top 5 (Gates, Clark, Witten, Finley, Davis) as being overvalued, but I suppose based on where I have seen them drafted I would say Gates is the one I would consider the most overvalued, only because he is getting older, Jackson should take some of those targets away and I have this fear of injury due to the last half of last year. That said, he was on such a tremendous pace early last year that I don't blame people for jumping early, I am just not willing to do so. So Jennings and Gates to replace White and Witten for me.
Hmmm...Well, there's several seeds of doubt. First, MJD's self admission that his knee still isn't completely right. He checked in with the media *I think* a couple of weeks ago and proclaimed himself 85% healthy.Second, the presence of a back-up (Jennings) who looked plenty capable in limited time last year. Del Rio and staff would be less inclined to keep pounding Jones-Drew if Jennings picks up where he left off. Third, the potential of Gabbert seeing time and floundering as most rookie QB's do. Nothing would derail MJD (and Jennings for that matter) faster than struggles in the passing game. Best case scenario, MJD heals up - tears off another 280 carries and life is good. But the above are more ifs than you should be able to find in a round 1 RB.the second time I've seen MJD.What am I missing here?QB - Peyton ManningRB - Maurice Jones-DrewWR - DeSean JacksonTE - Marcedes LewisCount me among those that think Schaub is actually solid value this year. These things tend to have an ebb and flow to them and as defenses account more heavily for Foster I think that bodes well for the passing game. Don't underestimate the healthy return of Owen Daniels.
Winslow has more pure talent and less competition for targets IMHO. Winslow has averaged 14 games in the last three years, Daniels has averaged 11...11 is a very low number.I don't have a huge problem with Daniels, he has shown spurts of upside that can't be ignored...the end of last season was encouraging.Hucks why so down on Daniels due to to injury history but so high on Winslow who also has a history of injuries?
Chris Johnson is the exception, not the rule.Charles: You use Chris Johnson as a comparison...um, after his electrifying rookie year, he went for 2k yards...and then he followed that up with 1300 yards and a top 5 RB finish. Look, if you're going to be that strict on overrated and say that CJ4.24 at #1 last season was overrated based on his finish at RB5, then ok. But if my #1 overall pick finishes with close to 100 VBD and is a top 5 guy, then I'm 100% ok with that.Charles isn't built like an everydown back - ok. So what? He doesn't need to be. If he can just do something similar to last season, I;d be ok with taking him #1 overall, and getting him 4th is great. If my first round pick finishes with a really solid season and is, say, in the top 8 at his position...then I call that a win. He doesn't need to finish #4 overall to justify a #4 ranking.
I didn't use him as a comparison. You did. Way to ignore the rest of the post. That's what we've come to expect from you I suppose...Chris Johnson is the exception, not the rule.Charles: You use Chris Johnson as a comparison...um, after his electrifying rookie year, he went for 2k yards...and then he followed that up with 1300 yards and a top 5 RB finish. Look, if you're going to be that strict on overrated and say that CJ4.24 at #1 last season was overrated based on his finish at RB5, then ok. But if my #1 overall pick finishes with close to 100 VBD and is a top 5 guy, then I'm 100% ok with that.Charles isn't built like an everydown back - ok. So what? He doesn't need to be. If he can just do something similar to last season, I;d be ok with taking him #1 overall, and getting him 4th is great. If my first round pick finishes with a really solid season and is, say, in the top 8 at his position...then I call that a win. He doesn't need to finish #4 overall to justify a #4 ranking.
I didn't use him as a comparison. You did. Way to ignore the rest of the post. That's what we've come to expect from you I suppose...Chris Johnson is the exception, not the rule.Charles: You use Chris Johnson as a comparison...um, after his electrifying rookie year, he went for 2k yards...and then he followed that up with 1300 yards and a top 5 RB finish. Look, if you're going to be that strict on overrated and say that CJ4.24 at #1 last season was overrated based on his finish at RB5, then ok. But if my #1 overall pick finishes with close to 100 VBD and is a top 5 guy, then I'm 100% ok with that.Charles isn't built like an everydown back - ok. So what? He doesn't need to be. If he can just do something similar to last season, I;d be ok with taking him #1 overall, and getting him 4th is great. If my first round pick finishes with a really solid season and is, say, in the top 8 at his position...then I call that a win. He doesn't need to finish #4 overall to justify a #4 ranking.
