****OFFICIAL**** 2008 Washington Redskins Off Season Thread! (1 Viewer)

[fatness]

Rich Tandler's blog is moving to a new location. Not sure why.

New location of Tandler's blog

 

[fatness]

Redskin Salary Cap position (frequently updated)

 

[Sidewinder16]

KFFL reported this yesterday

Redskins | Team expected to meet with B. Johnson

Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:18:57 -0700

Chrissy Mauck, of SF49ers.com, reports the Washington Redskins are expected to meet with unrestricted free-agent WR Bryant Johnson (Cardinals).

but JLC is saying today that the 'Skins are still not doing anything:

Continue to make my rounds of calls and emails but there is nothing going on right now.

G Jason Fabini may make a free agent trip this week (Miami has shown interest). Nothing seems to be up with LB Randall Godfrey or S Pierson Prioleau right now. There have been recent talks wiith P Derrick Frost, but the Skins are not budging, sources said,

They made a bare-bones initial offer and it stands. Frost has lower his price but for now sits out there s a a free agent. Doubtful he will generate significant interest so he may be left with no choice but to come back to them at some point, same thing that happend to Rock Cartwright.

Skins will eventually sign some back-up O Linemen, but that could happen anytime before the start of OTAs.

 

[dgreen]

Even if they are determined to not spend much, I don't the harm in bringing Johnson in for a talk. If he continues to ask for something you don't want to pay, then don't pay. If he's willing to negotiate some, then continue talking. But, this whole thing of not bringing people in is a little worrisome.

 

[redman]

I still want Hackett. It's baffling to me why they haven't moved on that guy, unless he's asking for the moon.

 

[thayman]

Even if they are determined to not spend much, I don't the harm in bringing Johnson in for a talk. If he continues to ask for something you don't want to pay, then don't pay. If he's willing to negotiate some, then continue talking. But, this whole thing of not bringing people in is a little worrisome.

I've been thinking lately that they are trying to change the way everyone thinks about them. Plus it's like a drug addict going through rehab, let's not put temptaion in the house.

 

[dgreen]

Even if they are determined to not spend much, I don't the harm in bringing Johnson in for a talk. If he continues to ask for something you don't want to pay, then don't pay. If he's willing to negotiate some, then continue talking. But, this whole thing of not bringing people in is a little worrisome.

I've been thinking lately that they are trying to change the way everyone thinks about them.

I've been thinking the same thing. However, that's no better than spending like crazy to look good. Both scenarios have them trying to please the public.

 

[thayman]

Even if they are determined to not spend much, I don't the harm in bringing Johnson in for a talk. If he continues to ask for something you don't want to pay, then don't pay. If he's willing to negotiate some, then continue talking. But, this whole thing of not bringing people in is a little worrisome.

I've been thinking lately that they are trying to change the way everyone thinks about them.

I've been thinking the same thing. However, that's no better than spending like crazy to look good. Both scenarios have them trying to please the public.

You cut off the temptation part of my post. If you are a recovering alcholic you don't wander into bars when you have been dry for just a few weeks.

 

[Marvelous]

Even if they are determined to not spend much, I don't the harm in bringing Johnson in for a talk. If he continues to ask for something you don't want to pay, then don't pay. If he's willing to negotiate some, then continue talking. But, this whole thing of not bringing people in is a little worrisome.

I think when they bring the Free Agent in speaks to how much they plan to pay him. Buffalo apparently brought Johnson in very early, so he was expecting a big contract. If the Redskins brought free agents in on day 1, that would have fuel speculation and expectations that they would be signing big contracts.To date, I have been very impressed with the Redskins on free agency. They judge the market correctly for Todd Collins and Rock Cartright. Both tested free agency, then came back and signed deals with the Redskins. I suspect Derrick Frost will do the same thing. He just needs time to realize that a better offer is not out there.Apparently, the asking pricing for Johnson and Hackett are higher than the Redskins will pay. Let them wait and their price will come down until someone signs them.

 

[dgreen]

Even if they are determined to not spend much, I don't the harm in bringing Johnson in for a talk. If he continues to ask for something you don't want to pay, then don't pay. If he's willing to negotiate some, then continue talking. But, this whole thing of not bringing people in is a little worrisome.

I've been thinking lately that they are trying to change the way everyone thinks about them.

I've been thinking the same thing. However, that's no better than spending like crazy to look good. Both scenarios have them trying to please the public.

