What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** OFFICAL 2009 San Diego Super Chargers Season Thread *** (1 Viewer)

Gr00vus

Footballguy
This season starts off with the nightcap for week 1. People probably haven't noticed (since the Chargers have won the last 11 meetings) but the Raiders have actually played the Chargers tough the last couple of seasons, with a couple of games not decided until the 4th quarter.

Things to watch:

Merriman's mobility.

Tomlinson's acceleration (or lack thereof).

Burnett's impact, particularly in coverage.

I'm most interested to see if Jamarcus has improved in any way once the real games have started. I'm still convinced Davis made a huge mistake in drafting this guy and that he's a bust of Denise Milani proportions.

I'm also curious to see how the Raider receivers look.

TGunz - what is your prediction for tonight's game?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
:blackdot:

First time in my life I ever placed pro football bets on NFL futures. I bet on the Chargers to exceed 10 wins and to win the Super Bowl. :football:

 
The pass rush is what I am looking forward to seeing. With English and Merriman back, I expect the Raiders to be getting some serious heat.

 
The pass rush is what I am looking forward to seeing. With English and Merriman back, I expect the Raiders to be getting some serious heat.
I'm more interested, for this game, to see how they do against the run. Particularly the Cesaire/Martin DE position. Igor was an overall disappointment, but he was strong in the run game where I think Cesaire is more of a pass rusher and I don't know what we'll get out of Martin/Og/Johnson.Anyone know how Asomugha's feeling? Is he 100%?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The pass rush is what I am looking forward to seeing. With English and Merriman back, I expect the Raiders to be getting some serious heat.
I'm looking forward to seeing this as well since we didn't see any last year! I'll also be looking for some tackling. That guy with the ball, knock him down! I know Denver should be a joke but every time they get a gift it makes me nervous. Let's go Chargers! Get off to a good start!
 
Coleman in, Johnson out. Looks like the Chargers need that extra DE to deal with the Raider run game?

Chargers sign Coleman

The Chargers have signed defensive end Andre Coleman to the active roster. To make room for Coleman on the roster, the team waived rookie running back Gartrell Johnson.

Coleman (6-3, 287), who has been on the team’s practice squad, will be eligible to play in tonight’s ESPN Monday Night Football season opener against the Raiders. He wears No. 78. Coleman spent the 2007 and ’08 seasons on the team’s practice squad and has yet to appear in a regular season game. Johnson was a fourth-round choice by the Chargers in this year’s NFL Draft out of Colorado State.
 
So the Chargers come from behind in the last 2 minutes to beat the Raiders. Hooray.

In the process Hardwick, Castillo and Vasquez all leave the game. While it remains to be seen how long they'll be out, I have to state the obvious that Castillo and Hardwick are glass.

Anyway how soon until Shelton gets a phone call from A.J.? I'm thinking he's already called. Too bad Forney's with the Jags now or he'd probably be getting a call too.

The Ravens have to be licking their chops.

 
TGunz - what is your prediction for tonight's game?
I predicted a 31-7 Charger win. Thought the Raiders would struggle offensively and that the Bolts would score a couple of TDs in the 3rd quarter to break it open.I was dead wrong.
 
Vasquez suffered a foot injury but was walking fine after the game. Hardwick was carted off after having his leg tangled in a pile on a play that had been whistled dead due to a delay-of-game penalty. (link)

 
Can someone explain to me why these guys look totally unprepared for season openers? It's been the same thing essentially for the last three seasons (Norv's tenure).

 
Can someone explain to me why these guys look totally unprepared for season openers? It's been the same thing essentially for the last three seasons (Norv's tenure).
The Raiders took it to them in the trenches for the first 20 minutes or so. After that I think the Chargers met the intensity, especially in defending the run, Cooper really stepped it up. It was a tough road game in a hostile environment, they had some injuries and gritted out the comeback win. The line play better improve, but you have to be happy with guys like Rivers, Sproles, Nannee, VJax, Gates, Weddle, Jammer, Coop, etc, plenty of positives. People dwell on negatives too much.As for Merriman, his power looked good, but his speed isnt there yet. English and Phillips did not impress me that much. The pass rush I wanted to see wasnt there, hopefully we can see some improvement in week2.Bottom line, the Bolts lost their first 2 games in 2008 at the end, this one on the road, they came back and won, be happy Charger fans.
 
well Norv isnt exactly great.