Well I'm not sure. Typically when somebody picks apart every aspect of your assertion one would respond with some time of rebuff that would re-assert the premises and back it up with evidence. Then again...I suppose your SOP is to blow off the response with "wit" (or lack thereof) and a sarcastic response. Lol. For instance, here was YOUR QUOTE regarding Charles:I didn't use him as a comparison. You did. Way to ignore the rest of the post. That's what we've come to expect from you I suppose...Chris Johnson is the exception, not the rule.Charles: You use Chris Johnson as a comparison...um, after his electrifying rookie year, he went for 2k yards...and then he followed that up with 1300 yards and a top 5 RB finish. Look, if you're going to be that strict on overrated and say that CJ4.24 at #1 last season was overrated based on his finish at RB5, then ok. But if my #1 overall pick finishes with close to 100 VBD and is a top 5 guy, then I'm 100% ok with that.
Charles isn't built like an everydown back - ok. So what? He doesn't need to be. If he can just do something similar to last season, I'd be ok with taking him #1 overall, and getting him 4th is great. If my first round pick finishes with a really solid season and is, say, in the top 8 at his position...then I call that a win. He doesn't need to finish #4 overall to justify a #4 ranking.What part of your post would you like me to address...I'm busy spotting value right now.
"Defenses will get better at gameplanning (see Chris Johnson)."To which I wondered where exactly defenses got better at gameplanning against Chris Johnson: After his 1200 yard rookie season, when he set the NFL single season record for yards from scrimmage? Or after that season when he once again went over 1600 total yards from scrimmage? To which I asserted that if defenses managed to gameplan better for Charles just like they did with Johnson (who you brought up as the comparison) then Charles would be a great pick at 4th overall.RB - Jamaal Charles - Ranked as high as #4 = Fool's Gold. He's an electrifying, flashy runner with a high YPC. What's not to like? As a result he's ranked as high as #4 in some rankings. Fools Gold. A) He's not built like an everydown back. B) Tougher Schedule C) Defenses will get better at gameplanning(see Chris Johnson). I'm not saying he wont finish top 10, I'm saying he's overvalued right now.
Simplistic reasoning.WR- Jennings - If you look at last season he only started to step up once Finley went down, i expect that to be the same this season, jennings will have a solid season I just have him outside the top 10 wr
His YPC saw a dramatic decrease(down to 4.3), I think anybody who actually watches football observed that defenses did a better job containing Johnson.I'm done responding to your posts. I don't appreciate your tone."Defenses will get better at gameplanning (see Chris Johnson)."To which I wondered where exactly defenses got better at gameplanning against Chris Johnson: After his 1200 yard rookie season, when he set the NFL single season record for yards from scrimmage? Or after that season when he once again went over 1600 total yards from scrimmage? To which I asserted that if defenses managed to gameplan better for Charles just like they did with Johnson (who you brought up as the comparison) then Charles would be a great pick at 4th overall.Edit: Oh yeah, I forgot...![]()
This is asinine. Peterson have proven he's probably the best running back in the NFL and he's going into a contract year. Is he holding out? No, he's going to play and dominate. So they have less help at receiver this year? They have a better QB and if you watched Vikings games last year you'd see that Peterson did fine against 8 man fronts. He'll be top 2, I think he will be #1.'Gamblin said:RB: Adrian Peterson - He's being drafted 1st or 2nd off the board in most drafts. 99.9% chance he doesn't finish the year that high.