You cut off the temptation part of my post. If you are a recovering alcholic you don't wander into bars when you have been dry for just a few weeks.

I can see the "let's not be active so people will think we're trying to be better" reasoning more than I can the "whenever we bring someone in, we just have to sign them so let's not bring anyone in" reasoning.

 

[dgreen]

I suspect Derrick Frost will do the same thing. He just needs time to realize that a better offer is not out there.

I pray every night that someone else makes Frosty a good offer.

 

[thayman]

Even if they are determined to not spend much, I don't the harm in bringing Johnson in for a talk. If he continues to ask for something you don't want to pay, then don't pay. If he's willing to negotiate some, then continue talking. But, this whole thing of not bringing people in is a little worrisome.

I've been thinking lately that they are trying to change the way everyone thinks about them.

I've been thinking the same thing. However, that's no better than spending like crazy to look good. Both scenarios have them trying to please the public.

You cut off the temptation part of my post. If you are a recovering alcholic you don't wander into bars when you have been dry for just a few weeks.

I can see the "let's not be active so people will think we're trying to be better" reasoning more than I can the "whenever we bring someone in, we just have to sign them so let's not bring anyone in" reasoning.

It's Dan Snyder, he likes to spend lots of money. This is the first year that he has restrained himself, would you bet he can restrain himself?? I certainly wouldn't.

 

[dgreen]

Even if they are determined to not spend much, I don't the harm in bringing Johnson in for a talk. If he continues to ask for something you don't want to pay, then don't pay. If he's willing to negotiate some, then continue talking. But, this whole thing of not bringing people in is a little worrisome.

I've been thinking lately that they are trying to change the way everyone thinks about them.

I've been thinking the same thing. However, that's no better than spending like crazy to look good. Both scenarios have them trying to please the public.

You cut off the temptation part of my post. If you are a recovering alcholic you don't wander into bars when you have been dry for just a few weeks.

I can see the "let's not be active so people will think we're trying to be better" reasoning more than I can the "whenever we bring someone in, we just have to sign them so let's not bring anyone in" reasoning.

It's Dan Snyder, he likes to spend lots of money. This is the first year that he has restrained himself, would you bet he can restrain himself?? I certainly wouldn't.

It's Dan Snyder, he likes to look good. He's heard for years that they are doing this wrong, so now he changes things to improve his image.Also, I'm not buying that he's literally or figuratively addicted to FAs. I just think he thought that was the way to win and a way to sell merchandise and club seats.

 

[Swing 51]

Seahawks WR to Visit RedskinsThis just in from the Jasons:Free agent wide receiver D.J. Hackett is scheduled to arrive in the Washington area on Wednesday to meet with the Redskins.While the Redskins are usually quite active in free agency, Hackett will be the first free agent to visit with the team since the period opened Feb. 29."We'll take a look and see if there's something that can work there," said Vinny Cerrato, Washington's executive vice president of football operations. "It's got to work for both sides, so we'll see what happens."At 6 feet 2 and 208 pounds, Hackett, 26, could provide a big target for quarterback Jason Campbell. Hackett has played for the Seattle Seahawks since entering the league in 2004, and new Redskins coach Jim Zorn previously worked as the Seahawks' quarterbacks coach."We've said we'll look at any player who can help us improve as a team," Cerrato said. "Whether it's free agency, trades or the draft, we're going to do everything we can to get better."Limited to only six games last season because of a high-ankle sprain, Hackett had 32 receptions for 384 yards (a 12.0-yard average) and three touchdowns in the regular season. He played a key role in the Seahawks' 35-14 victory over the Redskins in the first round of the NFC playoffs, catching six passes for 101 yards and one touchdown.He has best season in 2006, setting personal marks with 45 catches for 610 yards (a 13.6-yard average) and four touchdowns. In his career, Hackett has 105 receptions for 1,394 yards (a 13.3-yard average) and nine touchdowns.Hackett's agent has been talking with other teams, but has no other visits planned at this time.By washingtonpost.com Sports Editor | March 10, 2008; 4:52 PM ET

 

[Bizkiteer]

Oh boy...Redskins are going to host their first FA!

 

[fatness]

Perfect opportunity to sign the guy to a reasonable contract. They made him wait and sweat awhile; he's a WR who can undoubtedly help them if healthy.

