What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official 2013/2014 NHL Regular Season Thread*** (1 Viewer)

I know the Sabres are bad, but that's by design. Flames actually look better than expected most nights too.

When I watch the Oilers though, I'm usually just disgusted by what I see. All that talent and they just seem lost most nights.
Oilers are a more talented team than the Flames, but Calgary has more heart and is a harder working team. Hall looked absolutely lost on Calgary's first goal. How hard is it to take the only opposing player in your zone out of the play?

 
Not really in the rumor mill category but the word is that Kane has told Hawks mgmt that he would be eternally grateful if they could get Kesler. Not sure how I feel about that, don't think it would ever happen but Kesler must have left some kind of impression on Kane.
he'd be an awesome get for them, but (a) what would they have to give up? and (b) seems unlikely the Canucks would trade him to Chicago.I mean if someone like Patrick Sharp was going the other way, not sure it's worth it.

Bob McKenzie ‏@TSNBobMcKenzie 2m

Price to get Kesler is high. 1. Significant/established NHLer, preferably a C, 20 to 25; 2. Top prospect, preferably a F. 3. 1st rd pick.
Seems like a crazy price for Kesler to me. I bet the price gets dropped for an Eastern Conference team. Supposedly Pittsburgh is very interested.
I think it winds up exactly like Luongo last year. The Canucks are listening but want way the hell too much.
I think it ends up more like Schneider. The Canucks want a huge price from Western Conference teams and have a more reasonable asking price from Eastern Conference teams.
Schneider only happened since moving Luongo was impossible based on what they were asking.
Yes, but the asking price for Schneider from Western Conference teams, like Edmonton for one, was much higher than what they got from NJ.Essentially we are both right because we are talking about two different situations.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not really in the rumor mill category but the word is that Kane has told Hawks mgmt that he would be eternally grateful if they could get Kesler. Not sure how I feel about that, don't think it would ever happen but Kesler must have left some kind of impression on Kane.
he'd be an awesome get for them, but (a) what would they have to give up? and (b) seems unlikely the Canucks would trade him to Chicago.I mean if someone like Patrick Sharp was going the other way, not sure it's worth it.

Bob McKenzie ‏@TSNBobMcKenzie 2m

Price to get Kesler is high. 1. Significant/established NHLer, preferably a C, 20 to 25; 2. Top prospect, preferably a F. 3. 1st rd pick.
Seems like a crazy price for Kesler to me. I bet the price gets dropped for an Eastern Conference team. Supposedly Pittsburgh is very interested.
I think it winds up exactly like Luongo last year. The Canucks are listening but want way the hell too much.
I think it ends up more like Schneider. The Canucks want a huge price from Western Conference teams and have a more reasonable asking price from Eastern Conference teams.
Schneider only happened since moving Luongo was impossible based on what they were asking.
Yes, but the asking price for Schneider from Western Conference teams, like Edmonton for one, was much higher than what they got from NJ.
Well that's standard though, nobody wants to trade in the same conference. I just think they'll want too much for Kesler. Can't blame them though since who's going to fill that #2 C role? Hell the Hawks have been looking for 4 years and can't find one,

 
I know the Sabres are bad, but that's by design. Flames actually look better than expected most nights too.

When I watch the Oilers though, I'm usually just disgusted by what I see. All that talent and they just seem lost most nights.
Oilers are a more talented team than the Flames, but Calgary has more heart and is a harder working team.Hall looked absolutely lost on Calgary's first goal. How hard is it to take the only opposing player in your zone out of the play?
I've said it many times the past three years, I was just waiting and really excited about the Oilers talent and what seemed like a certain rise to excellence. I thought they needed to add a few veteran players to the mix, now I have no idea what is wrong with them.

They need to break it up a little after this year, get some different pieces and try to salvage all these high picks that individually look great at times, but rarely ever look good as a whole. Must be painful to be a fan right now. The down years with all the picks and youth coming in can actually be fun, what we see night to night right now certainly is not.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I know the Sabres are bad, but that's by design. Flames actually look better than expected most nights too.

