The Jerk,
I promised myself that I wouldn't get involved in any form of banter in reference to the Super Bowl. As a Math instructor I am well aware of how statistical data, especially unscientific polls, can be twisted to say anything you want.
I know that I am going to regret this, but let me take a stab humoring some of the ESPN stats that you linked:
Poll #3,
What is says - 14% of the people polled felt that the Seahawks were unfairly favored by the officials.
What it means - a) 14% of the people polled are morons, or
b) You guys need to continue your rants because you still have 86% of the people who need convinced.
Poll #4,
What it says - 33.5% of the people pollled felt that the Steelers won by making plays.
What it means - Pittsburgh didn't truely "win" the game.
Sea Bass,I'm an electrical engineer and I completely agree with you that these polls are virtually worthless. I'm bringing it up only because I've seen them used over and over again as "evidence" that the majority of football fans believe the officials decided the game, etc.
From what I've seen, you're a good sport and I'm trying to get away from all of the bickering, also. However, I will say that whether or not one believes the Steelers "won" the game due to making three big plays and playing good red zone defense or if one believes the Seahawks "lost" the game due to missed opportunities (2 missed FGs, numerous drops, poor clock management, etc.), the point remains that over 60% of the people in this poll believe the performance of the teams was more decisive than the officiating.
The broader point is that there are two ways to win games: one is by making more good plays, and the other is by making fewer bad plays. This can also be seen in even scientific polls. When the Steelers beat the Colts, it is likely that a poll in Indianapolis would have found more people attributing the loss to Colts mistakes than to Steeler execution. Yet the same poll conducted in Pittsburgh would have found the reverse to be true.
You spoke of twisting data to make any number of unjustified conclusions. I believe you are doing just that to conclude what you did from that poll question. What I see in those numbers is that 62% of the people thought the teams decided the game. Within that 62% group, 55% of them credited the Steelers' big plays as the difference in the game, while the other 45% blamed the Seahawks' missed opportunities. As a math instructor, I'm sure you understand that as well.
Anyway, I appreciate the sense of humor you're trying to bring to the board. Honestly, I don't see what is wrong with civil discussions. I don't believe anyone is being forced to view these threads against their will. I hope to see you mix it up with anyone, especially me, any time you want, because from what I've seen of your posts so far, you'll do it with style, class and tact.
to you, Sea Bass.