1. Red Auerbach
2. Pat Riley
3. Larry Brown
4. Gregg Popovich
5. Bill Sharman
6. Billy Cunningham
7. Phil Jackson
8. Don Nelson
9. Chuck Daly
10. Lenny Wilkens
No bias in that Brown pick I'm sure(1).1. Just kidding. Please don't rip me a new #######.

It's all good.I've got Brown that high because he's near the top both as a tactician and as a teacher of the game. A lot of folks see all of the different jobs he's had and see it as a negative because of the instability from it, but all those different stops showed he could win with completely different rosters, front offices, budgets, and styles of play.
He took the Nuggets to the ABA Finals and NBA conference finals.
He got the Nets into the playoffs.
He got the Clippers into the playoffs twice.
He orchestrated a +35 W/L improvement in one year in San Antonio.
He took a team with Rik Smits and Derrick McKey as starters within one game of the NBA Finals in Indiana.
He helmed perhaps the least-talented team ever to appear in an NBA Finals in Philly.
He annihilated Phil Jackson in the 2004 Finals by so much Jerry Buss should have sued Jax for coaching malpractice, winning the title in Detroit.
He got the Charlotte ####### Bobcats to lead the league in defense.
He won with running teams and walking teams, won with teams built around big men and with teams built around guards, won with teams that tried to outgun the opponent and with teams that tried to choke the opponent out.
Other coaches won more games. Other coaches won more titles. Other coaches could stand still for a lot longer. but no coach has ever demonstrated he could win in as many different environments using as many different approaches to the game as Larry Brown.
And none of that argument included the NCAA title he won at Kansas
or taking UCLA to the Final Four.