'Kev4029 said:
'sporthenry said:
'Cliff Clavin said:
'sporthenry said:
'Kev4029 said:
'Abraham said:
parsons contract is dollar for dollar the "best" deal in the league. I'd rather have Lebron at 35 million than parsons at 700k, but that isn't how things work. He's a reliable third option on offense and a plus defender and he costs 1/35th of Kobe Bryant and 1/3 of Ty freaking Lawson. Define value however you want - chandler parsons contract is of great value. And it lasts for two more seasons after this one.
What does this mean?And Parsons is at nearly 900k, not 700k for what that's worth.
It means if you did something like PER/$ like in baseball when they do $/win, Parsons would be one of if not the very best. Add in the fact, he is under control for 2 more years and I don't really see how anyone beats that. Blatche beats that this year, sure, but he'll probably get at least 5 and probably more next year.
If you're going to do Per/$, then he isn't even the best on his team.
Yes, like I said, Blatche probably beats him this year with a few others.
But do you think between the beginning of next year and over the next 2 years, someone still beats him. Sure, Greg Smith beats him this year and next, but what do you think Smith's next contract will look like? Now PER/$ is a bit flawed b/c I don't think it takes into account much of the usage rate so someone like Harden who plays 38 minutes is much more important than someone like Smith who plays 14 minutes even if their efficiency numbers are fairly close.
Kenneth Faried will, Isaiah Thomas has a chance, Barnes has a chance as hes a bit of a headcase so nobody is going to pay him well.
Between this year and 2014, Parsons makes $2.78 million, Faried will make $4.9 million. We'll see what Isaiah Thomas makes as an RFA but odds are if he is doing well, he'll get a decent contract offer. But back to Faried v. Parsons. Parsons right now sits at 71.5 VA and 2.4 EWA compared to Faried at 127.6 VA and 4.3 EWA. So Faried will make 1.76 times what Parson makes and is 1.78 VA and 1.79 EWA better. So Faried is producing better than his contract compared to Parsons but it is fairly close.
As far as Barnes. As you mention, his antics do provide a bit of a downfall to his value. But he is still going to make $1.2 million at least so that puts him at $3.6 for the minimum and his VA is 89.6 and EWA is 3. So he'll get paid 1.3 times Parsons and his VA and EWA is 1.25 times so Parsons is a bit better.
Either way, it is very close and while making an absolute statement such as Parsons is the "best" contract may not be advisable, it is one of the best especially considering he is locked up for 3 years.