What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

NHL Off-Season thread:Down goes Kane! (6 Viewers)

How the AHL overtime experiment reduced shootouts

http://o.canada.com/sports/ahl-experiment-shows-nhl-that-3-on-3-overtime-reduces-shootouts

I really like this and hope the NHL goes to this full time.Still keep the shootout after 7 minutes if no goal and you get tons of action.
I don't understand how anyone can be in favor of the shootout anymore.
Got a few here that seem to like it but I agree.7 minutes with 4 of them being 3 on 3 should help get a winner the right way.
It looks like it would be fun to watch. Speed, moves.and passing ability are key. There would be numerous fast break opportunities. Not sure how the players would feel about it. Its going to take a lot of energy to play 3 vs 2.
3 v 2?
I think he feels if there is a penalty then the offending player goes off and it is a 3 on 2 power play.
Nope, when it is 3 v 3 and a penalty occurs, a player is added to make it a 4 v 3.

 
How the AHL overtime experiment reduced shootoutshttp://o.canada.com/sports/ahl-experiment-shows-nhl-that-3-on-3-overtime-reduces-shootouts

I really like this and hope the NHL goes to this full time.Still keep the shootout after 7 minutes if no goal and you get tons of action.
I don't understand how anyone can be in favor of the shootout anymore.
Got a few here that seem to like it but I agree.7 minutes with 4 of them being 3 on 3 should help get a winner the right way.
It looks like it would be fun to watch. Speed, moves.and passing ability are key. There would be numerous fast break opportunities. Not sure how the players would feel about it. Its going to take a lot of energy to play 3 vs 2.
3 v 2?
I think he feels if there is a penalty then the offending player goes off and it is a 3 on 2 power play.
Nope, when it is 3 v 3 and a penalty occurs, a player is added to make it a 4 v 3.
Yep
 
How the AHL overtime experiment reduced shootouts

http://o.canada.com/sports/ahl-experiment-shows-nhl-that-3-on-3-overtime-reduces-shootouts

I really like this and hope the NHL goes to this full time.Still keep the shootout after 7 minutes if no goal and you get tons of action.
I don't understand how anyone can be in favor of the shootout anymore.
Got a few here that seem to like it but I agree.7 minutes with 4 of them being 3 on 3 should help get a winner the right way.
It looks like it would be fun to watch. Speed, moves.and passing ability are key. There would be numerous fast break opportunities. Not sure how the players would feel about it. Its going to take a lot of energy to play 3 vs 2.
3 v 2?
I think he feels if there is a penalty then the offending player goes off and it is a 3 on 2 power play.
And I'm thinking the guy made a mistake and after the fact said - hey, 3 on 2 powerplay. Although then I would have said 2 on 3 power play.

 
Aaron Rudnicki said:
Dickie Dunn said:
Aaron Rudnicki said:
Stupid Bruins
Stupid Sabres!
When you can't beat Lindback, might as well give up.
I was at the game, I have never seen the Bruins literally skate circles around a team like they did for the first two periods. But the Sabres packed it in, kept it close and took advantage of a bounce to tie it up. You could almost see it coming the longer it stayed 1-0.

Lindback was solid, if not spectacular. The B's probably should have had far more than 45 shots considering how much offensive zone time they had.

Kid on the train wearing a Vanek jersey said the Sabres are going to make a run at Matt O'Connor from BU in the offseason. You heard anything about that?

 
Aaron Rudnicki said:
Dickie Dunn said:
Aaron Rudnicki said:
Stupid Bruins
Stupid Sabres!
When you can't beat Lindback, might as well give up.
I was at the game, I have never seen the Bruins literally skate circles around a team like they did for the first two periods. But the Sabres packed it in, kept it close and took advantage of a bounce to tie it up. You could almost see it coming the longer it stayed 1-0.

Lindback was solid, if not spectacular. The B's probably should have had far more than 45 shots considering how much offensive zone time they had.

Kid on the train wearing a Vanek jersey said the Sabres are going to make a run at Matt O'Connor from BU in the offseason. You heard anything about that?
Is that the goalie? If so, there is talk the Rangers and about 15 other teams want in

Question for you as a New Englander

Where was the dividing line between Whalers fans and Bruins fans. Was it just CT people who rooted for the Whale or did it extend. Woudl have been tough since Bruins were original 6. One of my sons coaches wears a Whalers hat, played for BC and I think lived in Mass. Just one of the things I thought about on my way to work today

 
Nice back to back road wins for Mn at St Louis and then at Nashville. Im not as impressed with the St Louis win as they were pretty badly outplayed. They bounced back well against a struggling Predator team.

