What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official 2013 Chicago Bears Thread*** (1 Viewer)

Pure speculation, but Ratliff worked out for the Bengals Dolphins and Chiefs too. Could say that neither of them wanted him, or that he chose us. I'm going with the latter, cause he thinks we...have the best shot...at the super... bowl... ...

yup
I think he chose the Bears because it was his best shot at starting. I doubt he cares too much about the Super Bowl.
 
Hard to argue against the Ratliff signing.

Regardless, the Bears are likely going to get shredded this week. I would like to see some improvement/progress with Bostic and Greene. That would be a good takeaway from the game. Frey too.
Would be awesome to see Bostic and Greene play well. If they don't, however, I won't put too much thought into it. Asking them to perform well against GB in their first start is asking a lot.
 
McClellin wins NFC defensive player of the week while possibly helping us make the playoffs by knocking Rodgers out for a month. Didn't see that coming

 
McClellin wins NFC defensive player of the week while possibly helping us make the playoffs by knocking Rodgers out for a month. Didn't see that coming
Wrong thread - this belongs in the "Things You Never Thought You'd Say 2 Months Ago" :thumbup:

Shea has 6.5 career sacks - 4.5 are against the Packers. I say we keep him.

 
McClellin wins NFC defensive player of the week while possibly helping us make the playoffs by knocking Rodgers out for a month. Didn't see that coming
Unreal. Is there any chance this becomes a regular thing? No right?

 
DoubleG said:
RBM said:
McClellin wins NFC defensive player of the week while possibly helping us make the playoffs by knocking Rodgers out for a month. Didn't see that coming
Unreal. Is there any chance this becomes a regular thing? No right?
I hope so - if he knocks out Stafford this week, 1st place is mine!!!! Muwahahahahahahaha
"QB killa" Shea McClellin

 
DoubleG said:
RBM said:
McClellin wins NFC defensive player of the week while possibly helping us make the playoffs by knocking Rodgers out for a month. Didn't see that coming
Unreal. Is there any chance this becomes a regular thing? No right?
I hope so - if he knocks out Stafford this week, 1st place is mine!!!! Muwahahahahahahaha
"QB killa" Shea McClellin
"Shoulder Shea"

 
McClellin completely changed the NFC playoff chase. That being said he still sucks as a full time DE.
:shrug: We'll see I guess. I heard the talking heads talking about how Shea has a decent matchup this week too - with the Lions O-line banged up. Maybe the speed and "high motor" guy starts to perform better as O-lines get dinged up and the season drags on. Maybe he's learning better technique and the Bears are learning how to use him more efficiently. I do think the bye week helped Peppers - and anything that helps Pep, helps the entire defensive line.

I agree - I am not convinced that Shea suddenly had a lightbulb moment. But if McClellin can even bring most of that on a semi-regular basis, maybe that first round pick wasn't quite as horrible as it seemed earlier on. One concern is that McClellin IS part of the reason that the Packers were able to rip big runs (well, that and the safeties both are fairly bad) - he might be a good pass rusher but he is too small (or at least doesn't play stout enough yet) to play the run in a standard 4-3, imho.

 
If they had the defense from years past, they would have a shot. No chance now. Mel Tucker couldn't carry Marinelli's jock. Big mistake bringing on that bum. Stuck with him now

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think the D decline is all Tucker, injuries and age have finally come calling.
I agree with this. Add to the fact that it wasn't Tucker's drafting or roster decision to have the two schlebs they have at safety. As I said, Chris Conte MUST have pictures of several Bears front office people, because he might be the worst safety the Bears have trotted out as a true starter (i.e. not some injury replacement) - since the scab games in the 80's.

Conte takes horrible angles, is slow, can't cover, doesn't close well, doesn't take the ball away, is a very soft hitter and generally would be better off working at Best Buy selling dishwashers. If anyone can post one thing that Conte does well as an NFL safety, I would love to see it.

 
I don't think the D decline is all Tucker, injuries and age have finally come calling.
I agree with this. Add to the fact that it wasn't Tucker's drafting or roster decision to have the two schlebs they have at safety. As I said, Chris Conte MUST have pictures of several Bears front office people, because he might be the worst safety the Bears have trotted out as a true starter (i.e. not some injury replacement) - since the scab games in the 80's.

