NFC Championship GB@Seattle (2 Viewers)

[devouredbychaos]

The more I think about it, I'm loving how a 12-4 team with the best offensive AND best defensive player left playing, is set up as the underdog.

Who do you think your best defensive player is? I know two names worth talking about but I don't think they particularly would be even better than their Seattle counterparts--and those two aren't who I would call the best defensive players Seattle has...

Best Defensive player in the NFL not named Watt is Clay Matthews .... fact.

LOL! Cmon man I'm not a Packers or Seahawks fan and I know that isn't true.

 

[T with T]

Packer 34-17

Seahawks 27 Packers 20

 

[sho nuff]

The more I think about it, I'm loving how a 12-4 team with the best offensive AND best defensive player left playing, is set up as the underdog.

Who do you think your best defensive player is? I know two names worth talking about but I don't think they particularly would be even better than their Seattle counterparts--and those two aren't who I would call the best defensive players Seattle has...

Best Defensive player in the NFL not named Watt is Clay Matthews .... fact.

lol. I doubt he gets a single vote in the DPOY vote. He's not even top 5, not even best at his position... won't even be best on the field on Sunday.

Well, we'll just see about that won't we?

Not that making the "All Pro" list or garnering votes is the end-all, be-all, but Matthews did get votes for OLB so there are people who agree with you that he's at least in the conversation of being a top defensive player. And quite frankly since they've moved him inside that run defense has looked much, much better.

I don't really agree he's #2 on the list, but I don't find it that egregious. He may very well be in my top 10...

Agreed...very good player and may be the best all around LB on the field for his versatility. ..and great pass rush skills.

But dont think he will be the best defensive player on the field.

 

[T with T]

The more I think about it, I'm loving how a 12-4 team with the best offensive AND best defensive player left playing, is set up as the underdog.

Who do you think your best defensive player is? I know two names worth talking about but I don't think they particularly would be even better than their Seattle counterparts--and those two aren't who I would call the best defensive players Seattle has...

Best Defensive player in the NFL not named Watt is Clay Matthews .... fact.

LOL! Cmon man I'm not a Packers or Seahawks fan and I know that isn't true.

ya pretty silly statement............. Matthews isn't even top 5 imo and Im sure most would agree.............

 

[seahawk 17]

Alice in Chains performing at halftime.

Matthews is good, but he's not even a top five defensive player playing this weekend.

 

[TDorBust]

Alice in Chains performing at halftime.

Matthews is good, but he's not even a top five defensive player playing this weekend.

Packers have 4 other players better in your mind?

 

[ImTheScientist]

@DavisHsuSeattle: So Aaron and Marshawn are the only Offensive Skill Position 1st Round Picks in the NFCCG? (Wow) but maybe it says a lot.

 

[Pipes]

You knows what's better than having 12 men?

Having 13 championships. ..kiss the Rings!!!???

The funny thing about ITS is that the people who hate him turn into him

Good posting. Huge Packer fan here and I like ITS. All the trash talking is in good fun and he brings it with the best of them. Anyone who is offended or upset with anything written here or on any message board for that matter really needs to step away for a while.

 

[Doctor Detroit]

@DavisHsuSeattle: So Aaron and Marshawn are the only Offensive Skill Position 1st Round Picks in the NFCCG? (Wow) but maybe it says a lot.

Says a lot about the two organizations IMO.

 

[Pipes]

The more I think about it, I'm loving how a 12-4 team with the best offensive AND best defensive player left playing, is set up as the underdog.

Who do you think your best defensive player is? I know two names worth talking about but I don't think they particularly would be even better than their Seattle counterparts--and those two aren't who I would call the best defensive players Seattle has...

Best Defensive player in the NFL not named Watt is Clay Matthews .... fact.

LOL! Cmon man I'm not a Packers or Seahawks fan and I know that isn't true.

ya pretty silly statement............. Matthews isn't even top 5 imo and Im sure most would agree.............

I'd trade Clay for Earl Thomas or Richard Sherman straight up in a heartbeat.

 

[Sabertooth]

I have a pretty good feeling about this game. I love that the Packers have come out a lot more physical this season than years past. Since they beat the Steelers in the Super Bowl they almost leaned a little too much towards being a finesse team. Not this year though. Much tougher mentality.

