What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official 2014 World Cup Thread*** (1 Viewer)

Dutch trying to show how close you can get to scoring without scoring - it's like a force shield is up in front of the net

 
Took me a while to figure out who Robben's face reminded me of. Not a dead ringer but he could pass for the athletic brother of Andre from the show The League.

 
Holy crap... if I were writing a summary of the Brazil/Colombia game this is pretty much the exact take I'd have offered...from the New York Times:

RIO DE JANEIRO A Colombian defender named Juan Camilo Zúñiga ended the World Cup for the Brazilian star Neymar on Friday with a nasty knee into Neymars back that fractured one of the strikers vertebrae. It was an ugly play and a bad foul. It deserved, at least, a yellow card.Yet within any game, there is always a road map to every flash point. The beauty of soccers continuous flow is that one thing leads to another (and another and another), and that makes it possible to trace a path to a games most memorable moment. In a game like Fridays, doing so makes it easier to see where things went wrong.The Brazilian forward Neymar after injuring his back late in the second half. Neymar, who had four goals in the World Cup, fractured his vertebra and will miss the rest of the tournament.So what happened to Neymar? How did the face of this tournament end up in a hospital? Brazilian fans will not like to hear it, but while Zúñiga was directly responsible for causing Neymars injury, Neymars teammates specifically Fernandinho, though there were others as well as the referee, Carlos Velasco Carballo, deserve their share of the blame, too. They did not commit the crime, but they contributed to an environment of lawlessness that led to Neymars being battered.If that sounds harsh, consider that Brazils coach, Luiz Felipe Scolari, made a point of saying before the game that there was no historical rivalry between Brazil and Colombia and that games between the teams were friendly matches. Thiago Silva, the captain, said that playing against Colombias considerable skill players would make for a cleaner, more fluid game.Yet from the first minute it appeared that Brazil was determined to play the game cynically, tripping and pushing and kicking at Colombias players, especially James Rodríguez, the teams wunderkind scorer. Colombia, on the other hand, seemed almost deferential at first. When Neymar went off on a spirited run six minutes into the game, the Colombian defenders did little to try to knock him off stride, let alone scythe him to the ground as previous opponents had done. He ran freely.When Rodríguez went to claim the ball a few minutes later, however, Brazils Óscar ran right into Rodríguezs back as if to make clear to the Colombian that no space on the Fortaleza field would be a safe space. Rodríguezs teammates were understandably upset, but there was no retaliation the feeling of violence in the game, especially early on, came almost exclusively from Brazil.Two minutes after Óscars foul, Marcelo blasted the Colombian midfielder Juan Cuadrado. Three minutes after that, Fernandinho, a midfielder who often plays with an edge, slammed into Rodríguez again. Velasco Carballo blew his whistle and called a foul but did not show Fernandinho a yellow card.This quickly became a recurrent theme. Soccer referees will often show yellow cards to players for persistent infringement of the rules, a phrase that generally means players who commit three or four serious fouls. Fernandinho was called for four fouls in just the first half of the game, three of them significant hacks at Rodríguez. But Velasco Carballo gave him no penalty.Continue reading the main storyContinue reading the main storyContinue reading the main storyThis was not a new role for Fernandinho. He committed six fouls in Brazils previous game (or two more than the number of passes he completed), a difficult victory over Chile in a shootout. Of course, as Scolari noted, that game was between heated rivals. Colombia and Brazil were supposed to be more copacetic.Despite that, the temperature of the game continued to rise in the second half and, again, it was Brazil doing most of the stoking. David Luiz blatantly tripped Cuadrado in the first minute after intermission (Velasco Carballo missed it). Fernandinho slyly pushed Adrián Ramos into the sign boards behind the end line as the two chased a ball that was undoubtedly going out of play anyway.In all, Brazil committed nine of the first 11 fouls in the second half, hacking and pounding on the Colombians despite already holding a 1-0 lead. It was not hard to predict that at some point, Brazils star, Neymar, would become a target.It was in the 57th minute, though, when the match began to boil over. The Colombians had continued to mostly sit back and take the punishment, but they were clearly infuriated when Silva crushed Ramos from behind as he went toward a ball. Velasco Carballo, again, declined to whistle a foul. The Colombians ire was raised even more 10 minutes later when the referee showed a yellow card to Rodríguez who was apoplectic at the decision for an innocuous trip that was, as Rodríguez vociferously pointed out with multiple hand gestures, a relative first offense compared with Fernandinhos harrying.I think the referee influenced the game a lot, Rodríguez said afterward.He was being kind. Velasco Carballos role in the ugliness cannot be minimized. A Spaniard, he is known as a high-level official but it seemed clear that he was determined to avoid using cards to control the players. That decision backfired, particularly as it related to Fernandinho; instead of giving the players a comfort level to play more freely early on, his lenience served as an elastic band on the game, encouraging the players, especially the Brazilians, to try to see just how much contact they could get away with on Rodríguez without being punished.It was a poor miscalculation from Velasco Carballo, and one he compounded by neglecting to adjust as the game progressed. His culpability is impossible to ignore.Yet neither is that of the Brazilians who, emboldened, continued to chop. The Colombians took a few shots in return, though nothing compared with, say, Chile or earlier Brazil opponents, who clearly had a plan to harass Neymar. By the time the game reached its closing moments, the Colombians who saw Brazil commit 31 of the tournament-high 54 fouls in the game surely felt they were owed the proverbial pound of flesh.They got it, then, with Zúñigas challenge on Neymar, though it is hard to believe Zúñiga was looking to cause the sort of damage he inflicted. Taking a whack at an attacking player who is awaiting a bouncing or floating ball is standard fare: Rodríguez was hit high, low and in between multiple times on Friday. In the 87th minute, the ball came near, Zúñiga put his knee into Neymars back and Neymar crumpled, his World Cup suddenly over.It was unfortunate and sad, and afterward, Scolari and other Brazilian officials were incensed. Much of their frustration was directed at Zúñiga, with the rest being sent toward the referee.Everybody knew that Neymar would be hunted, Scolari said. Its been happening in the last three matches and we had been talking about it. But nobody listens to us.Those emotions were understandable. But if Scolari was truly being honest with himself, he must look inward too. Brazil has not showcased jogo bonito here, has not displayed the beautiful game that it is known for playing. It has played ugly and rugged and rough.That is Scolaris choice. And on Friday it was Scolaris players Neymars teammates who created the environment that ultimately sent Brazils superstar home.
Pretty incomplete view here, Colombia took out their knives early on as well. They didn't sit back and absorb it like the article claimed.
Respectfully, I think you are dead wrong, and the author of that article nailed it. It's about tracing the escalation to the root, which was Brazillian aggression, and the injustice created by the refs incompetence in enforcing order.