When I watch the Oilers though, I'm usually just disgusted by what I see. All that talent and they just seem lost most nights.
Oilers are a more talented team than the Flames, but Calgary has more heart and is a harder working team.Hall looked absolutely lost on Calgary's first goal. How hard is it to take the only opposing player in your zone out of the play?
I've said it many times the past three years, I was just waiting and really excited about the Oilers talent and what seemed like a certain rise to excellence. I thought they needed to add a few veteran players to the mix, now I have no idea what is wrong with them.

They need to break it up a little after this year, get some different pieces and try to salvage all these high picks that individually look great at times, but rarely ever look good as a whole. Must be painful to be a fan right now. The down years with all the picks and youth coming in can actually be fun, what we see night to night right now certainly is not.
I think the problem is very clear. they have not drafted very well outside of the early 1st round picks. if you look at their draft history over the past 5+ years, it's a mess outside of early round 1 picks. just a wasteland.

maybe it's a development issue too. not sure. but you need to fill in defense, goalie, and a bottom 6 around their stud skill players and they haven't done that very well at all.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not really in the rumor mill category but the word is that Kane has told Hawks mgmt that he would be eternally grateful if they could get Kesler. Not sure how I feel about that, don't think it would ever happen but Kesler must have left some kind of impression on Kane.
he'd be an awesome get for them, but (a) what would they have to give up? and (b) seems unlikely the Canucks would trade him to Chicago.I mean if someone like Patrick Sharp was going the other way, not sure it's worth it.

Bob McKenzie ‏@TSNBobMcKenzie 2m

Price to get Kesler is high. 1. Significant/established NHLer, preferably a C, 20 to 25; 2. Top prospect, preferably a F. 3. 1st rd pick.
Seems like a crazy price for Kesler to me. I bet the price gets dropped for an Eastern Conference team. Supposedly Pittsburgh is very interested.
I think it winds up exactly like Luongo last year. The Canucks are listening but want way the hell too much.
I think it ends up more like Schneider. The Canucks want a huge price from Western Conference teams and have a more reasonable asking price from Eastern Conference teams.
Schneider only happened since moving Luongo was impossible based on what they were asking.
Yes, but the asking price for Schneider from Western Conference teams, like Edmonton for one, was much higher than what they got from NJ.
Well that's standard though, nobody wants to trade in the same conference. I just think they'll want too much for Kesler. Can't blame them though since who's going to fill that #2 C role? Hell the Hawks have been looking for 4 years and can't find one,
That's why Pittsburgh makes so much sense as a trade partner because they have Crosby and Malkin as their 1 and 2 C. They can swap Sutter to Vcvr making him the Canucks #2 C and put Kesler on their third line.
 
Not really in the rumor mill category but the word is that Kane has told Hawks mgmt that he would be eternally grateful if they could get Kesler. Not sure how I feel about that, don't think it would ever happen but Kesler must have left some kind of impression on Kane.
he'd be an awesome get for them, but (a) what would they have to give up? and (b) seems unlikely the Canucks would trade him to Chicago.I mean if someone like Patrick Sharp was going the other way, not sure it's worth it.

Bob McKenzie ‏@TSNBobMcKenzie 2m

Price to get Kesler is high. 1. Significant/established NHLer, preferably a C, 20 to 25; 2. Top prospect, preferably a F. 3. 1st rd pick.
Seems like a crazy price for Kesler to me. I bet the price gets dropped for an Eastern Conference team. Supposedly Pittsburgh is very interested.
I think it winds up exactly like Luongo last year. The Canucks are listening but want way the hell too much.
I think it ends up more like Schneider. The Canucks want a huge price from Western Conference teams and have a more reasonable asking price from Eastern Conference teams.
Schneider only happened since moving Luongo was impossible based on what they were asking.
Yes, but the asking price for Schneider from Western Conference teams, like Edmonton for one, was much higher than what they got from NJ.
Well that's standard though, nobody wants to trade in the same conference. I just think they'll want too much for Kesler. Can't blame them though since who's going to fill that #2 C role? Hell the Hawks have been looking for 4 years and can't find one,
That's why Pittsburgh makes so much sense as a trade partner because they have Crosby and Malkin as their 1 and 2 C. They can swap Sutter to Vcvr making him the Canucks #2 C and put Kesler on their third line.
A Pens fan ( I think) addressed this, since Letang's stroke Pitt may not be pushing in this direction. But on this note is Sutter a legit #2 or is he a #3 that the Nucks would push into the #2 role?