My guess, and this is purely a guess, is that next week we'll hear about contacts and perhaps talk with some free agents. That will give some of them enough time to drop their asking prices, after sweating for a bit.

 

[Bizkiteer]

Perfect opportunity to sign the guy to a reasonable contract. They made him wait and sweat awhile; he's a WR who can undoubtedly help them if healthy.

My guess, and this is purely a guess, is that next week we'll hear about contacts and perhaps talk with some free agents. That will give some of them enough time to drop their asking prices, after sweating for a bit.

Good call...now let's see if it happens.

 

[redman]

Oh boy...Redskins are going to host their first FA!

CAN YOU SAY . . . . SLEEPOVER!?!?!?!

 

[southeastjerome]

Perfect opportunity to sign the guy to a reasonable contract. They made him wait and sweat awhile; he's a WR who can undoubtedly help them if healthy.

My guess, and this is purely a guess, is that next week we'll hear about contacts and perhaps talk with some free agents. That will give some of them enough time to drop their asking prices, after sweating for a bit.

Good call...now let's see if it happens.

If the reports from the past week or so are true (that the Redskins called his agent, but nothing came of it), one would have to assume Hackett's asking price has dropped. It should be interesting to see how the "new" Redskins front office handle their first FA visit.

 

[fatness]

CAN YOU SAY . . . . SLEEPOVER!?!?!?!

 

[Bizkiteer]

Oh boy...Redskins are going to host their first FA!

CAN YOU SAY . . . . SLEEPOVER!?!?!?!

LOL, hook up the ps3, xbox, wii or whatever gaming system Danny boy has got...TIME FOR SOME MADDEN! Ok, DJ what would you do here? Why did you run that route? Let's see how #18 looks in B&G.

 

[Sidewinder16]

A lot of mock drafts are floating around now (on this board and elsewhere) and many are predicting the 'Skins to go WR with their #1. I know Cerrato has mentioned wanting a "big" receiver (size-wise) and WR has been listed as one of the team's needs, but is that really the best use of the first round pick? This draft is extremely deep at WR, and if size is one of the main attributes you're looking for, I think a later pick on WR would serve them better.

I'd be pretty unhappy if that #21 pick was used on WR over DL or OL. I'd even be good with a DB pick there, but WR?

How likely do you guys see that first pick being used on WR? Is it people just looking at stats and thinking that's the biggest hole on offense? Are people just making too much of Cerrato's comments? Or am I just wrong in thinking that WR doesn't present good value at that pick?

 

[redman]

A lot of mock drafts are floating around now (on this board and elsewhere) and many are predicting the 'Skins to go WR with their #1. I know Cerrato has mentioned wanting a "big" receiver (size-wise) and WR has been listed as one of the team's needs, but is that really the best use of the first round pick? This draft is extremely deep at WR, and if size is one of the main attributes you're looking for, I think a later pick on WR would serve them better.I'd be pretty unhappy if that #21 pick was used on WR over DL or OL. I'd even be good with a DB pick there, but WR? How likely do you guys see that first pick being used on WR? Is it people just looking at stats and thinking that's the biggest hole on offense? Are people just making too much of Cerrato's comments? Or am I just wrong in thinking that WR doesn't present good value at that pick?

I just think that WR's tend to be among the toughest to project into the NFL given the complexity of NFL passing games and the defenses they face. You just never know how (or if) a guy will adjust. For that reason, I'm not a fan as a general matter of using 1st rounders on WR's. I also tend to like signing still-young but more proven FA's, such as DJ Hackett for example, or trading for proven veterans, to remove some of the risk.OTOH, it's clear to me that unless you draft a good D-lineman, you just can't count on being good at that position. You don't see the best d-linemen in free agency very often, and when you do their prices are astronomical. CB's are much the same. IMHO, those are the types of positions you target with your high draft picks.

 

[fatness]

Washington Times

Receiver D.J. Hackett, who scored the touchdown for the Seattle Seahawks that knocked the Washington Redskins out of the playoffs in January, will become the first free agent to visit Redskin Park this offseason tomorrow night. The 26-year-old has never amassed more than 45 catches, 610 yards or four touchdowns in a season and has been criticized for not practicing hard enough, summoning unhappy memories of Redskins bust Brandon Lloyd. However, new coach Jim Zorn knows Hackett well from their four years together with the Seahawks. And at 6-foot-2, 208 pounds, Hackett has the size the Redskins have been seeking to complement their vertically challenged holdovers.

