What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

**Official 2014 In Season Dynasty Trade Thread** (1 Viewer)

Late last night:

Stacy

For

Ertz
League specs?

In a start 2 RB league--I think you gave up too much. I'd personally have looked to pay much less for guys like Witten, Donnell, Eifert, or even the Reed/Paul combo.
12 team Q/R/R/W/W/TE/F/K/DB/DB/DL/LB/LB

I definitely have been trying to move Stacy for some time - and couldn't get a bite. I agree I may have given up too much, but with Forte/Morris/Ellington/West/Crowell plus my backups, I felt it was the best move I could make.

 
12 team PPR:

Jeffrey, Cooks, Locker, McCown

For

Romo, Cooper, Grice, 2015 2nd, 2015 3rd

 
Last edited by a moderator:
12-Team PPR. Lineup- QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, TE, Flex, SuperFlex, No K or D. 23-Man Rosters.

Gave- Rashad Jennings

Got- TY Hilton
I like the TY side, who knows where Jennings will be next year.
I'd take Jennings for a year or two, but I don't believe in Hilton long-term so I put less emphasis on the career length here. By the time Jennings is out of the league I could just as easily see Hilton as nothing more than an occasional slot receiver that's not startable in fantasy.

Things have fallen into place for Hilton perfectly and he's still been only a moderate fantasy asset. I think they'll replace him sooner rather than later.
Agree here.

Jennings looks to be used as a workhorse so the fact I don't think he is very good is negated some by his workload. I would have an easier time starting Jennings for the foreseeable future than Hilton

 
Got a big one here that just went down. Was approached, negotiated, and had a deal worked out all in under an hour, surprising with a big deal like this.

12 team PPR. Pretty standard, must start 2 RB's, 4 point passing TD's.

Gave:

Cam Newton

Arian Foster

Wes Welker

Christine Michael

Johnathon Grimes

Got:

Andrew Luck

Frank Gore

Vincent Jackson

Steven Jackson

Dion Lewis

Michael lovers will probably not like this one for me. And I know that the drop from Foster to Gore hurts, but I consider Welker to VJax to be an upgrade long term.
I like Luck side
I will take the Newton side but I have Newton and Luck pretty close.

I can see making the move and nothing really jumps out as a clear win on either side but I think the pieces with Newton are just slightly better

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Some recent trades in my contract dynasty league (max 4 year deals). Non-PPR. 1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, and 1 K.

Doug Martin (2 years) and Ryan Mathews (3)

for

Ben Tate (4)

Andy Dalton (1)

for

2nd round pick

I was involved in this deal, as Dalton was my backup behind Matt Ryan and the team on the other side had only McCown, Cassel, and RG3 on an otherwise great team.

Andrew Luck (2), Brandon LaFell (1), Keshawn Martin (1), and a 3rd round draft pick (likely top 2-3 at worst)

for

Russell Wilson (2), Larry Fitzgerald (4), and Eddie Royal (1)

Not a huge fan of this trade, as the team trading away Luck is pretty bad, but he thought it was a good opportunity to upgrade at WR (both Fitzgerald and Royal are instant starters for him). The team on the other side of the deal can still start D. Thomas, Nelson, and Cooks, although without Fitzgerald he doesn't have much depth.

 
Some recent trades in my contract dynasty league (max 4 year deals). Non-PPR. 1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, and 1 K.

Doug Martin (2 years) and Ryan Mathews (3)

for

Ben Tate (4)
This doesn't make sense. There's huge ? around them all but that seems overpay for Tate.
 
Got a big one here that just went down. Was approached, negotiated, and had a deal worked out all in under an hour, surprising with a big deal like this.

12 team PPR. Pretty standard, must start 2 RB's, 4 point passing TD's.