If Oakland had a QB that could execute they would have lost bad.

Positives:

Rivers, Gates, Vjax, Naanee, Sproles

Negatives:

Merriman, Gregory, Oline

And I thought Burnett looked, well didnt see him make a play except getting burned by Zack Miller. Jury is still out

Balt-Miami-Pitt before the bye.

Need to be 2-2 at worst, 3-1 would be nice!

 
DL was manhandled at the outset. And the miscommunication btw Cromartie and Hart at the end of the game allowing the long TD simply can't happen.

Otherwise, I don't feel too bad about the win. The Raiders aren't as bad of a team as they're made out to be, especially with a healthy McFadden, Greg Ellis, and Seymour.

 
And the miscommunication btw Cromartie and Hart at the end of the game allowing the long TD simply can't happen.
This (along with the general problems they seem to have in covering the middle of the field) and the defensive line getting pushed around and generating no pass rush were the most disturbing things.What's the excuse for the lousy coverage in the middle of the field? It's not a beginning of the year thing either, it's been this way for 2 and 1/16 seasons now. Usually Hart is one of the culprits, but last night Gregory (who seemed to get much more time at S than Hart) and Burnett chipped in as well. If I'm an opposing offensive coordinator I don't know that I do anything but run and hit the TE over the middle repeatedly. The TE over the middle for 10-15 yards is apparently there all the time for anyone who wants it.People like to say how talented this team is all the time. The problem is the talent is all on the periphery, it's not where it's most needed - up front. It's a shame that A.J. hasn't managed to address that (most of his experiments up there have to be considered failures at this point) because I think the window is closing for several key elements of this roster (Tomlinson, Merriman, Williams). Apart from Williams, Deilman and maybe McNeil I don't think they have anyone in the top 10 or 15 at their position on the lines - I have to discount Hardwick and Castillo outright since they can't stay on the field, and even when they're "100%" I don't know that they're that great.
 
And the miscommunication btw Cromartie and Hart at the end of the game allowing the long TD simply can't happen.
This (along with the general problems they seem to have in covering the middle of the field) and the defensive line getting pushed around and generating no pass rush were the most disturbing things.What's the excuse for the lousy coverage in the middle of the field? It's not a beginning of the year thing either, it's been this way for 2 and 1/16 seasons now. Usually Hart is one of the culprits, but last night Gregory (who seemed to get much more time at S than Hart) and Burnett chipped in as well. If I'm an opposing offensive coordinator I don't know that I do anything but run and hit the TE over the middle repeatedly. The TE over the middle for 10-15 yards is apparently there all the time for anyone who wants it.People like to say how talented this team is all the time. The problem is the talent is all on the periphery, it's not where it's most needed - up front. It's a shame that A.J. hasn't managed to address that (most of his experiments up there have to be considered failures at this point) because I think the window is closing for several key elements of this roster (Tomlinson, Merriman, Williams). Apart from Williams, Deilman and maybe McNeil I don't think they have anyone in the top 10 or 15 at their position on the lines - I have to discount Hardwick and Castillo outright since they can't stay on the field, and even when they're "100%" I don't know that they're that great.
Castillo blows.
 
Castillo blows.
I think this may be true, though I really can't tell since he seems to only be able to manage 12 plays a season. Either way he doesn't seem to be doing much for this team. 2006 is a long time ago.
The run defense got a lot better last night after Castillo came out of the game . . .
It'll be interesting to see how the defensive line shakes out. In their defense they are working in a ton of new guys and were without Cesaire. Of the areas that were problems last night, I have the most reason to believe that one will actually improve over the season. I was disappointed to not see Ellison get any time at SS. I realize they probably want to work the rookie in slowly (if at all), but could he really be that much worse than Hart or Gregory?
 
