NFC Championship GB@Seattle (2 Viewers)

[Jobber]

Oh boy, GB could be in trouble here.

 

[The General]

First time they have touched Rodgers all day.

 

[TwinTurbo]

All balls pete. They will win.

No horse in this race. Don't care who wins either way but I agree. Love to see coaches in there with some balls. Great score for Seattle.

Agreed. This is why you don't opt to kick FGs from the 1 yd line. Green Bay did it twice and that's why Seattle is still in it.

 

[MaxThreshold]

Here comes the GB 2nd half collapse.

 

[Donnybrook]

The turning point in this game will be the 3rd and 19 and Green Bays prevent D that didn't work.

 

[smackdaddies]

little things - if rodgers had not rolled that ankle, it would of been an easy 1st down catch and run for lacy. Instead - punt

 

[Wingnut]

Another Russell INT coming up.

 

[Mario Kart]

McCarthy is a great coach. His playcalling is top notch. All are in awe.

 

[cjv123]

Packers RT has been jumping all game but no calls, unlike SEAs. Refs in fix mode.

 

[mbuehner]

You know what I can't believe? I can't believe GB wasn't prepared for that. It's even worse than when they declined that personal foul. And nobody has even mentioned either of these events even once.

I still can't believe GB didn't see that coming.

Why wouldn't they decline the foul? The sack was 16 yards the foul was 15 yards.

Had to deline it, wasnt ruled a dead ball foul so would have wiped out the sack.

 

[Alex P Keaton]

Here comes the GB 2nd half collapse.

It is so weird that nobody saw this coming.

 

[sporthenry]

Mike Periera saying that personal foul was not a dead ball foul, not loss of down. Terrible call.

It's literally not even possible for it not to be a dead ball foul. If it wasn't a dead ball foul, then there was zero reason to even call it a penalty. But it clearly happened after the sack and was clearly a dead ball foul.

Mike Pereira sticking up the for refs when they clearly blew it once again. And he is getting shredded for it on Twitter.

Pereira didn't defend calling it a live ball. At least now that I've seen. Just said it wasn't called dead ball so not tacked on.

 

[CR69]

Rodgers injured by...himself.

 

[Leonidas]

You know what I can't believe? I can't believe GB wasn't prepared for that. It's even worse than when they declined that personal foul. And nobody has even mentioned either of these events even once.

I still can't believe GB didn't see that coming.

Why wouldn't they decline the foul? The sack was 16 yards the foul was 15 yards.

They wouldn't decline because it was a dead ball personal foul that should have been 15 yards tacked on.

Those who want to blame officials and the commish can erase the 7 points SEA has because only bad officiating allowed it to happen.

For the record.

 

[The General]

Non-call on the false start.

Saw that. They owe Seattle one now.

 

[bakes]

The juxtaposition of Kate Upton and Gary Busey is alarming...

 

[Sabertooth]

All the momentum all is Seattle's favor.

 

[Junior McSpiffy]

Mike Periera saying that personal foul was not a dead ball foul, not loss of down. Terrible call.

It's literally not even possible for it not to be a dead ball foul. If it wasn't a dead ball foul, then there was zero reason to even call it a penalty. But it clearly happened after the sack and was clearly a dead ball foul.

Mike Pereira sticking up the for refs when they clearly blew it once again. And he is getting shredded for it on Twitter.

But who is to say the fault is the ref's? It may have been the fault of the Packers coaches. They may not have understood the explanation from the refs and declined the penalty. The refs may be asking themselves "What the hell were they thinking?"

 

[Popinski]

Packers may not score again.

 

[jon_mx]

3+3+7+3+3=16

7+14>16

Wait what? How is 3+3+7+3+3 = 16? I'm so confused.

Base 13 numbering system.

 

[Alex P Keaton]

The turning point in this game will be the 3rd and 19 and Green Bays prevent D that didn't work.

Huh. I thought it was 4th and 26. Must have been a flashback.

 

[Osaurus]

The juxtaposition of Kate Upton and Gary Busey is alarming...

 

[Hawks64]

The turning point in this game will be the 3rd and 19 and Green Bays prevent D that didn't work.

Just like Philly in 2004.

 

[mbuehner]

Mike Periera saying that personal foul was not a dead ball foul, not loss of down. Terrible call.

It's literally not even possible for it not to be a dead ball foul. If it wasn't a dead ball foul, then there was zero reason to even call it a penalty. But it clearly happened after the sack and was clearly a dead ball foul.Mike Pereira sticking up the for refs when they clearly blew it once again. And he is getting shredded for it on Twitter.

Yup. But left Packers with no choice.

 

[Officer Pete Malloy]

Has a quarterback ever won a game in the super bowl era with a 0 QB rating?

Matt Flynn did it last week

 

[Pipes]

All the momentum all is Seattle's favor.

Agreed. Not liking this right now.

 

[The_Man]

Looked to me like GB was in a fake-aware formation on the fake FG but Hawk totally abandoned his responsibility. Even if the DL didn't prevent a first down, no way the holder was going to score

 

[Hoss Style]

Packers may not score again.

Pretty sure it's time for you and many others to R-e-l-a-x.

 

[Hawks64]

The turning point in this game will be the 3rd and 19 and Green Bays prevent D that didn't work.

