Rating numbers: 5.1 for espn and 3.0 UnivisionAhh I misread that. That makes much more sense.Ratings share is the percentage of people watching TV at the time. So the two games got the same fraction of viewers, not the same number of viewers.Holy crap. That was a 4:00pm start.Combined ESPN and Univision ratings for the game yesterday got the same 18 share as the NBA finals.
I expected number of viewers to be in the 2 million range yesterday (not including online).
Am I missing something?Nice call on the third. GDS was off when the defender played it.
Espn radio guys saying it was another bad call...?Nice call on the third. GDS was off when the defender played it.
Unless I am mistaken this game was not bumped. It was always scheduled for ESPN2.Yeah. It's pretty awesome. And ESPN bumped it to ESPN2 for golf today. I've liked their commitment and coverage, but don't agree with that.Holy crap. That was a 4:00pm start.Combined ESPN and Univision ratings for the game yesterday got the same 18 share as the NBA finals.
And I have to imagine the online numbers were enormous.
...and there are 32 people in this thread right now. Crazy.
I consider that bumped. #### golfUnless I am mistaken this game was not bumped. It was always scheduled for ESPN2.Yeah. It's pretty awesome. And ESPN bumped it to ESPN2 for golf today. I've liked their commitment and coverage, but don't agree with that.Holy crap. That was a 4:00pm start.Combined ESPN and Univision ratings for the game yesterday got the same 18 share as the NBA finals.
And I have to imagine the online numbers were enormous.
...and there are 32 people in this thread right now. Crazy.
It is likely contract related to the US Open.
This article says the overnights for ESPN were a 3.2Rating numbers: 5.1 for espn and 3.0 UnivisionAhh I misread that. That makes much more sense.Ratings share is the percentage of people watching TV at the time. So the two games got the same fraction of viewers, not the same number of viewers.Holy crap. That was a 4:00pm start.Combined ESPN and Univision ratings for the game yesterday got the same 18 share as the NBA finals.
I expected number of viewers to be in the 2 million range yesterday (not including online).
The Regiment says You Suck!Hate it even more when Americans do it...Nice clearance there for Marquez.
jeebus- I hate that Puto chant soooooooo much. #### mexico.
I have been playing and watching the sport since the early 70's and I still don't know the correct ruling on deflections.sorry but both Mexico goals should have been good. Cameroon's was called correctly.
This is only if on the initial ball by the offense you were offside. On a corner, when the ball is played he wasnt off. The ball played by the defender does not make you offside.wdcrob said:This isn't from an official source, but it's how I understand it too...Am I missing something?Cant be offside if the defender plays it.Nice call on the third. GDS was off when the defender played it.
Offsides is reset at every touch of the ball by the offense, and every intentionally directed touch by the defense. That is, if you are offsides, the ball is shot, hits a defender and bounces to you, you are still offsides, even if the defender is the goalie and in front of you. Further, even if the defender intentionally touches it, say by leaping up to attempt to head it, you will still remain offsides unless his touch is determined to be a controlled one.
The defender flicked it on, but never controlled it and GDS was offside when he did.
Thankfully it has almost 100% been removed from American soccer. It took years of shaming the idiots who thought it was a interesting chant.Hate it even more when Americans do it...Nice clearance there for Marquez.
jeebus- I hate that Puto chant soooooooo much. #### mexico.
But offsides never reset so we go by the last intentionally directed ball. Which was the corner. By that interpretation the goal is good.wdcrob said:This isn't from an official source, but it's how I understand it too...Am I missing something?Cant be offside if the defender plays it.Nice call on the third. GDS was off when the defender played it.
Offsides is reset at every touch of the ball by the offense, and every intentionally directed touch by the defense. That is, if you are offsides, the ball is shot, hits a defender and bounces to you, you are still offsides, even if the defender is the goalie and in front of you. Further, even if the defender intentionally touches it, say by leaping up to attempt to head it, you will still remain offsides unless his touch is determined to be a controlled one.
The defender flicked it on, but never controlled it and GDS was offside when he did.
neither do most refs!I have been playing and watching the sport since the early 70's and I still don't know the correct ruling on deflections.sorry but both Mexico goals should have been good. Cameroon's was called correctly.
outside the refs its actually been quite good and entertaining.Amazing this is goalless. So much good positive play.
Me either, apparently.I have been playing and watching the sport since the early 70's and I still don't know the correct ruling on deflections.sorry but both Mexico goals should have been good. Cameroon's was called correctly.
Tags: "Womens Sports and Soccer"Some of those are very good. Balotelli...The Type Of Person Who Sets Own Home Ablaze After Lighting Fireworks Indoors: Yes
Playing Style: Temperamental
Gives A #### About Playing Soccer: Sometimes
Chance Of Ever Realizing Full Potential: Pretty much zilch
I havent seen a good replay yet on the potential Cameroon PK, but I didnt see anything that would make me agree despite the announcers agreeing with you. From what I've seen both players were jostling and cameroon had just as much of the mexico guy as vice versa. Wouldnt have given one there either.Even if a deflection by a defender could make you offsides, he wasn't offsides at the time of the deflection anyway. He was in-line and didn't get ahead of the line until after the deflection.
Mexico should have 2 goals and, forgotten in all this, Cameroon probably should have had a PK of their own.
http://gfycat.com/LastingDimpledAmericantoadI havent seen a good replay yet on the potential Cameroon PK, but I didnt see anything that would make me agree despite the announcers agreeing with you. From what I've seen both players were jostling and cameroon had just as much of the mexico guy as vice versa. Wouldnt have given one there either.Even if a deflection by a defender could make you offsides, he wasn't offsides at the time of the deflection anyway. He was in-line and didn't get ahead of the line until after the deflection.
Mexico should have 2 goals and, forgotten in all this, Cameroon probably should have had a PK of their own.
yeah, should just start posting the URLsBest part of World Cup: A large swath of the FFA being exposed to the sublime joy of Go #### Yourself Cat.
so is the pk for the straight arm or for the cameroon player holding his arm.http://gfycat.com/LastingDimpledAmericantoadI havent seen a good replay yet on the potential Cameroon PK, but I didnt see anything that would make me agree despite the announcers agreeing with you. From what I've seen both players were jostling and cameroon had just as much of the mexico guy as vice versa. Wouldnt have given one there either.Even if a deflection by a defender could make you offsides, he wasn't offsides at the time of the deflection anyway. He was in-line and didn't get ahead of the line until after the deflection.
Mexico should have 2 goals and, forgotten in all this, Cameroon probably should have had a PK of their own.
me eitherso is the pk for the straight arm or for the cameroon player holding his arm.http://gfycat.com/LastingDimpledAmericantoadI havent seen a good replay yet on the potential Cameroon PK, but I didnt see anything that would make me agree despite the announcers agreeing with you. From what I've seen both players were jostling and cameroon had just as much of the mexico guy as vice versa. Wouldnt have given one there either.Even if a deflection by a defender could make you offsides, he wasn't offsides at the time of the deflection anyway. He was in-line and didn't get ahead of the line until after the deflection.
Mexico should have 2 goals and, forgotten in all this, Cameroon probably should have had a PK of their own.
Not a PK for me
Sorry I can't. The ef in Osama Osama chant. Just can't root for 'em.Going to watch the 2nd half...
Pulling hard for Mexico here. When people ask why, I say that we in the US should hope to have such support for our team. They are passionate, travel well, and the depth of support runs deep there. I don't want them to win CONCACAF ever, but in the WC, I pull for them.
lets go there!
Yeah, I'm enjoying this announcing team."the Colombian referee wants nothing to do with cards today..."
"or goals"
".. that's a good one!"