TobiasFunke
Footballguy
Good point- hadn't thought of that. I guess it comes down to showing gratitude not to the organization, but to the fans who have showered him with affection and bought his sneakers and whatever else he hawks and made him even richer. He doesn't have to, of course, but it's the right thing to do, and if he doesn't, the fans are justified in showing their displeasure with him. He's also saying, essentially, that their home town isn't "cool" enough for him, which is kind of a slap in the face.Bottom line- the guys who take issue with kev4029 (and also the Cleveland fans and other NBA fans that boo LeBron) are confusing the right of the organization to be mad at a player- which is almost never justified unless a guy dogs it or something- with the right of the fans to be mad at a player.Its not hard but it would also mean his new team would be weaker than it had to be. Its in Melo's best interest for the team that ultimately acquires him to do so by trading away as little as possible.How hard is it to keep his desire to play for only one team or city under wraps in order to help your current team get a better return on you in a trade? He'll still gets what he wants come summer.LHUCKS said:simmonjm said:You have it backwards. The franchise didn't put Melo in a position to win every year. He put them in a position to win every year. The Nuggets had exactly 1 winning season in 10 before he showed up and had a winning season every year after he did. But screw Melo right? Melo made them winners, explain what does he owe them for all he did for them? So if they fall back into losing because they don't have him.... what again was it that they did for him?Kev4029 said:Well, I guess we are going to find out if Chris Sheridan and the rest of the NY media are a bunch of rumor spreading 7th grade girls, or if all my hopes and dreams are shattered and I'll be buying a ticket for the next Nuggets game to boo Melo for screwing the organization.![]()

, it's why the NBA isn't interesting until March.