What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

My favorite team needs to draft a [fill in the blank] (1 Viewer)

Browns

QB

then a couple more offensive players, any position except LT and C works. I guess not a TE either (just talking top 3 rounds or so)

 
Bucs:

DE

OLine

WR

However, if they have a high enough pick to land a potential stud QB, they have to pull the trigger there.

 
They don't grow on trees, but I'd love for the Saints to draft a shutdown corner (or trade for Joe Haden). There are so many things this defense could do if they could pair someone on the other side of Greer (if he's back to full strength next year)

 
Steelers:

Safety

Nose Tackle

Cornerback

Punter

Tight End

Left Guard

Wide Receiver (Tall, preferably)
Don't forget OT, ILB and DE. Actually it would be a lot easier to list the positions the Steelers don't need to draft: quarterback, place kicker and long snapper.

 
Steelers:

Safety

Nose Tackle

Cornerback

Punter

Tight End

Left Guard

Wide Receiver (Tall, preferably)
Don't forget OT, ILB and DE. Actually it would be a lot easier to list the positions the Steelers don't need to draft: quarterback, place kicker and long snapper.
:goodposting:

I actually think they are decently set at DE with Cameron Heyward stepping up so much and Robert Woods in reserve (behind Keisel and Hood); ILB they have Timmons, but I like what Vince Williams has done and they should be getting Spence back next year -- they will probably take another ILB soon; I could see them taking a late round T just for the hell of it, but they have alot invested in Gilbert and Adams, and while both have been disappointments thus far, they are are both still real green and have shown flashes of real potential.

 
Jacksonville - QB, CB
Minnesota - QB, LB
Houston - QB, LB
Atlanta - DE, OL
Tampa Bay - DE, TE
St. Louis - OL, Safety, WR
Buffalo - LB, WR
Pittsburgh - DB, OL
Baltimore - LB, DB
Cleveland - QB, WR
Tennessee - DT, DB
Oakland - DE, QB
San Diego - OT, LB
NY Giants - OT, LB
Green Bay - LB, DB
Miami - OT, OG
Dallas - DLine, OLine
Chicago - Defense
Arizona - QB, OL
NY Jets - WR, TE
Philadelphia - OLB, DB
Detroit - DB, WR2
San Francisco - WR, DB
Cincinnati - LB, DB
New England - TE, DL
Carolina - WR, OL
New Orleans - DB, Defensive front 7
Kansas City - WR, QB of the future
Denver - DB, OLine depth
Seattle - OLine, WR
 
Bengals: QB
Are you giving up on Dalton developing already?
I never expected much development after his rookie year. I think he is what he'll always be at this point -- an average to low-end starter.
QB is one of the last things the Bengals need to worry about upgrading.
It would be a luxury pick, but frankly one the Bengals can afford if anyone can. I don't think they'll actually consider QB in the 1st, but if one of the 2nd tier QBs is there in the 2nd or 3rd I would understand taking him for competition and flexibility. I could see them liking either Carr or McCarron as a #2 for now.

Obviously, the bigger point is what to do with Dalton next year. He's too good to cast off, but is he too bad for a starting QB mega-deal? The Bengals have a Flacco type problem where they're going to have to make a decision because if they won't pay him big money plenty of teams are desperate at QB when he hits the market soon.

 
It would be a luxury pick, but frankly one the Bengals can afford if anyone can. I don't think they'll actually consider QB in the 1st, but if one of the 2nd tier QBs is there in the 2nd or 3rd I would understand taking him for competition and flexibility. I could see them liking either Carr or McCarron as a #2 for now.

Obviously, the bigger point is what to do with Dalton next year. He's too good to cast off, but is he too bad for a starting QB mega-deal? The Bengals have a Flacco type problem where they're going to have to make a decision because if they won't pay him big money plenty of teams are desperate at QB when he hits the market soon.
I get what you guys are saying, but having even an above average QB is a huge advantage in today's NFL.