Gr00vus said:
Maurile Tremblay said:
Gr00vus said:
bicycle_seat_sniffer said:
Castillo blows.
I think this may be true, though I really can't tell since he seems to only be able to manage 12 plays a season. Either way he doesn't seem to be doing much for this team. 2006 is a long time ago.
The run defense got a lot better last night after Castillo came out of the game . . .
It'll be interesting to see how the defensive line shakes out. In their defense they are working in a ton of new guys and were without Cesaire. Of the areas that were problems last night, I have the most reason to believe that one will actually improve over the season. I was disappointed to not see Ellison get any time at SS. I realize they probably want to work the rookie in slowly (if at all), but could he really be that much worse than Hart or Gregory?
Ellison was inactive. Had he been activated, I have no doubt Turner would have put him into the game after watching some of that soft play in the 1st Q. My guess is he (or Spillman) and Bennet will be active this week.
 
Offensive line depth added.

Chargers add veteran lineman

Casey Pearce

Posted Sep 16, 2009

The Chargers addressed their needs along the offensive line Wednesday as they added ninth-year lineman Dennis Norman, who started 14 games at center last year for the Jacksonville Jaguars.

Norman can play multiple spots on the offensive line and has appeared in 64 games with 24 starts during his NFL career. He’s expected to give the Chargers depth at center and guard. He’s started 15 games at center, eight at guard and one at tackle. The Princeton grad originally entered the NFL as a seventh-round draft pick of the Seattle Seahawks in 2001. He signed with Jacksonville as a free agent in 2004 and remained with the Jaguars until he was released this summer at the conclusion of training camp.

In order to make room for Norman on the active roster, the Chargers waived defensive end Andre Coleman, who was elevated from the team’s practice squad on Monday. Coleman re-signed with the Chargers’ practice squad Wednesday.
Andre Coleman getting sent back down leads me to believe there's a good chance Cesaire, Williams and Castillo (or at least 2 of the 3) will be able to go on Sunday.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think that's who the Jaguars released to make room for Kynan Forney. :confused:
:coffee:It might work out for both - I don't remember if Forney had any/much experience at center. And let's be honest it's not like any of these back end vets are Anthony Munoz here. You take what you can get.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here's a question for you guys. You think they'll use more "spread" offense this year? I don't know how much of it they have in the playbook but it seems like their personnel on offense might lend itself to that. I don't think the power running game is coming back any time soon, and they seemed to have better success with the extra receiver out there. Then again given how bad the line looked I don't know that you can give up the extra blocker or two. Could get Rivers killed if he's not getting the ball out fast enough. I'm not thinking total chuck and duck ala the Oilers/Falcons, but they could maybe emulate the Rams a bit as either Tomlinson or Sproles would work well in the Faulk role.

I'm just noodling here.

 
Not sure about the spread Gr00v, but I sure want more balls going to Legedu. All the guy has done is catch everything thrown to him since he became a Charger.

I may have to start the Legedu Naanee bandwagon.

 
Not sure about the spread Gr00v, but I sure want more balls going to Legedu. All the guy has done is catch everything thrown to him since he became a Charger.I may have to start the Legedu Naanee bandwagon.
I think all the Charger fans are already on it. It's more a question of what you do to get him on the field. It's not going to come at the expense of VJax or Gates. So you're talking putting him in either as WR 2 or ditching the FB/Marshmellowuna to get him on the field. That play they ran to Brandon was just stupid. The element of surprise isn't worth wasting a touch on that guy when there are so many better options that could do so much more with the opportunity.
 
I think if they run sets with Gates, Jackson, Floyd, Naanee, and Sproles, there are few, if any, defenses that can adequately cover them all... lot of height except for Sproles, but he obviously makes up for that with speed.

 
Sounds like "Mooch" is going to get the start for Hardwick this week.

Mruczkowski will be ready in a snap

Casey Pearce

Posted Sep 17, 2009

* a

* a

Scott Mruczkowski was a busy man in the Chargers’ win over the Raiders Monday night, and with the status of Nick Hardwick and Louis Vasquez up in the air, the fifth-year pro may be called upon again Sunday against the Ravens.

When Scott Mruczkowski was initially told this spring that he’d spend the majority of his time at center in 2009, it wasn’t a conversation he was very happy about. After hearing Norv Turner out, he became okay with his head coach’s decision, and now he may be in a position to really benefit from the call.

