Willie Neslon
Footballguy
What a shame to end the game like that. That's not called 80-90% of the time. To call it with 4 seconds left, down one in the national semi-final is just awful. UConn jobbed, fans robbed.
Your complaints about the foul count are silly. UConn employed the same approach the Pats DBs used against the Colts WRs many years ago. Clark was getting mauled out there most of the game. Refs could have called 30-40 fouls in the first half alone. The UConn gameplan ensured that they would get called for more fouls — and IMO that’s not a negative, it was a rational and deliberate approach. And if not for a horrible last second call, on par with the worst late game call of all time (the 2002 WCF call on Mike Bibby when Kobe hit him in the face), UConn would have had a chance to win on the last possession. Great gameplan by Geno and staff. They didn’t let Clark beat them. But the box score was always going to be way way more fouls on UConn — by design.What a terrible way to end a game. I really hope SC takes care of business. 18-9 final foul count and they played a huge part of the game including not letting UConn have a shot at the end after making a great steal to get an opportunity.
A win would have been nice but honestly, UConn would have gotten crushed by that deep SC team. They were able to contain Clark and make this a game but can’t do that against SC.
Not call that foul. I think it looked worse than it was by the defender's reaction, but she barely shifts in her stance. Bueckers was already 2 steps past the screen and the "foul" was going to have no bearing on the play.The UCONN screener visually lines the defender up, then both leans into her and flares the 'bow out as she's coming through. And the height differential highlighted all of the above. Not sure what the refs are supposed to do.
You and the video will have to agree to disagree.Not call that foul. I think it looked worse than it was by the defender's reaction, but she barely shifts in her stance. Bueckers was already 2 steps past the screen and the "foul" was going to have no bearing on the play.
Yea I’ve changed my stance and it’s definitely a foul. Look how wide her feet are.I mean. C'mon now. That is an easy call.
Perfect angle. Always a foulI mean. C'mon now. That is an easy call.
That's sped up and makes it look worse. It was a screen, turn and re-screen.Yea I’ve changed my stance and it’s definitely a foul. Look how wide her feet are.I mean. C'mon now. That is an easy call.
Watching it again, Edwards has the roll to the elbow/FT line with space. If Bueckers sees it and hits her they could have had something, but I got the sense that the play was to get Bueckers loose and Stuelke did a good job switching out to cover any open look there.I'm not too sure what UCONN was going to do there honestly. Bueckers had gotten the ball with less than 4 seconds left, Stuelke was right in her face and Clark was ready to help if she got around her. There was still time for 1 more pass, but Bueckers would have had to force it if she was going to shoot.
We will never know though and got robbed of a great finish.
That's sped up?That's sped up and makes it look worse. It was a screen, turn and re-screen.Yea I’ve changed my stance and it’s definitely a foul. Look how wide her feet are.I mean. C'mon now. That is an easy call.
Was it technically a foul? Sure. Lots of screens are like that and don't get called.
But in a 1 pt game in the Final 4? Nah, that's a play on.
That link was absolutely not sped up, that's real time.That's sped up and makes it look worse. It was a screen, turn and re-screen.
Not call that foul. I think it looked worse than it was by the defender's reaction, but she barely shifts in her stance. Bueckers was already 2 steps past the screen and the "foul" was going to have no bearing on the play.The UCONN screener visually lines the defender up, then both leans into her and flares the 'bow out as she's coming through. And the height differential highlighted all of the above. Not sure what the refs are supposed to do.
This is how it was for me, too.Watching the game I thought it was a bad call, watching the replay the call was correct.
As a ref, you should know what a clear moving screen isAs a ref and someone who is rooting for Iowa, that was a terrible call in that moment.
It's 100x worse in slo-mo.That's sped up
Biggest pet peeve in basketball. Get the stupid coaches off the court.It's 100x worse in slo-mo.That's sped up
Yep.They don`t make that call it would be the same complaining would be going on from other side.
Agreed. I can't think of another team sport where the coach or manager is regularly allowed to be on the legal field of play and be that close to the action during a live play.Biggest pet peeve in basketball. Get the stupid coaches off the court.It's 100x worse in slo-mo.That's sped up
If the defender was able to get around that screen, coach was set up to take her out with a screen of his own.Biggest pet peeve in basketball. Get the stupid coaches off the court.It's 100x worse in slo-mo.That's sped up
Looks like a straight up body check in that clip.
She literally raises her elbow into her…Not call that foul. I think it looked worse than it was by the defender's reaction, but she barely shifts in her stance. Bueckers was already 2 steps past the screen and the "foul" was going to have no bearing on the play.The UCONN screener visually lines the defender up, then both leans into her and flares the 'bow out as she's coming through. And the height differential highlighted all of the above. Not sure what the refs are supposed to do.
I don't watch many women's games but in the men's game a moving screen is called a foul in my estimation about 30%40% of the time. The rest of the time it is ignored. So for a ref to make this call with a team down one with 4 seconds left in a national semi-final game is completely nuts. If these fouls were called 100% of the time I'd agree it should be called at that point of the game too but we all know they are not called 100% of the time. And it's not just moving screens. Other fouls like push-offs are not called 100% of the time either. Clark got away with a blatant push-off earlier in the game on a play where she scored an important bucket. That's why you swallow the whistle in the last 10 seconds unless it's so egregious that you have no choice. You don't suddenly turn into an eagle eye and call an offensive foul in that situation. You rob sports fans of the moments we tune into games to see.
Well they go from playing in basketball arenas to these stupid giant stadiums. I remember hearing the under is always the play on final four Saturday.I am sorry but the women's game is so much more pleasant to watch than the men's game right now. These offenses are terrible.
Well they go from playing in basketball arenas to these stupid giant stadiums. I remember hearing the under is always the play on final four Saturday.I am sorry but the women's game is so much more pleasant to watch than the men's game right now. These offenses are terrible.
Well I mean we’ve already discussed upthread how horrible the college game is. People watch because the tournament format is amazing. The games are trash.Well they go from playing in basketball arenas to these stupid giant stadiums. I remember hearing the under is always the play on final four Saturday.I am sorry but the women's game is so much more pleasant to watch than the men's game right now. These offenses are terrible.
Both teams are shooting 37%. The stadium can't possibly be the reason for this. Duke's exit game they shot 28%, not in a stadium. Duke.
It's a tough watch. And yet, here I am.