What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official 2009 Philadelphia Eagles Thread*** (1 Viewer)

What’s going on with the WR spot across from Jackson?

Will Maclin hold on to it if/when Curtis returns from injury?

 
FWIW - In his press conference today, Andy Reid admitted that they probably should have run the ball more. :bowtie:

I think I've heard that about 35 times since he became the coach. I think he forgets about it after he gets up from the press table.

 
FWIW - In his press conference today, Andy Reid admitted that they probably should have run the ball more. :bowtie: I think I've heard that about 35 times since he became the coach. I think he forgets about it after he gets up from the press table.
"run the ball more" is AR code for "have my assistant run to Dunkin Donuts and get more donut holes (balls)" :angry:
 
stevegamer said:
Disheartening for sure. Yes, we did the whole cross country travel thing which never seems to serve us well, but there was a lot to be concerned about in this game.

1) Offensive line -- King Dunlap was HORRENDOUS in place of Peters and the entire line fell apart as a result. We desperate need Todd Herremans to get right and hope that Peters is correct in saying he'll be back on the field in Week 7. If Peters is hurt significantly, we'll be without our planned LT/RT with concerns on the interior starters to boot (i.e., Herremans and Andrews). That's a recipe for failure.

2) Play-Calling -- I try to lay off the play-calling usually b/c you can't assail Reid's pass first mentality at the same time you praise the man's success. It's part and parcel. BUT, I do have to wonder at least a bit why we ran the ball 11 times in a close, road game. We averaged better than 6 yards a carry and our pass blocking was horrendous, yet we don't have more balance. Really?

3) Decision making -- McNabb taking the 'time out'? He was rattled by the pass rush, not that any QB wouldn't have been.

4) Linebacking play -- We've been disguising the LB weaknesses for years and even earlier this year, but we're starting to get exposed. The LBs are just not instinctive in coverage and gave up huge plays. Watching the game intently as I was, a really proficient offense would have SKEWERED us yesterday. There are gaping holes downfield that Russell wasn't seeing, but someone like Ryan or Cutler or Manning or even Romo certainly would have.

I think we are what our record says we are. A reasonably good team that will vie for a playoff spot, but not an elite team that has any real shot at a title run. Is there any question New Orleans, Minnesota and the Giants are better? I also think Atlanta is demonstrably better although I'm not ready to set that in stone. Are we a 5th/6th seed? Probably so.
#3 really relates to #2 - ATROCIUS play calling. Can someone please explain what Vick is doing in the game with that little time left in the half, when the offense needs a rhythym. It looked to me that Vick lined up wrong, which caused the play clock to run down. Yes, McNabb should've known they had no time outs, due to earlier burning of the things.It's really looking like Vick is simply a way to get the fanbase exicted & riled up simultaneously, to increase ticket sales. I don't think he's helping, and I think they have no clue how to use him.

Abandoning the run against the Raiders is inexcusable.

This is a team, that can't afford to lose to the Raiders of the world. The most important thing for the Eagles right now is for the Redskins to not fire Zorn. If they do, and that team gets ramped up, MNF could be an ugly loss. It wouldn't surprise me to see this team go completely downhill if that happened.
I agree it was maddening to have Vick in the lineup near the goal line with time waning. On the other hand, this "to inflate ticket sales" stuff makes no sense to me. Eagles have sold out for years upon years, they don't need help selling tickets. They're also one of the best traveling fan bases in the NFL. If you had said Vick was signed to help sell JERSEYS, I might have been with you, but ticket sales aren't affected.
Sorry, I absolutely brain farted - I meant to just say sales, but the GF called asking about our tickets for the 2 Spectrum shows this week. :lmao: It's merchandise & related buzz. Ticket sales aren't the issue, obviously.

 
What's the deal with Kolb and Vick? Kolb seemed like a good handcuff for McNabb owners, but yesterday Vick was the backup and Kolb was the third QB. Is Kolb no longer worth holding as a handcuff?

 
McNabb was getting killed when he dropped back to pass. They should have made some adjustments with some runs and quick. short passes to get their speedsters the ball in the open field and let them make a play. Why do you continue to drop back and get sacked?