“Things happen for a reason,” Mruczkowski said. “Because of the move I may get a chance to start this week and if that happens I plan on stepping right in there, making the most of my opportunity and helping this team.”

Mruczkowski played center in college but had spent the majority of his time in San Diego at guard. This spring, the starting right guard position opened up and “Mooch” had hoped to have a chance to compete for the job. However, Turner felt Mruczkowski could help the Chargers more as a reserve at both guard and center, so he made the move.

“We have had a difficult time finding a backup center that could play either guard as well,” Turner said. “It was hard for Mooch because he wanted to compete for that starting right guard job spot, but from a standpoint of what was best for our team, I felt it was the right thing.”

While Mruczkowski was disappointed, he allowed Turner to put it in perspective.

“No one is in this league to be just a backup,” Mruczkowski said. “I’ve always wanted the opportunity to start and when they moved me to center I was a little upset. I talked to Norv and he put it in perspective for me: it all boils down to team. This is a team game. It’s not about an individual. If that’s where they want me, I’ll do the best I can.”

The Chargers began their preparation for their home opener against the Ravens Wednesday and did so without starting center Nick Hardwick, who suffered a sprained ankle Monday night in Oakland. With Hardwick’s status up in the air, Mruczkowski is preparing hard so he’ll be ready if he’s called upon.

“I’ve got a chance to I’m on the field and I’m happy about that,” Mruczkowski said. “I just had so much fun Monday and look forward to getting to do it again.”

Turner is proud of the way Mruczkowski accepted his challenge, and he feels comfortable with the Cleveland-area native in the middle of his offense.

“He’s continued to get better,” Turner said. “There are some things that we don’t do when he’s in the game that we do with Nick, but we have plenty of offense that we can tailor it to the guys we have. He’s a good center and it’s nice to have that depth and have a guy like Mooch who is a pro.”

Should Mruczkowski get the nod Sunday, it will be his third-career start. His previous two came at right guard, and he didn’t know he’d be playing until he arrived at the stadium those days. Things may be a little different this week.

“Although it won’t be my first start if it happens, it’s my first week with a full week preparing to start,” Mruczkowski said. “It’s a big week for me. I’m not nervous or anxious. I’m just going to go have fun like I did Monday.”
 
so carrying the Balt game discussion from the LT thread here.

The ravens run the ball well, Heap in the middle could be a killer, I expect clayton to burn us once on play action.

With hardwick out and "mooch" starting and Is Vaquez playing? the stiff we got for Jax walkin right in and playing? Clary? ugh

All that being said, Balt had a hard time at home beating a KC team starting Brody Croyle

all is not lost, hopefully the D will play better at home and perhaps Sproles can run one back

 
From yesterday's news it sounded like there were a bunch of guys dinged up that didn't practice but "should" be able to go Sunday. That included Vazquez. I guess we'll no more in a few hours after today's practice. Both Cesaire and Castillo practiced yesterday, Williams didn't (he's listed with an elbow problem).

Sunday will come down to whether the Charger D can stop the run and whether the Charger O can contain the pass rush.

Here's a question for you all - is Rice/McGahee/McClain better than McFadden/Bush?

 
From yesterday's news it sounded like there were a bunch of guys dinged up that didn't practice but "should" be able to go Sunday. That included Vazquez. I guess we'll no more in a few hours after today's practice. Both Cesaire and Castillo practiced yesterday, Williams didn't (he's listed with an elbow problem).Sunday will come down to whether the Charger D can stop the run and whether the Charger O can contain the pass rush.Here's a question for you all - is Rice/McGahee/McClain better than McFadden/Bush?
I would say about even, But advantage Balt on the QB and WR spot. But playing at home I hope the D is better. You also herd steve young during the game say how vanilla the Oak D was and we couldnt get anything going until the end when we put sproles in for the dink n dunk drive. Im worried Balt is a quality opponent, but I dont think their Def overall is as good as it's been, no Scott, No Leonard No Rex Ryan. SD by 3
 
Sounds like the Chargers will be going with two backups on the offensive line vs. the Ravens.

