What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

**Official 2014 In Season Dynasty Trade Thread** (2 Viewers)

Warhogs said:
King of the Jungle said:
12 Team PPR QB/5 Flex

Gave: Keenan Allen

Got: Odell Beckham Jr

Gave higher floor for higher ceiling IMO. Probably overpaid a bit but in a year may feel differently.
Seems like a pretty big overpay to me. As you say, OBJ may work out well for you but I don't think you got fair market value for Allen.
I agree but pulling trades in this league is challenging. I have a stacked team and Allen is not even a starter so I decided to go for upside.

 
12 team, ppr, qb,2rb,3wr,te,flex

All TDs worth 6

Team A gave Cam Newton

Team B gave Arian Foster

Team A does have Romo and could contend

Team B close to a rebuild

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Warhogs said:
King of the Jungle said:
12 Team PPR QB/5 Flex

Gave: Keenan Allen

Got: Odell Beckham Jr

Gave higher floor for higher ceiling IMO. Probably overpaid a bit but in a year may feel differently.
Seems like a pretty big overpay to me. As you say, OBJ may work out well for you but I don't think you got fair market value for Allen.
I agree but pulling trades in this league is challenging. I have a stacked team and Allen is not even a starter so I decided to go for upside.
How does the only WR1 candidate for the leagues hottest QB count as low upside

 
Warhogs said:
King of the Jungle said:
12 Team PPR QB/5 Flex

Gave: Keenan Allen

Got: Odell Beckham Jr

Gave higher floor for higher ceiling IMO. Probably overpaid a bit but in a year may feel differently.
Seems like a pretty big overpay to me. As you say, OBJ may work out well for you but I don't think you got fair market value for Allen.
I agree but pulling trades in this league is challenging. I have a stacked team and Allen is not even a starter so I decided to go for upside.
How does the only WR1 candidate for the leagues hottest QB count as low upside
When did Andrew Luck become SD's QB?

 
12 team PPR 1QB 1RB 1WR 1TE 3FLEX

Team A trades:

Brandon Marshall

Team B trades:

Amari Cooper

2015 1st

2015 3rd

Team A was most certainly going to miss the playoffs barring some miracle.

 
Warhogs said:
King of the Jungle said:
12 Team PPR QB/5 Flex

Gave: Keenan Allen

Got: Odell Beckham Jr

Gave higher floor for higher ceiling IMO. Probably overpaid a bit but in a year may feel differently.
Seems like a pretty big overpay to me. As you say, OBJ may work out well for you but I don't think you got fair market value for Allen.
I agree but pulling trades in this league is challenging. I have a stacked team and Allen is not even a starter so I decided to go for upside.
How does the only WR1 candidate for the leagues hottest QB count as low upside
:shrug:

I like Allen plenty, but he's currently being outscored by Gates, Royal and Floyd. That should change, but it's reasonable to think that OBJ has higher upside.

 
Warhogs said:
King of the Jungle said:
12 Team PPR QB/5 Flex

Gave: Keenan Allen

Got: Odell Beckham Jr

Gave higher floor for higher ceiling IMO. Probably overpaid a bit but in a year may feel differently.
Seems like a pretty big overpay to me. As you say, OBJ may work out well for you but I don't think you got fair market value for Allen.
I agree but pulling trades in this league is challenging. I have a stacked team and Allen is not even a starter so I decided to go for upside.
How does the only WR1 candidate for the leagues hottest QB count as low upside
It could be argued that Eli is the leagues hottest QB right now.

 
Several recent deals. All 12 team PPRs

Gave: 2015 2nd ( likely early)

Got: AP

Felt he was worth the price ( that's not my pick, as I'm a contender) and I could sit on him for a bit

Gave: A. Williams

Got: A. Johnson

Owner of AJ in a rebuild

Gave: L.Miller, M.Lee

Got: CPatt

Not a huge CPatt fan, but felt this was too good to pass up

Gave: A.Williams, J.Matthews, Bennett, 2015 1st

Got: AJG, V.Davis

 
Several recent deals. All 12 team PPRs

Gave: 2015 2nd ( likely early)

Got: AP

Felt he was worth the price ( that's not my pick, as I'm a contender) and I could sit on him for a bit

Gave: A. Williams

Got: A. Johnson

Owner of AJ in a rebuild

Gave: L.Miller, M.Lee

Got: CPatt

Not a huge CPatt fan, but felt this was too good to pass up

Gave: A.Williams, J.Matthews, Bennett, 2015 1st

Got: AJG, V.Davis
Seems pretty inexpensive getting a dynasty cornerstone like Green.