If they don't re-up Dalton, then they're back fishing for a starting QB and hoping the next guy is better. I can't see a franchise doing that.

Well...maybe the Bengals. :pokey:

 
NY Jets - WR, TE
Jets have bigger needs than TE (like safety or OG). Not that they couldn' use a TE, but Jeff Cumberland and Zach Sudfeld are decent young options for the time being.
They need some play makers on offense. Cumberland is just a guy (well, maybe a little more) and Sudfeld is a cast-off UDFA.

Since they're likely going to miss out on one of either Evans or Watkins, they're either going to have to roll the dice with Marquis Lee or take one of the very talented young TE's coming out this year.

 
It would be a luxury pick, but frankly one the Bengals can afford if anyone can. I don't think they'll actually consider QB in the 1st, but if one of the 2nd tier QBs is there in the 2nd or 3rd I would understand taking him for competition and flexibility. I could see them liking either Carr or McCarron as a #2 for now.

Obviously, the bigger point is what to do with Dalton next year. He's too good to cast off, but is he too bad for a starting QB mega-deal? The Bengals have a Flacco type problem where they're going to have to make a decision because if they won't pay him big money plenty of teams are desperate at QB when he hits the market soon.
I get what you guys are saying, but having even an above average QB is a huge advantage in today's NFL.

If they don't re-up Dalton, then they're back fishing for a starting QB and hoping the next guy is better. I can't see a franchise doing that.

Well...maybe the Bengals. :pokey:
So you would give Dalton a Stafford/Flacco type contract and let some of the other guys walk, right? I might as well, I just think it's a hard decision. If they don't, I think he finds someone who will.

I don't want to hijack this into another Dalton thread, but for sure your answer to that question determines whether it makes sense to draft a QB.

 
It would be a luxury pick, but frankly one the Bengals can afford if anyone can. I don't think they'll actually consider QB in the 1st, but if one of the 2nd tier QBs is there in the 2nd or 3rd I would understand taking him for competition and flexibility. I could see them liking either Carr or McCarron as a #2 for now.

Obviously, the bigger point is what to do with Dalton next year. He's too good to cast off, but is he too bad for a starting QB mega-deal? The Bengals have a Flacco type problem where they're going to have to make a decision because if they won't pay him big money plenty of teams are desperate at QB when he hits the market soon.
I get what you guys are saying, but having even an above average QB is a huge advantage in today's NFL.

If they don't re-up Dalton, then they're back fishing for a starting QB and hoping the next guy is better. I can't see a franchise doing that.

Well...maybe the Bengals. :pokey:
So you would give Dalton a Stafford/Flacco type contract and let some of the other guys walk, right? I might as well, I just think it's a hard decision. If they don't, I think he finds someone who will.

I don't want to hijack this into another Dalton thread, but for sure your answer to that question determines whether it makes sense to draft a QB.
I think you almost have to.

Is he worth it? Well, I don't think Flacco is worth Flacco's contract, but that's the reality of today's NFL.

 
It would be a luxury pick, but frankly one the Bengals can afford if anyone can. I don't think they'll actually consider QB in the 1st, but if one of the 2nd tier QBs is there in the 2nd or 3rd I would understand taking him for competition and flexibility. I could see them liking either Carr or McCarron as a #2 for now.

Obviously, the bigger point is what to do with Dalton next year. He's too good to cast off, but is he too bad for a starting QB mega-deal? The Bengals have a Flacco type problem where they're going to have to make a decision because if they won't pay him big money plenty of teams are desperate at QB when he hits the market soon.
I get what you guys are saying, but having even an above average QB is a huge advantage in today's NFL.
But he's 18th and 19th the last two years in terms of ANY/A. He's a little better in terms of NY/A but throws too many INTs. i.e. he's not above average at all today.