Then how do you explain their mediocrity on the road?

Don't get me wrong, I like the Packers as a team, but even if Rodgers was 100%, I don't think they'd win this game, and with him not close to 100%, I think they will get pummeled.

They've lost two games since September. That's not what I'd call mediocre.

 

[Sabertooth]

I have a pretty good feeling about this game. I love that the Packers have come out a lot more physical this season than years past. Since they beat the Steelers in the Super Bowl they almost leaned a little too much towards being a finesse team. Not this year though. Much tougher mentality.

Buffalo? Buffalo? Buffalo? Playing for all the marbles and they couldn't get it done. Mental toughness?

I read Rodgers had the flu in that game. Did not read that until just this past week so I don't know how true it is. But I'm going with it.

 

[Ditkaless Wonders]

Well it looks like the inevitable has happened. The few have overwhelmed the many. Bladders have filled and the pissing has started. Can the ####ting be far behind?

Enjoy the game everyone. I'd wish for the better team to win, but I want the Packers to prevail, and they just may.

 

[Sabertooth]

Packers have allowed the most scrambling yards and the most scrambling TDs this year.

Thankfully Russell Wilson doesn't scramble.

This is the potential Achilles heel. Good thing they also scored the most points this year.

 

[Ghost Rider]

I have a pretty good feeling about this game. I love that the Packers have come out a lot more physical this season than years past. Since they beat the Steelers in the Super Bowl they almost leaned a little too much towards being a finesse team. Not this year though. Much tougher mentality.

Then how do you explain their mediocrity on the road?

Don't get me wrong, I like the Packers as a team, but even if Rodgers was 100%, I don't think they'd win this game, and with him not close to 100%, I think they will get pummeled.

They've lost two games since September. That's not what I'd call mediocre.

They are on the road. They played four teams this year on the road that were .500 or better and they went 1-3 against them with a -37 point differential. That is mediocre. If this game were in GB, it'd be a whole other discussion, but they are a mediocre road team, especially against non-crappy teams.

 

[TDorBust]

Packers have allowed the most scrambling yards and the most scrambling TDs this year.

Thankfully Russell Wilson doesn't scramble.

Do you actually want to post stats with that? Who's #2? Whats the difference between the Packers and a average team? How did they fair against the average week of the teams they faced?

Just doing a little math for you:

2014 allowed to QBs

Seattle 51 for 142 + 0 TDs

Packers 57 for 282 yards + 2 TDs

Arizona 60 for 350 yards + 1 TD

Dallas 43 for 124 + 5 TDs

Packers are actually tied #9-13 with 2 TD and #5 with 282 yards allowed

http://www.fftoday.com/stats/fantasystats.php?Season=2014&GameWeek=Season&PosID=10&Side=Allowed&LeagueID=1&order_by=RuTD&sort_order=DESC

So not sure where you get your numbers.

 

[Sabertooth]

I have a pretty good feeling about this game. I love that the Packers have come out a lot more physical this season than years past. Since they beat the Steelers in the Super Bowl they almost leaned a little too much towards being a finesse team. Not this year though. Much tougher mentality.

Then how do you explain their mediocrity on the road?

Don't get me wrong, I like the Packers as a team, but even if Rodgers was 100%, I don't think they'd win this game, and with him not close to 100%, I think they will get pummeled.

They've lost two games since September. That's not what I'd call mediocre.

They are on the road. They played four teams this year on the road that were .500 or better and they went 1-3 against them with a -37 point differential. That is mediocre. If this game were in GB, it'd be a whole other discussion, but they are a mediocre road team, especially against non-crappy teams.

I think that whole road and away stuff gets overblown. Either way you have to play football.

 

[ScottyDog]

Packers have allowed the most scrambling yards and the most scrambling TDs this year.

Thankfully Russell Wilson doesn't scramble.

This is the potential Achilles heel. Good thing they also scored the most points this year.

Sort of like Denver scored the most points last year? Next!

 

[Doctor Detroit]

Packers have allowed the most scrambling yards and the most scrambling TDs this year.