Like the way you spotted Matt Leinart? Don't get me wrong it's a good thread topic, but the way you act all pretentious and narcissistic is disgusting.'LHUCKS said:'Instinctive said:I didn't use him as a comparison. You did. Way to ignore the rest of the post. That's what we've come to expect from you I suppose...'LHUCKS said:Chris Johnson is the exception, not the rule.'Instinctive said:Charles: You use Chris Johnson as a comparison...um, after his electrifying rookie year, he went for 2k yards...and then he followed that up with 1300 yards and a top 5 RB finish. Look, if you're going to be that strict on overrated and say that CJ4.24 at #1 last season was overrated based on his finish at RB5, then ok. But if my #1 overall pick finishes with close to 100 VBD and is a top 5 guy, then I'm 100% ok with that.
Charles isn't built like an everydown back - ok. So what? He doesn't need to be. If he can just do something similar to last season, I;d be ok with taking him #1 overall, and getting him 4th is great. If my first round pick finishes with a really solid season and is, say, in the top 8 at his position...then I call that a win. He doesn't need to finish #4 overall to justify a #4 ranking.What part of your post would you like me to address...I'm busy spotting value right now.
Let it all out big fella.Why are you hiding behind an alias?Don't get me wrong it's a good thread topic, but the way you act all pretentious and narcissistic is disgusting.
I think Peyton sees a dropoff this year. I've seen LeSean McCoy going top 5 in some drafts. That's crazy high for standard or PPR. I would probably agree with Jennings due to the SB hype. And I don't know TE's well enough because my league treats TE's like WR's. Good topic, btw.'eakfootball said:I would say
QB: Peyton
RB: Nobody
WR: Jennings
TE: Gates if he goes in the early 3rd like I've been seeing. Too injury prone to go that high.
I realize some of you have something against LHUCKS, I haven't been around long enough to have as much of a grudge(Even though I will always completely disagree with him about Greg Jennings'LHUCKS said:These threads always get "sharks" panties in a bunch because nobody likes to hear that their dynasty roster has an overvalued player.
Quite frankly there isn't enough talk about overrated players on this board...sometimes it seems everybody is trying to win a popularity contest, staff included.
So here is what you need to hear, although you may not like to hear it...my most overvalued TOP players in 2011 for redraft.
QB - Matt Schaub - guy is terribly inconsistent and unpredictable so his overall numbers are always misleading. Further he is ranked after the big 7, where there could be a huge dropoff in production IMHO. Not a horrible pick, but you can get similar value a few rounds later.
RB - Jamaal Charles - Ranked as high as #4 = Fool's Gold. He's an electrifying, flashy runner with a high YPC. What's not to like? As a result he's ranked as high as #4 in some rankings. Fools Gold. A) He's not built like an everydown back. B) Tougher Schedule C) Defenses will get better at gameplanning(see Chris Johnson). I'm not saying he wont finish top 10, I'm saying he's overvalued right now.
WR - Roddy White - ranked as high as #2, Roddy is not the redzone threat that others like Nicks/Fitz/Megatron/AJ etc. etc. are. Better in PPR leagues, but still overvalued due to limited TD ceiling. An easy pick as the most overvalued fantasy WR
TE - Jason Witten - ranked as high as #2 in some rankings, Romo has a lot of mouths to feed. The emergence of Bryant as a redzone threat doesn't help either. That being said, this call has more to do with the quality of TE depth this year...guys like Winslow, Finley, Davis, Miller, Graham are decent threats to match his production. Overvalued city here. Wait on TE this year.
I have more but these are my top overvalued guys based on ADP and rankings.
I don't know why all the fantasy sites and/or magazines are afraid of doing this analysis...avoiding duds in the early rounds is a key to winning your league.
'LHUCKS said:show me just one thread you've started in the last year that better helps people win their leagues?Just one, chief.I didn't think so.'Instinctive said:Why do we let LHUCKS out of the FFA and into the SP?
Let it all out big fella.Why are you hiding behind an alias?Don't get me wrong it's a good thread topic, but the way you act all pretentious and narcissistic is disgusting.