 
12 team ppr

I traded Terrence Williams for a 2015 first round pick ( 8-12 range ) and Robert Woods. Twill hasn't cracked my SLU so figured I'd sell while his stock is at a high and grab a 1.

 
12 team ppr

I traded Terrence Williams for a 2015 first round pick ( 8-12 range ) and Robert Woods. Twill hasn't cracked my SLU so figured I'd sell while his stock is at a high and grab a 1.
I like it. Williams has been landing a lot of TD's, surely it cannot keep up. Nice little sell high guy right now.

 
Several recent deals. All 12 team PPRs

Gave: 2015 2nd ( likely early)

Got: AP

Felt he was worth the price ( that's not my pick, as I'm a contender) and I could sit on him for a bit

Gave: A. Williams

Got: A. Johnson

Owner of AJ in a rebuild

Gave: L.Miller, M.Lee

Got: CPatt

Not a huge CPatt fan, but felt this was too good to pass up

Gave: A.Williams, J.Matthews, Bennett, 2015 1st

Got: AJG, V.Davis
Seems pretty inexpensive getting a dynasty cornerstone like Green.
The CP and AJG deals both seem like steals to me

 
12 team ppr

I traded Terrence Williams for a 2015 first round pick ( 8-12 range ) and Robert Woods. Twill hasn't cracked my SLU so figured I'd sell while his stock is at a high and grab a 1.
Great deal for you. The 1st on its own would be a good return for Williams getting Woods as well is a bonus

 
Somewhat of a big trade:

Newton, Cam CAR QB
Cadet, Travaris NOS RB
Ingram, Mark NOS RB
McCoy, LeSean PHI RB
Bailey, Stedman STL WR
Prater, Matt DET PK

for
Stafford, Matthew DET QB
Martin, Doug TBB RB
Zuerlein, Greg STL PK
Whitehead, Tahir DET LB
Two 2015 1sts (both likely late, 1.10-1.16 range)
2015 2nd (probably #20-24)
 
Somewhat of a big trade:

Newton, Cam CAR QB

Cadet, Travaris NOS RB

Ingram, Mark NOS RB

McCoy, LeSean PHI RB

Bailey, Stedman STL WR

Prater, Matt DET PK

for

Stafford, Matthew DET QB

Martin, Doug TBB RB

Zuerlein, Greg STL PK

Whitehead, Tahir DET LB

Two 2015 1sts (both likely late, 1.10-1.16 range)

2015 2nd (probably #20-24)
Am I overlooking something or is there more to it? For me the Cam side and it is IMO not close.

 
Somewhat of a big trade:

Newton, Cam CAR QB

Cadet, Travaris NOS RB

Ingram, Mark NOS RB

McCoy, LeSean PHI RB

Bailey, Stedman STL WR

Prater, Matt DET PK

for

Stafford, Matthew DET QB

Martin, Doug TBB RB

Zuerlein, Greg STL PK

Whitehead, Tahir DET LB

Two 2015 1sts (both likely late, 1.10-1.16 range)

2015 2nd (probably #20-24)
Am I overlooking something or is there more to it? For me the Cam side and it is IMO not close.
:shrug: one side is rebuilding (will be a force in a couple years or less) and the other contending.

Took awhile to get this one done. Started as Cam/Saints RBs for Stafford/Martin and escalated from there.

 
Somewhat of a big trade:

Newton, Cam CAR QB
Ingram, Mark NOS RB
McCoy, LeSean PHI RB

for
Stafford, Matthew DET QB
Martin, Doug TBB RB
Two 2015 1sts (both likely late, 1.10-1.16 range)
2015 2nd (probably #20-24)
Big win for the team getting Cam/McCoy/Ingram. Looks like McCoy for two late 1sts.

 
12 team dynasty (FFPC)

Michael Floyd

for

Jace Amaro

2015 1st (pick is as guaranteed a top 4 pick in this format as you can probably get, so the pick is anywhere from 1-4, likely in the pick 2-3 range)

 
12 team dynasty (FFPC)

Michael Floyd

for

Jace Amaro

2015 1st (pick is as guaranteed a top 4 pick in this format as you can probably get, so the pick is anywhere from 1-4, likely in the pick 2-3 range)
Seems fair, I'd take the Amaro/pick side if you can afford to take the hit this year. (either not competing or don't need Floyd)

 
12 Team PPR QRRWWWTKF

Gave: Darren McFadden, Calvin Johnson

Received: DeAndre Hopkins, 2015 1st, 2016 1st.