Conte takes horrible angles, is slow, can't cover, doesn't close well, doesn't take the ball away, is a very soft hitter and generally would be better off working at Best Buy selling dishwashers. If anyone can post one thing that Conte does well as an NFL safety, I would love to see it.
Couldn't agree more. I've never seen a Bears safety be just so consistently bad in every aspect of the game. Most of the long runs by Green Bay were a direct result of Conte missing tackles on RBs that got to the second level. The safety's main job has to be to contain those runs so a gain of 10 yards doesn't become a 50 yard TD run.

The Bears need to think seriously about replacing him. At least get someone in there who is a competent tackler. Steltz and Wright are the backups it's hard to imagine either one of them being any worse than what we've seen from Conte this year.

 
I don't think the D decline is all Tucker, injuries and age have finally come calling.
I agree with this. Add to the fact that it wasn't Tucker's drafting or roster decision to have the two schlebs they have at safety. As I said, Chris Conte MUST have pictures of several Bears front office people, because he might be the worst safety the Bears have trotted out as a true starter (i.e. not some injury replacement) - since the scab games in the 80's.Conte takes horrible angles, is slow, can't cover, doesn't close well, doesn't take the ball away, is a very soft hitter and generally would be better off working at Best Buy selling dishwashers. If anyone can post one thing that Conte does well as an NFL safety, I would love to see it.
Couldn't agree more. I've never seen a Bears safety be just so consistently bad in every aspect of the game. Most of the long runs by Green Bay were a direct result of Conte missing tackles on RBs that got to the second level. The safety's main job has to be to contain those runs so a gain of 10 yards doesn't become a 50 yard TD run.

The Bears need to think seriously about replacing him. At least get someone in there who is a competent tackler. Steltz and Wright are the backups it's hard to imagine either one of them being any worse than what we've seen from Conte this year.
Wrights a starter.

 
Wright was playing better early in the season. He's been banged up a little. He was listed as Questionable going into the GB game. Even after the bye.

so, I will give him a little break.

 
I really put this loss on Trestman. Jay Cutler had no business in the game in the fourth quarter. The Bears had an opportunity to make the playoffs. That chance is gone. Trestman will learn but this boneheaded decision was very costly.

This is typical Bears. I gave up on them before the Packer game. I gave them no chance in the Packers game. They win that. So again I have hope with a winnable game against Detroit. And the Bears lay a turd in this game and blow a chance to lead the division. But this is the type of game that bad teams lose.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think it's about Trestman learning. He's been coaching football for 30 years. I'll bet he will be the first to admit he probably should have done things differently.

I feel strange being the optimist in here, since I have always been the Bears biggest critic, but I think they will be fine. Still a lot of football left.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Admits he may have played his last game for the Bears.

All good things have to come to an end. But, I really like Tillman. As a player and a person.

 
I want him at safety next year. We have gone thru #### safety after #### safety for years. Peanut deserves a contract and a real chance to play. Love that guy.

D just got ALOT worse as hard as that is to imagine.

 
I want him at safety next year. We have gone thru #### safety after #### safety for years. Peanut deserves a contract and a real chance to play. Love that guy.

D just got ALOT worse as hard as that is to imagine.
Said he wasn't interested.
 
Listening to the Trestman presser now. Sticks by his decision to leave Jay in. Said we were moving the ball consistently and Jay was making great throws.

 
I don't think the D decline is all Tucker, injuries and age have finally come calling.
I agree with this. Add to the fact that it wasn't Tucker's drafting or roster decision to have the two schlebs they have at safety. As I said, Chris Conte MUST have pictures of several Bears front office people, because he might be the worst safety the Bears have trotted out as a true starter (i.e. not some injury replacement) - since the scab games in the 80's.Conte takes horrible angles, is slow, can't cover, doesn't close well, doesn't take the ball away, is a very soft hitter and generally would be better off working at Best Buy selling dishwashers. If anyone can post one thing that Conte does well as an NFL safety, I would love to see it.
Couldn't agree more. I've never seen a Bears safety be just so consistently bad in every aspect of the game. Most of the long runs by Green Bay were a direct result of Conte missing tackles on RBs that got to the second level. The safety's main job has to be to contain those runs so a gain of 10 yards doesn't become a 50 yard TD run.

The Bears need to think seriously about replacing him. At least get someone in there who is a competent tackler. Steltz and Wright are the backups it's hard to imagine either one of them being any worse than what we've seen from Conte this year.
Wrights a starter.
Conte played alright. Wright cost the Bears the game. He was nowhere near Calvin Johnson on the 4th-quarter TD and should have came up with the interception earlier in the game.