 
What's the deal with Kolb and Vick? Kolb seemed like a good handcuff for McNabb owners, but yesterday Vick was the backup and Kolb was the third QB. Is Kolb no longer worth holding as a handcuff?
Vick is #2 so they can use him in the wildcat.If McNabb gets hurt and will miss a game, Kolb becomes #1 and Vick remains at #2.
 
Curious to get other opinions on this: Do the Eagles win yesterday with Kolb at QB?
:nerd:Kolb would've been sacked 12 times, seriously.Any Eagles fan that thinks the Birds would've done better with Kolb in the game really, honestly, and truly needs to stop pretending they know anything about football. Sorry to sound so harsh, but the very idea of that even being in question baffles me.
 
Curious to get other opinions on this: Do the Eagles win yesterday with Kolb at QB?
:rant: Kolb would've been sacked 12 times, seriously.

Any Eagles fan that thinks the Birds would've done better with Kolb in the game really, honestly, and truly needs to stop pretending they know anything about football. Sorry to sound so harsh, but the very idea of that even being in question baffles me.
:excited: Everyone knows that fans always love the backup quarterback. I think some mix fantasy with NFL. They think Kolb is awesome because of the two 300+ yard games. They fail to remember that the Eagles got completely destroyed by the Saints in one of those games.

They also have quickly forgotten about how well McNabb has been playing this year, since week 10 last year inlcluding the playoffs.

 
Eagles looked bad, but lets not over-react. They lay this egg every year. It's embarassing, but hardly a disaster at this point. I fully excpect Philly to come back and beat Washington by 21+ points now.

 
Eagles looked bad, but lets not over-react. They lay this egg every year. It's embarassing, but hardly a disaster at this point. I fully excpect Philly to come back and beat Washington by 21+ points now.
really?their O-line looked like the worst in the NFL vs. the raiders. i see them playing a close game with the skins in DC.
 
The Raiders actually blitzed--that is why the Eagles lost. Honestly, doing film study on a team that blitzed 13% of the time coming in and then blitzing a lot will make any gameplan useless. It didn't help that Kung Dunlap was going up against Richard Seymour. I'll take Seymour every time concerning that matchup.

 
Curious to get other opinions on this: Do the Eagles win yesterday with Kolb at QB?
:rolleyes: Kolb would've been sacked 12 times, seriously.

Any Eagles fan that thinks the Birds would've done better with Kolb in the game really, honestly, and truly needs to stop pretending they know anything about football. Sorry to sound so harsh, but the very idea of that even being in question baffles me.
Doubt it. http://www.igglesblog.com/iggles_blog/2007...er-look-at.html And the Eagles do win if kolb starts because reid would have actually run the ball against a team with a great secondary that can't stop the run.

Why do you hate kolb so much anyway? I see you bash him constantly even though he has looked remarkably good so far.

 
Curious to get other opinions on this: Do the Eagles win yesterday with Kolb at QB?
:thumbup: Kolb would've been sacked 12 times, seriously.

Any Eagles fan that thinks the Birds would've done better with Kolb in the game really, honestly, and truly needs to stop pretending they know anything about football. Sorry to sound so harsh, but the very idea of that even being in question baffles me.
Doubt it. http://www.igglesblog.com/iggles_blog/2007...er-look-at.html And the Eagles do win if kolb starts because reid would have actually run the ball against a team with a great secondary that can't stop the run.

Why do you hate kolb so much anyway? I see you bash him constantly even though he has looked remarkably good so far.
And yet another sucker falls in love with the backup. ;) Philly's offensive line is decimated right now. They have two reserves in at tackle. McNabb couldn't getvanything done under that pressure. Kolb may have cried.

 
Curious to get other opinions on this: Do the Eagles win yesterday with Kolb at QB?
:goodposting: Kolb would've been sacked 12 times, seriously.

Any Eagles fan that thinks the Birds would've done better with Kolb in the game really, honestly, and truly needs to stop pretending they know anything about football. Sorry to sound so harsh, but the very idea of that even being in question baffles me.
Doubt it. http://www.igglesblog.com/iggles_blog/2007...er-look-at.html And the Eagles do win if kolb starts because reid would have actually run the ball against a team with a great secondary that can't stop the run.