I'm currently 4-2 (DH in week 3). Three division winners get the top three seeds, fourth seed best remaining record (tie breaker h2h), fifth/six seeds, most points remaining. I am currently the 4 seed, but 9th in points. I have a decent core, but felt the need to restructure the team a bit and I'm a fan of DeAndre, even though he doesn't go after crucial fumbles that help decide the game, haha.

The other team is current 1-5, second to last in points, mostly due to RB injuries, so good chance it remains a top four pick. 2016 pick I'd figure that team to be a playoff team.

 
Somewhat of a big trade:

Newton, Cam CAR QB

Cadet, Travaris NOS RB

Ingram, Mark NOS RB

McCoy, LeSean PHI RB

Bailey, Stedman STL WR

Prater, Matt DET PK

for

Stafford, Matthew DET QB

Martin, Doug TBB RB

Zuerlein, Greg STL PK

Whitehead, Tahir DET LB

Two 2015 1sts (both likely late, 1.10-1.16 range)

2015 2nd (probably #20-24)
Am I overlooking something or is there more to it? For me the Cam side and it is IMO not close.
:shrug: one side is rebuilding (will be a force in a couple years or less) and the other contending.

Took awhile to get this one done. Started as Cam/Saints RBs for Stafford/Martin and escalated from there.
So he was already bad (hence why he's rebuilding) and he trades AWAY McCoy, Cam, and Ingram for a bunch of junk and he's "going to be a force in a couple years or less"? Based on what? Two late 1st round picks that won't even come close to replacing the young studs he traded away even in a best case scenario?

:lol: Just another example of why some people are perpetually rebuilding.

 
12 team dynasty (FFPC)

Michael Floyd

for

Jace Amaro

2015 1st (pick is as guaranteed a top 4 pick in this format as you can probably get, so the pick is anywhere from 1-4, likely in the pick 2-3 range)
I'll take the early 1st. If it ends up being Gurley/Gordon those guys are probably going to be considered top 5-10 dynasty running backs before they ever step onto the field.

 
12 team /ppr/qb/3wr/2rb/te/flex/30 man rosters

Started off bad 2-4 looking to retool after Cruz went down tonight

Gave

Jordy Nelson

Brandon LaFell

Darren Sproles

Received

Brandon Oliver

Davante Adams

Marqise Lee

2016 1st

2015 4th

 
12 Team PPR QRRWWWTKF

Gave: Darren McFadden, Calvin Johnson

Received: DeAndre Hopkins, 2015 1st, 2016 1st.

I'm currently 4-2 (DH in week 3). Three division winners get the top three seeds, fourth seed best remaining record (tie breaker h2h), fifth/six seeds, most points remaining. I am currently the 4 seed, but 9th in points. I have a decent core, but felt the need to restructure the team a bit and I'm a fan of DeAndre, even though he doesn't go after crucial fumbles that help decide the game, haha.

The other team is current 1-5, second to last in points, mostly due to RB injuries, so good chance it remains a top four pick. 2016 pick I'd figure that team to be a playoff team.
Once you make the playoffs you'll probably regret this deal.

But a top 4 pick will be nice next year.

 
Somewhat of a big trade:

Newton, Cam CAR QB

Cadet, Travaris NOS RB

Ingram, Mark NOS RB

McCoy, LeSean PHI RB

Bailey, Stedman STL WR

Prater, Matt DET PK

for

Stafford, Matthew DET QB

Martin, Doug TBB RB

Zuerlein, Greg STL PK

Whitehead, Tahir DET LB

Two 2015 1sts (both likely late, 1.10-1.16 range)

2015 2nd (probably #20-24)
Am I overlooking something or is there more to it? For me the Cam side and it is IMO not close.
:shrug: one side is rebuilding (will be a force in a couple years or less) and the other contending.

Took awhile to get this one done. Started as Cam/Saints RBs for Stafford/Martin and escalated from there.
So he was already bad (hence why he's rebuilding) and he trades AWAY McCoy, Cam, and Ingram for a bunch of junk and he's "going to be a force in a couple years or less"? Based on what? Two late 1st round picks that won't even come close to replacing the young studs he traded away even in a best case scenario?

