This is cute coming from the guy who is about to lose his football team to the "varsity" city.He needs one more year of seasoning, then he'll be mature and ready to play for the varsity team.They're pretty much locked in as the 4 seed, but Dwight's immaturity and dumb antics cost his team a win tonight.He's having the best year of his career, but he needs to grow up.Portland wins by 4, bizarre last sequence for the Magic. Down by 4 with 20 seconds left, they work the clock!! and don't shoot until 5 seconds left.
Like I said in the beginning, James has one elite teammate who has a diminished impact because their skill set is nearly identical, another very good teammate who is more SF than PF leading to more diminished impact, one other legit piece in Mike Miller who again has some of the same repeated skills, and not much else that would crack a playoff rotation. The Heat will remain scary because of the ability of James and Wade to take over games, but their chances at a title are slim until they build up down low.The Cavs were less talented no doubt but built a team around James with size, defense, and a collection of shooters. I am not surprised at all that the old Cavs would have a better record.This is why players shouldn't build teams. Much like some owners/general managers, they have no clue. The NBA isn't a game where the highest collective PER wins.So the Heat have to go 18-1 to match the Cavs record of last year.LeBron finally has a team around him, right?
LeBron James is being sued by an Atlanta nightclub for reneging on a planned appearance on St. Patrick's Day, while it sounds like he will show up at a rival club instead.
You can check out all the sordid details in the link, including information about an agent named Chubbie Baby, but this will have no impact on his availability for the Heat, nor his inability to make clutch shots with the game on the line. We also doubt it will cause him to cry, but you never know.
Very true. But, remember that their best bench players, Haslem and Miller, have been injured for most of the season. It took Miller a while to get his shot after he came back from the thumb injury, but he had a stretch of some very good games, including a 30 point game. Then he had concussion symptoms and missed several games and he hasn't been the same since. They have some historically good shooters - Jones, House and Miller - and they will have to shoot well for the Heat to go anywhere in the playoffs. The plan next year is for Dexter Pittman to get some minutes at center and to add some defense at PG. Chalmers has played his best ball since Bibby arrived - maybe a wakeup call? Bosh and Miller are the reasons the Heat lost to Portland, whose bench might be as good as the starters.Like I said in the beginning, James has one elite teammate who has a diminished impact because their skill set is nearly identical, another very good teammate who is more SF than PF leading to more diminished impact, one other legit piece in Mike Miller who again has some of the same repeated skills, and not much else that would crack a playoff rotation. The Heat will remain scary because of the ability of James and Wade to take over games, but their chances at a title are slim until they build up down low.The Cavs were less talented no doubt but built a team around James with size, defense, and a collection of shooters. I am not surprised at all that the old Cavs would have a better record.This is why players shouldn't build teams. Much like some owners/general managers, they have no clue. The NBA isn't a game where the highest collective PER wins.So the Heat have to go 18-1 to match the Cavs record of last year.LeBron finally has a team around him, right?
Haslem really is the key, IMO. That's the missing piece. He's willing to do the dirty work in the post. A healthy Udonis and this team competes for the championship.Very true. But, remember that their best bench players, Haslem and Miller, have been injured for most of the season. It took Miller a while to get his shot after he came back from the thumb injury, but he had a stretch of some very good games, including a 30 point game. Then he had concussion symptoms and missed several games and he hasn't been the same since. They have some historically good shooters - Jones, House and Miller - and they will have to shoot well for the Heat to go anywhere in the playoffs. The plan next year is for Dexter Pittman to get some minutes at center and to add some defense at PG. Chalmers has played his best ball since Bibby arrived - maybe a wakeup call? Bosh and Miller are the reasons the Heat lost to Portland, whose bench might be as good as the starters.Like I said in the beginning, James has one elite teammate who has a diminished impact because their skill set is nearly identical, another very good teammate who is more SF than PF leading to more diminished impact, one other legit piece in Mike Miller who again has some of the same repeated skills, and not much else that would crack a playoff rotation. The Heat will remain scary because of the ability of James and Wade to take over games, but their chances at a title are slim until they build up down low.The Cavs were less talented no doubt but built a team around James with size, defense, and a collection of shooters. I am not surprised at all that the old Cavs would have a better record.This is why players shouldn't build teams. Much like some owners/general managers, they have no clue. The NBA isn't a game where the highest collective PER wins.So the Heat have to go 18-1 to match the Cavs record of last year.LeBron finally has a team around him, right?