 
Fleury awful case closed, let's hear it rudnick . You love to bad mouth since I'm a pens fan, like I never watch a game . Doosh
huh?

stay classy, Pens fan

pretty sure Dr Detroit asked you to show us a post of yours that didn't suck once. have you ever found one?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I know the Sabres are bad, but that's by design. Flames actually look better than expected most nights too.

When I watch the Oilers though, I'm usually just disgusted by what I see. All that talent and they just seem lost most nights.
Oilers are a more talented team than the Flames, but Calgary has more heart and is a harder working team.Hall looked absolutely lost on Calgary's first goal. How hard is it to take the only opposing player in your zone out of the play?
I've said it many times the past three years, I was just waiting and really excited about the Oilers talent and what seemed like a certain rise to excellence. I thought they needed to add a few veteran players to the mix, now I have no idea what is wrong with them.

They need to break it up a little after this year, get some different pieces and try to salvage all these high picks that individually look great at times, but rarely ever look good as a whole. Must be painful to be a fan right now. The down years with all the picks and youth coming in can actually be fun, what we see night to night right now certainly is not.
I think the problem is very clear. they have not drafted very well outside of the early 1st round picks. if you look at their draft history over the past 5+ years, it's a mess outside of early round 1 picks. just a wasteland.

maybe it's a development issue too. not sure. but you need to fill in defense, goalie, and a bottom 6 around their stud skill players and they haven't done that very well at all.
Yeah, depth is huge in an organization. The Wings are good at developing elite prospects (Z, Datsyuk, Federov, Lidstrom, etc) but they have made their bones with the help of depth guys like Draper, Holmstrom, Franzen, Maltby, Ericsson and Ward. They now have guys like Sheahan, Abdelkader, Glendening and Andersson. Not exciting names but they are all solid contributors who can be long-term 3rd and 4th round guys that play on a nightly basis. Hit with your elite guys like Tatar and Nyquist and sprinkle in these depth guys, and you can maintain some excellence long-term.

 
Luke Gazdic is one tough SOB. He tuned in Clayton Stoner of the Wild the other night and just turned out Westgarth's lights tonight.

Westgarth hung in there and then Luke knocked out his mouthguard and him. The linesman was immediately calling from help from the Flames' bench when Westgarth hit the ice.

Gazdic has to be the toughest guy, that can a play a regular shift, the Oilers have had since Laraque. And yes, as sad as it is, this gets fans excited in Edmonton. :thumbup:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ID26iClPumI

 
irish eyes, can you enlighten us on which goals tonight were Fleury's fault?

was it the one-timer that Sharp banked off the post? or maybe the Toews breakaway when Orpik lost his jock?

given the Penguins only goal came on a point-blank shot from Seabrook into his own net, I'm guessing the Penguins would have won that game if only they had the second coming of Hasek and Patrick Roy both playing between the pipes?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kesler to the Penguins makes absolutely no sense from the Canucks point of view. The Penguins best assets are young D-men, but the Canucks have too many D as is, they just need scoring in the worst way. Trading away Kesler for a young D prospect, a couple picks from the end of whatever round, and Brandon Sutter being the only forward coming back would be catastrophically bad. Though the way Gillis has been reeling these past few years I wouldn't put such a terrible deal past him.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kesler to the Penguins makes absolutely no sense from the Canucks point of view. The Penguins best assets are young D-man, but the Canucks have too many D as is, they just need scoring in the worst way. Trading away Kesler for a young D prospect, a couple picks from the end of whatever round, and Brandon Sutter being the only forward coming back would be catastrophically bad. Though the way Gillis has been reeling these past few years I wouldn't put such a terrible deal past him.
Does anyone besides CE think Sutter is even anything special? He looks lost most of the time when I watch the Pens and he isn't exactly lighting up the stat sheet playing with guys like Crosby, Malkin, and Neal. Pittsburgh's looking to move him because he isn't very good. :shrug:

 
Kesler to the Penguins makes absolutely no sense from the Canucks point of view. The Penguins best assets are young D-men, but the Canucks have too many D as is, they just need scoring in the worst way. Trading away Kesler for a young D prospect, a couple picks from the end of whatever round, and Brandon Sutter being the only forward coming back would be catastrophically bad. Though the way Gillis has been reeling these past few years I wouldn't put such a terrible deal past him.
does he have a NTC? I recall reading he wanted to go to a contender. Couver want Hodgson back?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I know the Sabres are bad, but that's by design. Flames actually look better than expected most nights too.