:lol: Just another example of why some people are perpetually rebuilding.
Not to argue much here, but I think you're overrating Ingram and underrating Stafford.

He has a lot of young talent on his roster - enough that after trading these guys away he's the top scoring team this week.

 
12 Team PPR QRRWWWTKF

Gave: Darren McFadden, Calvin Johnson

Received: DeAndre Hopkins, 2015 1st, 2016 1st.

I'm currently 4-2 (DH in week 3). Three division winners get the top three seeds, fourth seed best remaining record (tie breaker h2h), fifth/six seeds, most points remaining. I am currently the 4 seed, but 9th in points. I have a decent core, but felt the need to restructure the team a bit and I'm a fan of DeAndre, even though he doesn't go after crucial fumbles that help decide the game, haha.

The other team is current 1-5, second to last in points, mostly due to RB injuries, so good chance it remains a top four pick. 2016 pick I'd figure that team to be a playoff team.
Once you make the playoffs you'll probably regret this deal.

But a top 4 pick will be nice next year.
Seems like the rare deal that is bad for both teams.

 
Somewhat of a big trade:

Newton, Cam CAR QB

Cadet, Travaris NOS RB

Ingram, Mark NOS RB

McCoy, LeSean PHI RB

Bailey, Stedman STL WR

Prater, Matt DET PK

for

Stafford, Matthew DET QB

Martin, Doug TBB RB

Zuerlein, Greg STL PK

Whitehead, Tahir DET LB

Two 2015 1sts (both likely late, 1.10-1.16 range)

2015 2nd (probably #20-24)
Am I overlooking something or is there more to it? For me the Cam side and it is IMO not close.
:shrug: one side is rebuilding (will be a force in a couple years or less) and the other contending.

Took awhile to get this one done. Started as Cam/Saints RBs for Stafford/Martin and escalated from there.
So he was already bad (hence why he's rebuilding) and he trades AWAY McCoy, Cam, and Ingram for a bunch of junk and he's "going to be a force in a couple years or less"? Based on what? Two late 1st round picks that won't even come close to replacing the young studs he traded away even in a best case scenario?

:lol: Just another example of why some people are perpetually rebuilding.
Not to argue much here, but I think you're overrating Ingram and underrating Stafford.

He has a lot of young talent on his roster - enough that after trading these guys away he's the top scoring team this week.
I agree Stafford is certainly not "trash," but that's still a terrible deal.

Pro tip: when you're "rebuilding," don't trade your studs away in a package.

 
I agree Stafford is certainly not "trash," but that's still a terrible deal.

Pro tip: when you're "rebuilding," don't trade your studs away in a package.
Not this one anyway. Not sure everything he got would be enough for just mccoy, let alone giving teh other guys.

Actually no, definitely not enough for Mccoy unless its a 2 QB league then sure.

And no idea how the trade escalated into adding in Mccoy for a couple late picks. Terrible

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree Stafford is certainly not "trash," but that's still a terrible deal.

Pro tip: when you're "rebuilding," don't trade your studs away in a package.
Not this one anyway. Not sure everything he got would be enough for just mccoy, let alone giving teh other guys.

Actually no, definitely not enough for Mccoy unless its a 2 QB league then sure.

And no idea how the trade escalated into adding in Mccoy for a couple late picks. Terrible
I just find that generally speaking, when you package players, you're paying/selling for less. If someone approached me about Cam and McCoy, I'd basically tell them I'll do one at a time. Probably start with whichever player I felt there was less of a market for otherwise.

 
I agree Stafford is certainly not "trash," but that's still a terrible deal.

Pro tip: when you're "rebuilding," don't trade your studs away in a package.
Not this one anyway. Not sure everything he got would be enough for just mccoy, let alone giving teh other guys.

Actually no, definitely not enough for Mccoy unless its a 2 QB league then sure.

And no idea how the trade escalated into adding in Mccoy for a couple late picks. Terrible
I just find that generally speaking, when you package players, you're paying/selling for less. If someone approached me about Cam and McCoy, I'd basically tell them I'll do one at a time. Probably start with whichever player I felt there was less of a market for otherwise.
Generally, yes.

It's kinda rare to find a team that has the right ammo for what you would be looking for in that case. But if they do, and it works out, go for it

 
I agree Stafford is certainly not "trash," but that's still a terrible deal.

Pro tip: when you're "rebuilding," don't trade your studs away in a package.
Not this one anyway. Not sure everything he got would be enough for just mccoy, let alone giving teh other guys.