Why do you hate kolb so much anyway? I see you bash him constantly even though he has looked remarkably good so far.
And yet another sucker falls in love with the backup. :rolleyes: Philly's offensive line is decimated right now. They have two reserves in at tackle. McNabb couldn't getvanything done under that pressure. Kolb may have cried.
But he wouldn't have thrown up in his helmet :rolleyes:
 
Curious to get other opinions on this: Do the Eagles win yesterday with Kolb at QB?
:goodposting: Kolb would've been sacked 12 times, seriously.

Any Eagles fan that thinks the Birds would've done better with Kolb in the game really, honestly, and truly needs to stop pretending they know anything about football. Sorry to sound so harsh, but the very idea of that even being in question baffles me.
Doubt it. http://www.igglesblog.com/iggles_blog/2007...er-look-at.html And the Eagles do win if kolb starts because reid would have actually run the ball against a team with a great secondary that can't stop the run.

Why do you hate kolb so much anyway? I see you bash him constantly even though he has looked remarkably good so far.
And yet another sucker falls in love with the backup. :rolleyes: Philly's offensive line is decimated right now. They have two reserves in at tackle. McNabb couldn't getvanything done under that pressure. Kolb may have cried.
But he wouldn't have thrown up in his helmet :rolleyes:
I watched the game. I must have missed that part.
 
Eagles looked bad, but lets not over-react. They lay this egg every year. It's embarassing, but hardly a disaster at this point. I fully excpect Philly to come back and beat Washington by 21+ points now.
the same washington team that swept them last year you mean?
 
Eagles looked bad, but lets not over-react. They lay this egg every year. It's embarassing, but hardly a disaster at this point. I fully excpect Philly to come back and beat Washington by 21+ points now.
really?their O-line looked like the worst in the NFL vs. the raiders. i see them playing a close game with the skins in DC.
Yes, really. Philly's O-line looked like that in an embarassing loss to the G-men not that long ago, and recovered just fine.
 
Maybe it's Derrick Johnson?

Warpaint Illustrated said Kansas City general manager Scott Pioli got calls from the Eagles, the Detroit Lions and Miami Dolphins inquired about Johnson, who is in the Kansas City doghouse.

 
I'll settle for Witherspoon. Loved him as a FA in 06, pissed that the Eagles didn't sign him them. Oh well. Definitely an upgrade and possibly a consistent playmaker.

 
Curious to get other opinions on this: Do the Eagles win yesterday with Kolb at QB?
:thumbup: Kolb would've been sacked 12 times, seriously.

Any Eagles fan that thinks the Birds would've done better with Kolb in the game really, honestly, and truly needs to stop pretending they know anything about football. Sorry to sound so harsh, but the very idea of that even being in question baffles me.
Doubt it. http://www.igglesblog.com/iggles_blog/2007...er-look-at.html And the Eagles do win if kolb starts because reid would have actually run the ball against a team with a great secondary that can't stop the run.

Why do you hate kolb so much anyway? I see you bash him constantly even though he has looked remarkably good so far.
And yet another sucker falls in love with the backup. :rolleyes: Philly's offensive line is decimated right now. They have two reserves in at tackle. McNabb couldn't getvanything done under that pressure. Kolb may have cried.
:rolleyes: is right.All I was getting at is that reid gets more conservative when his Chunky savior isn't on the field and pointing out that Wood's sack comment is completely worthless.

Definitely not trying to suggest that Kolb today is better than Mcnabb.

It's just that this Jason Wood guy has been consistently ripping on kolb for months now and it puzzles me. Especially after his very encouraging performances.

 
Curious to get other opinions on this: Do the Eagles win yesterday with Kolb at QB?
:confused: Kolb would've been sacked 12 times, seriously.

Any Eagles fan that thinks the Birds would've done better with Kolb in the game really, honestly, and truly needs to stop pretending they know anything about football. Sorry to sound so harsh, but the very idea of that even being in question baffles me.
Doubt it. http://www.igglesblog.com/iggles_blog/2007...er-look-at.html And the Eagles do win if kolb starts because reid would have actually run the ball against a team with a great secondary that can't stop the run.

