Or if it's Fat Nick that is this dumb then hang onto this job for dear life.Back.
Get a new job if people you work with are this dumb.
Remember when "opposite day" was a thing when you were a 7 year old?Curious to hear the argument for "forward", I'm open minded.
I think it would be that you are pushing it "forward", away from the current date. I've never heard it used that way though.Curious to hear the argument for "forward", I'm open minded.
I think to start you have to discard your assumption that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, and accept that from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly, timey wimey... stuff.Curious to hear the argument for "forward", I'm open minded.
Sure. If the meeting was originally scheduled for the 12th, before it was pushed back to the 13th, you could then say you're moving it back to the 12th.I think both are correct and it depends upon how its worded. If we have a meeting on Jan 13, I think its acceptabel to ask if you can move it back to the 12th.
We read text from left to right, same as the days of the week on a calander, so in that context I guess 13th-14th is a forward move.... and science.CBusAlex said:I think to start you have to discard your assumption that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, and accept that from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly, timey wimey... stuff.TenTimes said:Curious to hear the argument for "forward", I'm open minded.
same and same.Arsenal of Doom said:I think it would be that you are pushing it "forward", away from the current date. I've never heard it used that way though.TenTimes said:Curious to hear the argument for "forward", I'm open minded.
Nope...I said "move it 'back.'"igbomb said:Or if it's Fat Nick that is this dumb then hang onto this job for dear life.RUSF18 said:Back.
Get a new job if people you work with are this dumb.
Just ask them what date they want to move the meeting to.Nope...I said "move it 'back.'"igbomb said:Or if it's Fat Nick that is this dumb then hang onto this job for dear life.RUSF18 said:Back.
Get a new job if people you work with are this dumb.
His argument was something along these lines...If you travel in time from now to the future, do you go back or forward in time? Forward. So he says forward. I told him that wasn't a legitimate analogy and that he was dumb. Someone else came along and agreed with him. I told them they were dumb too. Another colleague agreed with me, so we needed a tiebreaker.
If someone told me to move a meeting forward one day, I would always move it one day closer to now. Always.
Is that you, Doctor?CBusAlex said:I think to start you have to discard your assumption that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, and accept that from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly, timey wimey... stuff.TenTimes said:Curious to hear the argument for "forward", I'm open minded.
I was talking to one of my better friends about something or other being a paradigm and he looked at meNope...I said "move it 'back.'"igbomb said:Or if it's Fat Nick that is this dumb then hang onto this job for dear life.RUSF18 said:Back.
Get a new job if people you work with are this dumb.
His argument was something along these lines...If you travel in time from now to the future, do you go back or forward in time? Forward. So he says forward. I told him that wasn't a legitimate analogy and that he was dumb. Someone else came along and agreed with him. I told them they were dumb too. Another colleague agreed with me, so we needed a tiebreaker.
If someone told me to move a meeting forward one day, I would always move it one day closer to now. Always.
what would phil from the future say?unless you are Brad Pitt in 12 monkeys this is back
monkeyswhat would phil from the future say?unless you are Brad Pitt in 12 monkeys this is back
Now ask him if he wants to move the time for a meeting up or down.Nope...I said "move it 'back.'"igbomb said:Or if it's Fat Nick that is this dumb then hang onto this job for dear life.RUSF18 said:Back.
Get a new job if people you work with are this dumb.
His argument was something along these lines...If you travel in time from now to the future, do you go back or forward in time? Forward. So he says forward. I told him that wasn't a legitimate analogy and that he was dumb. Someone else came along and agreed with him. I told them they were dumb too. Another colleague agreed with me, so we needed a tiebreaker.
If someone told me to move a meeting forward one day, I would always move it one day closer to now. Always.
I prefer this vernacularCloser to today =forwardup
Further from today = back
Yeah, this is easy.Closer to today = forward
Further from today = back
Up and back is correctI prefer this vernacularCloser to today = forward up
Further from today = back
The situation was about scheduling. A schedule is an ordered list of events. The "top" or "front" of a schedule is the first item that will occur. So moving an item that way is moving it "up" or to the "front" of the scheduleNope...I said "move it 'back.'"igbomb said:Or if it's Fat Nick that is this dumb then hang onto this job for dear life.RUSF18 said:Back.
Get a new job if people you work with are this dumb.
His argument was something along these lines...If you travel in time from now to the future, do you go back or forward in time? Forward. So he says forward. I told him that wasn't a legitimate analogy and that he was dumb. Someone else came along and agreed with him. I told them they were dumb too. Another colleague agreed with me, so we needed a tiebreaker.
If someone told me to move a meeting forward one day, I would always move it one day closer to now. Always.
my guess is WisconsinI am curious what planet the 15 percent are from?