I think there may be more than one piece missing.Haslem really is the key, IMO. That's the missing piece. He's willing to do the dirty work in the post. A healthy Udonis and this team competes for the championship.Very true. But, remember that their best bench players, Haslem and Miller, have been injured for most of the season. It took Miller a while to get his shot after he came back from the thumb injury, but he had a stretch of some very good games, including a 30 point game. Then he had concussion symptoms and missed several games and he hasn't been the same since. They have some historically good shooters - Jones, House and Miller - and they will have to shoot well for the Heat to go anywhere in the playoffs. The plan next year is for Dexter Pittman to get some minutes at center and to add some defense at PG. Chalmers has played his best ball since Bibby arrived - maybe a wakeup call? Bosh and Miller are the reasons the Heat lost to Portland, whose bench might be as good as the starters.Like I said in the beginning, James has one elite teammate who has a diminished impact because their skill set is nearly identical, another very good teammate who is more SF than PF leading to more diminished impact, one other legit piece in Mike Miller who again has some of the same repeated skills, and not much else that would crack a playoff rotation. The Heat will remain scary because of the ability of James and Wade to take over games, but their chances at a title are slim until they build up down low.The Cavs were less talented no doubt but built a team around James with size, defense, and a collection of shooters. I am not surprised at all that the old Cavs would have a better record.So the Heat have to go 18-1 to match the Cavs record of last year.
LeBron finally has a team around him, right?
This is why players shouldn't build teams. Much like some owners/general managers, they have no clue. The NBA isn't a game where the highest collective PER wins.
Maybe he shouldve thought about that before he decided to team up with James and Wade
Out of curiosity, which team that's not currently in the top 8 of the eastern conference do you expect to win 43 games?Lebron: "We could lose all our remaining games and still make the playoffs."
I'm not sure if that's correct.
Maybe he should have thought about that before always being allergic to posting up.Maybe he shouldve thought about that before he decided to team up with James and Wade
Haslem would help no doubt. But I agree he isn't the difference between probable EC playoff exit and probable finals appearance. On the Bulls he would be fighting Taj Gibson for time and probably not see the floor on the Bulls. He is a rotation big guy which is great to have if you actually have a group of big guys to rotate. That said, I am not really piling on. This has been my opinion from day one. I still think the Heat could put together a great series and beat any team in the East in a series. I don't think they can do it against two of the Magic, Bulls, and Celtics in a row unless injuries weaken those teams. I am hoping for Heat/Knicks as that would be a very entertaining appetizer in round 1 for the coming Eastern Conference defensive struggles in round 2.I think there may be more than one piece missing.Haslem really is the key, IMO. That's the missing piece. He's willing to do the dirty work in the post. A healthy Udonis and this team competes for the championship.Very true. But, remember that their best bench players, Haslem and Miller, have been injured for most of the season. It took Miller a while to get his shot after he came back from the thumb injury, but he had a stretch of some very good games, including a 30 point game. Then he had concussion symptoms and missed several games and he hasn't been the same since. They have some historically good shooters - Jones, House and Miller - and they will have to shoot well for the Heat to go anywhere in the playoffs. The plan next year is for Dexter Pittman to get some minutes at center and to add some defense at PG. Chalmers has played his best ball since Bibby arrived - maybe a wakeup call? Bosh and Miller are the reasons the Heat lost to Portland, whose bench might be as good as the starters.Like I said in the beginning, James has one elite teammate who has a diminished impact because their skill set is nearly identical, another very good teammate who is more SF than PF leading to more diminished impact, one other legit piece in Mike Miller who again has some of the same repeated skills, and not much else that would crack a playoff rotation. The Heat will remain scary because of the ability of James and Wade to take over games, but their chances at a title are slim until they build up down low.The Cavs were less talented no doubt but built a team around James with size, defense, and a collection of shooters. I am not surprised at all that the old Cavs would have a better record.So the Heat have to go 18-1 to match the Cavs record of last year.
LeBron finally has a team around him, right?
This is why players shouldn't build teams. Much like some owners/general managers, they have no clue. The NBA isn't a game where the highest collective PER wins.
When did Bosh learn how to go into the post? Or does he mean that he wants to hold the ball 15 feet away from the rim, face up, jab step a few times, look around and then hoist a jumper?