 
Stewart has been fantastic so far. looking like a great deadline deal. underrated passer, sees the ice very well.

Bergenheim has been up and down, just okay. smaller role though.

 
Aaron Rudnicki said:
johnnyrock62000 said:
7 minutes doesn't seem very long. How about 10 minutes 4v4 and 5 minutes 3v3?
gllll getting that through
You know I don't have a seat at the negotiation table, right? I'm just a FBG. ;) If they play an extra period it's not like they're going to miss their bus or commercial flight.

 
Aaron Rudnicki said:
johnnyrock62000 said:
7 minutes doesn't seem very long. How about 10 minutes 4v4 and 5 minutes 3v3?
gllll getting that through
You know I don't have a seat at the negotiation table, right? I'm just a FBG. ;) If they play an extra period it's not like they're going to miss their bus or commercial flight.
NHLPA seems like they will fight anything. Longer overtimes put more stress on the players. They already started to complain about 3 v 3 being too hard on the star players.

 
Kid on the train wearing a Vanek jersey said the Sabres are going to make a run at Matt O'Connor from BU in the offseason. You heard anything about that?
yeah, I mentioned that in here after they dealt Neuvirth. I think they will go hard after him given their current goalie situation. If he wants to an easy path the to the NHL, they might give him the best chance.

 
Aaron Rudnicki said:
Dickie Dunn said:
Aaron Rudnicki said:
Stupid Bruins
Stupid Sabres!
When you can't beat Lindback, might as well give up.
I was at the game, I have never seen the Bruins literally skate circles around a team like they did for the first two periods. But the Sabres packed it in, kept it close and took advantage of a bounce to tie it up. You could almost see it coming the longer it stayed 1-0.

Lindback was solid, if not spectacular. The B's probably should have had far more than 45 shots considering how much offensive zone time they had.

Kid on the train wearing a Vanek jersey said the Sabres are going to make a run at Matt O'Connor from BU in the offseason. You heard anything about that?
Is that the goalie? If so, there is talk the Rangers and about 15 other teams want in

Question for you as a New Englander

Where was the dividing line between Whalers fans and Bruins fans. Was it just CT people who rooted for the Whale or did it extend. Woudl have been tough since Bruins were original 6. One of my sons coaches wears a Whalers hat, played for BC and I think lived in Mass. Just one of the things I thought about on my way to work today
Whalers' fan base was limited entirely to Connecticut, and that even excluded some of the closer-in to NYC suburbs like Greenwich. And that was also only when they were winning. No Mass kid ever switched allegiances and I don't think any Rhode Island kids did either.

That's part of the reason the franchise was doomed - it's not like thousands of lifelong Bruins and Rangers fans (let alone Islanders) suddenly abandoned their teams. They really only appealed to people who self-identified as hard core Connecticuters. I think people like the Whale more now for the cool/irony of wearing the gear than ever liked them when they were actually alive. Kind of like the Expos in that regard.

 
cool, thanks

ETA: I was wrong, He lived in CT

So everything in the world makes sense

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nice back to back road wins for Mn at St Louis and then at Nashville. Im not as impressed with the St Louis win as they were pretty badly outplayed. They bounced back well against a struggling Predator team.
I was at that game last night. Preds might have the worst powerplay in hockey. 5 on 3 for 50+ seconds and you take one shot?

 
Nice back to back road wins for Mn at St Louis and then at Nashville. Im not as impressed with the St Louis win as they were pretty badly outplayed. They bounced back well against a struggling Predator team.
I was at that game last night. Preds might have the worst powerplay in hockey. 5 on 3 for 50+ seconds and you take one shot?
Wild are the #1 PK unit in the league and well over 90% since the all-star break.

 
Nice back to back road wins for Mn at St Louis and then at Nashville. Im not as impressed with the St Louis win as they were pretty badly outplayed. They bounced back well against a struggling Predator team.
I was at that game last night. Preds might have the worst powerplay in hockey. 5 on 3 for 50+ seconds and you take one shot?
Islanders had a 5-minute PP against the Blackhawks last night, and managed just 1 shot on goal.

 
There's always next year. Toronto mathematically eliminated from the playoffs.

I wonder where Kessel will play next year.

 
Hammond has been on a serious roll for the Sens and if he continues this they have a legit shot to get in.12 consecutive games to start his career with 2 or fewer goal just tied the record.