When I watch the Oilers though, I'm usually just disgusted by what I see. All that talent and they just seem lost most nights.
Oilers are a more talented team than the Flames, but Calgary has more heart and is a harder working team.Hall looked absolutely lost on Calgary's first goal. How hard is it to take the only opposing player in your zone out of the play?
I've said it many times the past three years, I was just waiting and really excited about the Oilers talent and what seemed like a certain rise to excellence. I thought they needed to add a few veteran players to the mix, now I have no idea what is wrong with them. They need to break it up a little after this year, get some different pieces and try to salvage all these high picks that individually look great at times, but rarely ever look good as a whole. Must be painful to be a fan right now. The down years with all the picks and youth coming in can actually be fun, what we see night to night right now certainly is not.
Definitely painful to be an Oilers fan right now.
 
Kesler to the Penguins makes absolutely no sense from the Canucks point of view. The Penguins best assets are young D-man, but the Canucks have too many D as is, they just need scoring in the worst way. Trading away Kesler for a young D prospect, a couple picks from the end of whatever round, and Brandon Sutter being the only forward coming back would be catastrophically bad. Though the way Gillis has been reeling these past few years I wouldn't put such a terrible deal past him.
Does anyone besides CE think Sutter is even anything special? He looks lost most of the time when I watch the Pens and he isn't exactly lighting up the stat sheet playing with guys like Crosby, Malkin, and Neal. Pittsburgh's looking to move him because he isn't very good. :shrug:
I don't think he's special at all. Certainly a nice player, but given the Canucks scoring woes they need a scoring forward to be the key asset coming back for Kesler, and Sutter is not that player.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kesler to the Penguins makes absolutely no sense from the Canucks point of view. The Penguins best assets are young D-men, but the Canucks have too many D as is, they just need scoring in the worst way. Trading away Kesler for a young D prospect, a couple picks from the end of whatever round, and Brandon Sutter being the only forward coming back would be catastrophically bad. Though the way Gillis has been reeling these past few years I wouldn't put such a terrible deal past him.
does he have a NTC? I recall reading he wanted to go to a contender. Couver want Hodgson back?
He does, but there's enough contenders out there and Kesler is a desired enough player that there should be no reason not to get a fair value return.

And yes, very much so....

 
I know the Sabres are bad, but that's by design. Flames actually look better than expected most nights too.

When I watch the Oilers though, I'm usually just disgusted by what I see. All that talent and they just seem lost most nights.
Oilers are a more talented team than the Flames, but Calgary has more heart and is a harder working team.Hall looked absolutely lost on Calgary's first goal. How hard is it to take the only opposing player in your zone out of the play?
I've said it many times the past three years, I was just waiting and really excited about the Oilers talent and what seemed like a certain rise to excellence. I thought they needed to add a few veteran players to the mix, now I have no idea what is wrong with them. They need to break it up a little after this year, get some different pieces and try to salvage all these high picks that individually look great at times, but rarely ever look good as a whole. Must be painful to be a fan right now. The down years with all the picks and youth coming in can actually be fun, what we see night to night right now certainly is not.
I think the problem is very clear. they have not drafted very well outside of the early 1st round picks. if you look at their draft history over the past 5+ years, it's a mess outside of early round 1 picks. just a wasteland.maybe it's a development issue too. not sure. but you need to fill in defense, goalie, and a bottom 6 around their stud skill players and they haven't done that very well at all.
I think that has been a problem for the Oilers, but not the only one. As far as drafting goes, I even question their first round picks. Tambellini was always drafting BPA and not looking at team need if the choice was a close one. He also made some horrible FA signings that were supposed to fill holes on the team (Cam Barker,etc.) and left them going back to the drawing board in 2-3 seasons. They rushed their first round picks in to the NHL and probably stunted their development by throwing them into the deep end before they were ready. Successful teams put most of their high picks back in Junior or on the 3rd line and ease them into the transition to the pro game.

They also drafted too many of the same kind of player (small playmaking wingers, offensive DMen,etc.) and ignored the fact that you need all kinds of players to make up a good team.