Actually no, definitely not enough for Mccoy unless its a 2 QB league then sure.

And no idea how the trade escalated into adding in Mccoy for a couple late picks. Terrible
I just find that generally speaking, when you package players, you're paying/selling for less. If someone approached me about Cam and McCoy, I'd basically tell them I'll do one at a time. Probably start with whichever player I felt there was less of a market for otherwise.
Generally, yes.

It's kinda rare to find a team that has the right ammo for what you would be looking for in that case. But if they do, and it works out, go for it
:shrug: the guy had made it known that McCoy was available but RBs generally don't sell high in this league. Last year a different owner shopped Charles for weeks without success until I also traded for him.

Cam being offered was out of nowhere, but he wanted Stafford so that's not a huge drop.

As for how the trade escalated, it can happen if you discuss possibilities with the other owner.

but thanks for the "pro" tip. :lmao:

 
12 Team .5 PPR - QB, RB, WR, TE, 4 Flex(RB,WR,TE) K, TD

Team A(Contender) Gives - Wheaton

Team B- Gives - Moreno, Marquess Wilson

 
I agree Stafford is certainly not "trash," but that's still a terrible deal.

Pro tip: when you're "rebuilding," don't trade your studs away in a package.
Not this one anyway. Not sure everything he got would be enough for just mccoy, let alone giving teh other guys.

Actually no, definitely not enough for Mccoy unless its a 2 QB league then sure.

And no idea how the trade escalated into adding in Mccoy for a couple late picks. Terrible
I just find that generally speaking, when you package players, you're paying/selling for less. If someone approached me about Cam and McCoy, I'd basically tell them I'll do one at a time. Probably start with whichever player I felt there was less of a market for otherwise.
Generally, yes.

It's kinda rare to find a team that has the right ammo for what you would be looking for in that case. But if they do, and it works out, go for it
:shrug: the guy had made it known that McCoy was available but RBs generally don't sell high in this league. Last year a different owner shopped Charles for weeks without success until I also traded for him.

Cam being offered was out of nowhere, but he wanted Stafford so that's not a huge drop.

As for how the trade escalated, it can happen if you discuss possibilities with the other owner.

but thanks for the "pro" tip. :lmao:
I don't even know what you're saying here. It's nice that he made it known McCoy was available and that you traded for Jamal Charles last year. Thanks for letting us know that things "can happen if you discuss possibilities" when talking trade.

It's still a terrible trade.

If RB's don't sell very high in your league, then don't trade McCoy. I have no idea why "rebuilding" means you have to trade McCoy. He's not Peterson or Fred Jackson, or even Jamal Charles who is older than him. He's a young, stud RB.

But hey, I'm rebuilding, and this league doesn't like paying for RB's, so I guess I should trade him for a sidegrade at QB, a couple of late 1sts, and whatever negligible difference there may be between Mark Ingram and Doug Martin.

So many bad trades are done under the justification of "I'm rebuilding." :shrug: Most often you're just spinning your wheels, or worse.

 
I agree Stafford is certainly not "trash," but that's still a terrible deal.

Pro tip: when you're "rebuilding," don't trade your studs away in a package.
Not this one anyway. Not sure everything he got would be enough for just mccoy, let alone giving teh other guys.

Actually no, definitely not enough for Mccoy unless its a 2 QB league then sure.

And no idea how the trade escalated into adding in Mccoy for a couple late picks. Terrible
I just find that generally speaking, when you package players, you're paying/selling for less. If someone approached me about Cam and McCoy, I'd basically tell them I'll do one at a time. Probably start with whichever player I felt there was less of a market for otherwise.
Generally, yes.

It's kinda rare to find a team that has the right ammo for what you would be looking for in that case. But if they do, and it works out, go for it
:shrug: the guy had made it known that McCoy was available but RBs generally don't sell high in this league. Last year a different owner shopped Charles for weeks without success until I also traded for him.

Cam being offered was out of nowhere, but he wanted Stafford so that's not a huge drop.

As for how the trade escalated, it can happen if you discuss possibilities with the other owner.

but thanks for the "pro" tip. :lmao:
I don't even know what you're saying here. It's nice that he made it known McCoy was available and that you traded for Jamal Charles last year. Thanks for letting us know that things "can happen if you discuss possibilities" when talking trade.

It's still a terrible trade.

