What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official 2014 World Cup Thread*** (1 Viewer)

Confederation Records So Far*: W-D-L (points per game)

South America: 9-1-2 (2.3)

Africa: 3-2-5 (1.1)

UEFA: 5-4-7 (1.2)

Concacaf: 4-2-2 (1.8)

Asia: 0-3-5 (0.4)

*Europe vs Europe excluded
Side note: Concacaf is undefeated against teams ranked in the FIFA top 10 (2-2-0).

 
Chile needs a win here to (probably) avoid Brazil in their round of 16 matchup.
At this point, I think Brazil want to avoid Chile... ...
That would be a massive regional tilt, 'would be awesome to watch.
I hope it happens...should be a hell of a game and atmosphere.
Don't think it is possible but it would be an awesome match for Maracana in the quarterfinals

 
QuizGuy66 said:
Ted Lange as your Bartender said:
IvanKaramazov said:
IvanKaramazov said:
Serious question from a non-soccer guy. Why the hell is H2H not the first tie-breaker?
I didn't mean this as a rhetorical question. Is there some some of soccer philosophy that frowns on h2h? I just have a hard time justifying us and Ghana tying after three matches and seeing them advance ahead of us.
:shrug: Encourages goal scoring?
This. The thought is that the object of the game is to attack and score more goals that the opposition. This is why the tiebreaker is set up in this fashion. It's a matter of taste.-QG
I think it's more an aversion to change on FIFA's part than anything else. Most other tournaments with a group stage use H2H as the first tiebreaker.

 
Are there other countries, other than us, that have been getting better in the past years? Could the rise in scoring be tied to better players all around?
Hard to say. On the one hand, yes lots of mid and lower-tier teams have improved.

Colombia: Even without their star striker Radmael Falcao, Colombia is hitting on all cylanders. Their young players are all immensely talented and have been scoring regularly in the WC until now. The Colombian stars command some of the highest transfer fees in the world and its showing on the field.

Belgium: Belgium has a "golden generation" of players all hitting their prime right now and making huge amounts of money for the top clubs in Europe. Guys like Hazard, Witsel, De Bruyne, Lukaku, Fellaini, Miralllis, Courtois etc are playing regulalrly (for the most part) on some of the best teams in the world. Its not cooincidence that the national team has improved as a result and its no wonder they are already through. They havent been banging in goals, but they are formidable.

Algeria: More than 2/3 of their players were actually born and raised in France and grew up playing in the French league. Might explain how a former after-thought of a team suddenly can explode for four goals vs South Korea. That did NOT happen four years ago.

Costa Rica: Dont think ANYONE saw this one coming. They were pedestrian in the games leading upto the World Cup. The fact that they piled three on Uruguay and shutout Italy has to be the story of the tournament. Have they improved? I guess so, based on their remarkable results, but there was no writing on the wall with the Tico's. Shocking story.

On the flip side, squads like England and especially Spain failed to impress. So to your question, I dont know if its correct that more teams "improving" is the reason why more goals have been scored. Because there have been an equal number of disappointments. But it sure has been fun to watch.

 
From an on field playing aspect Portugal should get stronger with the return of Pepe and Ghana loses I think the heart of their team in Muntari who one could argue has been Ghana's best player.

I hope this closes some of the mental gap as I think Ghana senses they have a good path to the second round where as Portugal looked defeated even after the last second goal last night.

I don't think CRo will recover in time but he is still dangerous enough to cause problems. If he finds his shooting boots, he could pip one since he found some openings against the US but shot poorly.
Good stuff andy- I was lamenting Muntari's loss because I've loved how he's played in the WC... but the reality is, we need Ghana to lose or tie, so Pepe coming back helps. Is Coentrau out for the WC?

Totally agree about Portugal's visual state even after scoring the tying goal- looked defeated. They know their WC is over unless they are able to beat Ghana and have the US lose big to Germany. Both of which are possible.

 
Mexico was considered to be on the rise before their near-disastrous qualifying campaign last year, but Herrera seems to have righted the ship somewhat.