Two starters returned to practice Thursday – nose tackle Jamal Williams (elbow) in a limited fashion and left tackle Marcus McNeill. Punter Mike Scifres was added to the injury report with a groin strain.

Linebacker Antwan Applewhite (hamstring), center Nick Hardwick (ankle), defensive lineman Travis Johnson (groin), running back LaDainian Tomlinson (ankle) and guard Louis Vasquez (knee) did not practice. Hardwick will not play, and the rest are becoming increasingly less likely to suit up Sunday. Said head coach Norv Turner: “The odds go against you. The guys that practiced today have a better chance. The guys that didn't practice, their chances are going down.”
I figure the Ravens are more likely to win this one already, but I really don't like the Chargers' chances if Scifres injury hinders him. For those considering wagering on this game pay close attention to his status.
 
Sounds like the Chargers will be going with two backups on the offensive line vs. the Ravens.

Two starters returned to practice Thursday – nose tackle Jamal Williams (elbow) in a limited fashion and left tackle Marcus McNeill. Punter Mike Scifres was added to the injury report with a groin strain.

Linebacker Antwan Applewhite (hamstring), center Nick Hardwick (ankle), defensive lineman Travis Johnson (groin), running back LaDainian Tomlinson (ankle) and guard Louis Vasquez (knee) did not practice. Hardwick will not play, and the rest are becoming increasingly less likely to suit up Sunday. Said head coach Norv Turner: “The odds go against you. The guys that practiced today have a better chance. The guys that didn't practice, their chances are going down.”
I figure the Ravens are more likely to win this one already, but I really don't like the Chargers' chances if Scifres injury hinders him. For those considering wagering on this game pay close attention to his status.
Disagree. Baltimore was at home last week, for this game they have to travel across country. Last week, Baltimore shut down KC's running game, but Croyle had a 116 QB rating and threw 2 TDs. With LT not playing or at least not 100%, it seems likely that San Diego will play Sproles a lot and focus on the pass, and they have a better QB and better targets than KC. I certainly think they can put up enough points to win. Granted, it is very possible San Diego's defense won't be up to the task of stopping Baltimore, though. I'm not saying it's a gimme for San Diego but I see no reason to think the Ravens are more likely to win.
 
Sounds like the Chargers will be going with two backups on the offensive line vs. the Ravens.

Two starters returned to practice Thursday – nose tackle Jamal Williams (elbow) in a limited fashion and left tackle Marcus McNeill. Punter Mike Scifres was added to the injury report with a groin strain.

Linebacker Antwan Applewhite (hamstring), center Nick Hardwick (ankle), defensive lineman Travis Johnson (groin), running back LaDainian Tomlinson (ankle) and guard Louis Vasquez (knee) did not practice. Hardwick will not play, and the rest are becoming increasingly less likely to suit up Sunday. Said head coach Norv Turner: “The odds go against you. The guys that practiced today have a better chance. The guys that didn't practice, their chances are going down.”
I figure the Ravens are more likely to win this one already, but I really don't like the Chargers' chances if Scifres injury hinders him. For those considering wagering on this game pay close attention to his status.
Disagree. Baltimore was at home last week, for this game they have to travel across country. Last week, Baltimore shut down KC's running game, but Croyle had a 116 QB rating and threw 2 TDs. With LT not playing or at least not 100%, it seems likely that San Diego will play Sproles a lot and focus on the pass, and they have a better QB and better targets than KC. I certainly think they can put up enough points to win. Granted, it is very possible San Diego's defense won't be up to the task of stopping Baltimore, though. I'm not saying it's a gimme for San Diego but I see no reason to think the Ravens are more likely to win.
Given the problems the Chargers had on the line on Monday before they lost 2 starters I think it's going to be rough sledding on offense. Rivers could take a lot of hits. I keep saying they need to spread things out and work more quick/short routes to compensate, but I don't know that Norv makes that adjustment. The adjustment he seems to make is to run RB/Flanker screens which just aren't working very well - particularly against D's that have decent speed, like the Ravens.
 
Sounds like the Chargers will be going with two backups on the offensive line vs. the Ravens.

