NFL W-L Records Since 2010 (1 Viewer)

[David Yudkin]

Team	W	L	PtDif	TODifNEP	37	8	574	69GBP	34	11	393	41ATL	34	11	256	28BAL	33	12	257	21PIT	31	14	255	-9NOS	29	16	254	-13SFO	28.5	16.5	242	33HOU	27	18	168	21NYG	27	18	144	20CHI	27	18	149	19NYJ	25	20	16	0DEN	22	23	-90	-23SDC	22	23	159	-12PHI	22	23	29	-24SEA	22	23	7	7IND	21	24	-177	-32DAL	21	24	-34	-6CIN	20	25	-11	-8DET	20	25	58	9TBB	20	25	-138	5TEN	19	26	-90	-13OAK	19	26	-189	-13KCC	19	26	-243	-15MIA	18	27	-80	-29WAS	18	27	-140	-6ARI	17	28	-287	-18MIN	16	29	-179	-19STL	15.5	29.5	-296	-1BUF	15	30	-267	-23JAC	15	30	-295	-10CLE	14	31	-163	8CAR	12	33	-282	-6

 

[I was in the pool]

Shows the value of QB with Saints and Steelers up there despite TO margin. Also Browns near the bottom despite positive TO margin.

 

[Urlacher54]

I find it interesting that only 11 of the 32 teams are over .500 especially given the parity that the NFL is known to represent.

 

[Leroy Hoard]

I find it interesting that only 11 of the 32 teams are over .500 especially given the parity that the NFL is known to represent.

Some of the bottom feeders jump up once in a while but then decend to back down to the ocean floor.

 

[Dinsy Ejotuz]

I've been wondering for awhile if the Patriots draft players with TO margin in mind, and this really highlights why.

I suspect they're willing to take average-to-poor RBs with a history of ball security or who maybe have physical attributes that relate to ball security for example. Or that they'll give playing time to CBs who are weaker in coverage but catch the ball when they have a chance to make a play. That sort of thing.

If turnovers can trump talent, why not draft with TO margin in mind?

Obviously having Brady helps a lot as well but I think it's more than that.

 

[snogger]

Yea.. Vikings are #6

Oh wait..

6th worst since 2010

 

[Please See Mine]

Shows the value of QB with Saints and Steelers up there despite TO margin. Also Browns near the bottom despite positive TO margin.

Also interesting to look at how much Detroit has seemingly squandered, considering Pt and TO differential being positive. Also Eagles and Chargers just shooting themselves in the foot despite having a lot of talent. Of course, we all kind of knew all of those, but nice to see the numbers solidify the case.

 

[FDC]

San Fran is the odd one here. In 2010 they looked like the worst team in the league with a flop at QB and coach.

 

[butcher boy]

San Fran is the odd one here. In 2010 they looked like the worst team in the league with a flop at QB and coach.

Last year, their TO differential was crazy high, similar to the Pats this year.

 

[David Yudkin]

San Fran is the odd one here. In 2010 they looked like the worst team in the league with a flop at QB and coach.

Last year, their TO differential was crazy high, similar to the Pats this year.

Pats have been consistent . . .2012 +242011 +172010 +28

 

[Donsmith753]

Cleveland and Miami's point differentials jumped out at me.