If RB's don't sell very high in your league, then don't trade McCoy. I have no idea why "rebuilding" means you have to trade McCoy. He's not Peterson or Fred Jackson, or even Jamal Charles who is older than him. He's a young, stud RB.

But hey, I'm rebuilding, and this league doesn't like paying for RB's, so I guess I should trade him for a sidegrade at QB, a couple of late 1sts, and whatever negligible difference there may be between Mark Ingram and Doug Martin.

So many bad trades are done under the justification of "I'm rebuilding." :shrug: Most often you're just spinning your wheels, or worse.
Yeah. This trade makes no sense giving up Newton/McCoy for Stafford/Martin and late picks.

Rebuilds will take forever if you don't sell at the right time or for enough

 
12 team ppr - QB/2RB/3WR/TE/FL

About a half hour before kickoff I gave Brandon Oliver for a 2015 1st rounder (likely late, team is now 5-1).

I'm a believer in Oliver and still have him in another league, but figured I had to accept the offer of a 1st for a guy I picked up on waivers three weeks ago and really isn't guaranteed anything.

If Oliver becomes a stud RB (seems possible), I'll have to live with a "good process, bad results" type of deal I guess. It also gives me 4 first round picks, so I'll have plenty of draft flexibilities and my team is still pretty good and sitting at 3-3.

 
12 team ppr - QB/2RB/3WR/TE/FL

About a half hour before kickoff I gave Brandon Oliver for a 2015 1st rounder (likely late, team is now 5-1).

I'm a believer in Oliver and still have him in another league, but figured I had to accept the offer of a 1st for a guy I picked up on waivers three weeks ago and really isn't guaranteed anything.

If Oliver becomes a stud RB (seems possible), I'll have to live with a "good process, bad results" type of deal I guess. It also gives me 4 first round picks, so I'll have plenty of draft flexibilities and my team is still pretty good and sitting at 3-3.
Big win for you. Like you, I like Oliver, but those types are flashes in the pan much more often than not. Making this kind of deal--sure, you'll miss out on Alfred Morrises here and there,but you'll get value for a lot of duds, too.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
12 team ppr - QB/2RB/3WR/TE/FL

About a half hour before kickoff I gave Brandon Oliver for a 2015 1st rounder (likely late, team is now 5-1).

I'm a believer in Oliver and still have him in another league, but figured I had to accept the offer of a 1st for a guy I picked up on waivers three weeks ago and really isn't guaranteed anything.

If Oliver becomes a stud RB (seems possible), I'll have to live with a "good process, bad results" type of deal I guess. It also gives me 4 first round picks, so I'll have plenty of draft flexibilities and my team is still pretty good and sitting at 3-3.
Great deal.

I would sell Oliver for a 1st where I picked him up

 
12 team /ppr/qb/3wr/2rb/te/flex/30 man rosters

Started off bad 2-4 looking to retool after Cruz went down tonight

Gave

Jordy Nelson

Brandon LaFell

Darren Sproles

Received

Brandon Oliver

Davante Adams

Marqise Lee

2016 1st

2015 4th
I think that is a little light for Jordy

 
12 team /ppr/qb/3wr/2rb/te/flex/30 man rosters

Started off bad 2-4 looking to retool after Cruz went down tonight

Gave

Jordy Nelson

Brandon LaFell

Darren Sproles

Received

Brandon Oliver

Davante Adams

Marqise Lee

2016 1st

2015 4th
I think that is a little light for Jordy
I think it's close to fair market value, myself--right around 3 firsts (Adams, Lee, 1st). If I were rebuilding, I'd take it, assuming I did some homework first on other potential offers.

 
12 Team .5 PPR - QB, RB, WR, TE, 4 Flex(RB,WR,TE) K, TD

Team A(Contender) Gives - Wheaton

Team B- Gives - Moreno, Marquess Wilson
Good deal for both sides but I like the Moreno side

Wilson could be as good as Wheaton and Moreno might help a contender down the stretch

 
12 team /ppr/qb/3wr/2rb/te/flex/30 man rosters

Started off bad 2-4 looking to retool after Cruz went down tonight

Gave

Jordy Nelson

Brandon LaFell

Darren Sproles

Received

Brandon Oliver

Davante Adams

Marqise Lee

2016 1st

2015 4th
I think that is a little light for Jordy
I could see dealing Jordy for that if I were rebuilding.

That 2016 1st is obviously further out than I would like but Adams, Oliver and Lee are all solid young adds for a rebuild

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top