Clutch is Eli
Footballguy
GO...
Unlike Otis, LHUCKS can occasionally be correct. There are four Hall of Famers who had significant stats in the 80s: Dickerson, Payton, Marcus Allen, and Tony Dorsett. Payton wasn't in the prime of his career, although he did put up respectable numbers (9800 yards rushing, 3114 receiving, 62 total TDs). Marcus Allen won a Super Bowl after the 1984 season, and had one of the best RB seasons ever in 1985 (2314 total yards, 14 TDs). Dorsett was effective but not at the level of those two. But Dickerson was a cut above, with 11226 rushing yards for the decade (along with 1633 receiving yards) and a total of 86 TDs. He also averaged 4.58 yards per carry, a huge amount for that time in the NFL.DickersonNext question.
Dickerson Payton 19 18 17 16 15 15 13 13 10 12 10 10 9 8 6
why does this matter for RB stats? RBs are at the mercy of the quality of their team for superbowls.How many super bowls did Dickerson sniff?
But it does for QBs.Dilfer > Marinowhy does this matter for RB stats? RBs are at the mercy of the quality of their team for superbowls.How many super bowls did Dickerson sniff?
Well that settles it then. I guess it's Roger Craig.How many super bowls did Dickerson sniff?Since when is 9800 rushing yards, 3100 receiving yards and 62 TDs "respectable"?
Has to be between Dickerson and Sweetness. I think an argument could be made either way, but for me, Walter Payton was simply the greatest back to play football, and he was still at the top of his game in the 80's, so he edges out Dickerson's decade stats.
No denying the yardage Dickerson put up during the 80's, but I never viewed the guy as a complete back. Payton was the best RB in history IMO, and have to go with him even though he retired in 87 and did most of his TD damage in the late 70's. Payton did it all and was one of the toughest runners in history. I remember Dickerson always looking for the sidelines where as Payton was looking to hit someone. I preferred the way Payton played the game. One of a kind.
Payton. But Allen would have been in this conversation if he was used as he should have been by the Raiders.Marcus Allen is probably the most underrated RB in the Hall of Fame (if that makes sense). I don't think I have ever seen a more complete running back (not only was he a great runner and receiver but he was a great blocker downfield and on blitz pickup and the emergency QB). His feud with Al Davis helped extend his career but I think it also limited his production during his peak years, which is a shame.
Allen is a deserving Hall of Famer, but definitely in a tier below the best of his extended era. I'd put him below Payton, Dickerson, OJ, Emmitt, Barry, in a tier with guys like Riggins, Thurman Thomas, and Dorsett.A quick look at Allen's stats make me think that other than the highlight reel Super Bowl where the Raiders destroyed my Skins and his incredible 85' season, he seems to be a bit overrated to me.
Larry Centers, Keith Byars, Mike Alstott, Mike Tolbert.I keep seeing this thread and want to chime in with the greatest fullback of the 80s, but that guy had a big overlap to the 90s.
He was fantasy relevant from 87 to 91.
I give you John L. Williams. The last of a dead breed. Seriously, can anyone name a fullback since that has been fantasy relevant?
Earl Campbell and John Riggins
A grossly underrated back, IMHO. Stupid as a rock,but a phenomenal RB.Could have been Billy Sims if injuries didnt cut his carerr short
Barry Sanders behind that OL would have been better.90s Emmitt Smith
Payton was the 3rd QB?Payton. But Allen would have been in this conversation if he was used as he should have been by the Raiders.Marcus Allen is probably the most underrated RB in the Hall of Fame (if that makes sense). I don't think I have ever seen a more complete running back (not only was he a great runner and receiver but he was a great blocker downfield and on blitz pickup and the emergency QB). His feud with Al Davis helped extend his career but I think it also limited his production during his peak years, which is a shame.
Still remember this weird game Williams had on 10/25/92: http://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/199210250nyg.htm11 carries/44 yardsI keep seeing this thread and want to chime in with the greatest fullback of the 80s, but that guy had a big overlap to the 90s.
He was fantasy relevant from 87 to 91.
I give you John L. Williams. The last of a dead breed. Seriously, can anyone name a fullback since that has been fantasy relevant?
Super bowls? That is meaningless in this conversation.How many super bowls did Dickerson sniff?Since when is 9800 rushing yards, 3100 receiving yards and 62 TDs "respectable"?
