What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official 2009 Minnesota Twins Thread*** (1 Viewer)

The Twins became the first team to overcome a three-game deficit with four to play. This will be a good triva question.

 
Would be nice to get a split in NY. I just don't see how they can pull out game one. There has to be some let down right?

 
Does anyone know where I could get one of those 163 t-shirts people were wearing in the crowd tonight?

Thanks

 
Why do the Yankees get to pick when they want to play game 1? This should be MLB making the decision, not the home team. Not sure how much difference it will make anyway, but MLB should be making this decision.

 
FunkyPlutos said:
Why do the Yankees get to pick when they want to play game 1? This should be MLB making the decision, not the home team. Not sure how much difference it will make anyway, but MLB should be making this decision.
Every year one ALDS series happens over an 8 day stretch and one ALDS series happens over a 7 day stretch. MLB gives the #1 AL team the option of which series they want to play. This is nothing new.
 
Great year for the Twins. This year was a great example of why it's fun to be a Rwins fan. The team played hard and never gave up. Made a great run at the end to win the Central.

As with most years I hope the Twins can get a another bat to help out. But I don't expect any bi name free agents heading this way. Just not how the Twins role. Which is fine as the have had good success with the way the run things.

Thanks for the memories HHH Metrodome. Can not wait for outdoor baseball next year.

 
Great year for the Twins. This year was a great example of why it's fun to be a Rwins fan. The team played hard and never gave up. Made a great run at the end to win the Central. As with most years I hope the Twins can get a another bat to help out. But I don't expect any bi name free agents heading this way. Just not how the Twins role. Which is fine as the have had good success with the way the run things.Thanks for the memories HHH Metrodome. Can not wait for outdoor baseball next year.
As much as opposing teams despised the place, and I don't think any field gave a team as much of an advantage as the HHH dome, it's always sad to see a place with such memories die.
 
Link

Twins overspend on veteran, again

November 7, 2009 2:16 PM

There's something to be said for stability, I suppose ...

The Minnesota Twins have picked up outfielder Michael Cuddyer's $10.5 million option for 2011.

--snip--

The option is part of a contract Cuddyer signed in 2008. He will make $8.5 million in 2010 and be paid $33.5 million over the life of the four-year deal. If the Twins had declined the option, they would have owed Cuddyer a $1 million buyout.

For a franchise that routinely cries poor, $10.5 million is a decent chunk of change.

Particularly for a player like Michael Cuddyer.

Cuddyer is a good hitter but a subpar outfielder, resulting in a player who is, at his best, worth less than $10 million. Granted, considering the $1 million buyout, the Twins essentially have committed to spending $9.5 million on Cuddyer in 2011. And $9.5 million isn't much more than what he was worth this year, and in 2007 (2008 was a disaster).

Of course the problem is that Cuddyer has entered his decline phase. He'll turn 31 next spring and (more to the point) 32 in 2011. He might be just as good in 2011 as he was in 2009 ... but we know that he probably won't be. We know that instead of being a (roughly) $9 million player, as he was this year, he's more likely to be an $8 million player or a $7 million player.

No, the difference between Cuddyer's salary and his value is not a great deal of money. But the Twins have a history of overspending on decent players while complaining about the high price of truly great players. Remember, it was just a year ago that they couldn't afford Johan Santana but quite happily blew $9 million on Craig Monroe and Livan Hernandez. And if they're not able to keep Justin Morneau and Joe Mauer in the long term, their money mismanagement is simply going to drop them from contention.

 
Link

Twins overspend on veteran, again

November 7, 2009 2:16 PM

There's something to be said for stability, I suppose ...

The Minnesota Twins have picked up outfielder Michael Cuddyer's $10.5 million option for 2011.

--snip--

The option is part of a contract Cuddyer signed in 2008. He will make $8.5 million in 2010 and be paid $33.5 million over the life of the four-year deal. If the Twins had declined the option, they would have owed Cuddyer a $1 million buyout.

For a franchise that routinely cries poor, $10.5 million is a decent chunk of change.

Particularly for a player like Michael Cuddyer.

Cuddyer is a good hitter but a subpar outfielder, resulting in a player who is, at his best, worth less than $10 million. Granted, considering the $1 million buyout, the Twins essentially have committed to spending $9.5 million on Cuddyer in 2011. And $9.5 million isn't much more than what he was worth this year, and in 2007 (2008 was a disaster).

Of course the problem is that Cuddyer has entered his decline phase. He'll turn 31 next spring and (more to the point) 32 in 2011. He might be just as good in 2011 as he was in 2009 ... but we know that he probably won't be. We know that instead of being a (roughly) $9 million player, as he was this year, he's more likely to be an $8 million player or a $7 million player.

No, the difference between Cuddyer's salary and his value is not a great deal of money. But the Twins have a history of overspending on decent players while complaining about the high price of truly great players. Remember, it was just a year ago that they couldn't afford Johan Santana but quite happily blew $9 million on Craig Monroe and Livan Hernandez. And if they're not able to keep Justin Morneau and Joe Mauer in the long term, their money mismanagement is simply going to drop them from contention.
Amen.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top