 
Jacksonville - QB, CB
Minnesota - QB, LB
Houston - QB, LB
Atlanta - DE, OL
Tampa Bay - DE, TE
St. Louis - OL, Safety, WR
Buffalo - LB, WR
Pittsburgh - DB, OL
Baltimore - LB, DB
Cleveland - QB, WR
Tennessee - DT, DB
Oakland - DE, QB
San Diego - OT, LB
NY Giants - OT, LB
Green Bay - LB, DB
Miami - OT, OG
Dallas - DLine, OLine
Chicago - Defense
Arizona - QB, OL
NY Jets - WR, TE
Philadelphia - OLB, DB
Detroit - DB, WR2
San Francisco - WR, DB
Cincinnati - LB, DB
New England - TE, DL
Carolina - WR, OL
New Orleans - DB, Defensive front 7
Kansas City - WR, QB of the future
Denver - DB, OLine depth
Seattle - OLine, WR
NT is more pressing need for Steelers than OL IMHO. McClendon is not getting job done effectively enough.

 
Kansas City - WR, QB of the future
Could Tyler Bray be that QB of the future? He seems to have the natural talent.
Bray has some warts, but the combo of being 21 years old, getting to sit for a couple years, and being mentored by Reid and a QB like Smith that gets it done with brains instead of raw talent makes him the best non-starting QB prospect right now IMO. Actually Bray and Osweiler -- who's in an almost identical situation.

 
Kansas City - WR, QB of the future
Could Tyler Bray be that QB of the future? He seems to have the natural talent.
Kansas City - WR, QB of the future
Could Tyler Bray be that QB of the future? He seems to have the natural talent.
Given that he was an UDFA, it's a long shot but it's possible, I suppose.

But he's 18th and 19th the last two years in terms of ANY/A. He's a little better in terms of NY/A but throws too many INTs. i.e. he's not above average at all today.
And? That's both a function of his arm strength and the style of offense. I'll give you the too many INT's.

I'm not saying he'd be my 1st or even 5th pick to start a franchise with. But you're really rolling the dice that he can be improved on. I don't think there's harm in drafting a QB in the mid-to-late part of the draft in hopes that you'll luck into an upgrade. But spending an early pick doesn't make much sense, IMO.

 
Seahawks: besides the obvious O-Line holes, viable replacements for our DBs in the not-so-far-off great exodus of young guys demanding big contracts would be great. Also, a tall WR so we have a WR archetype other than agressive, fast, slightly undersized guys with lots of big play ability.

 
Jacksonville - QB, CB
Minnesota - QB, LB
Houston - QB, LB
Atlanta - DE, OL
Tampa Bay - DE, TE
St. Louis - OL, Safety, WR
Buffalo - LB, WR
Pittsburgh - DB, OL
Baltimore - LB, DB
Cleveland - QB, WR
Tennessee - DT, DB
Oakland - DE, QB
San Diego - OT, LB
NY Giants - OT, LB
Green Bay - LB, DB
Miami - OT, OG
Dallas - DLine, OLine
Chicago - Defense
Arizona - QB, OL
NY Jets - WR, TE
Philadelphia - OLB, DB
Detroit - DB, WR2
San Francisco - WR, DB
Cincinnati - LB, DB
New England - TE, DL
Carolina - WR, OL
New Orleans - DB, Defensive front 7
Kansas City - WR, QB of the future
Denver - DB, OLine depth
Seattle - OLine, WR
I think the Vikings need another DT before linebacker...I still think Mauti will start in the middle next year. They do need to draft linebacker but need a fat DT to put alongside Floyd.

 
I think the Vikings need another DT before linebacker...I still think Mauti will start in the middle next year. They do need to draft linebacker but need a fat DT to put alongside Floyd.
That would help. I keep forgetting about Mauti. Apparently so does Frazier.

Haven't we seen enough of Henderson? :wall:

 
Giants

OL

D linemen( Clowney?)

upgrades across the secondary

TE in a big, big way

RB - doubting Wilson, and Brown is productive but fragile

WR to replace Nicks

def coordinator

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top