You can't question how the raiders used him. Unless you feel they should have traded one they used him perfect. In fact, they extended Marcus' career five years.Payton. But Allen would have been in this conversation if he was used as he should have been by the Raiders.Marcus Allen is probably the most underrated RB in the Hall of Fame (if that makes sense). I don't think I have ever seen a more complete running back (not only was he a great runner and receiver but he was a great blocker downfield and on blitz pickup and the emergency QB). His feud with Al Davis helped extend his career but I think it also limited his production during his peak years, which is a shame.
I guess I disagree. Were they really true fullbacks? I know Alstott and Tolbert weren't (or aren't). Was their primary purpose to be lead blockers on more of the snaps? Williams was a real fullback leading the way for Curt Warner. I remember Centers having a ton of catches for a few teams. Same with Byars. But real true leading blocking fullbacks? That's what made Williams different, and as far as I know there hasn't been anyone like him since. Williams finished five consecutive seasons among the top 24 RBs in fantasy points scored. IMO that makes him an extreme oddity. The game has certainly changed.Larry Centers, Keith Byars, Mike Alstott, Mike Tolbert.I keep seeing this thread and want to chime in with the greatest fullback of the 80s, but that guy had a big overlap to the 90s.
He was fantasy relevant from 87 to 91.
I give you John L. Williams. The last of a dead breed. Seriously, can anyone name a fullback since that has been fantasy relevant?
I think this is unusually insulting toward Dickerson.Sweetness, RIP, was phenomenal no doubt. Plenty of fans had this awesome appreciation for him and this joy that he could finally win a Supe, while at the same time seeing him get "old."Has to be between Dickerson and Sweetness. I think an argument could be made either way, but for me, Walter Payton was simply the greatest back to play football, and he was still at the top of his game in the 80's, so he edges out Dickerson's decade stats.
Tolbert?Centers was a RB at some point in his career. He once had over 100 catches. It was a joke like the Cards were so bad the WRs couldn't get open so many times that Centers had 100 catches. Their offense was terrible partly because the RB or FB had 100 catches.I guess I disagree. Were they really true fullbacks? I know Alstott and Tolbert weren't (or aren't). Was their primary purpose to be lead blockers on more of the snaps? Williams was a real fullback leading the way for Curt Warner. I remember Centers having a ton of catches for a few teams. Same with Byars. But real true leading blocking fullbacks? That's what made Williams different, and as far as I know there hasn't been anyone like him since. Williams finished five consecutive seasons among the top 24 RBs in fantasy points scored. IMO that makes him an extreme oddity. The game has certainly changed.Larry Centers, Keith Byars, Mike Alstott, Mike Tolbert.I keep seeing this thread and want to chime in with the greatest fullback of the 80s, but that guy had a big overlap to the 90s.
He was fantasy relevant from 87 to 91.
I give you John L. Williams. The last of a dead breed. Seriously, can anyone name a fullback since that has been fantasy relevant?
Cool story broBut really it isDickerson. For sure............and not just because I carried his helmet from the locker room to the practice field at Cal Sate Fullerton a few times as a kid.Dickerson was a beast. My favorite player back in the day. In fact, I have a Rams helmet signed by Dickerson in my office......sitting about 10 feet from me at the moment. Good times.
Emmitt was great. Barry was better than great.90s Emmitt Smith
Yes, he was. I believe there was a game against the Packers in 1984 when the first two Chicago QBs got knocked out of the game, and Payton took over at QB. He mostly ran the wildcat but also threw a handful of passes. In his career, he attempted 35 passes, including postseason. He threw 9 TDs and 6 interceptions.He was also the emergency punter. He punted once in his career for 39 yards.Payton was the 3rd QB?Payton. But Allen would have been in this conversation if he was used as he should have been by the Raiders.Marcus Allen is probably the most underrated RB in the Hall of Fame (if that makes sense). I don't think I have ever seen a more complete running back (not only was he a great runner and receiver but he was a great blocker downfield and on blitz pickup and the emergency QB). His feud with Al Davis helped extend his career but I think it also limited his production during his peak years, which is a shame.