Switzerland too, probably to a lesser extent than Belgium.

 
From an on field playing aspect Portugal should get stronger with the return of Pepe and Ghana loses I think the heart of their team in Muntari who one could argue has been Ghana's best player.

I hope this closes some of the mental gap as I think Ghana senses they have a good path to the second round where as Portugal looked defeated even after the last second goal last night.

I don't think CRo will recover in time but he is still dangerous enough to cause problems. If he finds his shooting boots, he could pip one since he found some openings against the US but shot poorly.
Good stuff andy- I was lamenting Muntari's loss because I've loved how he's played in the WC... but the reality is, we need Ghana to lose or tie, so Pepe coming back helps. Is Coentrau out for the WC?

Totally agree about Portugal's visual state even after scoring the tying goal- looked defeated. They know their WC is over unless they are able to beat Ghana and have the US lose big to Germany. Both of which are possible.
Coentrao is out for the rest of the cup even if they advance

 
Are there other countries, other than us, that have been getting better in the past years? Could the rise in scoring be tied to better players all around?
Hard to say. On the one hand, yes lots of mid and lower-tier teams have improved.

***

On the flip side, squads like England and especially Spain failed to impress. So to your question, I dont know if its correct that more teams "improving" is the reason why more goals have been scored. Because there have been an equal number of disappointments. But it sure has been fun to watch.
I think the key is not that teams get better, but that there is more parity, allowing more teams to play less conservatively.

 
Was offline yesterday and now playing catchup through a lot of pages. Don't know if this question was asked about the finish yesterday, but...

On a long cross into the box, what goes through a keeper's mind when making the split decision to either sit back and let the play develop or charge out and try to punch the ball away as it arrives at the head of the forward? On shorter crosses I understand there probably isn't time to charge out. But on longer crosses it just seems like a challenge worth taking. Those headers from that close can come off at any angle, giving the keeper zero time to react. Even if the keeper doesn't quite make it to the ball, maybe by closing the distance the angle is significantly cut off and he gets a piece of it enough to knock wide/over.

Please note I'm not pinning blame on Howard. I just want to understand the game better.
I think it's mostly instinctual, frankly. Keep in mind that Howard flapped at and missed at least one cross earlier and that he had plenty of numbers back. My sole virtue as a goalkeeper was that I was aggressive as hell at coming out and claiming balls, but I don't think I would have made a play on that one.
They just showed that highlight again, and Ronaldo had almost no windup for the cross. Plus he smoked it. Even less time than usual to react -- really was a great ball.
That ball was head height at about the 8 yard line. Perfect depth - really hard for a goalie to move out that far. You see lots of goalies look like fools trying to punch balls like that and whiff. IMO Howard didn't have much of a chance to come out there.

As much as folks are whining about Bradley in here many are overlooking how insanely good that cross was. You probably won't see a better struck cross in the WC this time around.

 
QuizGuy66 said:
Here's your Group A and B scenarios.

Group B:

Netherlands are 1st with a win or tie, 2nd with a loss.

Chile are 1st with a win, 2nd with a tie or loss.

Spain will come in last if they lose or tie against the Socceroos.

Group A:

Cameroon - are out of it and will be looking for players, on their own and other team, officials, and ball boys to punch and or head-butt all game.

Croatia - make it through with:

1) a win vs Mexico,

or 2) a tie and a Brazil loss (they will win the tie-breaker on superior goal differential)

Mexico - make it through with:

1) a win or tie vs Croatia.

or 2) a loss and a Brazil loss where Brazil's margin of defeat is 2 or more goals greater than Mexico's margin of defeat

or 3) a loss and a Brazil loss where Brazil's margin of defeat is 1 goal greater than Mexico's margin of defeat and Mexico outscores Brazil by at least 3 goals.

Brazil - make it through with:

1) a win or tie vs Cameroon

or 2) a loss and Croatia loss

or 3) a loss and Mexico loss and Brazil's margin of defeat is the same or less than Mexico's margin of defeat

or 4) a loss and Mexico loss and Brazil's margin of defeat is 1 goal greater than Mexico's margin of defeat and Mexico fails to outscore Brazil by at least 3.