LHUCKSnice topic, I agree with the majority of the players you've mentioned,but can't get behind your analysis of Witten..of those other TE's you've mentioned, sure, each 'can' be the top TE in football, but none of them have been yet...Witten , year in and year out, produces top 5 TE numbers..he has 81+ receptions in 5 of his 8 NFL seasons.in 3 of the last 4 seasons, Witten has caught 94 or more passes, had three 1,000 yard seasons, and avg'd over 11 yards per reception..ok sure he's not a TD magnet, but neither is Winslow, who through 6 NFL seasons in which he's actually played, has recorded 21 total TDs, never scoring more that 5 TDs in a given season.in only two of his 6 NFL seasons in which he actually played, has Winslow caught more than 80 balls..he avg's 71 recs, 804 yards, 4.2 TDs/yr (if we dismiss his 5 recs in 2004 and count full seasons only..)he also missed the entire 2005 season and 6 games in 2008.one thing you can't put a price on is that Witten never misses a game, and you can't say that about Winslow, Finley,Clark, Gates, etc..every year we hear the same old line about Witten - too many mouths to feed in Dallas, Dez, Austin, etc - and yet seemingly every year (especially 3 of last 4 seasons) Witten records 90+ recs,1000+ yards, and roughly 5 TDs..so how exactly does he actually record his best season as a pro on a team with a backup QB( Kitna) and with emerging 'stars' like Dez and Austin? your points about the other TE's would work if, and only if, they actually played full 16 game schedules ( even Clark has problems staying healthy and is one hit away from yet another concussion)based on his reliability he deserves to be the #1 TE in FF..'LHUCKS said:so you really don't disagree with any except for Witten.'johnb said:based on where they are being drafted, i would agree with charles and roddy compared to where i think they'll end. i'd rather a few others guys a few spots later.i don't agree on witten. if he and romo are healthy, i think he has as good as shot as any to be right up there at end of the year.schaub seems to be drafted about where i think he should go. i might lean towards agreeing, but he's not going in the tier of rivers/romo, and i can't really argue if someone prefers him over ben/flacco/eli/etc.Regarding Witten, is he a slam dunk to finish substantially higher than the other TEs I mentioned? I would argue no. His ADP is unjustified given the quality TE depth this year.
Can only agree with Gore and Desean.I think Fitz and S Jax are the most undervalued with MJD not far behind. All 3 are slipping to Rd 2 at least and all 3 could easily finish #1 at their position in 2011'argamath said:RB Steven Jackson, Maurice Jones-Drew, Frank GoreWR Andre Johnson, Larry Fitzgerald, DeSean Jackson
he certainly has more risk than Rodgers (injury risk) but his upside is also greater. Just depends on your strategy. Although with Rodgers concussion issues he may be a hit away from a long term injury as well. With Vick though I think you do need to grab a decent backup or cuff with VY (although I'm taking a wait and see approach here to see how he picks up the offense).'LHUCKS said:I almost said Vick...he's got his fair share of risk. I don't like him going before Rodgers.'PizzaDeliveryGuy said:QB- I think Schaub is absolute value going off the board 8th. I think Vick could wind up being the most overvalued.
Agree on Schaub. Foster seriously eats into Schaub's TD potential. Still a solid QB, but I would rather wait a little for Freeman or Bradford.Disagree on Charles. He could be the #1RB at the end of the year. Good chance at 2000 all purpose yards. Harder schedule could make Charles have to catch more passes, so he could catch 60+ passes this year. Well worth the #4 overall pick.'LHUCKS said:These threads always get "sharks" panties in a bunch because nobody likes to hear that their dynasty roster has an overvalued player.
Quite frankly there isn't enough talk about overrated players on this board...sometimes it seems everybody is trying to win a popularity contest, staff included.
So here is what you need to hear, although you may not like to hear it...my most overvalued TOP players in 2011 for redraft.
QB - Matt Schaub - guy is terribly inconsistent and unpredictable so his overall numbers are always misleading. Further he is ranked after the big 7, where there could be a huge dropoff in production IMHO. Not a horrible pick, but you can get similar value a few rounds later.