Gave:

Cam Newton

Arian Foster

Wes Welker

Christine Michael

Johnathon Grimes

Got:

Andrew Luck

Frank Gore

Vincent Jackson

Steven Jackson

Dion Lewis

Michael lovers will probably not like this one for me. And I know that the drop from Foster to Gore hurts, but I consider Welker to VJax to be an upgrade long term.
I like Luck side
I will take the Newton side but I have Newton and Luck pretty close.I can see making the move and nothing really jumps out as a clear win on either side but I think the pieces with Newton are just slightly better
Yeah, I definitely gave up the better non-QB pieces. I just see Luck as being a true difference maker, and I think he'll be even more untouchable than he already is after this season.

 
Yeah, I definitely gave up the better non-QB pieces. I just see Luck as being a true difference maker, and I think he'll be even more untouchable than he already is after this season.
Maybe true but I still think Cam is the QB that has 3 top 5 finishes his first 3 years in the league. Don't think that was fluke

 
Yeah, I definitely gave up the better non-QB pieces. I just see Luck as being a true difference maker, and I think he'll be even more untouchable than he already is after this season.
Maybe true but I still think Cam is the QB that has 3 top 5 finishes his first 3 years in the league. Don't think that was fluke
Honesty this deal was as much about buying into the guy I think is going to be the consensus #1 dynasty QB at the end of the season, as it was about bailing on Cam.

I love Cam. But I think as he runs less, he'll settle in as more of a Roethlisburger-level QB than the fantasy dynamo we saw his first couple/few years. Great real life QB who will have some big fantasy weeks but otherwise settle in as a replaceable dynasty QB.

I think Luck is the next Peyton and I think it's more sustainable.

 
Yeah, I definitely gave up the better non-QB pieces. I just see Luck as being a true difference maker, and I think he'll be even more untouchable than he already is after this season.
Maybe true but I still think Cam is the QB that has 3 top 5 finishes his first 3 years in the league. Don't think that was fluke
Honesty this deal was as much about buying into the guy I think is going to be the consensus #1 dynasty QB at the end of the season, as it was about bailing on Cam.

I love Cam. But I think as he runs less, he'll settle in as more of a Roethlisburger-level QB than the fantasy dynamo we saw his first couple/few years. Great real life QB who will have some big fantasy weeks but otherwise settle in as a replaceable dynasty QB.

I think Luck is the next Peyton and I think it's more sustainable.
Then it is a very good move for you

 
Yeah, I definitely gave up the better non-QB pieces. I just see Luck as being a true difference maker, and I think he'll be even more untouchable than he already is after this season.
Maybe true but I still think Cam is the QB that has 3 top 5 finishes his first 3 years in the league. Don't think that was fluke
Honesty this deal was as much about buying into the guy I think is going to be the consensus #1 dynasty QB at the end of the season, as it was about bailing on Cam.

I love Cam. But I think as he runs less, he'll settle in as more of a Roethlisburger-level QB than the fantasy dynamo we saw his first couple/few years. Great real life QB who will have some big fantasy weeks but otherwise settle in as a replaceable dynasty QB.

I think Luck is the next Peyton and I think it's more sustainable.
I agree with this.

 
Honesty this deal was as much about buying into the guy I think is going to be the consensus #1 dynasty QB at the end of the season, as it was about bailing on Cam.I love Cam. But I think as he runs less, he'll settle in as more of a Roethlisburger-level QB than the fantasy dynamo we saw his first couple/few years. Great real life QB who will have some big fantasy weeks but otherwise settle in as a replaceable dynasty QB.

I think Luck is the next Peyton and I think it's more sustainable.
I think your stance on Luck is certainly reasonable. I think he's as likely as anyone to be the top QB this coming off-season, including ARod.

But I question the stance on Newton. He ran 5.3 times a game last year. How much do you see that dropping, once he is healthy? Luck runs 4 times a game, for reference.

 
I agree that Luck is a big upgrade over Cam.

We've seen this a few times with running QBs. They put up a monster rushing season in one of their first few years, then get dinged not too long after that, and have their rushing scaled back. I doubt we ever see Cam rush for 700 yards again and I'm sure we won't see him rush for 14 TDs again.

I think Cam can settle in as a solid ~QB5 type player with the amount of rushing he does now (~5/game). But that's a far cry from what people are anticipating Luck could be, IE way-ahead-of-the-field QB1.