1st Place:

Croatia get top with a win and a Brazil tie or loss

Mexico get top with:

1) a win and a Brazil loss or tie

or 2) a tie and a Brazil loss

or 3) a win and a Brazil win and Mexico's margin of victory is 2 or more goals greater than Brazil's margin of victory

or 4) a win and a Brazil win and Mexico's margin of victory is 1 more than Brazil's margin of victory and Mexico outscores Brazil by at least 3.

Brazil get top with:

1) a win and a Mexico loss or tie

or 2) a tie and a Mexico tie

or 3) a win and a Mexico win and Brazil's margin of victory is the same or greater than Mexico's margin of victory

or 4) a win and a Mexico win and Brazil's margin of victory is 1 less than Mexico's margin of victory and Mexico fails to outscore Brazil by at least 3.

So there you go :)

-QG
Bumping this from 50 pages ago.

And actually fixing a mistake - Brazil are out if they lose and Mexico/Ecuador ends up in a tie. They will be behind Croatia on goal differential. If Cameroon somehow takes a miracle lead it'll be interesting if Mexico and Croatia get a little friendly.

-QG
Rebump for the late games.

-QG

 
It certainly seems, to me, that more teams are playing with two strikers or with the more attacking variant of the 3-5-2 (which can be a very attacking formation OR a very defensive one depending on whether you turn the wing backs loose or not). But its hard to draw a lot of conclusions.

I will say that in the last 8 to 10 years, the quality of attacking players appears to have improved beyond that of the defenders. By which I mean that a guy like Robben, who is a "top 10" attacking player, strikes me as a better player than a guy like Varela, who is probably a top 10 defender. Or even Kompany. A whole generation of once great defenders seem to be getting old or losing form all at once.

 
Are there other countries, other than us, that have been getting better in the past years? Could the rise in scoring be tied to better players all around?
Hard to say. On the one hand, yes lots of mid and lower-tier teams have improved.

***

On the flip side, squads like England and especially Spain failed to impress. So to your question, I dont know if its correct that more teams "improving" is the reason why more goals have been scored. Because there have been an equal number of disappointments. But it sure has been fun to watch.
I think the key is not that teams get better, but that there is more parity, allowing more teams to play less conservatively.
I agree.

I've also seen a real shift in style, tactics and "brand" of soccer in the last 30 years. I feel like fitness and tactical shape has become more of a global thing as the internet has allowed teams and players to be intimately aware of what is going on around the world. Used to be you could count on teams like Brazil to be great moving forward and on the individual tackle, but a mess with their defensive shape. Germany played a fairly stiff, robotic but errorless style. England, more direct to their forwards. etc, etc. But countries have blended all the styles that work best around the world to suit their particular players. They've also become more aware of how important fitness is from a holistic standpoint- diet, hydration, electrolytes (!), smoking, sechs, etc. It wasn't unusual to see guys smoking and not look like they were tip-top fit. Not any more.

 
so how many of us will be playing hooky from work on Thursday to watch this US game live?
:hey:
Still trying to decide whether to:

1) Watch from my office at work (no booze, no friends, but don't need to take any hours off)

2) Go to the big public big screens with scoobygang (good friend, exciting crowd scene, but will be 88 degrees and people will smell terrible. I assume no booze, I guess I could do some other mind-altering substance before I go).

3) Go to Mexican bar/restaurant a few blocks from work where they're having a going-away party for a guy that's leaving. Advantages include booze and air conditioning.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Without getting into too much detail, why the different ball every world cup? How long do players have to familiarize themselves with a new ball?

Doesn't it seem similar to if the NFL used the same ball all year, and then for each Superbowl they designed a different ball that flew and bounced differently? What reason would there be to do that, other than to sell merchandise?
None whatsoever normally. But this time the balls have the goal line chip in them, which no other balls have. Still it's all about seling someone who already have five or six soccer balls one more (which won't have the chip, btw)
I don't believe there is any chip in the solution they chose for the World Cup. It is camera based

http://goalcontrol.de/

 
Was offline yesterday and now playing catchup through a lot of pages. Don't know if this question was asked about the finish yesterday, but...