Why do you hate kolb so much anyway? I see you bash him constantly even though he has looked remarkably good so far.
And yet another sucker falls in love with the backup. :rolleyes: Philly's offensive line is decimated right now. They have two reserves in at tackle. McNabb couldn't getvanything done under that pressure. Kolb may have cried.
:rolleyes: is right.All I was getting at is that reid gets more conservative when his Chunky savior isn't on the field and pointing out that Wood's sack comment is completely worthless.

Definitely not trying to suggest that Kolb today is better than Mcnabb.

It's just that this Jason Wood guy has been consistently ripping on kolb for months now and it puzzles me. Especially after his very encouraging performances.
I think part of the problem is that the statistics don't pan out your assumption that they call a more conservative game/run more when McNabb is not playingIn 3 games McNabb started, they threw the ball 62% of the time

In 2 games Kolb started, they threw the ball 67% of the time - and one of those games was vs KC who is 31st in the league against the run

In fact, prior to the Oakland abberation - they had been 53% pass vs 47% run when McNabb started this year

 
Eagles looked bad, but lets not over-react. They lay this egg every year. It's embarassing, but hardly a disaster at this point. I fully excpect Philly to come back and beat Washington by 21+ points now.
really?their O-line looked like the worst in the NFL vs. the raiders. i see them playing a close game with the skins in DC.
If we bring out the same offensive line on MNF, I would agree it will be closer than many think. But Peters and Herremans are supposedly going to be in the lineup, which would equate to lights years of improvement. An Eagles team with Peters and Herremans on the line will be hard for the banged up and disenfranchised Skins to overcome.
 
Per FBG players in the news...

Peters and Herremans both practiced fully. :confused:

Looks like they will be able to perform Monday night. After watching King Dunlap vs. OAK, we dodged a bullet with Peters. Glad he is fine. And finally, Herremans will help anchor the interior line.

The O-Line and playcalling were horrible last week. I'd like to think this means at least one will improve.

 
Bad News:

So much for thinking the loss to the Raiders might not have been too bad since they may have been turning things around... (Jets 38 - Raiders 0)

Good News:

With the Giants loss at home to the Cardinals; the Giants, Cowboys, and Eagles all currently have 2 losses.

If the Eagles can bounce back and win the next 3 games (@WAS, NYG, DAL) we'll be alone atop the NFC East.

 
The offense still looked out of sync. Aside from the two big plays to DJax, it wasn't very good at moving the ball at all. That's not going to get it done against good teams.

 
The offense still looked out of sync. Aside from the two big plays to DJax, it wasn't very good at moving the ball at all. That's not going to get it done against good teams.
Like it or not the offense looked smoother with Kolb in there. McNabb just can not hit anyone in stride. DJax even had to wait and then reach back to pull in the TD.
 
The offense still looked out of sync. Aside from the two big plays to DJax, it wasn't very good at moving the ball at all. That's not going to get it done against good teams.
Like it or not the offense looked smoother with Kolb in there. McNabb just can not hit anyone in stride. DJax even had to wait and then reach back to pull in the TD.
Also aggravating was when he didn't see a wide open Maclin running along the sideline toward the end zone, and instead threw it into the ground over the middle.
 
Like it or not the offense looked smoother with Kolb in there. McNabb just can not hit anyone in stride. DJax even had to wait and then reach back to pull in the TD.
These are my thoughts as well. Any chance Reid makes the McNabb-Kolb switch if this continues through the next 1-2 games? I'm a McNabb fan as a Chicago resident and always have been, but Kolb just flat-out made the Eagles look like a better team. The ankle throws and overall lack of accuracy is troubling.
 
The offense still looked out of sync. Aside from the two big plays to DJax, it wasn't very good at moving the ball at all. That's not going to get it done against good teams.
Like it or not the offense looked smoother with Kolb in there. McNabb just can not hit anyone in stride. DJax even had to wait and then reach back to pull in the TD.
Everbody loves the back up QB. :lmao:
 
One of the most frustrating things about Reid and McNabb is also one of the things that makes them so similar and almost inseperable in my mind when evaluating this team... looking at the team on a year to year basis and over the last 10 years they have been very successful overall and that success is hard to question BUT on the other hand they both seem to have boneheaded breakdowns at the most inopportune times.