 
We've seen this a few times with running QBs. They put up a monster rushing season in one of their first few years, then get dinged not too long after that, and have their rushing scaled back.
We have? Who? I looked up Culpepper and Vick--and they don't qualify. RG3's only dropped 1.4 attempts/game while playing injured--still 6.6 per game.

But that's a far cry from what people are anticipating Luck could be, IE way-ahead-of-the-field QB1.
Not even the great Peyton Manning has been way ahead of the field for consecutive seasons. Nor have Brees, Brady, or Rodgers. Might as well put the kid in Canton.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Honesty this deal was as much about buying into the guy I think is going to be the consensus #1 dynasty QB at the end of the season, as it was about bailing on Cam.

I love Cam. But I think as he runs less, he'll settle in as more of a Roethlisburger-level QB than the fantasy dynamo we saw his first couple/few years. Great real life QB who will have some big fantasy weeks but otherwise settle in as a replaceable dynasty QB.

I think Luck is the next Peyton and I think it's more sustainable.
I think your stance on Luck is certainly reasonable. I think he's as likely as anyone to be the top QB this coming off-season, including ARod.

But I question the stance on Newton. He ran 5.3 times a game last year. How much do you see that dropping, once he is healthy? Luck runs 4 times a game, for reference.
I knew when I posted that about Cam I was shining the bat signal for you, thanks for sharing your thoughts.

It's not just about the next couple years. I agree that once he gets healthy he could certainly rush enough to be a strong QB1 as he was last year--and maybe he can do that for a few years--but what is that worth, if he never has a year like his rookie year again (and I don't think he will, rushing-wise)?

He was technically a top-5 QB, but not a real special, difference-making fantasy QB, as he was within 1 PPG of 8 other QB's. That's not a real advantage.

So with 587 rushing yards and 6 rushing TD's, Cam was in a big PPG cluster among guys like Dalton, Rivers, Stafford, Romo, and pre-unleashed Luck.

Basically all the QB's between 20-22 PPG (Cam came in around 21).

I think Luck has a much higher chance every year going forward of putting up Brees/Peyton type numbers, and we're seeing that so far this year.

Just my opinion, Cam certainly has a high ceiling as a passer as well, he can make every throw and extend plays, especially if they surround him with some more talent and he stays healthy.

But he hasn't shown that he can be a true difference making fantasy QB without running for 700-14. That year, his rookie year, he was a 26 PPG QB and a difference maker. Then he dropped to 23 PPG and we all said he'd make up for it the next year with improved passing, etc. Then last year happened and he put up 21 PPG. And he's resilient, but accumulating smaller injuries that slow him down.

Luck just seems like he's destined to be the heir to that Brees/Peyton fantasy throne of truly difference-making numbers.

 
12 team .5 ppr rb/1ppr wr/1.25 ppr te

qb/rb/rb/wr/wr/te/3 flex rb/wr/te -11 starters

Team A gives Toby Gerhart/2015 3rd (looks like it will be 3.8-3.12 range)

Team B gives Martellus Bennett

 
Last edited by a moderator:
He was technically a top-5 QB, but not a real special, difference-making fantasy QB, as he was within 1 PPG of 8 other QB's. That's not a real advantage.
I'm not arguing against the trade or your stance on Luck. I just think your take on Newton is a bit cynical. Big Ben with Newtons lowest rushing numbers = QB3, less than a point behind Brees, and 4 ahead of Luck, FWIW.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
He was technically a top-5 QB, but not a real special, difference-making fantasy QB, as he was within 1 PPG of 8 other QB's. That's not a real advantage.
I'm not arguing against the trade or your stance on Luck. I just think your take on Newton is a bit cynical. Big Ben with Newtons lowest rushing numbers = QB3, less than a point behind Brees, and 4 ahead of Luck, FWIW.
That's fair. And to be fair to Newton, I've seem him make jaw-dropping throws dating all the way back to his rookie year even. But as a whole package, he has yet to prove he has the passing chops to be consistently elite without historic rushing numbers.