RB - Jamaal Charles - Ranked as high as #4 = Fool's Gold. He's an electrifying, flashy runner with a high YPC. What's not to like? As a result he's ranked as high as #4 in some rankings. Fools Gold. A) He's not built like an everydown back. B) Tougher Schedule C) Defenses will get better at gameplanning(see Chris Johnson). I'm not saying he wont finish top 10, I'm saying he's overvalued right now.
WR - Roddy White - ranked as high as #2, Roddy is not the redzone threat that others like Nicks/Fitz/Megatron/AJ etc. etc. are. Better in PPR leagues, but still overvalued due to limited TD ceiling. An easy pick as the most overvalued fantasy WR
TE - Jason Witten - ranked as high as #2 in some rankings, Romo has a lot of mouths to feed. The emergence of Bryant as a redzone threat doesn't help either. That being said, this call has more to do with the quality of TE depth this year...guys like Winslow, Finley, Davis, Miller, Graham are decent threats to match his production. Overvalued city here. Wait on TE this year.
I have more but these are my top overvalued guys based on ADP and rankings.
I don't know why all the fantasy sites and/or magazines are afraid of doing this analysis...avoiding duds in the early rounds is a key to winning your league.
Four games is more than enough to ignore a careers worth of work. Just ask lhuckSTER.'PizzaDeliveryGuy said:It isn't hate. I love his upside but 4 games is an awfully small sample size to be prorating and there are plenty of weapons for Rodgers to find in GB. I think he will have a good year but of the top TEs I think he has the ability to bust more than the others.'LHUCKS said:Finley was on pace for 1200 yards after four games last year...not sure why everybody is afraid of him a. He's ranked anywhere from 4-6 on average and his ADP is beyond the 6th round.I don't get the Finley hate.'Bankerguy said:QB-VickRB-Cant think of anyoneWR-NicksTE-Finley
nice post I share similiar feelings on those guys........1. Ryan: I would lve to have Ryan QB'ing my NFL team, but not my fantasy team....have a feeling Ben, Stafford, Bradford, Eli, and even the likes of Freeman and Cutler to outproduce him fantasy wise....will be looking to team one of those guys up with Tebow....seeing Ryan go before Ben is surprising...2. Charles: Die hard KC fan here but I think it is going to be a long year for all KC offensive players....that schedule is brutal....and this discussion is talking about redraft, so with that in mind, KC schedule weeks 11-15 is not friendly when you are looking at ending your season and starting your playoffs.....I think Charles may be one of the top 3 RB's in the league, but I do not think he will be a guy that will help you win your league this year....Cassel is a below average QB IMO and scares nobody....a decline by him and Bowe could clog things up for Charles..3. Bowe: see above....I will be very happy to see other owners chasing last years stats....4. TE: don't feel strongly about anyone here although I do think Gates is risky as hiogh as he is going and I would rather wait and snag Graham....I think Gore, McFad, and Turner will underperform their draft position, while Rice and Mendy with their schedules will out perform their drafts spots....I also think Hillis isn't being given enough credit nor S Jax....Some of my other thoughts:1) QB - Matt Ryan - like him as an NFL QB, but he's overrated in fantasy. I see ATL leaning on Turner for one more year while Turner still has some left in the tank. There could be some growing pains between Ryan and Julio Jones. I would rather form a QBBC with a couple of Freeman/Flacco/Cutler/Stafford/Bradford than to rely on Ryan as my everyweek starter.2) RB - MJD - too much injury risk, JAX passing game appears to be in disarray, I don't see the days when MJD was a lock for 13+ TDs. Buyer beware there3) WR - Agree with many regarding DeSean Jackson. Just doesn't catch enough passes for me to rely on him as my WR1. I wouldn't be shocked if Maclin outperformed him. Also you can almost be certain that Vick will miss some time during the year.....4) TE - Dallas Clark - Tamme showed that he can contribute at TE, so I would think that IND will be cautious with Clark so that he stays healthy throughout the year. Tamme should eat into his production enough to make Clark overvalued as a top TE coming off the board.