They also changed Coaches far too often and introduced new schemes and concepts to a bunch of young players and overwhelmed them.

MacTavish has made some good trades, signed some nice FAs and sent Nurse back to Juniors. Maybe he can start to turrn this huge mess around. Perron ties it up with a great shot!

 
I know the Sabres are bad, but that's by design. Flames actually look better than expected most nights too.

When I watch the Oilers though, I'm usually just disgusted by what I see. All that talent and they just seem lost most nights.
Oilers are a more talented team than the Flames, but Calgary has more heart and is a harder working team.Hall looked absolutely lost on Calgary's first goal. How hard is it to take the only opposing player in your zone out of the play?
I've said it many times the past three years, I was just waiting and really excited about the Oilers talent and what seemed like a certain rise to excellence. I thought they needed to add a few veteran players to the mix, now I have no idea what is wrong with them. They need to break it up a little after this year, get some different pieces and try to salvage all these high picks that individually look great at times, but rarely ever look good as a whole. Must be painful to be a fan right now. The down years with all the picks and youth coming in can actually be fun, what we see night to night right now certainly is not.
I think the problem is very clear. they have not drafted very well outside of the early 1st round picks. if you look at their draft history over the past 5+ years, it's a mess outside of early round 1 picks. just a wasteland.maybe it's a development issue too. not sure. but you need to fill in defense, goalie, and a bottom 6 around their stud skill players and they haven't done that very well at all.
Yeah, depth is huge in an organization. The Wings are good at developing elite prospects (Z, Datsyuk, Federov, Lidstrom, etc) but they have made their bones with the help of depth guys like Draper, Holmstrom, Franzen, Maltby, Ericsson and Ward. They now have guys like Sheahan, Abdelkader, Glendening and Andersson. Not exciting names but they are all solid contributors who can be long-term 3rd and 4th round guys that play on a nightly basis. Hit with your elite guys like Tatar and Nyquist and sprinkle in these depth guys, and you can maintain some excellence long-term.
Detroit has also done a good job of letting their young players develop in the minors.
 
I know the Sabres are bad, but that's by design. Flames actually look better than expected most nights too.

When I watch the Oilers though, I'm usually just disgusted by what I see. All that talent and they just seem lost most nights.
Oilers are a more talented team than the Flames, but Calgary has more heart and is a harder working team.Hall looked absolutely lost on Calgary's first goal. How hard is it to take the only opposing player in your zone out of the play?
I've said it many times the past three years, I was just waiting and really excited about the Oilers talent and what seemed like a certain rise to excellence. I thought they needed to add a few veteran players to the mix, now I have no idea what is wrong with them. They need to break it up a little after this year, get some different pieces and try to salvage all these high picks that individually look great at times, but rarely ever look good as a whole. Must be painful to be a fan right now. The down years with all the picks and youth coming in can actually be fun, what we see night to night right now certainly is not.
I think the problem is very clear. they have not drafted very well outside of the early 1st round picks. if you look at their draft history over the past 5+ years, it's a mess outside of early round 1 picks. just a wasteland.maybe it's a development issue too. not sure. but you need to fill in defense, goalie, and a bottom 6 around their stud skill players and they haven't done that very well at all.
Yeah, depth is huge in an organization. The Wings are good at developing elite prospects (Z, Datsyuk, Federov, Lidstrom, etc) but they have made their bones with the help of depth guys like Draper, Holmstrom, Franzen, Maltby, Ericsson and Ward. They now have guys like Sheahan, Abdelkader, Glendening and Andersson. Not exciting names but they are all solid contributors who can be long-term 3rd and 4th round guys that play on a nightly basis. Hit with your elite guys like Tatar and Nyquist and sprinkle in these depth guys, and you can maintain some excellence long-term.
Detroit has also done a good job of letting their young players develop in the minors.
Yeah, they leave them there a long time in most cases and expect them to be ready to play the sytem when they are called up. I think they wanted Nyquist and Tatar to play in Grand Rapids all year this year, but couldn't afford to do so with the injuries. In Babcock's system forwards are expected to play defense and the d-men are expected to play a perfect game. Smith and Kindl have struggled in Detroit where I think their shortcomings would be less obvious elsewhere, but they learn as they go.