Although he is rated by some scouts as the top receiver on the market after Randy Moss re-signed with New England and Bernard Berrian jumped to Minnesota, Hackett's visit with Washington also will be his first as a free agent. Hackett's agent, Kevin Robinson, blamed the relative lack of interest in his client on the fact he missed 10 games with a pair of sprained ankles last season. However, Hackett had an impressive 30 catches for 377 yards and four touchdowns in the five games he played after returning from the first injury and added eight catches for 116 yards and a touchdown in Seattle's two playoff games.

"D.J.'s looking to play for a playoff team with a good quarterback," Robinson said. "He has a great deal of respect for Coach Zorn ... and of course he knows the offense."

Sleepover confirmed.

 

[Sidewinder16]

A lot of mock drafts are floating around now (on this board and elsewhere) and many are predicting the 'Skins to go WR with their #1. I know Cerrato has mentioned wanting a "big" receiver (size-wise) and WR has been listed as one of the team's needs, but is that really the best use of the first round pick? This draft is extremely deep at WR, and if size is one of the main attributes you're looking for, I think a later pick on WR would serve them better.I'd be pretty unhappy if that #21 pick was used on WR over DL or OL. I'd even be good with a DB pick there, but WR? How likely do you guys see that first pick being used on WR? Is it people just looking at stats and thinking that's the biggest hole on offense? Are people just making too much of Cerrato's comments? Or am I just wrong in thinking that WR doesn't present good value at that pick?

I just think that WR's tend to be among the toughest to project into the NFL given the complexity of NFL passing games and the defenses they face. You just never know how (or if) a guy will adjust. For that reason, I'm not a fan as a general matter of using 1st rounders on WR's. I also tend to like signing still-young but more proven FA's, such as DJ Hackett for example, or trading for proven veterans, to remove some of the risk.OTOH, it's clear to me that unless you draft a good D-lineman, you just can't count on being good at that position. You don't see the best d-linemen in free agency very often, and when you do their prices are astronomical. CB's are much the same. IMHO, those are the types of positions you target with your high draft picks.

That's similar to what I'm thinking.I think that when you add the fact that none of the WRs in this draft class "stand out" from the rest (there are certainly no Calvin Johnsons or Larry Fitzgeralds), using a 1st rounder on one is really a waste.

 

[southeastjerome]

A lot of mock drafts are floating around now (on this board and elsewhere) and many are predicting the 'Skins to go WR with their #1. I know Cerrato has mentioned wanting a "big" receiver (size-wise) and WR has been listed as one of the team's needs, but is that really the best use of the first round pick? This draft is extremely deep at WR, and if size is one of the main attributes you're looking for, I think a later pick on WR would serve them better.I'd be pretty unhappy if that #21 pick was used on WR over DL or OL. I'd even be good with a DB pick there, but WR? How likely do you guys see that first pick being used on WR? Is it people just looking at stats and thinking that's the biggest hole on offense? Are people just making too much of Cerrato's comments? Or am I just wrong in thinking that WR doesn't present good value at that pick?

I just think that WR's tend to be among the toughest to project into the NFL given the complexity of NFL passing games and the defenses they face. You just never know how (or if) a guy will adjust. For that reason, I'm not a fan as a general matter of using 1st rounders on WR's. I also tend to like signing still-young but more proven FA's, such as DJ Hackett for example, or trading for proven veterans, to remove some of the risk.OTOH, it's clear to me that unless you draft a good D-lineman, you just can't count on being good at that position. You don't see the best d-linemen in free agency very often, and when you do their prices are astronomical. CB's are much the same. IMHO, those are the types of positions you target with your high draft picks.

That's similar to what I'm thinking.I think that when you add the fact that none of the WRs in this draft class "stand out" from the rest (there are certainly no Calvin Johnsons or Larry Fitzgeralds), using a 1st rounder on one is really a waste.

I agree with everything said above. I've always been for building the strength of a team thru the line and the rest will be much more likely to fall into place. That said, I do think this team needs a big target WR to win. Especially with the WCO. It has been said in this thread before that by signing Hackett they can concentrate on the lines and CB with their first 3 picks and WR becomes less of a concern.

