New Feature - Saturday Night Injury Watch (1 Viewer)

[Joe Bryant]

Our @FootballDiehard Bob Harris with a fun new feature.

Saturday Night Injury Watch: Week 2 Skill Players

Get the latest outlooks for the players you're most interested in heading into Sunday morning.

www.footballguys.com

A concise run down of the Skill Position players we're watching Saturday night.

 

[Joe Bryant]

Let us know if you'd like us to keep doing this one.

 

[IHEARTFF]

I like it as a nice summary of injury issues heading into Sunday

 

[jm192]

Love it. Thanks Joe

 

[BoltNlava]

Nice! I'll visit this every Saturday night.

 

[Joe Bryant]

Thanks y'all.

 

[Joe Bryant]

It is something Bob puts together for us internally as we track the players to watch Sunday morning. I get a lot of value from it and it hit me that you folks might like something like this too.

 

[Ministry of Pain]

Definitely need a go to on this
Just so much nonsense out there, hard to tell who has the scoop and who is just spewing conjecture

 

[Wrigley]

Looks like a keeper Clark

 

[Bri]

I watched Bob on YouTube today.

I am a diehard listener to Bob and Jeff Sunday morning. They go thru every game and they followup the inactives with like "what can we glean from this."

Idk if I need a night update.
Do I? It's great it's there and of some comfort to know if I need it

 

[Pietaster2]

Love this feature. Thanks for doing this!

 

[Pickle Rody]

I enjoy reading anything Harris writes. Keep 'em coming!

 

[Kuz]

Looks Great!

 

[themeistersinger]

Like it - I also appreciate his Outlook - pessimistic or optimistic. Gets some additional context to the P or Q or D designation

 

[finfansteve]

This is awesome

 

[GrantK]

This is cool, thank you!

 

[joey]

It is something Bob puts together for us internally as we track the players to watch Sunday morning. I get a lot of value from it and it hit me that you folks might like something like this too.

Love it.

And I’d personally love for it to end up in my email on Saturday night light you do with rankings and other emails you send to subscribers.
I’m guessing I’d forget about it entirely if I had to visit another web page.

2 cents.

 

[TheWinz]

Thanx much!

 

[Smack Tripper]

Thank you this is helpful

 

[nittanylion]

I watched Bob on YouTube today.

I am a diehard listener to Bob and Jeff Sunday morning. They go thru every game and they followup the inactives with like "what can we glean from this."

Idk if I need a night update.
Do I? It's great it's there and of some comfort to know if I need it

I'm with you, @Bri

Staple of my Sunday AM Prep - church ends, I'm in my truck by 11:30 (Melissa driving, with me riding shotgun so I can be on FBG's (News Blogger/Articles/Shark Pool) ), with @FootballDiehard / Bob Harris and Jeff Mans on the XM, getting caught up on all things football prior to Noon-1pm phone call with my High Stakes partner, making last minute decisions and putting finishing touches on our portfolio of Starting Lineups.

Wouldn't be a proper Football Sunday without 'em!

 

[QuizGuy66]

-QG

 

[fatness]

I like it and will check it on Saturday nights.

I like this feature a lot more, since it keeps updating: https://www.footballguys.com/news

 

[blue42]

Is it Bob's opinion on the outlook (optimistic, pessimistic, etc.) ?

 

[Joe Bryant]

Is it Bob's opinion on the outlook (optimistic, pessimistic, etc.) ?

Yes. The designations are the official report from the league and then @FootballDiehard adds the additional.

From the article (I added the bold)

The injury designations listed below (QUESTIONABLE, DOUBTFUL, and OUT) are from the official NFL Injury Report, released by the league office. Monday designations are from either the league or the updated injury reports provided by the teams' media relations departments (via social media or the official team websites).

The "outlook" comments -- optimistic, uncertain, and pessimistic -- for players with QUESTIONABLE and DOUBTFUL designations are our own. They're based on local and national reporting, practice participation, and coaches' comments.

 

[Joe Bryant]

I watched Bob on YouTube today.

I am a diehard listener to Bob and Jeff Sunday morning. They go thru every game and they followup the inactives with like "what can we glean from this."

Idk if I need a night update.
Do I? It's great it's there and of some comfort to know if I need it

For me, I use it as a guide Sunday morning to make sure we're focused on searching down the info on the specific players.

Sure, some days there's a surprise. But for most Sundays, we go in knowing we're looking for official word on a specific list of players and focus on those. This feature helps me with that.

 

[Bri]

I watched Bob on YouTube today.

I am a diehard listener to Bob and Jeff Sunday morning. They go thru every game and they followup the inactives with like "what can we glean from this."

Idk if I need a night update.
Do I? It's great it's there and of some comfort to know if I need it

For me, I use it as a guide Sunday morning to make sure we're focused on searching down the info on the specific players.

Sure, some days there's a surprise. But for most Sundays, we go in knowing we're looking for official word on a specific list of players and focus on those. This feature helps me with that.

I'm planning to add it to my routine.

I feel like week 3?4? guys start to drop players "last minute" in hopes they can reclaim them if needed on Wednesday. I try to pounce on that and I think this will fuel me for that

 

[Chaka]

I appreciate how concise it is, I will definitely check it out every week.

 

[Joe Bryant]

I appreciate how concise it is, I will definitely check it out every week.

That was what got me. Too many times I see stuff and it's a wall of text. This was quick and to the point and helpful when I was running down things.

It seemed to me that if it was useful for me, I bet it would be useful for y'all.

 

[Chaka]

I appreciate how concise it is, I will definitely check it out every week.

That was what got me. Too many times I see stuff and it's a wall of text. This was quick and to the point and helpful when I was running down things.

It seemed to me that if it was useful for me, I bet it would be useful for y'all.

What about turning it into a 42 minute video, with 11 minutes of intro forced banter? People love that ####, right?


Right???


Seriously, the format is awesome. Don't change a thing.