CurlyNight
Footballguy
He should also be fined for air kissing Le B.Lance fined $10000 for flopping.
Vinny Del Negro a serious coaching candidate (!) for the Wolves and (!) Cavs. Yikes.
He should also be fined for air kissing Le B.Lance fined $10000 for flopping.
Vinny Del Negro a serious coaching candidate (!) for the Wolves and (!) Cavs. Yikes.
Mike had some clunkers. Rarely in the sort of 3-1 up situation where the coach could say, "you know what, Mike, we don't really need you to put up 30 bad looking shots tonight, so let's just take a breather, huh?"If nothing else, Dr. J definitely made me curious about Jordan's history and got me to take a closer look, which is kinda cool.
Here's the playoff games (after his first season, when they don't have the stat) where he had a Game Score of less than 15. I don't really remember most of them.
That's okay, Mike followed that string up by hanging 54 on the Knicks. He was a great player, no doubt. He closed that series out with an epic 8-24 showing. The Bulls won anyway.Does 2-18, 6-24, 5-16, 7-20, etc count. What did he shoot on that series? .355 I think?Mike had some clunkers. Rarely in the sort of 3-1 up situation where the coach could say, "you know what, Mike, we don't really need you to put up 30 bad looking shots tonight, so let's just take a breather, huh?"If nothing else, Dr. J definitely made me curious about Jordan's history and got me to take a closer look, which is kinda cool.
Here's the playoff games (after his first season, when they don't have the stat) where he had a Game Score of less than 15. I don't really remember most of them.
Likewise, I'm not sure Lebron ever had a string of games against a conference opponent where he went 10-27, 12-32, and 3-18.That's okay, Mike followed that string up by hanging 54 on the Knicks. He was a great player, no doubt. He closed that series out with an epic 8-24 showing. The Bulls won anyway.
In that same vein, I'm not all that down on Lebron for his poor series against the Spurs when he was a young kid playing with the Cavs, especially when Mike's first six years of finals box scores looked like this:
1984-85: DNP, eliminated
1985-86: DNP, eliminated
1986-87: DNP, eliminated
1987-88: DNP, eliminated
1988-89: DNP, eliminated
1989-90: DNP, eliminated
Jordan's still the GOAT in my book, but it ain't because he never played badly. He did. He had lots of poor games. But he had lots more good-to-great ones, and came up biggest on the biggest stages. Props. Last night wasn't the biggest stage. It was minor, and Lebron came up small. As long as he's still on run of MVP-caliber seasons topped off with title runs, he gets less than no flack for it, IMO.
Maybe I misread something or missed the OP, but nowhere did it say "you must take one from every individual position," or at least not that I saw. And They added up to $15...You just decided to completely ignore the rules? Can I take Jordan as my PG?LeBron - 5
Dirk - 2
Garnett - 1
Durant - 2
Jordan - 5
We're going small ball, really need a stretch 4 with a guy like Jordan who can't shoot 3sDurant guards the 3, Dirk the 4, Garnett at 5. Jordan and LeBron can guard either guard position, lets us match up great with any of the PG/SG combos from other teams.
Fun game making the rounds on social media the last couple of days.
You have $15 to spend to make your starting 5:
He had 5 boards, 8 assists, 4 steals and 3 blocks and was +29 in the 5-16 game, a 24 point win for the Cavs. Not really sure you should count that one as a stinker.Does 2-18, 6-24, 5-16, 7-20, etc count. What did he shoot on that series? .355 I think?Mike had some clunkers. Rarely in the sort of 3-1 up situation where the coach could say, "you know what, Mike, we don't really need you to put up 30 bad looking shots tonight, so let's just take a breather, huh?"If nothing else, Dr. J definitely made me curious about Jordan's history and got me to take a closer look, which is kinda cool.
Here's the playoff games (after his first season, when they don't have the stat) where he had a Game Score of less than 15. I don't really remember most of them.
Likewise, I'm not sure Lebron ever had a string of games against a conference opponent where he went 10-27, 12-32, and 3-18.That's okay, Mike followed that string up by hanging 54 on the Knicks. He was a great player, no doubt. He closed that series out with an epic 8-24 showing. The Bulls won anyway.