 
I don't think the D decline is all Tucker, injuries and age have finally come calling.
I agree with this. Add to the fact that it wasn't Tucker's drafting or roster decision to have the two schlebs they have at safety. As I said, Chris Conte MUST have pictures of several Bears front office people, because he might be the worst safety the Bears have trotted out as a true starter (i.e. not some injury replacement) - since the scab games in the 80's.Conte takes horrible angles, is slow, can't cover, doesn't close well, doesn't take the ball away, is a very soft hitter and generally would be better off working at Best Buy selling dishwashers. If anyone can post one thing that Conte does well as an NFL safety, I would love to see it.
Couldn't agree more. I've never seen a Bears safety be just so consistently bad in every aspect of the game. Most of the long runs by Green Bay were a direct result of Conte missing tackles on RBs that got to the second level. The safety's main job has to be to contain those runs so a gain of 10 yards doesn't become a 50 yard TD run.

The Bears need to think seriously about replacing him. At least get someone in there who is a competent tackler. Steltz and Wright are the backups it's hard to imagine either one of them being any worse than what we've seen from Conte this year.
Wrights a starter.
Conte played alright. Wright cost the Bears the game. He was nowhere near Calvin Johnson on the 4th-quarter TD and should have came up with the interception earlier in the game.
I don't think you can say anyone on defense lost this game even though they weren't great. This one falls squarely on the shoulders of the offense and Coaching.

 
I don't think the D decline is all Tucker, injuries and age have finally come calling.
I agree with this. Add to the fact that it wasn't Tucker's drafting or roster decision to have the two schlebs they have at safety. As I said, Chris Conte MUST have pictures of several Bears front office people, because he might be the worst safety the Bears have trotted out as a true starter (i.e. not some injury replacement) - since the scab games in the 80's.Conte takes horrible angles, is slow, can't cover, doesn't close well, doesn't take the ball away, is a very soft hitter and generally would be better off working at Best Buy selling dishwashers. If anyone can post one thing that Conte does well as an NFL safety, I would love to see it.
Couldn't agree more. I've never seen a Bears safety be just so consistently bad in every aspect of the game. Most of the long runs by Green Bay were a direct result of Conte missing tackles on RBs that got to the second level. The safety's main job has to be to contain those runs so a gain of 10 yards doesn't become a 50 yard TD run.

The Bears need to think seriously about replacing him. At least get someone in there who is a competent tackler. Steltz and Wright are the backups it's hard to imagine either one of them being any worse than what we've seen from Conte this year.
Wrights a starter.
Conte played alright. Wright cost the Bears the game. He was nowhere near Calvin Johnson on the 4th-quarter TD and should have came up with the interception earlier in the game.
I don't think you can say anyone on defense lost this game even though they weren't great. This one falls squarely on the shoulders of the offense and Coaching.
Wright was awful. The defense played well for the most part, yes. But Tillman has to have safety help on Johnson in the red zone and Wright was in lala land. A couple coaching blunders are frustrating for sure, but Wright has to make some plays... Slauson's hold, Jeffery's drop in the end zone, plenty of blame to go around. Just tired of hearing the blame toward Cutler for fighting through an injury when the same people probably moaned when he wasn't playing through the MCL sprain.

 
I don't think the D decline is all Tucker, injuries and age have finally come calling.
I agree with this. Add to the fact that it wasn't Tucker's drafting or roster decision to have the two schlebs they have at safety. As I said, Chris Conte MUST have pictures of several Bears front office people, because he might be the worst safety the Bears have trotted out as a true starter (i.e. not some injury replacement) - since the scab games in the 80's.Conte takes horrible angles, is slow, can't cover, doesn't close well, doesn't take the ball away, is a very soft hitter and generally would be better off working at Best Buy selling dishwashers. If anyone can post one thing that Conte does well as an NFL safety, I would love to see it.
Couldn't agree more. I've never seen a Bears safety be just so consistently bad in every aspect of the game. Most of the long runs by Green Bay were a direct result of Conte missing tackles on RBs that got to the second level. The safety's main job has to be to contain those runs so a gain of 10 yards doesn't become a 50 yard TD run.

