ok but Harris should have at least 0.5tkl & 0.5sacki did not see the play that way. romo was down when the ball came loose. i would not be surprised if the fumble is reversed in a few days.
i agree with thatok but Harris should have at least 0.5tkl & 0.5sacki did not see the play that way. romo was down when the ball came loose. i would not be surprised if the fumble is reversed in a few days.
When stats get "adjusted" week to week, who is in charge of making that happen?i think we need to wait for Elias Sports correction now![]()
Elias makes the official corrections for the NFLWhen stats get "adjusted" week to week, who is in charge of making that happen?i think we need to wait for Elias Sports correction now
![]()
I'm not say it won't happen..... It's just not a fact that it will be corrected, hence don't hold your breath or you "might" suffocate.Just last week, NYG had a defensive stat adjustment. It happens.
http://football.myfantasyleague.com/2007/s...stics%20ChangesI am not seeing so few corrections on defense that we could say they neglect D stats. There are several defensive corrections per week.If it was an offensive statistic in question it would be changed, they neglect D stats.
I agree with that too. Im not sure what my league would do with a stat adjustment that happens the week after the game.ok but Harris should have at least 0.5tkl & 0.5sacki did not see the play that way. romo was down when the ball came loose. i would not be surprised if the fumble is reversed in a few days.
I saw the same thing, but NFL.com didnt rule it a sack for some unknown reason.didnt Tapp get a sack on the last play of the game for seattle? MFL didnt score it
Gaither went from 1 assist to 8-4 right at the end also.Anybody watching the Eagles/Pats stats on NFL.com? Patterson went from 10 solo to 6.
Yeah, I dont know if it will do any good or not, but everyone should start writing the NFL about what a crappy job they are doing scoring the games. I have sent my email in.wowa lot of drunk people @NFL.COM this week![]()
It will not do any good. Tackles and sacks are not official NFL stats. There are numerous changes every week by Elias Sports Bureau. I'm not sure if NFL people are the ones who score the games while they are being played. ?2007 stat changescaptbly said:Yeah, I dont know if it will do any good or not, but everyone should start writing the NFL about what a crappy job they are doing scoring the games. I have sent my email in.Young 8 said:wow
a lot of drunk people @NFL.COM this week
![]()
When a fumble occurs, the play is ruled "aborted". Therfore, no sack is awarded. It is basically a fumble recovery and a run for Frerotte.Deadman31 said:I saw the same thing, but NFL.com didnt rule it a sack for some unknown reason.Little Big Head said:didnt Tapp get a sack on the last play of the game for seattle? MFL didnt score it
Saved a game for me - I was watching and Gaither who is 96's jersey was rumpled alot and it looked like 98. I'm in a DT manditory and the guy was killing me (Patterson) with 2.5 per tackle. At the end - and I figured someone was giving Gaither's stats to Patterson - MFL corrected it.chook said:Gaither went from 1 assist to 8-4 right at the end also.nortobc said:Anybody watching the Eagles/Pats stats on NFL.com? Patterson went from 10 solo to 6.
That's why. I had the same problem watching last night.I was watching and Gaither who is 96's jersey was rumpled alot and it looked like 98.chook said:Gaither went from 1 assist to 8-4 right at the end also.nortobc said:Anybody watching the Eagles/Pats stats on NFL.com? Patterson went from 10 solo to 6.
He did have a sack. It didn't show up anywhere. Apparently it has now.There is a major war going on on my league at espn.com regarding a forced fumble and a sack that was never attributed to Kamerion Wimbley. of course, it would affect the score, and probably one team's playoff hopes.nfl.com says he had one tackle, a sack, vs. Baltimore. espn.com has him with zero's across the board. Craziness.