My assumption is this thread is only supposed to take production from 1980-1989 into account. When doing that, Dickerson led all players in total TDs (86) during that span. Allen was second (80).Yes, Allen has some impressive awards, but it's not like Dickerson is without awards. He was OROY in 1983, OPOY in 1986, and had 5 first team AP selections. Allen had the OROY in 1982, SB MVP in 1983, OPOY and MVP in 1985, and 2 first team AP selections.Marcus was MVP of the entire league and a SB MVP in dominating fasion.Can those other guys say that?And what about career TD's, are those a big deal?Marcus 145Sweetness 125Dickerson 96And don't give me that crap about him playing on better teams. If he would have been on the 9ers, he would have 200 TD'sYou guys are over looking him
The OP didn't say No 1 NFL RB of the 80s. Herschel Walker was the best pro football RB in the 80s, IMO. Wasn't his combined stats from both leagues better than anyone else's career... including Jerry Rice? Or something like that.To stir up some debate-I would vote Herschel Walker as the best RB of the 80s. Marcus second best.I'd probably be torn between older gems in Detroit and Chicago. Want to pick Dickerson, for sure. Bo was very impressive but so were many backs for a short time. I think Tecmo and other games have turned him into a legend. It's just so unusual to have such praise for such a short short career.Herschel was a ridiculous physical specimen-like a prototype for a RB. We don't credit his USFL stats here. We don't throw him a bone for going to a bad team in one of the most famous trades ever. His special teams play also never gets noticed. When he was on a good team as the lead back, he was my fave in the 80s. I did watch the USFL.Marcus is the biggest crying shame I've ever seen in sports. I've never seen a brighter career benched/blackballed for something so egotistically puny in my life. I think in today's WWW world, it wouldn't happen. I thought us NFL fans were cheated in a big way. Maybe Bo's injury was karma for Big Al if you believe in that...I don't know, but if I were a Raider fan then I'd have been furious he didn't get 20 carries 16 games every year.
Going by that logic, he didn't ask who the best pro RB was, either. So for Dickerson, we get to include another 4,128 yards from scrimmage and 42 TDs, to go along with his NFL production from 1983 to 1989. Pretty sure that keeps him ahead of Herschel Walker.The OP didn't say No 1 NFL RB of the 80s. Herschel Walker was the best pro football RB in the 80s, IMO. Wasn't his combined stats from both leagues better than anyone else's career... including Jerry Rice? Or something like that.To stir up some debate-I would vote Herschel Walker as the best RB of the 80s. Marcus second best.I'd probably be torn between older gems in Detroit and Chicago. Want to pick Dickerson, for sure. Bo was very impressive but so were many backs for a short time. I think Tecmo and other games have turned him into a legend. It's just so unusual to have such praise for such a short short career.Herschel was a ridiculous physical specimen-like a prototype for a RB. We don't credit his USFL stats here. We don't throw him a bone for going to a bad team in one of the most famous trades ever. His special teams play also never gets noticed. When he was on a good team as the lead back, he was my fave in the 80s. I did watch the USFL.Marcus is the biggest crying shame I've ever seen in sports. I've never seen a brighter career benched/blackballed for something so egotistically puny in my life. I think in today's WWW world, it wouldn't happen. I thought us NFL fans were cheated in a big way. Maybe Bo's injury was karma for Big Al if you believe in that...I don't know, but if I were a Raider fan then I'd have been furious he didn't get 20 carries 16 games every year.
Going by that logic, he didn't ask who the best pro RB was, either. So for Dickerson, we get to include another 4,128 yards from scrimmage and 42 TDs, to go along with his NFL production from 1983 to 1989. Pretty sure that keeps him ahead of Herschel Walker.The OP didn't say No 1 NFL RB of the 80s. Herschel Walker was the best pro football RB in the 80s, IMO. Wasn't his combined stats from both leagues better than anyone else's career... including Jerry Rice? Or something like that.To stir up some debate-I would vote Herschel Walker as the best RB of the 80s. Marcus second best.I'd probably be torn between older gems in Detroit and Chicago. Want to pick Dickerson, for sure. Bo was very impressive but so were many backs for a short time. I think Tecmo and other games have turned him into a legend. It's just so unusual to have such praise for such a short short career.Herschel was a ridiculous physical specimen-like a prototype for a RB. We don't credit his USFL stats here. We don't throw him a bone for going to a bad team in one of the most famous trades ever. His special teams play also never gets noticed. When he was on a good team as the lead back, he was my fave in the 80s. I did watch the USFL.Marcus is the biggest crying shame I've ever seen in sports. I've never seen a brighter career benched/blackballed for something so egotistically puny in my life. I think in today's WWW world, it wouldn't happen. I thought us NFL fans were cheated in a big way. Maybe Bo's injury was karma for Big Al if you believe in that...I don't know, but if I were a Raider fan then I'd have been furious he didn't get 20 carries 16 games every year.