The Bears need to think seriously about replacing him. At least get someone in there who is a competent tackler. Steltz and Wright are the backups it's hard to imagine either one of them being any worse than what we've seen from Conte this year.
Wrights a starter.
Conte played alright. Wright cost the Bears the game. He was nowhere near Calvin Johnson on the 4th-quarter TD and should have came up with the interception earlier in the game.
I don't think you can say anyone on defense lost this game even though they weren't great. This one falls squarely on the shoulders of the offense and Coaching.
Wright was awful. The defense played well for the most part, yes. But Tillman has to have safety help on Johnson in the red zone and Wright was in lala land. A couple coaching blunders are frustrating for sure, but Wright has to make some plays... Slauson's hold, Jeffery's drop in the end zone, plenty of blame to go around. Just tired of hearing the blame toward Cutler for fighting through an injury when the same people probably moaned when he wasn't playing through the MCL sprain.
I haven't really seen too many people put much blame on cutler, and i don't think he deserves much, overall i thought he played pretty well. INT wasn't really his falut, just a good play by Suh getting his hands up, cutler made some great 3rd and long throws, the first TD pass to Jeffery was a bullet in perfection position. I think he should have been pulled a little earlier then he was, but he did look pretty good most of the game even with his injuries and getting the hell beat out of him again.

Oh and you are correct Wright was pretty bad, no question about it. I really doubt we see him on the team next year. His contract is up and he just hasn't shown growth as a playmaking safety. I can see how they resign him. I think we will have to deal with Conte for another year or two as we just have to many holes to fill, so anyone under contract, besides Peppers will likely be back.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think the D decline is all Tucker, injuries and age have finally come calling.
I agree with this. Add to the fact that it wasn't Tucker's drafting or roster decision to have the two schlebs they have at safety. As I said, Chris Conte MUST have pictures of several Bears front office people, because he might be the worst safety the Bears have trotted out as a true starter (i.e. not some injury replacement) - since the scab games in the 80's.Conte takes horrible angles, is slow, can't cover, doesn't close well, doesn't take the ball away, is a very soft hitter and generally would be better off working at Best Buy selling dishwashers. If anyone can post one thing that Conte does well as an NFL safety, I would love to see it.
Couldn't agree more. I've never seen a Bears safety be just so consistently bad in every aspect of the game. Most of the long runs by Green Bay were a direct result of Conte missing tackles on RBs that got to the second level. The safety's main job has to be to contain those runs so a gain of 10 yards doesn't become a 50 yard TD run.

The Bears need to think seriously about replacing him. At least get someone in there who is a competent tackler. Steltz and Wright are the backups it's hard to imagine either one of them being any worse than what we've seen from Conte this year.
Wrights a starter.
Conte played alright. Wright cost the Bears the game. He was nowhere near Calvin Johnson on the 4th-quarter TD and should have came up with the interception earlier in the game.
I don't think you can say anyone on defense lost this game even though they weren't great. This one falls squarely on the shoulders of the offense and Coaching.
Wright was awful. The defense played well for the most part, yes. But Tillman has to have safety help on Johnson in the red zone and Wright was in lala land. A couple coaching blunders are frustrating for sure, but Wright has to make some plays... Slauson's hold, Jeffery's drop in the end zone, plenty of blame to go around. Just tired of hearing the blame toward Cutler for fighting through an injury when the same people probably moaned when he wasn't playing through the MCL sprain.
You left out the part about zero pass rush.
 
Cutler out for the foreseeable future. I wouldn't doubt it's for the season. This stinks
Not one source has even hinted at it being for the season
That was my opinion. On his radio show, he said it was worse than had been reported and he was still in a cast. Ankle injuries, especially when there is significant damage to multiple ligaments, are a real problem.
 
Trestman's summary, of not taking TOs at the end of regulation, was a refreshing departure from the old regime.
His summary (i.e. willingness to explain) - yes. The decision not to do so could have easily backfired (and does if Doss doesn't drop an easy first down in OT - or the snap on 3rd and goal at the end of regulation isn't into the ground).

I like Trestman's willingness to explain his thought process - I don't always agree with that thought process however. His clock management is still quite suspect, imho. I also don't always like the Bear reluctance to run in the ball in the red zone.

 
Rotoworld:

Bears RE Julius Peppers admits he's entered his decline phase.
Peppers is still capable of affecting games intermittently, but can no longer dominate for long stretches. He has just four sacks through ten starts. "You reach a point where your body won't always do what your mind tells it to," said Peppers, who turns 34 in two months. "Sometimes you get up and come to practice and the body just isn't going to do it that day." Pro Football Focus has graded Peppers negatively in both run and pass defense.

Source: Chicago Tribune
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top