On a long cross into the box, what goes through a keeper's mind when making the split decision to either sit back and let the play develop or charge out and try to punch the ball away as it arrives at the head of the forward? On shorter crosses I understand there probably isn't time to charge out. But on longer crosses it just seems like a challenge worth taking. Those headers from that close can come off at any angle, giving the keeper zero time to react. Even if the keeper doesn't quite make it to the ball, maybe by closing the distance the angle is significantly cut off and he gets a piece of it enough to knock wide/over.

Please note I'm not pinning blame on Howard. I just want to understand the game better.
I think it's mostly instinctual, frankly. Keep in mind that Howard flapped at and missed at least one cross earlier and that he had plenty of numbers back. My sole virtue as a goalkeeper was that I was aggressive as hell at coming out and claiming balls, but I don't think I would have made a play on that one.
They just showed that highlight again, and Ronaldo had almost no windup for the cross. Plus he smoked it. Even less time than usual to react -- really was a great ball.
That ball was head height at about the 8 yard line. Perfect depth - really hard for a goalie to move out that far. You see lots of goalies look like fools trying to punch balls like that and whiff. IMO Howard didn't have much of a chance to come out there.

As much as folks are whining about Bradley in here many are overlooking how insanely good that cross was. You probably won't see a better struck cross in the WC this time around.
great cross.

from my days, the GK should own the 6 yard box. So you'd try hit your crosses right at it or just outside to draw the GK out away from the goal and to ideally hit it just out of his reach. Good GKs won't be tempted. That cross was inch-perfect and as has been overstated, Cameron let his man get inside of him to get to the ball first... but still in astonishing fashion (diving header... c'mon- great goal).

 
Updated

Confederation Records So Far*: W-D-L (points per game)

South America: 9-1-3 (2.2)
Africa: 3-2-5 (1.1)
UEFA: 7-4-7 (1.4)
Concacaf: 4-2-2 (1.8)
Asia: 0-3-6 (0.3)

======================================================

Asia might get no wins this tournament. Yikes that is ugly.

*Europe vs Europe excluded

 
so how many of us will be playing hooky from work on Thursday to watch this US game live?
:hey:
2) Go to the big public big screens with scoobygang (good friend, exciting crowd scene, but will be 88 degrees and people will smell terrible. I assume no booze, I guess I could do some other mind-altering substance before I go).
I'll probably pre-game and have some option for half time. Can't do anything about the smell, but after enduring your Cheech and Chong hotel room in Houston, you hardly have room to complain.

 
so how many of us will be playing hooky from work on Thursday to watch this US game live?
:hey:
Still trying to decide whether to:

1) Watch from my office at work (no booze, no friends, but don't need to take any hours off)

2) Go to the big public big screens with scoobygang (good friend, exciting crowd scene, but will be 88 degrees and people will smell terrible. I assume no booze, I guess I could do some other mind-altering substance before I go).

3) Go to Mexican bar/restaurant a few blocks from work where they're having a going-away party for a guy that's leaving. Advantages include booze and air conditioning.
what time is the game?

 
so how many of us will be playing hooky from work on Thursday to watch this US game live?
:hey:
Still trying to decide whether to:

1) Watch from my office at work (no booze, no friends, but don't need to take any hours off)

2) Go to the big public big screens with scoobygang (good friend, exciting crowd scene, but will be 88 degrees and people will smell terrible. I assume no booze, I guess I could do some other mind-altering substance before I go).

3) Go to Mexican bar/restaurant a few blocks from work where they're having a going-away party for a guy that's leaving. Advantages include booze and air conditioning.
what time is the game?
Noon Eastern time.

 
so how many of us will be playing hooky from work on Thursday to watch this US game live?
:hey:
Still trying to decide whether to:

1) Watch from my office at work (no booze, no friends, but don't need to take any hours off)

2) Go to the big public big screens with scoobygang (good friend, exciting crowd scene, but will be 88 degrees and people will smell terrible. I assume no booze, I guess I could do some other mind-altering substance before I go).