In that same vein, I'm not all that down on Lebron for his poor series against the Spurs when he was a young kid playing with the Cavs, especially when Mike's first six years of finals box scores looked like this:
1984-85: DNP, eliminated
1985-86: DNP, eliminated
1986-87: DNP, eliminated
1987-88: DNP, eliminated
1988-89: DNP, eliminated
1989-90: DNP, eliminated
Jordan's still the GOAT in my book, but it ain't because he never played badly. He did. He had lots of poor games. But he had lots more good-to-great ones, and came up biggest on the biggest stages. Props. Last night wasn't the biggest stage. It was minor, and Lebron came up small. As long as he's still on run of MVP-caliber seasons topped off with title runs, he gets less than no flack for it, IMO.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/j/jamesle01/gamelog/2008/
Point was that Lebron shot that poorly against a conference opponent, like Freelove suggested he hadn't. If we want to bring in other stats, Jordan had 11 assists, 8 boards, 2 steals, and 2 blocks in the 3-18 game, to go along with his 16 of 17 free throws made. And the Bulls won by 20.He had 5 boards, 8 assists, 4 steals and 3 blocks and was +29 in the 5-16 game, a 24 point win for the Cavs. Not really sure you should count that one as a stinker.Does 2-18, 6-24, 5-16, 7-20, etc count. What did he shoot on that series? .355 I think?Mike had some clunkers. Rarely in the sort of 3-1 up situation where the coach could say, "you know what, Mike, we don't really need you to put up 30 bad looking shots tonight, so let's just take a breather, huh?"If nothing else, Dr. J definitely made me curious about Jordan's history and got me to take a closer look, which is kinda cool.
Here's the playoff games (after his first season, when they don't have the stat) where he had a Game Score of less than 15. I don't really remember most of them.
Likewise, I'm not sure Lebron ever had a string of games against a conference opponent where he went 10-27, 12-32, and 3-18.That's okay, Mike followed that string up by hanging 54 on the Knicks. He was a great player, no doubt. He closed that series out with an epic 8-24 showing. The Bulls won anyway.
In that same vein, I'm not all that down on Lebron for his poor series against the Spurs when he was a young kid playing with the Cavs, especially when Mike's first six years of finals box scores looked like this:
1984-85: DNP, eliminated
1985-86: DNP, eliminated
1986-87: DNP, eliminated
1987-88: DNP, eliminated
1988-89: DNP, eliminated
1989-90: DNP, eliminated
Jordan's still the GOAT in my book, but it ain't because he never played badly. He did. He had lots of poor games. But he had lots more good-to-great ones, and came up biggest on the biggest stages. Props. Last night wasn't the biggest stage. It was minor, and Lebron came up small. As long as he's still on run of MVP-caliber seasons topped off with title runs, he gets less than no flack for it, IMO.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/j/jamesle01/gamelog/2008/
Same goes for the 6 boards, 13 assists (!) 3 steals, 2 blocks and +15 in an 11 point win where he shot 7-20.
Cheers, DrJ. Enjoy Game 5 tonight, should be awesome.
I'd rather go with your original selection. Duncan is a better player than Garnett, but Garnett is the superior fit here as he complements Olajuwon better offensively and defensively. And any difference between Bird and LeBron offensively is overshadowed by the significant difference on defense. I just can't pass up a defense of Olajuwon, Garnett, LeBron, and Jordan. Stockton would be the weakest, and he was a pretty good defender himself.I have done some further looking into it and while I still like my initial reaction, here is another run that could be a better squad:Jayrod said:I only want to spend $14.Stockton8ebok24 said:Fun game making the rounds on social media the last couple of days.
You have $15 to spend to make your starting 5:
Jordan
LeBron
Garnett
Olajuwon
I don't want guys that will take shots from MJ and can play great defense.
I suppose Shaq could be used over Hakeem, but I love the mobility and shot blocking tandem of KG & Hakeem. I also don't like Isaiah over Stockton for this squad as he was more of a scoring PG. Would love to have Magic, but he is not worth $3 more.
PG - Stockton
SG - MJ
SF - Larry
PF - Duncan
C - Hakeem
I think the jump from KG to Duncan is more valuable than the dropoff from LeBron to Larry. I really wanted to find a way to get Wilt in there, but couldn't justify the drop in $2 somewhere else. I considered Frazier a few times, but his lack of assist production just felt wrong with great scorers like MJ & Larry...I need a distributor for those two and the dropoff in defense from Frazier to Stockton isn't too bad. Hakeem's defensive dominance made it an easier decision (2x DPOY, 9x All-D). He and Duncan can control the paint while Larry and MJ do the scoring. I have great balance in scoring, rebounding and defense.
Suck it Paul Allen. Maybe monkey boy will move the Clippers to Seattle.Insane.Ballmer dropping $2 billion on the Clippers.
That's totally crazy. How much would the Lakers or Knicks be then? $3B? That's outrageous.Insane.Ballmer dropping $2 billion on the Clippers.
Awesome.Insane.Ballmer dropping $2 billion on the Clippers.
Nothing to prevent that number from going up as well if one of the other groups decides to up their offer.Ballmer dropping $2 billion on the Clippers.
I don't see it happening. Maybe they increase the bid but I'll be shocked if he doesn't win this.Nothing to prevent that number from going up as well if one of the other groups decides to up their offer.Ballmer dropping $2 billion on the Clippers.
Ballmer dropping $2 billion on the Clippers.
Ownership of the Los Angeles Clippers, with his $2-billion offer setting a record price for an NBA team, The Times has learned.