Huh. I thought it was 4th and 26. Must have been a flashback.

Exactly what I was thinking.

 

[sporthenry]

Mike Periera saying that personal foul was not a dead ball foul, not loss of down. Terrible call.

It's literally not even possible for it not to be a dead ball foul. If it wasn't a dead ball foul, then there was zero reason to even call it a penalty. But it clearly happened after the sack and was clearly a dead ball foul.

Mike Pereira sticking up the for refs when they clearly blew it once again. And he is getting shredded for it on Twitter.

But who is to say the fault is the ref's? It may have been the fault of the Packers coaches. They may not have understood the explanation from the refs and declined the penalty. The refs may be asking themselves "What the hell were they thinking?"

pretty sure this didn't happen. Heck not sure the refs even give you the option to decline a dead ball penalty?

 

[Popinski]

Mike Periera saying that personal foul was not a dead ball foul, not loss of down. Terrible call.

It's literally not even possible for it not to be a dead ball foul. If it wasn't a dead ball foul, then there was zero reason to even call it a penalty. But it clearly happened after the sack and was clearly a dead ball foul.

Mike Pereira sticking up the for refs when they clearly blew it once again. And he is getting shredded for it on Twitter.

But who is to say the fault is the ref's? It may have been the fault of the Packers coaches. They may not have understood the explanation from the refs and declined the penalty. The refs may be asking themselves "What the hell were they thinking?"

This could be possible too. Won't know till after the game.

 

[joffer]

put the holder back in

 

[The General]

Hawks going to need a Def TD.

 

[Freelove]

That was a no-balls playcall.

 

[Alex P Keaton]

Big defensive stop

 

[MaxThreshold]

Here comes the GB 2nd half collapse.

It is so weird that nobody saw this coming.

Well, besides you and me, of course.

 

[Leonidas]

Mike Periera saying that personal foul was not a dead ball foul, not loss of down. Terrible call.

It's literally not even possible for it not to be a dead ball foul. If it wasn't a dead ball foul, then there was zero reason to even call it a penalty. But it clearly happened after the sack and was clearly a dead ball foul.

Mike Pereira sticking up the for refs when they clearly blew it once again. And he is getting shredded for it on Twitter.

But who is to say the fault is the ref's? It may have been the fault of the Packers coaches. They may not have understood the explanation from the refs and declined the penalty. The refs may be asking themselves "What the hell were they thinking?"

pretty sure this didn't happen. Heck not sure the refs even give you the option to decline a dead ball penalty?

Good point, why would any team EVER decline a dead ball penalty??

 

[ROCKET]

GB has played well on D but how much of it has been Wilson's performance? He just doesn't have it today.

 

[Doctor Detroit]

Brutal play calling

 

[Hawks64]

Big defensive stop

That was big. Need a long drive here regardless of points.

 

[bostonfred]

Probably three drives left for the Seahawks. They need a turnover badly

 

[Power Monster]

These offenses seem to have little confidence in the running game

 

[Hoss Style]

See? What's changed since the ST TD by Seattle?

The Packers have shut them down all game. The TD didn't change that. Nothing has happened to show that any "momentum" had changed. Seattle needs to show something on offense before I'd be worried as a Packer fan (barring another crazy ST play or defensive TD from Seattle).

 

[GroveDiesel]

Mike Periera saying that personal foul was not a dead ball foul, not loss of down. Terrible call.

It's literally not even possible for it not to be a dead ball foul. If it wasn't a dead ball foul, then there was zero reason to even call it a penalty. But it clearly happened after the sack and was clearly a dead ball foul.

Mike Pereira sticking up the for refs when they clearly blew it once again. And he is getting shredded for it on Twitter.

But who is to say the fault is the ref's? It may have been the fault of the Packers coaches. They may not have understood the explanation from the refs and declined the penalty. The refs may be asking themselves "What the hell were they thinking?"

Refs announced it as "penalty is declined, the result of the play stands." So they obviously we're the ones that were wrong, not GB.

 

[georg013]

Russell Wilson on the sidelines firing up the Gatorade jug. Yeah, he's not concussed.

 

[mbuehner]

Mike Periera saying that personal foul was not a dead ball foul, not loss of down. Terrible call.

It's literally not even possible for it not to be a dead ball foul. If it wasn't a dead ball foul, then there was zero reason to even call it a penalty. But it clearly happened after the sack and was clearly a dead ball foul.

Mike Pereira sticking up the for refs when they clearly blew it once again. And he is getting shredded for it on Twitter.

But who is to say the fault is the ref's? It may have been the fault of the Packers coaches. They may not have understood the explanation from the refs and declined the penalty. The refs may be asking themselves "What the hell were they thinking?"

This could be possible too. Won't know till after the game.

The way the referee explained it made it seem it wasnt a dead ball foul.

 

[Popinski]

By not going for two, it's still a 2 possession game entering the fourth.

 

[Alex P Keaton]

Here comes the GB 2nd half collapse.

It is so weird that nobody saw this coming.

Well, besides you and me, of course.

 

[bostonfred]

Beast mode activated... by lacy

 

[CR69]

Russell Wilson on the sidelines firing up the Gatorade jug. Yeah, he's not concussed.