I just don't think the whole "he cares about winning!" and "legacy" thing is nearly as important. Or, that its the only important thing. The Bulls have Noah, Rose and Deng. Add Bosh and LBJ and that's a heck of a lineup. But two years from now, when Rose and Noah have to be extended what happens? Conversely, New Jersey could have LBJ and Bosh as well but have a very good big man (which LBJ has never had) and a power forward that could be very good. Are you SURE that in 2011 and 2012 the Bulls will be in that much better shape then the Nets?Additionally, I don't think that Lebron would give up better opportunities for himself and his brand just for the immediate gratification of a slightly better roster. Chicago is a big market, for sure, but it's not LA or NY. He's talking about trying to be a billion dollar man. I'm sure he wants to win, but considering he's had a team like the Cavs (loaded with mediocre talent) win 60 games each year, I'm not sure that the Clips, Knicks, Nets, Mavs, etc. would be that much worse of a situation in the short (or long) term.