Thankfully Russell Wilson doesn't scramble.

Do you actually want to post stats with that? Who's #2? Whats the difference between the Packers and a average team? How did they fair against the average week of the teams they faced?

Just doing a little math for you:

2014 allowed to QBs

Seattle 51 for 142 + 0 TDs

Packers 57 for 282 yards + 2 TDs

Arizona 60 for 350 yards + 1 TD

Dallas 43 for 124 + 5 TDs

Packers are actually tied #9-13 with 2 TD and #5 with 282 yards allowed

http://www.fftoday.com/stats/fantasystats.php?Season=2014&GameWeek=Season&PosID=10&Side=Allowed&LeagueID=1&order_by=RuTD&sort_order=DESC

So not sure where you get your numbers.

Got them from Sportscenter, guy. Call them and complain.

 

[ImTheScientist]

Seahawks lead the league in explosive plays on offense this year.

http://www.seahawks.com/news/articles/article-1/When-it-comes-to-explosive-plays-Seahawks%E2%80%99-offense-leads-the-way/81f75044-0a9d-4e05-a835-bc12dc3d8e4b

 

[Wingnut]

I have a pretty good feeling about this game. I love that the Packers have come out a lot more physical this season than years past. Since they beat the Steelers in the Super Bowl they almost leaned a little too much towards being a finesse team. Not this year though. Much tougher mentality.

Then how do you explain their mediocrity on the road?

Don't get me wrong, I like the Packers as a team, but even if Rodgers was 100%, I don't think they'd win this game, and with him not close to 100%, I think they will get pummeled.

They've lost two games since September. That's not what I'd call mediocre.

They are on the road. They played four teams this year on the road that were .500 or better and they went 1-3 against them with a -37 point differential. That is mediocre. If this game were in GB, it'd be a whole other discussion, but they are a mediocre road team, especially against non-crappy teams.

Playoffs are a whole different beast than reg season. Both QBs have a ring. Both understand you've got to up your game in January. I think this game will be closer than most people think.

 

[Wingnut]

Seahawks lead the league in explosive plays on offense this year.

And Green Bay was a CLOSE 2nd. Seattle had more big running plays, Green Bay had more big passing plays.

PUSH.

http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/team-big-play-statistics/2014/

 

[TDorBust]

I have a pretty good feeling about this game. I love that the Packers have come out a lot more physical this season than years past. Since they beat the Steelers in the Super Bowl they almost leaned a little too much towards being a finesse team. Not this year though. Much tougher mentality.

Then how do you explain their mediocrity on the road?

Don't get me wrong, I like the Packers as a team, but even if Rodgers was 100%, I don't think they'd win this game, and with him not close to 100%, I think they will get pummeled.

They've lost two games since September. That's not what I'd call mediocre.

They are on the road. They played four teams this year on the road that were .500 or better and they went 1-3 against them with a -37 point differential. That is mediocre. If this game were in GB, it'd be a whole other discussion, but they are a mediocre road team, especially against non-crappy teams.

I think that whole road and away stuff gets overblown. Either way you have to play football.

Since week 3 who has the Seahawks played and won against that makes me thing they are so special?

Packers have allowed the most scrambling yards and the most scrambling TDs this year.

Thankfully Russell Wilson doesn't scramble.

Do you actually want to post stats with that? Who's #2? Whats the difference between the Packers and a average team? How did they fair against the average week of the teams they faced?

Just doing a little math for you:

2014 allowed to QBs

Seattle 51 for 142 + 0 TDs

Packers 57 for 282 yards + 2 TDs

Arizona 60 for 350 yards + 1 TD

Dallas 43 for 124 + 5 TDs

Packers are actually tied #9-13 with 2 TD and #5 with 282 yards allowed

http://www.fftoday.com/stats/fantasystats.php?Season=2014&GameWeek=Season&PosID=10&Side=Allowed&LeagueID=1&order_by=RuTD&sort_order=DESC

So not sure where you get your numbers.

Got them from Sportscenter, monkeynuts. Call them and complain.

Well show where the stat comes from then? What are the stats? Call the Packers out which is fine they are subpar against a running QB but why not cite the information and anytime stats are in articles its usually spun to show proof for the writer. Also why not keep the name calling for another forum.