Datsyuk out a few games according to Babcock with the dreaded LBI.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Aaron Rudnicki said:
johnnyrock62000 said:
7 minutes doesn't seem very long. How about 10 minutes 4v4 and 5 minutes 3v3?
gllll getting that through
You know I don't have a seat at the negotiation table, right? I'm just a FBG. ;) If they play an extra period it's not like they're going to miss their bus or commercial flight.
NHLPA seems like they will fight anything. Longer overtimes put more stress on the players. They already started to complain about 3 v 3 being too hard on the star players.
just go back to what they used to do. play 5 more minutes 5on5 and then end in a tie if no one scores.

 
Aaron Rudnicki said:
Dickie Dunn said:
Aaron Rudnicki said:
Stupid Bruins
Stupid Sabres!
When you can't beat Lindback, might as well give up.
I was at the game, I have never seen the Bruins literally skate circles around a team like they did for the first two periods. But the Sabres packed it in, kept it close and took advantage of a bounce to tie it up. You could almost see it coming the longer it stayed 1-0.

Lindback was solid, if not spectacular. The B's probably should have had far more than 45 shots considering how much offensive zone time they had.

Kid on the train wearing a Vanek jersey said the Sabres are going to make a run at Matt O'Connor from BU in the offseason. You heard anything about that?
Is that the goalie? If so, there is talk the Rangers and about 15 other teams want in

Question for you as a New Englander

Where was the dividing line between Whalers fans and Bruins fans. Was it just CT people who rooted for the Whale or did it extend. Woudl have been tough since Bruins were original 6. One of my sons coaches wears a Whalers hat, played for BC and I think lived in Mass. Just one of the things I thought about on my way to work today
Whalers' fan base was limited entirely to Connecticut, and that even excluded some of the closer-in to NYC suburbs like Greenwich. And that was also only when they were winning. No Mass kid ever switched allegiances and I don't think any Rhode Island kids did either.

That's part of the reason the franchise was doomed - it's not like thousands of lifelong Bruins and Rangers fans (let alone Islanders) suddenly abandoned their teams. They really only appealed to people who self-identified as hard core Connecticuters. I think people like the Whale more now for the cool/irony of wearing the gear than ever liked them when they were actually alive. Kind of like the Expos in that regard.
Yeah, the Whalers didn't really spill much into Massachusetts, except for maybe right along the border. I've worked with a couple of Whalers fans ... one grew up in Western Mass., so closer to Hartford than Boston, the other was kind of a curmudgeon who just liked to hate on the Boston teams more than anything. But the Bruins were too established through the Orr/Espo years for anyone to really jump ship.

I did like going to games in Hartford. It was much cheaper and easier to see NHL games there rather than trying to get into the old Garden. I ended up seeing Games 3 and 6 of the Adams Division playoffs in 1990 when I was in college (of course, the Bruins won Game 4). But I used to go down there to see other teams as well ... saw Gretzky's Oilers there, but never in Boston. Quite a few other random games as well.

Kind of miss The Mall. I could get to Hartford just as easily from my house now as I could get into the Garden last night.

 
More ties is not really an option. Time to let that idea go.
The one thing I don't understand is the resistance to the three-point system. Especially if you're playing a team from the other conference, there's no difference between winning a game in regulation and winning in OT/shootout.

It's not like the OT/shootout third point hasn't already skewed the tradition of the standings/point structure compared with anything pre-1990s.

 
More ties is not really an option. Time to let that idea go.
The one thing I don't understand is the resistance to the three-point system. Especially if you're playing a team from the other conference, there's no difference between winning a game in regulation and winning in OT/shootout.

It's not like the OT/shootout third point hasn't already skewed the tradition of the standings/point structure compared with anything pre-1990s.
agree

I have no idea why people in the media and elsewhere aren't banging that drum louder. it's so obvious that it needs to be changed. the arguments for keeping this current system just have no sound logic behind them anymore. nobody should care about records for points in a season after you started handing out 3 points in some games and 2 points in others.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
More ties is not really an option. Time to let that idea go.
The one thing I don't understand is the resistance to the three-point system. Especially if you're playing a team from the other conference, there's no difference between winning a game in regulation and winning in OT/shootout.

It's not like the OT/shootout third point hasn't already skewed the tradition of the standings/point structure compared with anything pre-1990s.
agree

I have no idea why people in the media and elsewhere aren't banging that drum louder. it's so obvious that it needs to be changed. the arguments for keeping this current system just have no sound logic behind them anymore. nobody should care about records for points in a season after you started handing out 3 points in some games and 2 points in others.
Me three. The three-point system would alleviate the original problem where teams had little incentive to try to win in overtime, since they didn't want to lose the one point they'd get for a tie. Awarding one point for the OT loss was a good idea, but I think the three-point system would be even better. Puts all the incentives in the right place.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top