Not to sink to LHUCKS level...but my response to that post linked multiple threads which were significantly less full of shtick and actually included analysis and statistics - started by me. He simply chose to ignore them...'LHUCKS said:show me just one thread you've started in the last year that better helps people win their leagues?Just one, chief.I didn't think so.'Instinctive said:Why do we let LHUCKS out of the FFA and into the SP?![]()
![]()
![]()
'Instinctive said:Well I'm not sure. Typically when somebody picks apart every aspect of your assertion one would respond with some time of rebuff that would re-assert the premises and back it up with evidence. Then again...I suppose your SOP is to blow off the response with "wit" (or lack thereof) and a sarcastic response. Lol. For instance, here was YOUR QUOTE regarding Charles:'LHUCKS said:![]()
What part of your post would you like me to address...I'm busy spotting value right now.
Hmm.....looks like exactly what I said would happen, no?'LHUCKS said:I'm done responding to your posts. I don't appreciate your tone.'Instinctive said:"Defenses will get better at gameplanning (see Chris Johnson)."
To which I wondered where exactly defenses got better at gameplanning against Chris Johnson: After his 1200 yard rookie season, when he set the NFL single season record for yards from scrimmage? Or after that season when he once again went over 1600 total yards from scrimmage? To which I asserted that if defenses managed to gameplan better for Charles just like they did with Johnson (who you brought up as the comparison) then Charles would be a great pick at 4th overall.
Edit: Oh yeah, I forgot...![]()
'Instinctive said:Well I'm not sure. Typically when somebody picks apart every aspect of your assertion one would respond with some time of rebuff that would re-assert the premises and back it up with evidence. Then again...I suppose your SOP is to blow off the response with "wit" (or lack thereof) and a sarcastic response. Lol. For instance, here was YOUR QUOTE regarding Charles:
Like the way you spotted Matt Leinart? Don't get me wrong it's a good thread topic, but the way you act all pretentious and narcissistic is disgusting.'LHUCKS said:![]()
What part of your post would you like me to address...I'm busy spotting value right now.
A thread laced with d-bagery like this pops up by Lhucks every single season and it's mostly wrong by the end of the season. You have to give him credit for making people think about things like this, but think for yourself and DO NOT TAKE HIS ADVICE AT FACE VALUE! Just look up his big thread last season.
For instance he cites Roddy White because, "WR - Roddy White - ranked as high as #2, Roddy is not the redzone threat that others like Nicks/Fitz/Megatron/AJ etc. etc. are. Better in PPR leagues, but still overvalued due to limited TD ceiling. An easy pick as the most overvalued fantasy WR"
That entire piece of information is factually wrong. Roddy White is a red-zone BEAST. Only three WRs had more red-zone targets than Roddy: Danny Amendola(24), Larry Fitzgerald(24), and Lance Moore(22). Larry Fitz scored on 20.8% of those targets while Roddy scored on 23.8% of those targets. If anything Roddy will be WORSE in PPR leagues IF you feel Julio will have that big of an impact. Last season White had the highest percentage of total team targets among WRs at 31%, and he he still managed to convert 64.2% of those targets(the best among at least the top ten of guys that had the highest percentage of total team targets). If Anything having another player to take attention away from White will result in a fewer targets and receptions, but I feel his YPC avg will come back up.
(DISCLAIMER!: The one rub is that these stats don't take into account what was catchable or not and who's fault it was for the lack of conversion. If anyone can find better stats please post them.)
Then LHUCKS agrees with this pile of trash posted by Gamblin'man, "RB: Adrian Peterson - He's being drafted 1st or 2nd off the board in most drafts. 99.9% chance he doesn't finish the year that high. The O-line is getting old and declining. They have no vertical threat and probably boast the worst starting outside WRs in the NFL. This means every week this year he will see the box stacked solely to stop him. He's being drafted much to high on name recognition.