"I can prove anything by statistics except the truth." - George Canning

 

[ImTheScientist]

Seahawks lead the league in explosive plays on offense this year.

And Green Bay was a CLOSE 2nd. Seattle had more big running plays, Green Bay had more big passing plays.

PUSH.http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/team-big-play-statistics/2014/

How is it a push when the hawks lead the league in explosive plays? Niners addition is a strange thing.

 

[MaxThreshold]

Seahawks lead the league in explosive plays on offense this year.

http://www.seahawks.com/news/articles/article-1/When-it-comes-to-explosive-plays-Seahawks%E2%80%99-offense-leads-the-way/81f75044-0a9d-4e05-a835-bc12dc3d8e4b

Wtf does this even mean? Another horse #### stat?

 

[Doctor Detroit]

Packers have allowed the most scrambling yards and the most scrambling TDs this year.

Thankfully Russell Wilson doesn't scramble.

Do you actually want to post stats with that? Who's #2? Whats the difference between the Packers and a average team? How did they fair against the average week of the teams they faced?

Just doing a little math for you:

2014 allowed to QBs

Seattle 51 for 142 + 0 TDs

Packers 57 for 282 yards + 2 TDs

Arizona 60 for 350 yards + 1 TD

Dallas 43 for 124 + 5 TDs

Packers are actually tied #9-13 with 2 TD and #5 with 282 yards allowed

http://www.fftoday.com/stats/fantasystats.php?Season=2014&GameWeek=Season&PosID=10&Side=Allowed&LeagueID=1&order_by=RuTD&sort_order=DESC

So not sure where you get your numbers.

Got them from Sportscenter, monkeynuts. Call them and complain.

Well show where the stat comes from then? What are the stats? Call the Packers out which is fine they are subpar against a running QB but why not cite the information and anytime stats are in articles its usually spun to show proof for the writer. Also why not keep the name calling for another forum.

"I can prove anything by statistics except the truth." - George Canning

Aren't you the one that got owned in the Flacco thread? You mad bro?

 

[TDorBust]

Seahawks lead the league in explosive plays on offense this year.

http://www.seahawks.com/news/articles/article-1/When-it-comes-to-explosive-plays-Seahawks%E2%80%99-offense-leads-the-way/81f75044-0a9d-4e05-a835-bc12dc3d8e4b

Packers had 128, so not far off

PASS

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/play-index/play_finder.cgi?request=1&match=summary_all&search=&player_id=&year_min=2014&year_max=2014&team_id=gnb&opp_id=&game_type=R&playoff_round=&game_num_min=0&game_num_max=99&week_num_min=0&week_num_max=99&quarter=1&quarter=2&quarter=3&quarter=4&quarter=5&tr_gtlt=lt&minutes=15&seconds=00&down=0&down=1&down=2&down=3&down=4&yds_to_go_min=&yds_to_go_max=&yg_gtlt=gt&yards=16&is_first_down=-1&field_pos_min_field=team&field_pos_min=&field_pos_max_field=team&field_pos_max=&end_field_pos_min_field=team&end_field_pos_min=&end_field_pos_max_field=team&end_field_pos_max=&type=PASS&is_turnover=-1&turnover_type=interception&turnover_type=fumble&is_scoring=-1&score_type=touchdown&score_type=field_goal&score_type=safety&is_sack=-1&include_kneels=-1&no_play=0&game_day_of_week=&game_location=&game_result=&margin_min=&margin_max=&order_by=yards&rush_direction=LE&rush_direction=LT&rush_direction=LG&rush_direction=M&rush_direction=RG&rush_direction=RT&rush_direction=RE&pass_location=SL&pass_location=SM&pass_location=SR&pass_location=DL&pass_location=DM&pass_location=DR