Reid and McNabb are two of the main reasons for the run of success the Eagles have had and the number of times they're reached the NFC Championship but you could probably point to them equally as much as a couple of the reasons why the Eagles haven't been able to make that next step and win the Superbowl.

Do you love or hate Reid and McNabb? It probably comes down to whether you're happy with having a successful team year in and year out that's almost always in the hunt or if you would give anything just for a Superbowl win.

 
Do you love or hate Reid and McNabb? It probably comes down to whether you're happy with having a successful team year in and year out that's almost always in the hunt or if you would give anything just for a Superbowl win.
Or the "realism" option: having the best coach and QB in team history (despite their warts) gives you the best chance to win the super bowl...ETA: despite their warts
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Do you love or hate Reid and McNabb? It probably comes down to whether you're happy with having a successful team year in and year out that's almost always in the hunt or if you would give anything just for a Superbowl win.
Or the "realism" option: having the best coach and QB in team history gives you the best chance to win the super bowl...
The best chance compared to former Eagles coaches and qbs? Are you implying that there aren't any coaches or qbs that may be available (either via free agency or through trade) that would give the Eagles a better chance of winning it all? Look.....I think McNabb and Reid are phenomenal but at what point do you just say that it's time for a change? They've had so many chances to win it all but have fallen short every single time. Change isn't always bad........Tomlin came in to a good system in Pittsburgh and got a championship in his 2nd year. Kolb is in a good system with a lot of talent around him and has shown at least a sliver of being a decent NFL qb (albeit a very small sample size). The way Reid coached against Oakland just exemplifies his personality. He is so stubborn that he will try to force his game plan rather than adjust to a strategy that actually gives the team the best chance to win.
 
Any chance Reid makes the McNabb-Kolb switch if this continues through the next 1-2 games?
No. There is a better chance of Reid buying crack for his sons than of him permanently benching McNabb for a reason other than injury.
Good deals on crack in Baltimore last year?But I agree, it will take alot for Reid to bench McNabb.
:kicksrock: And it sure-as-hell won't be discussed after an inter-divisional road win.
 
It probably comes down to whether you're happy with having a successful team year in and year out that's almost always in the hunt or if you would give anything just for a Superbowl win.
I love how people act as if winning the Super Bowl is teh only measure of success. Yes, it's the ultimate prize, but the season was not considered a failure for 31 teams every year. In a simplistic point-of-view, I suppose it is, but in actuality, there are many, many levels of success and failure.Maybe Detroit was considered to be less of a failure than Super Bowl runners-up Arizona, since they "won" the first overall pick?All I know is that without Reid and/or McNabb, the Eagles could easily fall to a 9-7 or 8-8 non-playoff team. Sure, there's a chance that they could still succeed ort even exceed current success, but why would you ess with a team who is right-there year after year? Do you know how hard it is in the NFL to maintain excellence? There are only a very select few teams (NE, Indy, Pittsburgh) who manage to do it. They are in-the-hunt every single year. Philly has made 5 of the last 8 NFC CHampionship games. Yes, they've lost 4 times, but maybe they weren't the better team. THat happens.
 
The offense still looked out of sync. Aside from the two big plays to DJax, it wasn't very good at moving the ball at all. That's not going to get it done against good teams.
Like it or not the offense looked smoother with Kolb in there. McNabb just can not hit anyone in stride. DJax even had to wait and then reach back to pull in the TD.
Everbody loves the back up QB. :shrug:
Can I assume you have not watched the games this season? There is no way anyone can say that the Eagles offense looked better under McNabb than it did Kolb. Your eyes dont lie and what they are showing you is rather simple. Kolb is more accurate than McNabb and he gets rid of the ball quicker. Its that simple.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Clearly McNabb needs to be more accurate, I yell at my TV too, but look at the big picture. He's about 59% completions right now for his career, but here are some of the guys that is better than:

Dan Fouts (tied)

Warren Moon

Bart Starr

Len Dawson

Fran Tarkenton

Roger Staubach

John Elway

Randall Cunningham

Bob Griese

Johnny Unitas

Terry Bradshaw

Dan Marino is only slightly ahead at 59.4% and Jim Kelly also very close at 60.1%.

Take a breath.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top