Two starters returned to practice Thursday – nose tackle Jamal Williams (elbow) in a limited fashion and left tackle Marcus McNeill. Punter Mike Scifres was added to the injury report with a groin strain.

Linebacker Antwan Applewhite (hamstring), center Nick Hardwick (ankle), defensive lineman Travis Johnson (groin), running back LaDainian Tomlinson (ankle) and guard Louis Vasquez (knee) did not practice. Hardwick will not play, and the rest are becoming increasingly less likely to suit up Sunday. Said head coach Norv Turner: “The odds go against you. The guys that practiced today have a better chance. The guys that didn't practice, their chances are going down.”
I figure the Ravens are more likely to win this one already, but I really don't like the Chargers' chances if Scifres injury hinders him. For those considering wagering on this game pay close attention to his status.
Disagree. Baltimore was at home last week, for this game they have to travel across country. Last week, Baltimore shut down KC's running game, but Croyle had a 116 QB rating and threw 2 TDs. With LT not playing or at least not 100%, it seems likely that San Diego will play Sproles a lot and focus on the pass, and they have a better QB and better targets than KC. I certainly think they can put up enough points to win. Granted, it is very possible San Diego's defense won't be up to the task of stopping Baltimore, though. I'm not saying it's a gimme for San Diego but I see no reason to think the Ravens are more likely to win.
Given the problems the Chargers had on the line on Monday before they lost 2 starters I think it's going to be rough sledding on offense. Rivers could take a lot of hits. I keep saying they need to spread things out and work more quick/short routes to compensate, but I don't know that Norv makes that adjustment. The adjustment he seems to make is to run RB/Flanker screens which just aren't working very well - particularly against D's that have decent speed, like the Ravens.
Im hopin the Ravens D isnt the same as it was. Croyle played well and the Ravens special teams didnt look so hot either.SD by 3

 
Gr00vus said:
Just Win Baby said:
Gr00vus said:
Sounds like the Chargers will be going with two backups on the offensive line vs. the Ravens.

Two starters returned to practice Thursday – nose tackle Jamal Williams (elbow) in a limited fashion and left tackle Marcus McNeill. Punter Mike Scifres was added to the injury report with a groin strain.

Linebacker Antwan Applewhite (hamstring), center Nick Hardwick (ankle), defensive lineman Travis Johnson (groin), running back LaDainian Tomlinson (ankle) and guard Louis Vasquez (knee) did not practice. Hardwick will not play, and the rest are becoming increasingly less likely to suit up Sunday. Said head coach Norv Turner: “The odds go against you. The guys that practiced today have a better chance. The guys that didn't practice, their chances are going down.”
I figure the Ravens are more likely to win this one already, but I really don't like the Chargers' chances if Scifres injury hinders him. For those considering wagering on this game pay close attention to his status.
Disagree. Baltimore was at home last week, for this game they have to travel across country. Last week, Baltimore shut down KC's running game, but Croyle had a 116 QB rating and threw 2 TDs. With LT not playing or at least not 100%, it seems likely that San Diego will play Sproles a lot and focus on the pass, and they have a better QB and better targets than KC. I certainly think they can put up enough points to win. Granted, it is very possible San Diego's defense won't be up to the task of stopping Baltimore, though. I'm not saying it's a gimme for San Diego but I see no reason to think the Ravens are more likely to win.
Given the problems the Chargers had on the line on Monday before they lost 2 starters I think it's going to be rough sledding on offense. Rivers could take a lot of hits. I keep saying they need to spread things out and work more quick/short routes to compensate, but I don't know that Norv makes that adjustment. The adjustment he seems to make is to run RB/Flanker screens which just aren't working very well - particularly against D's that have decent speed, like the Ravens.
1. Not sure the Ravens DL is better than the Raiders DL with Seymour. The Chargers offense eventually adjusted to the Raiders DL, and I see no reason they can't do the same against the Ravens. Actually, I think the game against the Raiders was good preparation for the Ravens.2. Weren't the Chargers down those same players on their last two scoring drives against the Raiders? They made adjustments on those drives.