RUSH

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/play-index/play_finder.cgi?request=1&match=summary_all&search=&player_id=&year_min=2014&year_max=2014&team_id=gnb&opp_id=&game_type=R&playoff_round=&game_num_min=0&game_num_max=99&week_num_min=0&week_num_max=99&quarter=1&quarter=2&quarter=3&quarter=4&quarter=5&tr_gtlt=lt&minutes=15&seconds=00&down=0&down=1&down=2&down=3&down=4&yds_to_go_min=&yds_to_go_max=&yg_gtlt=gt&yards=12&is_first_down=-1&field_pos_min_field=team&field_pos_min=&field_pos_max_field=team&field_pos_max=&end_field_pos_min_field=team&end_field_pos_min=&end_field_pos_max_field=team&end_field_pos_max=&type=RUSH&is_turnover=-1&turnover_type=interception&turnover_type=fumble&is_scoring=-1&score_type=touchdown&score_type=field_goal&score_type=safety&is_sack=-1&include_kneels=-1&no_play=0&game_day_of_week=&game_location=&game_result=&margin_min=&margin_max=&order_by=yards&rush_direction=LE&rush_direction=LT&rush_direction=LG&rush_direction=M&rush_direction=RG&rush_direction=RT&rush_direction=RE&pass_location=SL&pass_location=SM&pass_location=SR&pass_location=DL&pass_location=DM&pass_location=DR

 

[ImTheScientist]

Seahawks lead the league in explosive plays on offense this year.http://www.seahawks.com/news/articles/article-1/When-it-comes-to-explosive-plays-Seahawks’-offense-leads-the-way/81f75044-0a9d-4e05-a835-bc12dc3d8e4b

Wtf does this even mean? Another horse #### stat?

Read the article for an explanation.

 

[Doctor Detroit]

Seahawks lead the league in explosive plays on offense this year.

http://www.seahawks.com/news/articles/article-1/When-it-comes-to-explosive-plays-Seahawks%E2%80%99-offense-leads-the-way/81f75044-0a9d-4e05-a835-bc12dc3d8e4b

Wtf does this even mean? Another horse #### stat?

Packers were second, so I'm inclined to side with you here.

 

[Wingnut]

Seahawks lead the league in explosive plays on offense this year.

And Green Bay was a CLOSE 2nd. Seattle had more big running plays, Green Bay had more big passing plays.

PUSH.http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/team-big-play-statistics/2014/

How is it a push when the hawks lead the league in explosive plays?

Reread my post, junior.Hawks had a *few* more big plays. Its not like they ran away from the league in the category. The majority of Seattle's big plays came from Lynch. Green Bays came from the passing game, which has more weapons. D Adams has turned it on lately, which gives Green Bay 3 viable WRs that can do damage.

PUSH.

 

[TDorBust]

Seahawks lead the league in explosive plays on offense this year.

And Green Bay was a CLOSE 2nd.Seattle had more big running plays, Green Bay had more big passing plays.

PUSH.http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/team-big-play-statistics/2014/

How is it a push when the hawks lead the league in explosive plays? Niners addition is a strange thing.

Push because the Packers had a total of like 4+ quarters where Rodgers didn't even play.

Min - 1 Quarter

Car - 1 Quarter

Chi - 1.5 Quarters

PHI - .5 Quarter

So your talking about a whole game where the leagues best player didn't even take the field to have an explosive play..... I would say PUSH about sums it up.

 

[ImTheScientist]

Seahawks lead the league in explosive plays on offense this year.

And Green Bay was a CLOSE 2nd. Seattle had more big running plays, Green Bay had more big passing plays.

PUSH.http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/team-big-play-statistics/2014/

How is it a push when the hawks lead the league in explosive plays?

Reread my post, junior.Hawks had a *few* more big plays. Its not like they ran away from the league in the category. The majority of Seattle's big plays came from Lynch. Green Bays came from the passing game, which has more weapons. D Adams has turned it on lately, which gives Green Bay 3 viable WRs that can do damage.

PUSH.

Stats say seahawks are #1. You can claim push but it's an incorrect opinion.

 

[Doctor Detroit]

Seahawks lead the league in explosive plays on offense this year.

And Green Bay was a CLOSE 2nd.Seattle had more big running plays, Green Bay had more big passing plays.

PUSH.http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/team-big-play-statistics/2014/

How is it a push when the hawks lead the league in explosive plays?