It is 99.99% correct.Lebron: "We could lose all our remaining games and still make the playoffs."
I'm not sure if that's correct.
You are the most negative Laker fan I have ever heard. Don't you think the Lakers remember what happened on Christmas day?Have to believe the Heat will win tomorrow. I wonder what the line looks like.People are dancing on their grave a bit too early methinks.
Christmas day has nothing to do with it. The current 8 game run is tied for the Lakers's longest winning streak of the year. The Heat are on a 6 game losing streak. It's in Miami. I'm not saying blowout, but this is a desperate team the Lakers will be playing while they're probably feeling fat and sassy right about now. It's not about having faith in the Lakers, it's about seeing this show a million times before and knowing how it ends. In a 7 game series, the Lakers would win, and if Bynum can sustain this level of play + the Lakers don't sustain any serious injuries I think they're the best team in the league, but tomorrow night is a whole different thing.You are the most negative Laker fan I have ever heard. Don't you think the Lakers remember what happened on Christmas day?Have to believe the Heat will win tomorrow. I wonder what the line looks like.People are dancing on their grave a bit too early methinks.
Miami should have been desperate to win Sunday. They should have been desperate to win last night. Are they going to be more desperate to win tommorow night? The team is in disarray right now. As to your other point, watching the Lakers last night I didn't see any sign of fat and sassy. Sure Miami could win- they're at home and they have incredible talent. But I don't see how you can EXPECT them to win.Christmas day has nothing to do with it. The current 8 game run is tied for the Lakers's longest winning streak of the year. The Heat are on a 6 game losing streak. It's in Miami. I'm not saying blowout, but this is a desperate team the Lakers will be playing while they're probably feeling fat and sassy right about now. It's not about having faith in the Lakers, it's about seeing this show a million times before and knowing how it ends. In a 7 game series, the Lakers would win, and if Bynum can sustain this level of play + the Lakers don't sustain any serious injuries I think they're the best team in the league, but tomorrow night is a whole different thing.You are the most negative Laker fan I have ever heard. Don't you think the Lakers remember what happened on Christmas day?Have to believe the Heat will win tomorrow. I wonder what the line looks like.People are dancing on their grave a bit too early methinks.
Logic like Tim's- "Don't you think the Lakers will remember what happened Xmas Day?" is the kind of wonderful meaningless stuff that creates value in betting lines. A previous game has little to no impact on a future game other than maybe possibly if it suggests a particular matchup problem. The problem, of course, is that if the Lakers win tomorrow, people consider it validation for their silly theory of revenge, whereas if they lose the "revenge" theorists forget about it and move on.Games like this- one team riding a winning streak, the other riding a losing streak, with the latter at home, and with silly theories of revenge playing into it- are a gambler's dream. Squares LOVE to play streaks. Of course I'm not saying the Heat will win, but if they're an underdog or even if it's a pick 'em game, the Heat are obvious value in my opinion.Christmas day has nothing to do with it. The current 8 game run is tied for the Lakers's longest winning streak of the year. The Heat are on a 6 game losing streak. It's in Miami. I'm not saying blowout, but this is a desperate team the Lakers will be playing while they're probably feeling fat and sassy right about now. It's not about having faith in the Lakers, it's about seeing this show a million times before and knowing how it ends. In a 7 game series, the Lakers would win, and if Bynum can sustain this level of play + the Lakers don't sustain any serious injuries I think they're the best team in the league, but tomorrow night is a whole different thing.You are the most negative Laker fan I have ever heard. Don't you think the Lakers remember what happened on Christmas day?Have to believe the Heat will win tomorrow. I wonder what the line looks like.People are dancing on their grave a bit too early methinks.
The Heat easily could have won Sunday. I'm sure they looked right past the Blazers going in to last night, anticipating the Lakers on Thursday. Fat and sassy shows up for the Lakers when you least expect it, and considering they've been on their biggest winning streak of the year, I actually expect it right about now, when they're playing a team everyone is leaving for dead. Sure Kobe will say all the right stuff, but will the rest of the guys put in the effort?Miami should have been desperate to win Sunday. They should have been desperate to win last night. Are they going to be more desperate to win tommorow night? The team is in disarray right now. As to your other point, watching the Lakers last night I didn't see any sign of fat and sassy. Sure Miami could win- they're at home and they have incredible talent. But I don't see how you can EXPECT them to win.
