New Type of Dynasty League (1 Viewer)

[Donsmith753]

I'm looking for some new things to try out in dynasty leagues.

My first thought is to have variable roster sizes based upon previous years finish.

E.g. Champion can roster 24 players.

Bottom 4 teams can roster 30.

Would help poorer teams hold onto more lottery tickets and hopefully redress balance over the medium term.

 

[jeter23]

I'm looking for some new things to try out in dynasty leagues.

My first thought is to have variable roster sizes based upon previous years finish.

E.g. Champion can roster 24 players.

Bottom 4 teams can roster 30.

Would help poorer teams hold onto more lottery tickets and hopefully redress balance over the medium term.

I like that idea too. Did you see the info about my Kitchen Sink league?

 

[Donsmith753]

I'm looking for some new things to try out in dynasty leagues.

My first thought is to have variable roster sizes based upon previous years finish.

E.g. Champion can roster 24 players.

Bottom 4 teams can roster 30.

Would help poorer teams hold onto more lottery tickets and hopefully redress balance over the medium term.

I like that idea too. Did you see the info about my Kitchen Sink league?

Yeah that one looked scary. Wouldn't even know where to begin on valuations for that league!

 

[FUBAR]

I'm looking for some new things to try out in dynasty leagues.

My first thought is to have variable roster sizes based upon previous years finish.

E.g. Champion can roster 24 players.

Bottom 4 teams can roster 30.

Would help poorer teams hold onto more lottery tickets and hopefully redress balance over the medium term.

Should help off season trading too. Lots of 2 for 1 deals there

 

[Warrior]

Just had an idea for another type of league. I am not going to try this one this year, but would still welcome input. How about a keeper league where the number of keepers aligns with the number of wins each team has? So, the team that wins the league and wins 10 games, gets to keep 10 players. The worst team that wins 3 games only keeps 3 for the next season. Obviously, this would reward strong teams, but would it be too much for the weaker teams to overcome?

It would be more interesting IMO to let the league champion keep one player (say in a 12 team league) and let the league loser/lowest scorer keep up to 12 (or maybe up to 6?). This would help show whether the league champ is really draft/WW savvy and/or how much luck comes in to play.

I hope you enjoy seeing 5-6 teams tanking their season when they realize they're out of the playoffs and want extra keepers. Punishing owners for having a good team and being an active manager is always a bad idea.