Reread my post, junior.Hawks had a *few* more big plays. Its not like they ran away from the league in the category. The majority of Seattle's big plays came from Lynch. Green Bays came from the passing game, which has more weapons. D Adams has turned it on lately, which gives Green Bay 3 viable WRs that can do damage.

PUSH.

Adams has been "viable" all year, rookie receivers are a little weird though and I don't think he had the route running down (with a perfectionist like Rodgers, that can be problematic). I think he makes Cobb expendable in the off-season, guy is gonna be really good.

 

[Doctor Detroit]

PUSH

 

[MaxThreshold]

Seahawks lead the league in explosive plays on offense this year.

And Green Bay was a CLOSE 2nd. Seattle had more big running plays, Green Bay had more big passing plays.

PUSH.http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/team-big-play-statistics/2014/

How is it a push when the hawks lead the league in explosive plays?

Reread my post, junior.Hawks had a *few* more big plays. Its not like they ran away from the league in the category. The majority of Seattle's big plays came from Lynch. Green Bays came from the passing game, which has more weapons. D Adams has turned it on lately, which gives Green Bay 3 viable WRs that can do damage.

PUSH.

I think he means hawks lead the league in explosive diarrhea of the mouth plays.

 

[Wingnut]

Seahawks lead the league in explosive plays on offense this year.

And Green Bay was a CLOSE 2nd. Seattle had more big running plays, Green Bay had more big passing plays.

PUSH.http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/team-big-play-statistics/2014/

How is it a push when the hawks lead the league in explosive plays?

Reread my post, junior.Hawks had a *few* more big plays. Its not like they ran away from the league in the category. The majority of Seattle's big plays came from Lynch. Green Bays came from the passing game, which has more weapons. D Adams has turned it on lately, which gives Green Bay 3 viable WRs that can do damage.

PUSH.

Stats say seahawks are #1. You can claim push but it's an incorrect opinion.

Its more like 1a and 1b. Sorry, sports fan, but you're not getting much support on this one.PUSH.

 

[ScottyDog]

.

 

[Wingnut]

Seahawks lead the league in explosive plays on offense this year.

And Green Bay was a CLOSE 2nd. Seattle had more big running plays, Green Bay had more big passing plays.

PUSH.http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/team-big-play-statistics/2014/

How is it a push when the hawks lead the league in explosive plays?

Reread my post, junior.Hawks had a *few* more big plays. Its not like they ran away from the league in the category. The majority of Seattle's big plays came from Lynch. Green Bays came from the passing game, which has more weapons. D Adams has turned it on lately, which gives Green Bay 3 viable WRs that can do damage.

PUSH.

I think he means hawks lead the league in explosive diarrhea of the mouth plays.

They're a clear cut #1 in that category.NO PUSH.

 

[Wingnut]

PUSH

 

[Doctor Detroit]

Seahawks lead the league in explosive plays on offense this year.

And Green Bay was a CLOSE 2nd.Seattle had more big running plays, Green Bay had more big passing plays.

PUSH.http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/team-big-play-statistics/2014/

How is it a push when the hawks lead the league in explosive plays?

Reread my post, junior.Hawks had a *few* more big plays. Its not like they ran away from the league in the category. The majority of Seattle's big plays came from Lynch. Green Bays came from the passing game, which has more weapons. D Adams has turned it on lately, which gives Green Bay 3 viable WRs that can do damage.

PUSH.

I think he means hawks lead the league in explosive diarrhea of the mouth plays.

They're a clear cut #1 in that category.NO PUSH.

You are really obsessed with the Seahawks, I didn't know it was this bad.

Niners won some titles back in the 90s, right? Right?

 

[Mr.Pack]

I have a pretty good feeling about this game. I love that the Packers have come out a lot more physical this season than years past. Since they beat the Steelers in the Super Bowl they almost leaned a little too much towards being a finesse team. Not this year though. Much tougher mentality.

Then how do you explain their mediocrity on the road?

Don't get me wrong, I like the Packers as a team, but even if Rodgers was 100%, I don't think they'd win this game, and with him not close to 100%, I think they will get pummeled.

They've lost two games since September. That's not what I'd call mediocre.