 
1. Not sure the Ravens DL is better than the Raiders DL with Seymour. The Chargers offense eventually adjusted to the Raiders DL, and I see no reason they can't do the same against the Ravens. Actually, I think the game against the Raiders was good preparation for the Ravens.2. Weren't the Chargers down those same players on their last two scoring drives against the Raiders? They made adjustments on those drives.
I'll keep being captain pessimism here.They might not be better, but if they're close to as good it'll be a problem. The Ravens have a run game at least on par with the Raiders and they have an actual NFL QB - if the Chargers "eventually adjust" it may be too late. Their last scoring drive was a 2 minute drill against an idiotic prevent defense. I can't extrapolate that over a whole game, and the Chargers will need to play a complete game if they expect to win this week. Being down 2 starting linemen isn't a cause for optimism. Let's also not forget that by all rights last week should have gone to OT. Murphy's non-TD was ridiculous - I don't care what the rules say.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
We've got problems.

Chargers scratch LT with ankle sprain

Comment Email Print Share

By John Clayton

SAN DIEGO -- Chargers running back LaDainian Tomlinson was officially scratched for Sunday's game against the Ravens.

He didn't practice Friday because of his sore left ankle and was ruled out after practice.

Also scratched were defensive end Travis Johnson (groin) and center Nick Hardwick (ankle).

Listed as questionable were defensive tackle Jamal Williams (arm), linebacker Antwan Applewhite (hamstring) and guard Louis Vasquez (knee) are questionable.

Punter Mike Scifres (groin) was probable.
Good news on Scifres though! :shrug:
 
Jamal placed on IR. Absolutely DEVASTING news. :( :popcorn: :thumbdown:

Triceps injury ends Williams' seasonSAN DIEGO -- The San Diego Chargers have placed defensive tackle Jamal Williams on injured reserve with a triceps injury, meaning he'll miss the rest of the season.It's a big loss for the Chargers. Although the 12-year veteran has a history of knee injuries, he's still been a force in the middle, particularly against the run.William's backup is Ogemdi Nwagbuo, who spent five weeks on San Diego's practice squad last year. To fill Williams' roster spot, defensive end Andre Coleman was signed from the practice squad.The Chargers already are without running back LaDainian Tomlinson and center Nick Hardwick for Sunday's home opener against Baltimore. Both have sprained ankles. Also, backup defensive end Travis Johnson is out with a groin injury.
 
Going into today, I feared a blowout with no Williams, LT, Hardwick, etc. Then, as I'm watching the game I'm thinking, "Okay, they're hanging around. Definite problems, especially on D, but they're playing alright." Then the final two offensive plays, and I'm back to throwing things and screaming for someone to get rid of Norv before the window is shut. (I personally don't think it's shut yet, but it's getting there.)

Yes, it would've been better for Naanee to just run for the first down, but he was trying to make a play and score, I'll cut a little slack there. What really bothers me about the playcalling at the end is that the Ravens have a backup DB in, and one of the Chargers' strengths in the redzone should be the size of the WRs and Gates. So for the critical 3rd and then 4th down plays, Norv uses a 3 TE set??? :thumbdown: I'd prefer to have the field spread and let Rivers try to find someone rather than having a TE scrum in the middle of the field. (Brandon wasn't actually open like Fouts said on the broadcast- his guy left him when Rivers threw it.) Then on 4th down, the decision to run behind a patchwork line at the strength of the Ravens D was so absurd it actually took a minute for it to register. No, Sproles isn't a between the tackles runner, but the way that play developed LT wouldn't have made it. (For that matter, neither would any back who wasn't the combination of Jim Brown, Walter Payton, and Barry Sanders.) Under the definition of "No Chance" there should be a picture of that last play.

The team will still win the division, but I'd feel a lot more comfortable in the playoffs if I could have some confidence that the coaches have some idea of what they're doing.

 
I only saw the last few minutes of the game when cbs switched, why was Merriman on the sidelines in the last minutes of the 4th? Hurt? Ineffective?

 
Boltz Boy said:
The team will still win the division, but I'd feel a lot more comfortable in the playoffs if I could have some confidence that the coaches have some idea of what they're doing.
When does a fan of a Norv Turner-coached team ever have that confidence? Gutty effort by the Bolts today, but I still don't believe in Turner.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top