3) Go to Mexican bar/restaurant a few blocks from work where they're having a going-away party for a guy that's leaving. Advantages include booze and air conditioning.
what time is the game?
noon eastern

 
Updated

Confederation Records So Far*: W-D-L (points per game)

South America: 9-1-3 (2.2)

Africa: 3-2-5 (1.1)

UEFA: 7-4-7 (1.4)

Concacaf: 4-2-2 (1.8)

Asia: 0-3-6 (0.3)

======================================================

Asia might get no wins this tournament. Yikes that is ugly.

*Europe vs Europe excluded
Don't know the formula, but I'd guess there's definitely a chance CONCACAF and CONMEBOL pick up half-spots. Let Asia play Oceania in the playoff.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
so how many of us will be playing hooky from work on Thursday to watch this US game live?
:hey:
Still trying to decide whether to:

1) Watch from my office at work (no booze, no friends, but don't need to take any hours off)

2) Go to the big public big screens with scoobygang (good friend, exciting crowd scene, but will be 88 degrees and people will smell terrible. I assume no booze, I guess I could do some other mind-altering substance before I go).

3) Go to Mexican bar/restaurant a few blocks from work where they're having a going-away party for a guy that's leaving. Advantages include booze and air conditioning.
what time is the game?
noon eastern
hmmm. Might have to watch this from work. not good if so- I'll be freaking the #### out either way... pretty sure the interior design staff will not like what they see.

eta: oh yeah- andy- WORK.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
so how many of us will be playing hooky from work on Thursday to watch this US game live?
:hey:
Still trying to decide whether to:

1) Watch from my office at work (no booze, no friends, but don't need to take any hours off)

2) Go to the big public big screens with scoobygang (good friend, exciting crowd scene, but will be 88 degrees and people will smell terrible. I assume no booze, I guess I could do some other mind-altering substance before I go).

3) Go to Mexican bar/restaurant a few blocks from work where they're having a going-away party for a guy that's leaving. Advantages include booze and air conditioning.
what time is the game?
noon eastern

 
Are there other countries, other than us, that have been getting better in the past years? Could the rise in scoring be tied to better players all around?
Hard to say. On the one hand, yes lots of mid and lower-tier teams have improved.

***

On the flip side, squads like England and especially Spain failed to impress. So to your question, I dont know if its correct that more teams "improving" is the reason why more goals have been scored. Because there have been an equal number of disappointments. But it sure has been fun to watch.
I think the key is not that teams get better, but that there is more parity, allowing more teams to play less conservatively.
I agree with that. A lot less bunkering going on.

 
Without getting into too much detail, why the different ball every world cup? How long do players have to familiarize themselves with a new ball?

Doesn't it seem similar to if the NFL used the same ball all year, and then for each Superbowl they designed a different ball that flew and bounced differently? What reason would there be to do that, other than to sell merchandise?
None whatsoever normally. But this time the balls have the goal line chip in them, which no other balls have. Still it's all about seling someone who already have five or six soccer balls one more (which won't have the chip, btw)
I don't believe there is any chip in the solution they chose for the World Cup. It is camera based

http://goalcontrol.de/
In that case it is none what so ever

 
so how many of us will be playing hooky from work on Thursday to watch this US game live?
realize I have some quarter end meeting with accounting at 10 am PST....am going to be blazing through that meeting to get home by game time. Numbers look great!
Is the game not 9am PT?
i thought it was noon PST maybe I am off and have to record it regardless.Looks like I fail at time zones.

Back to ignoring all media for halfa day that day until I get home >.<.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
One last thought about the clock (ok maybe it won't be the last) - I like the subjectivity involved. I like the idea that a team is going to get one last offensive surge if they start it before time runs out. I like that teams can hold onto hope, instead of seeing the clock tick down to 00:00. I like that teams know they have to defend as long as the ball is still in play, instead of watching a clock.