Of course I'm not saying the Heat will win, but if they're an underdog or even if it's a pick 'em game, the Heat are obvious value in my opinion.
My comment about Christmas day is not in itself reason to believe the Lakers will win, only that it argues against the notion that, because the Lakers have won 7 in a row, they will be unmotivated. Why is it illogical to think, "The Lakers will be motivated by revenge over what happend on Christmas" but logical to think, "The Lakers will be unmotivated because they have won 7 in a row, so they are overconfident."?? That doesn't make sense. Here's what I believe I know:1. Because of Christmas Day, the Lakers will not be unmotivated.2. The Heat are disarray. Yes they are desparate for a win, but that hasn't helped them in the last few games.3. Matchups in this game really favor the Lakers because the Heat have no answer for the frontline. To me that means you have to go in favoring the Lakers. It will be no surprise if Miami wins at home, but the odds shouldn't favor it.Logic like Tim's- "Don't you think the Lakers will remember what happened Xmas Day?" is the kind of wonderful meaningless stuff that creates value in betting lines. A previous game has little to no impact on a future game other than maybe possibly if it suggests a particular matchup problem. The problem, of course, is that if the Lakers win tomorrow, people consider it validation for their silly theory of revenge, whereas if they lose the "revenge" theorists forget about it and move on.Games like this- one team riding a winning streak, the other riding a losing streak, with the latter at home, and with silly theories of revenge playing into it- are a gambler's dream. Squares LOVE to play streaks. Of course I'm not saying the Heat will win, but if they're an underdog or even if it's a pick 'em game, the Heat are obvious value in my opinion.Christmas day has nothing to do with it. The current 8 game run is tied for the Lakers's longest winning streak of the year. The Heat are on a 6 game losing streak. It's in Miami. I'm not saying blowout, but this is a desperate team the Lakers will be playing while they're probably feeling fat and sassy right about now. It's not about having faith in the Lakers, it's about seeing this show a million times before and knowing how it ends. In a 7 game series, the Lakers would win, and if Bynum can sustain this level of play + the Lakers don't sustain any serious injuries I think they're the best team in the league, but tomorrow night is a whole different thing.You are the most negative Laker fan I have ever heard. Don't you think the Lakers remember what happened on Christmas day?Have to believe the Heat will win tomorrow. I wonder what the line looks like.People are dancing on their grave a bit too early methinks.
That makes slightly more sense. In that case I'd say that I'd expect the Lakers to be equally motivated regardless of the Christmas game. As a general rule, most serious gamblers will tell you that motivation in either direction plays far less of a role than most fans think. A team might come out flat and unmotivated, but it's really kind of hard to predict when it will happen. Recent play-almost always overvalued- and the frontcourt matchup with the addition of Bynum favor the Lakers. Home court and recent history between the teams favors the Heat. Useful gambling stats like the teams' respective scoring margins are about even. I'd predict a line around pick, which looks like some value on the Heat to me.Regardless, it's got the makings of the NBA regular season game of the year when you consider star power, recent play, and the fact that it's the last huge game before the NBA cedes the limelight to college ball basically until the playoffs start. Should be a great one.My comment about Christmas day is not in itself reason to believe the Lakers will win, only that it argues against the notion that, because the Lakers have won 7 in a row, they will be unmotivated. Why is it illogical to think, "The Lakers will be motivated by revenge over what happend on Christmas" but logical to think, "The Lakers will be unmotivated because they have won 7 in a row, so they are overconfident."?? That doesn't make sense. Here's what I believe I know:1. Because of Christmas Day, the Lakers will not be unmotivated.2. The Heat are disarray. Yes they are desparate for a win, but that hasn't helped them in the last few games.3. Matchups in this game really favor the Lakers because the Heat have no answer for the frontline. To me that means you have to go in favoring the Lakers. It will be no surprise if Miami wins at home, but the odds shouldn't favor it.Logic like Tim's- "Don't you think the Lakers will remember what happened Xmas Day?" is the kind of wonderful meaningless stuff that creates value in betting lines. A previous game has little to no impact on a future game other than maybe possibly if it suggests a particular matchup problem. The problem, of course, is that if the Lakers win tomorrow, people consider it validation for their silly theory of revenge, whereas if they lose the "revenge" theorists forget about it and move on.Games like this- one team riding a winning streak, the other riding a losing streak, with the latter at home, and with silly theories of revenge playing into it- are a gambler's dream. Squares LOVE to play streaks. Of course I'm not saying the Heat will win, but if they're an underdog or even if it's a pick 'em game, the Heat are obvious value in my opinion.Christmas day has nothing to do with it. The current 8 game run is tied for the Lakers's longest winning streak of the year. The Heat are on a 6 game losing streak. It's in Miami. I'm not saying blowout, but this is a desperate team the Lakers will be playing while they're probably feeling fat and sassy right about now. It's not about having faith in the Lakers, it's about seeing this show a million times before and knowing how it ends. In a 7 game series, the Lakers would win, and if Bynum can sustain this level of play + the Lakers don't sustain any serious injuries I think they're the best team in the league, but tomorrow night is a whole different thing.You are the most negative Laker fan I have ever heard. Don't you think the Lakers remember what happened on Christmas day?Have to believe the Heat will win tomorrow. I wonder what the line looks like.People are dancing on their grave a bit too early methinks.
