There's two ways to look at that.
The first way is your way. The second way is that Roe operated like a "Pause Button" that took away the power of state legislatures to decide for themselves on what was best for their constituents. What happens in Texas is not the same as what happens in New York is not the same in what happens in North Carolina.
You see overturning Roe as terrible precedent.
I see Roe, in the first place, as terrible precedent.
What's wrong with states "doing their own thing"? Our Constitution provides for areas where states can do their own thing. Maybe the people of North Carolina tend to lean one way on things, whereas Texas will be the complete opposite.
Where a lot of tension arises is the GOP strategically, over the long term, put in massive resources, effort and personnel into winning individual state legislatures and built up the asset base/influence base to make overturning Roe happen. They didn't just sit around, they went out and tried to win as many elections as possible. They invested in areas so they could produce a SCOTUS candidate like Amy Coney Barrett.
The GOP took the long haul plan. Team Blue did the reactionary haphazard plan.
The other group that was immediately cast aside were the Pro Life Democrats. They lost their "voice" within the Party apparatus almost completely for 50 years. That was more fallout from Roe.