 

[Marvelous]

A lot of mock drafts are floating around now (on this board and elsewhere) and many are predicting the 'Skins to go WR with their #1. I know Cerrato has mentioned wanting a "big" receiver (size-wise) and WR has been listed as one of the team's needs, but is that really the best use of the first round pick? This draft is extremely deep at WR, and if size is one of the main attributes you're looking for, I think a later pick on WR would serve them better.I'd be pretty unhappy if that #21 pick was used on WR over DL or OL. I'd even be good with a DB pick there, but WR? How likely do you guys see that first pick being used on WR? Is it people just looking at stats and thinking that's the biggest hole on offense? Are people just making too much of Cerrato's comments? Or am I just wrong in thinking that WR doesn't present good value at that pick?

I just think that WR's tend to be among the toughest to project into the NFL given the complexity of NFL passing games and the defenses they face. You just never know how (or if) a guy will adjust. For that reason, I'm not a fan as a general matter of using 1st rounders on WR's. I also tend to like signing still-young but more proven FA's, such as DJ Hackett for example, or trading for proven veterans, to remove some of the risk.OTOH, it's clear to me that unless you draft a good D-lineman, you just can't count on being good at that position. You don't see the best d-linemen in free agency very often, and when you do their prices are astronomical. CB's are much the same. IMHO, those are the types of positions you target with your high draft picks.

That's similar to what I'm thinking.I think that when you add the fact that none of the WRs in this draft class "stand out" from the rest (there are certainly no Calvin Johnsons or Larry Fitzgeralds), using a 1st rounder on one is really a waste.

I agree with everything said above. I've always been for building the strength of a team thru the line and the rest will be much more likely to fall into place. That said, I do think this team needs a big target WR to win. Especially with the WCO. It has been said in this thread before that by signing Hackett they can concentrate on the lines and CB with their first 3 picks and WR becomes less of a concern.

I personally think they will go DL since that is probably the hardest position to get good players in free agency. CB is the next most likely. I think OL and WR are a little easier to find good players later in the draft. But I think it will come down to the BPA (excluding QB and RB).

 

[Guinis72]

I agree with the consensus that WR wouldn't be the best use of our 1st rounder. I'd much rather see us draft DT, DE, CB or even OLB, depending on Rocky's recovery, then take someone like Earl Bennett, Jerome Simpson or Jordy Nelson in the 3rd.

If we sign Hackett, hopefully that'll keep us from taking another WR early. I'm also very high on Anthony Mix and think he could end up coming out of nowhere to be a sold WR in our offense.

 

[fatness]

I love Extremeskins. Unbridled optimism in the face of reality. A gem from today:

i dont necessarily see why mix can't be the next plaxico

 

[Bizkiteer]

I love Extremeskins. Unbridled optimism in the face of reality. A gem from today:

i dont necessarily see why mix can't be the next plaxico

They really should have an insanity test and/or IQ test before allowing someone to post there. I never claimed to be the sharpest tool in the shed, but many there sure do make me look like one.

 

[fatness]

"I don't see why we didn't trade Brandon Lloyd for Chad Johnson."

 

[Sebowski]

I suspect Derrick Frost will do the same thing. He just needs time to realize that a better offer is not out there.

I pray every night that someone else makes Frosty a good offer.

I like Frost and hope he sticks around.

 

[southeastjerome]

The DJ Hackett bandwagon is warming up.

D.J. Hackett to Visit Tampa

Tampa Bay wants to add a playmaker to its roster and has a chance to find a diamond in the rough when Seattle free agent receiver D.J. Hackett visits tomorrow.

Hackett is visiting Washington today, but slated to fly into Tampa Bay and meet with the coaches and staff before flying out to Carolina on Friday. The Bucs recently signed WR Antonio Bryant, but Hackett, 26, could provided Tampa Bay with another potent receiver to compliment Joey Galloway.

Limited to six games last season because of a high ankle sprain, Hackett had 32 receptions for 384 yards (a 12-yard average) and three touchdowns in the regular season. He caught six passes for 101 yards (a 16.8-yard average) and one touchdown in the Seahawks’ 35-14 victory over the Redskins in the first round of the NFC playoffs.

Hackett’s best season occurred in 2006 when he set personal marks with 45 catches for 610 yards (a 13.6-yard average) and four touchdowns. In his career, Hackett has 105 receptions for 1,394 yards (a 13.3-yard average) and nine touchdowns. He originally was the 25th selection of the fifth round (157th overall) of the 2004 NFL Draft.

Tampa Bay is a team Hackett could thrive on.