I'm just saying that while the common refrain that he's been a top-5 fantasy QB every year he's been in the league is technically true, he was only a real difference maker among his peers (even in 4 pt passing TD leagues) his rookie year. I just don't think a player at a position you can only start 1 of gives an advantage when he's in a cluster with 5-6 other players in the second tier behind the true difference maker(s). That means around half the owners in a 12-team league are starting QB's at least as productive as Newton every season. No real advantage. It's all about positional advantage for me and he hasn't given me any in awhile despite some huge weeks.

 
That's fair. And to be fair to Newton, I've seem him make jaw-dropping throws dating all the way back to his rookie year even. But as a whole package, he has yet to prove he has the passing chops to be consistently elite without historic rushing numbers.
Fair. I'll lastly point out that Carolina was bottom 5 in passing attempts both of his "down" seasons. It'll be interesting to see--either way.

 
2 x Super Flex League (So up to three QBs startable), PPR, IDP with return points, large rosters, very deep (40 player squads), so rarely waiver fodder.

Julio, 2015 4th and CJ Mosley

for

Harvin, Lofton, 2015 1st (Should be top 4), 2015 1st (should be bottom 4)

Team trading away Julio is pretty weak everywhere

 
10 team dynasty ppr start: 1QB / 2RB / 3WR / 1 TE / 2 Flex (R/W/T)

Done deal:

A gives John Brown, Storm Johnson

B gives TY Hilton, Bryce Brown

 
10 team dynasty ppr start: 1QB / 2RB / 3WR / 1 TE / 2 Flex (R/W/T)

Done deal:

A gives John Brown, Storm Johnson

B gives TY Hilton, Bryce Brown
Not sure any of those players are solid starts in a 10 team league but Hilton/Brown probably for me

 
2 x Super Flex League (So up to three QBs startable), PPR, IDP with return points, large rosters, very deep (40 player squads), so rarely waiver fodder.

Julio, 2015 4th and CJ Mosley

for

Harvin, Lofton, 2015 1st (Should be top 4), 2015 1st (should be bottom 4)

Team trading away Julio is pretty weak everywhere
Decent return for Julio in a rebuild

 
10 team dynasty ppr start: 1QB / 2RB / 3WR / 1 TE / 2 Flex (R/W/T)

Done deal:

A gives John Brown, Storm Johnson

B gives TY Hilton, Bryce Brown
Not sure any of those players are solid starts in a 10 team league but Hilton/Brown probably for me
TY Hilton, not even with 2 flex positions? I'm the one acquiring TY, he will actually be my WR 4 or 5 in this league. his targets are there the first 3 weeks: 11,11, 6 (injury)

 
Start 2 Qb league

Gave Bridgewater

Got rg3

I don't need any production this year with Peyton and Rodgers with Ben backing up so this is a long term move.

 
2 x Super Flex League (So up to three QBs startable), PPR, IDP with return points, large rosters, very deep (40 player squads), so rarely waiver fodder.

Julio, 2015 4th and CJ Mosley

for

Harvin, Lofton, 2015 1st (Should be top 4), 2015 1st (should be bottom 4)

Team trading away Julio is pretty weak everywhere
I'd likely move Julio for this, depending on how many WRs are started each week.

The early pick will likely net a QB or Gurley. The late pick should provide solid value too, with the QBs being pushed to the top. If the top pick ends up being Mariota, Winston (or other top QB), or Gurley--it's a homerun.

 
Well, it's a pretty unusual deal. There's a reason most people don't get value like this for their young studs. Basically young stud with a sexy name was traded for two studs with less sexy names and a 1st. And nobody in the deal is very old.

It's great value, but you'll rarely see a deal like this.
Agree it's overpay -- but if you want a top-10 dynasty player you should have to overpay.

The difference between Dez and Cobb/Nelson is that Dez is close to bulletproof while the other two guys have significant value tied up in their situation. Cobb on the Browns is Cecil Shorts. Dez on the Browns is ~Josh Gordon.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top