What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Nirvana Nevermind Baby Sues 30 years later (1 Viewer)

from Artnet (I assume because this baby is trying to be an artist). child sexual exploitation and claim that his parents never signed a release. and :lol: at his comments about hooking up with hot chicks:

On the cover of an iconic 1991 album, a baby chased a dollar bill in a pool. Three decades later, he’s doing the same thing, but in court.

Spencer Elden, who appeared naked on the front of Nirvana’s landmark album Nevermind when he was just four months old, is now suing the band for commercial child sexual exploitation.

In the complaint, filed this week in California’s Central District Court, Elden alleges that he has suffered “lifelong damages” after the band “leveraged the shocking nature of his image to promote themselves and their music.” He notes that his legal guardians never signed a release “authorizing the use of any images of Spencer or of his likeness, and certainly not of commercial child pornography depicting him.”

Among those named in the suit are two surviving former members of Nirvana, drummer Dave Grohl and bassist Krist Novoselic; the overseers of deceased frontman Kurt Cobain’s estate, including Courtney Love; the photographer who took the image, Kirk Weddle; as well as several record companies associated with the album. 

The defendant is seeking damages, attorney fees, and a jury trial. His lawyer did not immediately respond to Artnet News’s request for comment, nor did representatives for the band. 

Elden, now 30 and an artist himself, has had a complicated relationship with the Nirvana cover, among the most recognizable in all of popular music. As a young man, he re-created the pool scene on numerous occasions, including for the album’s 10th, 15th, and 25th anniversaries. He has the word “nevermind” tattooed on his chest.   

However, his enthusiasm appears to have waned in recent years. In a 2016 interview with GQ Australia, Elden said his stance on the photograph changed after he reached out to Nirvana to see if the band would participate in an art show he was putting on. “I was asking if they wanted to put a piece of art in the ####### thing,” he said. “I was getting referred to their managers and their lawyers. Why am I still on their cover if I’m not that big of a deal?”

In that same interview, Elden discussed the negative aspects of the notoriety, too. When asked if the cover affected his relationships, he said, “Totally. Everyone thinks you’re making money from it.”

“You’ll hook up with a hot chick, and then they figure out you’re not making any money from it and they’ll dump you,” he went on. “You have these people who think you’re cool because you’re the Nirvana baby. But it’s ####### weird, man. It’s like that dream where you go to school without your clothes on.” 

After high school, Elden interned for the artist Shepard Fairey. He went to the ArtCenter College of Design in Pasadena, California, and now maintains a painting practice. 

Most accounts point to Cobain as the originator of Nevermind’s cover concept; it was inspired by a documentary he had seen about underwater births. Weddle, a photographer friend of Elden’s father, paid the family $200 for the original shoot.

 
I would wager that police brutality and violations of policies and procedures re the same occur at a higher rate than frivolous lawsuits. 


I very seriously doubt that to be true. 

Bureau of Justice Statistics (data from 2015)

Contacts Between Police and the Public, 2015

NCJ Number

251145

Date Published

October 2018

Author(s)

Elizabeth Davis, BJS Statisticians; Anthony Whyde, BJS Statisticians; Lynn Langton, former BJS Statistician

Publication Series

Contacts between Police and the Public

Publication Type

Publication

Annotation

This summary report presents data for 2015 on the number and percentages of the U.S. population ages 16 or older who had any contact with police, by type of contact, and reason.

Abstract

Presents data on the nature and frequency of contact between police and U.S. residents age 16 or older, including demographic characteristics of residents, the reason for and outcomes of the contact, police threats or use of nonfatal force, and residents' perceptions of police behavior during the contact. Data are also provided on residents' perceptions of police behavior and police use of a non-fatal threat or the use of force, distinguished by race and sex.

Highlights

The portion of U.S. residents age 16 or older who had contact with the police in the preceding 12 months declined from 26% in 2011 to 21% in 2015, a drop of more than 9 million people (from 62.9 million to 53.5 million).

The number of persons experiencing police-initiated contact fell by 8 million (down 23%), the number of persons who initiated contact with the police fell by 6 million (down 19%), and the number experiencing contact from traffic accidents did not change significantly.

Whites (23%) were more likely than blacks (20%) or Hispanics (17%) to have contact with police.

Police were equally likely to initiate contact with blacks and whites (11% each) but were less likely to initiate contact with Hispanics (9%).

Police were more likely to initiate contact with males (12 percent) than with females (9 percent); however, females (11 percent) were more likely than males (10 percent) to initiate contact with police.

Of the 223.3 million people who experienced a police-initiated contact, 8.6 were driving a vehicle when the contact occurred.

Blacks (9.8 percent) were more likely than Whites (8.6 percent) and Hispanics (7.6 percent) to be the driver in a traffic stop.

A higher percentage of Blacks (1.5 percent experienced street stops than Whites (0.9 percent) and Hispanics (0.9 percent)

Date Created: October 10, 2018


Number of police-public encounters totaled over 53,469,300.

1104 police uses of lethal force 

Including justified deaths thats a rate of 0.0000206473%.

Im going to go with my first assumption and say that you are loud wrong on this one GB. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top