I wouldn't be offended to see an actual game-clock, but I never thought that was one of the things that needed fixing. I don't think adding a clock really adds to the enjoyment of the game, nor would it shorten the games significantly. Sure, you might avoid SAF-time, but I don't find that to be reason enough to make the change.

 
One last thought about the clock (ok maybe it won't be the last) - I like the subjectivity involved. I like the idea that a team is going to get one last offensive surge if they start it before time runs out. I like that teams can hold onto hope, instead of seeing the clock tick down to 00:00. I like that teams know they have to defend as long as the ball is still in play, instead of watching a clock.

I wouldn't be offended to see an actual game-clock, but I never thought that was one of the things that needed fixing. I don't think adding a clock really adds to the enjoyment of the game, nor would it shorten the games significantly. Sure, you might avoid SAF-time, but I don't find that to be reason enough to make the change.
I've always enjoyed that aspect as a neutral. This is the first time I've been on the "wrong" side of one of these calls as a fan. Have to say that it didn't bug me much. But I think this stuff evens out.

 
One last thought about the clock (ok maybe it won't be the last) - I like the subjectivity involved. I like the idea that a team is going to get one last offensive surge if they start it before time runs out. I like that teams can hold onto hope, instead of seeing the clock tick down to 00:00. I like that teams know they have to defend as long as the ball is still in play, instead of watching a clock.

I wouldn't be offended to see an actual game-clock, but I never thought that was one of the things that needed fixing. I don't think adding a clock really adds to the enjoyment of the game, nor would it shorten the games significantly. Sure, you might avoid SAF-time, but I don't find that to be reason enough to make the change.
I've always enjoyed that aspect as a neutral. This is the first time I've been on the "wrong" side of one of these calls as a fan. Have to say that it didn't bug me much. But I think this stuff evens out.
:goodposting:

Liverpool/Arsenal from a few years ago that end in a draw? The one where Dalglish told Wenger to piss off...lol

I think that went 5 minutes over an already lengthy stoppage time(carragher knocked out) because of two PKs and hit 102 minutes iirc.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is about where I am now...

Beyond our team’s mathematical situation, I’m feeling good about how we’re playing and about Klinsmann, who seems to be getting the best out of the players. Maybe him saying that we can’t win was the exact right thing to say at the exact right time. The belief on and off the field is as strong as I’ve ever seen it. His tactics have been spot-on, too. Our nervy approach to the Ghana game may have given us all ulcers, but it went according to plan if you account for the fact that no one could’ve planned that we would score in the first thirty seconds. When we’ve needed to circle the wagons and hold back the hordes, we’ve mostly done so. And when we’ve needed to surge forward and get a goal, we’ve done that, too.

We can play this game. Maybe it’s time for fans like me to quit with the fickleness. Maybe it’s time to relax and know that we’re a good team and only getting better. Can we win? Yes. Will we win? Who knows? But if we don’t, it won’t mean that soccer has a popularity problem. It won’t mean that soccer is the world’s game and not ours. It’ll only mean that in ninety minutes of play (and a few extra minutes of stoppage time) anything can happen. Sometimes it feels great and sometimes it feels terrible.
Especially with the TV revenue and ratings exploding I think the rock is at the top of the hill. It'll still take time to roll down and exactly what it looks like when it comes to rest is still unknown, but the team is solid now and should be solid going forward. There are a handful of teams in the world at any time that will be strong favorites over us, but not all that many and when the coach gets things right and we get a bit of luck we can beat them too.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Updated

Confederation Records So Far*: W-D-L (points per game)

South America: 9-1-3 (2.2)

Africa: 3-2-5 (1.1)

UEFA: 7-4-7 (1.4)

Concacaf: 4-2-2 (1.8)

Asia: 0-3-6 (0.3)

======================================================

Asia might get no wins this tournament. Yikes that is ugly.

*Europe vs Europe excluded
Didn't Chile lose? Seemed like you added only a tie.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top