The Bucs have been unable to find a fast receiver to compliment Galloway since his arrival in 2004, but the additions of Bryant and Hackett could substianally improve Tampa Bay’s passing attack. Although Bucs quarterback Jeff Garcia played well last season, he threw only 13 touchdown pass, but those numbers could increase with Hackett.

Hackett could easily become Tampa Bay’s No.2 receiver, followed by Bryant, Ike Hilliard, Michael Clayton and Chad Lucas. The Bucs also have the inside track to signing Hackett because of all their available salary cap money.

http://www.tboblogs.com/index.php/sports/c...to-visit-tampa/In light of the fact that Bryant Johnson was supposed to go to DC for a visit, you have to wonder if this is just agent-speak. Or perhaps he's lining these visits up back to back in the hope that someone overpays so that DJ doesn't go on to the next visit. I guess time will tell. He was supposed to be in DC last night, interesting that there is no update on WP or WT Redskins' blogs.

 

[Sidewinder16]

The DJ Hackett bandwagon is warming up.

D.J. Hackett to Visit Tampa

Tampa Bay wants to add a playmaker to its roster and has a chance to find a diamond in the rough when Seattle free agent receiver D.J. Hackett visits tomorrow.

Hackett is visiting Washington today, but slated to fly into Tampa Bay and meet with the coaches and staff before flying out to Carolina on Friday. The Bucs recently signed WR Antonio Bryant, but Hackett, 26, could provided Tampa Bay with another potent receiver to compliment Joey Galloway.

Limited to six games last season because of a high ankle sprain, Hackett had 32 receptions for 384 yards (a 12-yard average) and three touchdowns in the regular season. He caught six passes for 101 yards (a 16.8-yard average) and one touchdown in the Seahawks’ 35-14 victory over the Redskins in the first round of the NFC playoffs.

Hackett’s best season occurred in 2006 when he set personal marks with 45 catches for 610 yards (a 13.6-yard average) and four touchdowns. In his career, Hackett has 105 receptions for 1,394 yards (a 13.3-yard average) and nine touchdowns. He originally was the 25th selection of the fifth round (157th overall) of the 2004 NFL Draft.

Tampa Bay is a team Hackett could thrive on.

The Bucs have been unable to find a fast receiver to compliment Galloway since his arrival in 2004, but the additions of Bryant and Hackett could substianally improve Tampa Bay’s passing attack. Although Bucs quarterback Jeff Garcia played well last season, he threw only 13 touchdown pass, but those numbers could increase with Hackett.

Hackett could easily become Tampa Bay’s No.2 receiver, followed by Bryant, Ike Hilliard, Michael Clayton and Chad Lucas. The Bucs also have the inside track to signing Hackett because of all their available salary cap money.

http://www.tboblogs.com/index.php/sports/c...to-visit-tampa/In light of the fact that Bryant Johnson was supposed to go to DC for a visit, you have to wonder if this is just agent-speak. Or perhaps he's lining these visits up back to back in the hope that someone overpays so that DJ doesn't go on to the next visit. I guess time will tell. He was supposed to be in DC last night, interesting that there is no update on WP or WT Redskins' blogs.

According to Adam Kaplan, Hackett is making the rounds so he can take the highest offer back to Seattle to see if they'll match it. Given the sound of that and Cerrato's stance on not overpaying FAs this year, I'd be surprised if Hackett ended up in DC.It is a little weird that no one local is reporting any updates on the visit, though. Too soon, maybe? He could still be in town.

 

[fatness]

He's not supposed to arrive here until tonight.

Link to article from yesterday

If Hackett is supposed to be visiting 3 teams, that means either he's dropped his asking price, or his agent is making up "interest" in him.

 

[Sidewinder16]

He's not supposed to arrive here until tonight.

Link to article from yesterday

If Hackett is supposed to be visiting 3 teams, that means either he's dropped his asking price, or his agent is making up "interest" in him.

Whoops. You're right. I was forgetting what day it was.

 

[southeastjerome]

He's not supposed to arrive here until tonight.

Link to article from yesterday

If Hackett is supposed to be visiting 3 teams, that means either he's dropped his asking price, or his agent is making up "interest" in him.

Whoops. You're right. I was forgetting what day it was.

Yeah me too, and I just assumed that if he's headed to TB tomorrow and Carolina, he'd stay in DC for more than few hours. More than likely he's not in DC yet, that would explain as to why the WT and WP blogs are quiet.