This. I think that fans of sports think that "momentum" and "motivation" play a much bigger role in the pro ranks then they really do. Sure, a player occasionally gets hot or has a run where things are clicking. But NBA, MLB, NFL players are the finest performers for that sport on the planet. They are professionals primarily because their WORST days are still eons better then the best days of everyone watching on TV. The Heat take their jobs seriously every game, as do the Lakers. I don't think Kobe is going to look up and say, "I can dig a little deeper today then normal!"That makes slightly more sense. In that case I'd say that I'd expect the Lakers to be equally motivated regardless of the Christmas game. As a general rule, most serious gamblers will tell you that motivation in either direction plays far less of a role than most fans think. A team might come out flat and unmotivated, but it's really kind of hard to predict when it will happen.
About the bolded part, I disagree. After "crygate" as was as being aware of the Blazers recent success, the Heat were focused.The Heat easily could have won Sunday. I'm sure they looked right past the Blazers going in to last night, anticipating the Lakers on Thursday. Fat and sassy shows up for the Lakers when you least expect it, and considering they've been on their biggest winning streak of the year, I actually expect it right about now, when they're playing a team everyone is leaving for dead. Sure Kobe will say all the right stuff, but will the rest of the guys put in the effort?Miami should have been desperate to win Sunday. They should have been desperate to win last night. Are they going to be more desperate to win tommorow night? The team is in disarray right now. As to your other point, watching the Lakers last night I didn't see any sign of fat and sassy.
Sure Miami could win- they're at home and they have incredible talent. But I don't see how you can EXPECT them to win.
I'd go even a little farther -- it would be shocking if the Heat wins.My comment about Christmas day is not in itself reason to believe the Lakers will win, only that it argues against the notion that, because the Lakers have won 7 in a row, they will be unmotivated. Why is it illogical to think, "The Lakers will be motivated by revenge over what happend on Christmas" but logical to think, "The Lakers will be unmotivated because they have won 7 in a row, so they are overconfident."?? That doesn't make sense. Here's what I believe I know:1. Because of Christmas Day, the Lakers will not be unmotivated.2. The Heat are disarray. Yes they are desparate for a win, but that hasn't helped them in the last few games.3. Matchups in this game really favor the Lakers because the Heat have no answer for the frontline. To me that means you have to go in favoring the Lakers. It will be no surprise if Miami wins at home, but the odds shouldn't favor it.Logic like Tim's- "Don't you think the Lakers will remember what happened Xmas Day?" is the kind of wonderful meaningless stuff that creates value in betting lines. A previous game has little to no impact on a future game other than maybe possibly if it suggests a particular matchup problem. The problem, of course, is that if the Lakers win tomorrow, people consider it validation for their silly theory of revenge, whereas if they lose the "revenge" theorists forget about it and move on.Games like this- one team riding a winning streak, the other riding a losing streak, with the latter at home, and with silly theories of revenge playing into it- are a gambler's dream. Squares LOVE to play streaks. Of course I'm not saying the Heat will win, but if they're an underdog or even if it's a pick 'em game, the Heat are obvious value in my opinion.Christmas day has nothing to do with it. The current 8 game run is tied for the Lakers's longest winning streak of the year. The Heat are on a 6 game losing streak. It's in Miami. I'm not saying blowout, but this is a desperate team the Lakers will be playing while they're probably feeling fat and sassy right about now. It's not about having faith in the Lakers, it's about seeing this show a million times before and knowing how it ends. In a 7 game series, the Lakers would win, and if Bynum can sustain this level of play + the Lakers don't sustain any serious injuries I think they're the best team in the league, but tomorrow night is a whole different thing.You are the most negative Laker fan I have ever heard. Don't you think the Lakers remember what happened on Christmas day?Have to believe the Heat will win tomorrow. I wonder what the line looks like.People are dancing on their grave a bit too early methinks.