Most of that analysis is not grounded in reality. All Day has been one of the most consistent RBs in his time in the league. I think he has a higher chance at finishing at or very near his ADP than any other RB in the top 5. Last year most of the o-line played all or most of the season with very bad injuries and it showed with the lack of experienced depth we had. Loosing Sully in preseason really hurt any continuity the unit had. Hutch is getting older(33) along with McKinnie(31), however Loadholt(25) and Sullivan(25) needed to just stay healthy and not regress. They did neither, but they do have talent. We had less of a vertical threat last season and teams have been stacking the box since AD entered the league yet he continues to be one of the very best among his peers.
Last season proves that he can play on a garbage team and not have his typical burst and still be a stud.
Hmm...SOP again?Let it all out big fella.
Why are you hiding behind an alias?
'Instinctive said:Well I'm not sure. Typically when somebody picks apart every aspect of your assertion one would respond with some time of rebuff that would re-assert the premises and back it up with evidence. Then again...I suppose your SOP is to blow off the response with "wit" (or lack thereof) and a sarcastic response. Lol. For instance, here was YOUR QUOTE regarding Charles:
LHUCKS threads are the best. I appreciate his ability to get everyone into the discussion with passion.
What I am seeing is that the WRs with ADPs between WR8-13 (Wallace, Austin, VJackson, Bowe, DJackson, Welker) are getting some votes as to most overvalued. You can make an argument for each one of these guys as overvalued. Each one of these guys has some risk and I would not be really happy with any of them as my WR1. Out of these guys, I like VJax the best.I think it's imperative to get one of the top 7WRs this year to anchor your WRs.
Witten's last two years with Romo2009 - 1030 yards 2 TDs2010 - 900 yards 3-4 TDs (extrapolated full season using first six weeks when Romo played)LHUCKSnice topic, I agree with the majority of the players you've mentioned,but can't get behind your analysis of Witten..of those other TE's you've mentioned, sure, each 'can' be the top TE in football, but none of them have been yet...Witten , year in and year out, produces top 5 TE numbers..he has 81+ receptions in 5 of his 8 NFL seasons.in 3 of the last 4 seasons, Witten has caught 94 or more passes, had three 1,000 yard seasons, and avg'd over 11 yards per reception..ok sure he's not a TD magnet, but neither is Winslow, who through 6 NFL seasons in which he's actually played, has recorded 21 total TDs, never scoring more that 5 TDs in a given season.in only two of his 6 NFL seasons in which he actually played, has Winslow caught more than 80 balls..he avg's 71 recs, 804 yards, 4.2 TDs/yr (if we dismiss his 5 recs in 2004 and count full seasons only..)he also missed the entire 2005 season and 6 games in 2008.one thing you can't put a price on is that Witten never misses a game, and you can't say that about Winslow, Finley,Clark, Gates, etc..every year we hear the same old line about Witten - too many mouths to feed in Dallas, Dez, Austin, etc - and yet seemingly every year (especially 3 of last 4 seasons) Witten records 90+ recs,1000+ yards, and roughly 5 TDs..so how exactly does he actually record his best season as a pro on a team with a backup QB( Kitna) and with emerging 'stars' like Dez and Austin? your points about the other TE's would work if, and only if, they actually played full 16 game schedules ( even Clark has problems staying healthy and is one hit away from yet another concussion)based on his reliability he deserves to be the #1 TE in FF..'LHUCKS said:so you really don't disagree with any except for Witten.'johnb said:based on where they are being drafted, i would agree with charles and roddy compared to where i think they'll end. i'd rather a few others guys a few spots later.i don't agree on witten. if he and romo are healthy, i think he has as good as shot as any to be right up there at end of the year.schaub seems to be drafted about where i think he should go. i might lean towards agreeing, but he's not going in the tier of rivers/romo, and i can't really argue if someone prefers him over ben/flacco/eli/etc.Regarding Witten, is he a slam dunk to finish substantially higher than the other TEs I mentioned? I would argue no. His ADP is unjustified given the quality TE depth this year.