One of the individuals with knowledge of the negotiations said the Geffen group bid $1.6 billion and Ressler at $1.2 billion.Ballmer, who was chief executive of Microsoft for 14 years, was chosen over competitors that included Los Angeles-based investors Tony Ressler and Bruce Karsh and a group that included David Geffen and executives from the Guggenheim Group, the Chicago-based owner of the Los Angeles Dodgers, according to three individuals familiar with the negotiations.
The sale price is almost four times the highest previous NBA franchise sale price -- the $550 million paid earlier this month for the Milwaukee Bucks. It is second only to the Dodgers' 2012 sale for $2.1 billion as the highest price for any sports team in North America.
8
The prospective sale by Clippers co-owner Shelly Sterling comes five days ahead of an NBA hearing to oust her family from ownership following a controversy in which Donald Sterling insulted African-Americans in a secret audio recording.
The tentative deal still must receive the blessing of her husband, Donald Sterling, who has waxed and waned on the question of whether he would allow his wife to sell the team he has controlled for more than three decades.
The deal also needs the eventual approval of 29 other NBA owners, but is expected to clear that hurdle as long as Ballmer reaffirms his pledge to keep the team in Los Angeles and not move it to Seattle, where he lives.
I think he gets the team as well but I'm pretty sure the plan was to have multiple rounds of bidding. The plan was to offer a handful of the original bidders an opportunity to submit best and finals after their initial bids. Seems like that is the case seeing how each bid amount has already been leaked to the media.I don't see it happening. Maybe they increase the bid but I'll be shocked if he doesn't win this.Nothing to prevent that number from going up as well if one of the other groups decides to up their offer.Ballmer dropping $2 billion on the Clippers.
That's a problem?The only problem with Westbrook getting hot like this is that he never wants to give up the ball.
Hoos First said:I'm sure Miami will win game 6 by 30. NBA doesn't care, another game, more millions for their pockets![]()
There was no way Miami was going to be allowed to win this game.
Seriously. A couple of terrible calls <> conspiracy. Amazing how we go through this every year.Premier said:The NBA is a billion dollar business that operates mainly off of the public trust that its games are on the up and up. They aren't going to risk tens of billions of dollars to make a few extra million on one game.Hoos First said:I'm sure Miami will win game 6 by 30. NBA doesn't care, another game, more millions for their pockets![]()
There was no way Miami was going to be allowed to win this game.
You guys are complete idiots if you think the league office is rigging these games.
Yep, because eventually he starts throwing up bricks and they don't run their offense- which happened here.That's a problem?The only problem with Westbrook getting hot like this is that he never wants to give up the ball.
15 points on 8 shots. I don't think he's holding them back too much.Yep, because eventually he starts throwing up bricks and they don't run their offense- which happened here.That's a problem?The only problem with Westbrook getting hot like this is that he never wants to give up the ball.
The bigger problem for the Thunder, of course, is that their defense in the paint is dismal tonight.
Ballmer is apparently moving himself to LA. That's a blow for the potential Seattle ownership groups.Suck it Paul Allen. Maybe monkey boy will move the Clippers to Seattle.Insane.Ballmer dropping $2 billion on the Clippers.
I really don't understand the hate. I know I would have screwed things up in his situation.Woo! Man have I missed all this LeBron hate the last few years! FEELS GOOD!
Saints, could you expand on your post about your preference to have Wade shooting the last shot over James? What time period are you considering this hypothetical shot be taken? '06? '13? '14? (I'm more of a Rubber Soul guy but Revolver and Rubber Soul are largely 2 chapters of the same book, IMO).
What is clutch? Is it hitting a 3 when your team is on the brink of elimination down 5 with 20 seconds left and the championship tape is on the court in preparation of the opponent celebrating? Is going into Boston down 3-2 and dropping 45/15/5 or whatever it was clutch? How about the late jumper in game 7 to go up 4 and clinch the title against the Spurs? Is clutch only the last second 3 in Golden State right before the 13-14 all star game?
I can't really comment about LeBron vs Jordan or Bird or Wilt or any other great or how absurd it is (IMO) to say definitively that one will never be better than the other when you can have no idea how LeBrons career will play out or that if LeBron doesn't win it this year or because of 2012 or leaving Cleveland or wearing a headband that he'll never be better than player X. I understand the fascination of having such a discussion but it's pointless media fodder to me, i'll let you guys enjoy that.
I'm glad James is on my team. I can't wait to see what he does tomorrow night. I really hope UD blows a kiss towards Lance at some point.
Love the guy!FixedThe only problem with Westbrookgetting hot like thisis that he never wants to give up the ball.
You can put your Spurs pom poms up now. Pull out the heat pom poms.Way to go Spursssssssssssssss!!!! Even though I anticipate a game 7 on Saturday at home.....![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The "pom poms" are the same: flailing arms and jumping legs!You can put your Spurs pom poms up now. Pull out the heat pom poms.Way to go Spursssssssssssssss!!!! Even though I anticipate a game 7 on Saturday at home.....![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()