 
Stepan or JT Miller and Hagelin for Kessler?

Would couver have any interest.

And what should the Rangers do with Talbot. He can not sit on the bench for next 7 years. What could he return in a deal

 
I wonder how yankeefan23 enjoyed the snot kicking at the Wells Fargo Center yesterday? I hope he at least enjoyed our stadium again!

 
Looks like a good day of NBC Hockey today, for those without Center Ice.

Flyers-Caps at noon.

Sens-Canucks at four on NBCSports

Bruins-Rangers at seven on NBC Sports

 
AcerFC said:
Stepan or JT Miller and Hagelin for Kessler?

Would couver have any interest.

And what should the Rangers do with Talbot. He can not sit on the bench for next 7 years. What could he return in a deal
Oh hell yes. Would love to see a deal like that.

 
Game was great last night. Absolute blizzard in the first. Unfortunately, my shoes and jeans got wet and it was a little cold in the third. Thankfully, I shot the lock off my wallet and bought Club seats so we could warm up in the intermissions.

I have a stalker. Someone came up to me in the first intermission and asked if I was at game 6 on the glass. :unsure:

 
The good Ovechkin brings around the bad Ovechkin.A drop pass to nobody behind his own net(on a PP mind you)and then just stands in the zone while Hall gets into position for a shot(and scores).

Orlov with 2 bombs though and the team is actually playing some of it's best hockey these last few games and they have to be with the schedule not looking good in March.

 
northern exposure said:
Doctor Detroit said:
Aaron Rudnicki said:
Doctor Detroit said:
northern exposure said:
Aaron Rudnicki said:
I know the Sabres are bad, but that's by design. Flames actually look better than expected most nights too.

When I watch the Oilers though, I'm usually just disgusted by what I see. All that talent and they just seem lost most nights.
Oilers are a more talented team than the Flames, but Calgary has more heart and is a harder working team.Hall looked absolutely lost on Calgary's first goal. How hard is it to take the only opposing player in your zone out of the play?
I've said it many times the past three years, I was just waiting and really excited about the Oilers talent and what seemed like a certain rise to excellence. I thought they needed to add a few veteran players to the mix, now I have no idea what is wrong with them. They need to break it up a little after this year, get some different pieces and try to salvage all these high picks that individually look great at times, but rarely ever look good as a whole. Must be painful to be a fan right now. The down years with all the picks and youth coming in can actually be fun, what we see night to night right now certainly is not.
I think the problem is very clear. they have not drafted very well outside of the early 1st round picks. if you look at their draft history over the past 5+ years, it's a mess outside of early round 1 picks. just a wasteland.maybe it's a development issue too. not sure. but you need to fill in defense, goalie, and a bottom 6 around their stud skill players and they haven't done that very well at all.
Yeah, depth is huge in an organization. The Wings are good at developing elite prospects (Z, Datsyuk, Federov, Lidstrom, etc) but they have made their bones with the help of depth guys like Draper, Holmstrom, Franzen, Maltby, Ericsson and Ward. They now have guys like Sheahan, Abdelkader, Glendening and Andersson. Not exciting names but they are all solid contributors who can be long-term 3rd and 4th round guys that play on a nightly basis. Hit with your elite guys like Tatar and Nyquist and sprinkle in these depth guys, and you can maintain some excellence long-term.
Detroit has also done a good job of letting their young players develop in the minors.
That is touted and rightfully so in most cases, but I think Holland also hangs onto veterans longer than he should. There is no reason guys like Bertuzzi and Sammuelson should have been resigned.

 
AcerFC said:
Stepan or JT Miller and Hagelin for Kessler?

Would couver have any interest.

And what should the Rangers do with Talbot. He can not sit on the bench for next 7 years. What could he return in a deal
Vancouver has Eddie Lack, they don't need Talbot.

I think Talbot's value is hard to gauge right now, he doesn't have a pedigree or enough game experience at the NHL level to have real value. Having depth at golaie is good for any franchise, Rangers included. I'd say keeping him is best. Also maybe a little early to give up on Stepan, his long-term value seems to be pretty high even though he's been terrible this year.

 
Just love giving away a point to the Flyers because of stupid ####### hockey players making stupid ####### hockey plays.Why the #### is Ovechkin on the ice when you are up by one and the Flyers dominating play?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top