They are on the road. They played four teams this year on the road that were .500 or better and they went 1-3 against them with a -37 point differential. That is mediocre. If this game were in GB, it'd be a whole other discussion, but they are a mediocre road team, especially against non-crappy teams.

Preposterous. Haven't you heard? The Packers couldn't beat the Seahaks if they were allowed 16 players on each side of the ball.

 

[Wingnut]

Seahawks lead the league in explosive plays on offense this year.

And Green Bay was a CLOSE 2nd.Seattle had more big running plays, Green Bay had more big passing plays.

PUSH.http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/team-big-play-statistics/2014/

How is it a push when the hawks lead the league in explosive plays?

Reread my post, junior.Hawks had a *few* more big plays. Its not like they ran away from the league in the category. The majority of Seattle's big plays came from Lynch. Green Bays came from the passing game, which has more weapons. D Adams has turned it on lately, which gives Green Bay 3 viable WRs that can do damage.

PUSH.

I think he means hawks lead the league in explosive diarrhea of the mouth plays.

They're a clear cut #1 in that category.NO PUSH.

You are really obsessed with the Seahawks, I didn't know it was this bad.

How do you figure? They're a division rival, and I dont want to see them win another title. Hate Sherman's mouth, hate Lynch's juvenile interview answers after games, and hate Carroll. I actually like and respect Wilson, Kam, and Earl. The rest I have no opinion of.

 

[Doctor Detroit]

Seahawks lead the league in explosive plays on offense this year.

And Green Bay was a CLOSE 2nd.Seattle had more big running plays, Green Bay had more big passing plays.

PUSH.http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/team-big-play-statistics/2014/

How is it a push when the hawks lead the league in explosive plays?

Reread my post, junior.Hawks had a *few* more big plays. Its not like they ran away from the league in the category. The majority of Seattle's big plays came from Lynch. Green Bays came from the passing game, which has more weapons. D Adams has turned it on lately, which gives Green Bay 3 viable WRs that can do damage.

PUSH.

I think he means hawks lead the league in explosive diarrhea of the mouth plays.

They're a clear cut #1 in that category.NO PUSH.

You are really obsessed with the Seahawks, I didn't know it was this bad.

How do you figure? They're a division rival, and I dont want to see them win another title.Hate Sherman's mouth, hate Lynch's juvenile interview answers after games, and hate Carroll. I actually like and respect Wilson, Kam, and Earl. The rest I have no opinion of.

I'm just giving you ####, you're my brohan.

I don't hate any NFL team that way, but I think I hate the Red Sox and White Sox that much FWIW.

 

[Doctor Detroit]

I have a pretty good feeling about this game. I love that the Packers have come out a lot more physical this season than years past. Since they beat the Steelers in the Super Bowl they almost leaned a little too much towards being a finesse team. Not this year though. Much tougher mentality.

Then how do you explain their mediocrity on the road?

Don't get me wrong, I like the Packers as a team, but even if Rodgers was 100%, I don't think they'd win this game, and with him not close to 100%, I think they will get pummeled.

They've lost two games since September. That's not what I'd call mediocre.

They are on the road. They played four teams this year on the road that were .500 or better and they went 1-3 against them with a -37 point differential. That is mediocre. If this game were in GB, it'd be a whole other discussion, but they are a mediocre road team, especially against non-crappy teams.

Preposterous. Haven't you heard? The Packers couldn't beat the Seahaks if they were allowed 16 players on each side of the ball.

Don't play the victim, if the Packers win plenty of talking heads will eat some crow. If not, you'll be exactly where you started.

I say Seahawks cover with a late score but it will be a tight game.

 

[Mr.Pack]

Seahawks lead the league in explosive plays on offense this year.

And Green Bay was a CLOSE 2nd.Seattle had more big running plays, Green Bay had more big passing plays.

PUSH.http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/team-big-play-statistics/2014/

How is it a push when the hawks lead the league in explosive plays?

Reread my post, junior.Hawks had a *few* more big plays. Its not like they ran away from the league in the category. The majority of Seattle's big plays came from Lynch. Green Bays came from the passing game, which has more weapons. D Adams has turned it on lately, which gives Green Bay 3 viable WRs that can do damage.

PUSH.