 

[fatness]

BramWeinstein's blog

Vinny Cerrato was on Redskins Radio and said WR DJ Hackett would come in for dinner tonight and meetings tomorrow.. The team is hoping to get a deal done with the former Seattle WR in the near future.. He would essentially replace Brandon Lloyd as an outside WR with Antwaan Randle El moving into the slot in 3 WR sets.. In two WR sets, Randle-El would likely remain the starter opposite Santana Moss..

The team has no interest in resigning free agent linebacker Lemar Marshall..

Cerrato described the free agent market as one with “nothing left.” There was a small pool of impact players available, none of which the Redskins actively pursued and so the bulk of free agency went as this team expected, overpayment for the few players worth chasing and little to no major roster overhaul..

The Redskins do have offers out to free agent OL Jason Fabini and P Derrick Frost and are waiting to hear from them their plans.. Cerrato says he believes the offers out “are competitive.”

Lions WR Roy Williams is not “available” per se, but the Skins believe if someone were to overpay drastically, the Lions would listen.. The Skins don’t figure to be among those trying to pry him out of Detroit.. But Philly could be..

The team is hopeful to receive a compensatory 3rd round pick after losing Derrick Dockery to free agency last off-season.. Because Dockery was among the top 5 highest paid free agents last spring, the Skins will receive a compensatory pick, just how high has yet to be determined.. It was a be a boon should the Skins get a third rounder..

 

[fatness]

OK, we've gone far too long without any wild speculation. Here we go.

So with Larry Fitzgerald redoing his deal with Arizona, the other stud WR with the Cardinals, Anquan Boldin, will be the new subject of trade rumors. Fitzgerald's new deal makes it much easier for the Cards to keep both players now - it's more cap-friendly in the short term - but obviously Boldin is gonna want to get paid, also.

He's another No. 1 WR who fits the mold of what the Skins prize, and they have certainly created enough cap space in the last few months to pull off one major deal. I'm not sure the Cards would even do a deal any time soon, but if they did shop Boldin I would expect the Skins to fish around on that.

Vinny Cerrato has talked a lot about holding onto draft picks, but, like Chad Johnson, Boldin is the kind of unique talent who can cause you to consider making a move. The Skins could even potentially address a need with the Cards with someone like Ladell Betts going the other way - as a hypothetical - and it may be worth watching how involved in a deal for Boldin the Skins may get down the line. (He's also represented by Drew Rosenhaus, so the Skins will be linked to Boldin regardless; even when they aren't interested in a Rosenahus client they often let the agent tell other teams they are involved as a favor of sorts).

The Skins have free agent WR DJ Hackett coming to town today for a visit, but the club has been firm about maintaining lower salaries for role players, and Hackett is not in the same class as a Boldin, though when healthy he has been a fine WR in his own right. So I don't expect the Skins to break the bank on Hackett, and will be looking for a reduced rate.

 

[Marvelous]

BramWeinstein's blog

Vinny Cerrato was on Redskins Radio and said WR DJ Hackett would come in for dinner tonight and meetings tomorrow.. The team is hoping to get a deal done with the former Seattle WR in the near future.. He would essentially replace Brandon Lloyd as an outside WR with Antwaan Randle El moving into the slot in 3 WR sets.. In two WR sets, Randle-El would likely remain the starter opposite Santana Moss..

The team has no interest in resigning free agent linebacker Lemar Marshall.

Cerrato described the free agent market as one with “nothing left.” There was a small pool of impact players available, none of which the Redskins actively pursued and so the bulk of free agency went as this team expected, overpayment for the few players worth chasing and little to no major roster overhaul..

The Redskins do have offers out to free agent OL Jason Fabini and P Derrick Frost and are waiting to hear from them their plans.. Cerrato says he believes the offers out “are competitive.”

Lions WR Roy Williams is not “available” per se, but the Skins believe if someone were to overpay drastically, the Lions would listen.. The Skins don’t figure to be among those trying to pry him out of Detroit.. But Philly could be..

The team is hopeful to receive a compensatory 3rd round pick after losing Derrick Dockery to free agency last off-season.. Because Dockery was among the top 5 highest paid free agents last spring, the Skins will receive a compensatory pick, just how high has yet to be determined.. It was a be a boon should the Skins get a third rounder..