Yes - Columbia started to retaliate, but the refs inconsistency in enforcement only poured gasoline on flames.

I agree with every word of that piece. He nailed it.

 
ever notice how announcers always - it seems - talk about a game as if it was 90 minutes plus second-half stoppage time? like, the extra 2 minutes played in the first half really didn't happen? i've heard this a lot during this world cup.

 
ever notice how announcers always - it seems - talk about a game as if it was 90 minutes plus second-half stoppage time? like, the extra 2 minutes played in the first half really didn't happen? i've heard this a lot during this world cup.
Just a convention. They never count stoppage time going forward into a new half.

 
Can't wait to hear all the hot sport takes about this game ruining the sport.
I feel vindicated by the article about that Brazil game. Made me feel a lot better to see what I felt articulated perfectly. I felt that Brazil was first to set the tone of cynical aggression - and was first to then set the tone of cynical flopping.

Fact someone else saw all of this, was able to point out how the flow is cumulative and leads to a progression of events makes me feel hopeful.

What doesn't make me feel hopeful are those that cannot even entertain or see that all of this so blatantly happened - and excuse it.

As the journalist so aptly pointed out, the ref's inability to police and enforce a modicum of justice contributed not only to an ugly match lacking in fair play, but quite possibly in serious injury.

I won't speak for others, but THAT is the problem I personally had with the sport - not the sport itself.

And the fact you so stubbornly glaze all of this over, well. That informs how I value your opinion.

 
I think the ref sucked but thought Colombia was more to blame for the chippy game than Brazil. Time to move on IMO.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top