Adams has been "viable" all year, rookie receivers are a little weird though and I don't think he had the route running down (with a perfectionist like Rodgers, that can be problematic). I think he makes Cobb expendable in the off-season, guy is gonna be really good.

Wow, a football post!

I agree with almost all of this. I don't think he makes Cobb expendable though, Cobb does so many different things ala Percy Harvin (Without the bad attitude).

I think if they can lock up Cobb, with the 2 TE's coming on, this will be an even scarier Offense for years to come.

 

[Mr.Pack]

Seahawks lead the league in explosive plays on offense this year.

And Green Bay was a CLOSE 2nd.Seattle had more big running plays, Green Bay had more big passing plays.

PUSH.http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/team-big-play-statistics/2014/

How is it a push when the hawks lead the league in explosive plays?

Reread my post, junior.Hawks had a *few* more big plays. Its not like they ran away from the league in the category. The majority of Seattle's big plays came from Lynch. Green Bays came from the passing game, which has more weapons. D Adams has turned it on lately, which gives Green Bay 3 viable WRs that can do damage.

PUSH.

I think he means hawks lead the league in explosive diarrhea of the mouth plays.

They're a clear cut #1 in that category.NO PUSH.

You are really obsessed with the Seahawks, I didn't know it was this bad.

How do you figure? They're a division rival, and I dont want to see them win another title.Hate Sherman's mouth, hate Lynch's juvenile interview answers after games, and hate Carroll. I actually like and respect Wilson, Kam, and Earl. The rest I have no opinion of.

I'm just giving you ####, you're my brohan.

I don't hate any NFL team that way, but I think I hate the Red Sox and White Sox that much FWIW.

Can he take that to the bank?

 

[Doctor Detroit]

Seahawks lead the league in explosive plays on offense this year.

And Green Bay was a CLOSE 2nd.Seattle had more big running plays, Green Bay had more big passing plays.

PUSH.http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/team-big-play-statistics/2014/

How is it a push when the hawks lead the league in explosive plays?

Reread my post, junior.Hawks had a *few* more big plays. Its not like they ran away from the league in the category. The majority of Seattle's big plays came from Lynch. Green Bays came from the passing game, which has more weapons. D Adams has turned it on lately, which gives Green Bay 3 viable WRs that can do damage.

PUSH.

I think he means hawks lead the league in explosive diarrhea of the mouth plays.

They're a clear cut #1 in that category.NO PUSH.

You are really obsessed with the Seahawks, I didn't know it was this bad.

How do you figure? They're a division rival, and I dont want to see them win another title.Hate Sherman's mouth, hate Lynch's juvenile interview answers after games, and hate Carroll. I actually like and respect Wilson, Kam, and Earl. The rest I have no opinion of.

I'm just giving you ####, you're my brohan.

I don't hate any NFL team that way, but I think I hate the Red Sox and White Sox that much FWIW.

Can he take that to the bank?

### #### right he can!

 

[sho nuff]

@DavisHsuSeattle: So Aaron and Marshawn are the only Offensive Skill Position 1st Round Picks in the NFCCG? (Wow) but maybe it says a lot.

Says a lot about the two organizations IMO.

Definitely. ..know how to find skill players later...and build elsewhere in the 1st round.

 

[Doctor Detroit]

@DavisHsuSeattle: So Aaron and Marshawn are the only Offensive Skill Position 1st Round Picks in the NFCCG? (Wow) but maybe it says a lot.

Says a lot about the two organizations IMO.

Definitely. ..know how to find skill players later...and build elsewhere in the 1st round.

I have a lot of respect for the Packers, wouldn't want this any other way. I hate the Cowboys more than almost any other franchise, but getting Green Bay was what I wanted. They were the two best teams in the NFL this year IMO, let's settle it on the field.

 

[sho nuff]

I like Adams...but not sure he makes Cobb expendable.

Cobb just adds so much. Look at last week and others when McCarthy wants to spread out a team and get the right matchups. Moves Cobb around, puts him in the backfield....hands off , throws to him out of the backfield.

Just think he is worth the money...and brings a ton to the table.

He may learn from the old ron wolf quotes of him regretting not giving Favre the weapons every year.