I wonder why they have no interest in Lemar Marshall. He played decenly outside in Arrington's last year. He had one decent and one poor season as a starting middle linebacker. If he is cheap (like the veteran minimum), he could provide good depth at LB.

 

[Sidewinder16]

I wonder why they have no interest in Lemar Marshall. He played decenly outside in Arrington's last year. He had one decent and one poor season as a starting middle linebacker. If he is cheap (like the veteran minimum), he could provide good depth at LB.

Probably because he'll be 32 this year, is coming off a pretty serious injury (ruptured Achilles) and he was no more than an average LB before the injury.I'd rather re-sign Randall Godfrey for the vet min.

 

[fatness]

LaCanfora explanded his last blog entry a little bit.

The Redskins have $7.7 million in cap space in addition to having set aside money to sign their picks in the upcoming draft and additional players during the season, if needed, because of injuries. Despite having room to maneuver, however, the Redskins haven't been active in free agency to this point, only re-signing backup quarterback Todd Collins and return specialist Rock Cartwright.

"We're not spending because we choose not to spend at the present time," Cerrato said. "If there would have been somebody out there, or a situation that occurs that warrants us to take a look at it, we would. And if it cost money, we would have looked at an individual who was a high-priced guy if we felt like it was something that made sense for us. In our opinion, there was nothing like we felt we wanted to get into a bidding war over for the Redskins. After our evaluations, what we needed and what was out there really wasn't a fit. Whether it be financially, or whether they [certain players] wouldn't fit in our locker room, there's a lot of issues that have to be evaluated."

The Redskins have no concerns about Hackett's ability to make a smooth transition to their organization, team sources said. New coach Jim Zorn, formerly the Seattle Seahawks' quarterbacks coach, worked with Hackett in Seattle. Hackett could provide a big target for quarterback Jason Campbell.

Cerrato is excited about the potential of wide receiver Anthony Mix (6-5, 235 pounds), who was signed off the New York Giants' practice squad in November. But Mix, a college teammate of Campbell at Auburn, has played in only nine games in his two-year pro career and has three receptions for 39 yards.

 

[fatness]

Ryan Boschetti has re-signed with the Skins.

Link (that's Rich Tandler posting)

 

[redman]

Ryan Boschetti has re-signed with the Skins.

Link (that's Rich Tandler posting)

Looks like "continuity" wasn't just a catch-phrase, right down to their role players and practice squad guys.

 

[Bizkiteer]

Ryan Boschetti has re-signed with the Skins.

Link (that's Rich Tandler posting)

Who is this guy Rich Tandler?

 

[fatness]

Who is this guy Rich Tandler?

A writer (for no newspaper) who has covered the Redskins on his own for years. Not a bad writer, but his website/blog keeps moving around and is hard to keep track of.Rich Tandler's blog (latest location)

 

[fatness]

Looks like "continuity" wasn't just a catch-phrase, right down to their role players and practice squad guys.

Yes, it does. And ironically it may work out better with Gibbs gone. Gibbs would keep players out of loyalty. Now (I think) they're more likely to keep players based on performance (and to a lesser extent on salary).

 

[fatness]

Zorn on Hackett

"This will all be up to him," Zorn said of Hackett, who declined comment. "We're not going to risk it all to try to pay him. The financial package has to work. But if we have a chance to get him, we'd like to have him. He's got two other teams plus Seattle that wants to match [his contract offers]."

"I tried to instigate this a little bit," said Zorn, a Seahawks assistant during Hackett's four seasons in Seattle. "Nobody was bringing him anywhere. I said, 'Let's try to get him out here.' We brought him out here and now [it's like] 'Oh, they're interested? Let's see if we're interested.' When you run slants and things like that, you like to be big enough to where you can take a pounding," Zorn said. "[When] you're running inside on curl routes and crossing routes, you like to have a bigger target. And in the red zone when we're going for the end zone, you like to have a target that you can throw to. D.J. fits that bill."

"We've got a chance [to sign Hackett], but it's really a one in four chance right now," Zorn said.

 

[fatness]

Supposedly Hackett left for the airport just after noon, without a contract.

 

[Sidewinder16]

Minicamp & OTAs (from JLC):

The Redskins have released dates for Jim Zorn's first minicamp and organized team activities. Minicamp will be held May 2-4 and OTA dates are May 5, 6, 7; June 2, 3, 4, 5 and 9, 10, 11, 12. None of these are open to the public, of course.