http://twitter.com/darylhawksSeems it's just a sprained ankleBoozer went down with an ugly looking injury. Hoping it isn't his ACL.
Good to hear.... his ankle was bent behind his leg when he went down.http://twitter.com/darylhawksSeems it's just a sprained ankleBoozer went down with an ugly looking injury. Hoping it isn't his ACL.
Every team is beatable most nightsWhen Korver is hitting his shots, the Bulls are close to unbeatable.
Rondo??? Either you totally forgot about 2008 or you forgot that the Lakers won game 7 last year.When is the last time a PG dominated team won? I guess an argument can be made that both the Celtics (Rondo) and Spurs (Parker) have won titles in the last decade with the PG being the best player on the floor for their playoff runs. But otherwise, aren't we having to go back to Magic to find a PG that was his team's alpha dog on the way to a ring? The more I watch Chicago, the more I think their offseason moves (as we discussed here) were the "right" formula. Korver for bombs, Boozer for some offense down low. Also, Durantula can fill it up, can't he?
Isiah and Magic led their team in scoring on the way to a championship. Parker was close to doing so.When is the last time a PG dominated team won? I guess an argument can be made that both the Celtics (Rondo) and Spurs (Parker) have won titles in the last decade with the PG being the best player on the floor for their playoff runs. But otherwise, aren't we having to go back to Magic to find a PG that was his team's alpha dog on the way to a ring? The more I watch Chicago, the more I think their offseason moves (as we discussed here) were the "right" formula. Korver for bombs, Boozer for some offense down low. Also, Durantula can fill it up, can't he?
Thanks for the obvious. The point is that when Korver brings the extra offense, a team like the Bulls that struggles to score at times but plays tremendous defense are very hard to beat.Every team is beatable most nightsWhen Korver is hitting his shots, the Bulls are close to unbeatable.
Hey overly defensive Laker guy, I was pointing to teams that won the title with a point guard as their best player. Was Rondo the team's best player in 2008 playoffs? I'm asking. And what does last year have to do with anything?Rondo??? Either you totally forgot about 2008 or you forgot that the Lakers won game 7 last year.When is the last time a PG dominated team won? I guess an argument can be made that both the Celtics (Rondo) and Spurs (Parker) have won titles in the last decade with the PG being the best player on the floor for their playoff runs. But otherwise, aren't we having to go back to Magic to find a PG that was his team's alpha dog on the way to a ring? The more I watch Chicago, the more I think their offseason moves (as we discussed here) were the "right" formula. Korver for bombs, Boozer for some offense down low. Also, Durantula can fill it up, can't he?
Overly defensive?Just was stating, I think you made a mistake. You may have just quickly typed Rondo without remembering that they did lose last year. Last year was the second year Rondo was their best player.In 2008 Rondo was probably their 4th best player. Sam Cassell was getting minutes at PG, and I think he even finished some games.And even though Parker won the Finals MVP, Duncan was clearly their best player for each of the playoff runs.I think Isiah would be the last PG led team to win the title.'Abraham said:Hey overly defensive Laker guy, I was pointing to teams that won the title with a point guard as their best player. Was Rondo the team's best player in 2008 playoffs? I'm asking. And what does last year have to do with anything?'JMon348 said:Rondo??? Either you totally forgot about 2008 or you forgot that the Lakers won game 7 last year.When is the last time a PG dominated team won? I guess an argument can be made that both the Celtics (Rondo) and Spurs (Parker) have won titles in the last decade with the PG being the best player on the floor for their playoff runs. But otherwise, aren't we having to go back to Magic to find a PG that was his team's alpha dog on the way to a ring? The more I watch Chicago, the more I think their offseason moves (as we discussed here) were the "right" formula. Korver for bombs, Boozer for some offense down low. Also, Durantula can fill it up, can't he?