And like 7 of the last 8 National Championshipwell, they do have 6 teams in the top 15 in the country in one side of the conference.![]()
![]()
Do people really wonder why the SEC is hated? So arrogant.
![]()
And like 7 of the last 8 National Championshipwell, they do have 6 teams in the top 15 in the country in one side of the conference.![]()
![]()
Do people really wonder why the SEC is hated? So arrogant.
![]()
Still don't see OM hanging with them. They have a great D, no doubt about that. They've struggled to pull away from Memphis and Boise this year.if both defenses are that good it sure doesn't sound like a barn burner. It sounds like a 10-6 game. Hope I'm wrong.gump said:Wallace and Sims. Sims first big road test...vs a very good D. His mobility may be the difference.The Ds have only given up 5 TDs total, minus turnovers and ST....3 by Bama.[icon] said:Man my bama-fan friends are wayyyyyyy too overconfident heading into this game. This meme is running rampant.
This is Ole Miss' superbowl. Despite the relatively early kickoff for a game of this caliber, the crowd will be well-lubricated with bourbon and should make for a solid environment despite the small stadium.
Statfox has the true line at Ole Miss -2![]()
Bama is 1-2-1 ATS this year.. Ole Miss is 4-0
Bama Defense has allowed 56 points against
Ole Miss Defense has allowed 34 points against
Surprising given Bama's SOS is on par with Ole Miss's (29.7 vs 29.3 opponent power rating)
Not that this isn't obvious, but Bo Wallace is the lynchpin of this whole thing. Should be one hell of a game.
A lot of experts picking Ole Miss and the points...agree it'll be a barn burner.
After this weeks play that would be my Top 5 if everybody in the Top 10 wins. I still think the loser of the Iron Bowl only if the both go into the matchup undefeated will be the 2nd team from the SEC to be in the playoffs. All 3 teams A&M, Alabama, Auburn have ridiculous schedules ahead of them.Ummm...how can Bama and Auburn both be undefeated if they play each other?Ummm, Baylor over FSU?If the remaining top 10 wins out tomorrow and factoring strength of schedule and giving added weight to victories over opponents currently ranked in Top 25 my 5 would be as follows:
1. Alabama
2. Oklahoma
3. Texas A&M
4. Auburn
5. Baylor
I believe this came about due to protecting rivalries and good old fashioned politics.What about some realignment in the SEC. Move Mississippi State, A&M and LSU to the East and then move Tennessee, Kentucky and Missouri to the West. Would that hurt the conference; as is the conference is dominating even in recruiting 5 of the top 10 recruits in the State of Texas signed with SEC schools, A&M and LSU had 2 each and Alabama had 1. The way the confrence is algined with the West being top heavy in the rankings like one said they will cannibalize themselves and it also hurts recruiting now if you balance the conferences and they are all ranked and you now have a Top 5 team coming out of the East and West both undefeated for the Championship game that does wonders for the conference and its exposure.
You take an A&M team and move them to the East and they lose Bama and Auburn from the schedule and they end up undefeated in the East and they play an undefeated Bama or Auburn out of the West in the SEC Championship game how can a committee say that losing the Championship game doesn't give you the right to be in the playoffs.
I personally think the Selection Committee should select the 4 playoff teams prior to Championship weekend so none of the conference championships come into play.
Huh? That's a horrible idea. What if you have a pair of 1 loss teams in the SEC or PAC championship games? Hell, what if you gave 1 loss teams in the ACC or even BIG?I personally think the Selection Committee should select the 4 playoff teams prior to Championship weekend so none of the conference championships come into play.
Coaching should be part of the game too and IMO, Oregon was out coached last night as if Bobby Fischer was taking on Sarah Palin in a game of chess. If you know your offense line is weak and ineffectual, why do you continue to run the ball up the gut and into the teeth of the Arizona defense? I mean, it was just head spinningly stupid. The press has talked for weeks about how Mariota has put this team on his shoulders when it mattered most...well, where was the improvisation last night? Where were the designed runs outside? It was just pathetic watching him flounder. 12 sacks in 2 games is a bad offensive line for sure, but where is the coaching adjustment?Why? Nobody's given Brett Hundley a pass the past 2+ years when he's lost 3-4 starting OL per year and had true frosh starting in their place. Injuries are part of the game.timschochet said:I think Oregon has a bunch of injuries to their offensive line. Tough to rip Mariota too much if he's running for his life.
They don't play each other tomorrow. That's how.Ummm...how can Bama and Auburn both be undefeated if they play each other?Ummm, Baylor over FSU?If the remaining top 10 wins out tomorrow and factoring strength of schedule and giving added weight to victories over opponents currently ranked in Top 25 my 5 would be as follows:
1. Alabama
2. Oklahoma
3. Texas A&M
4. Auburn
5. Baylor
" post="17309733" timestamp="1412350951"]
Nobody will mess with your food. The rivalry between FL and UT has died down considerably since the Fulmer/Spurrier era, and it wasn't really an issue then.Premier said:No but the wife is. If they're going to crap in our food I'll just eat at the hotel.
You're good to go![]()
Fans in Knoxville are pretty hospitable, nothing to worry about here.![]()
Because that one play is the basis for their entire offense more or less. The inside zone read is what the entire play book is centered around. You stop that, you essentially stop Oregon.Coaching should be part of the game too and IMO, Oregon was out coached last night as if Bobby Fischer was taking on Sarah Palin in a game of chess. If you know your offense line is weak and ineffectual, why do you continue to run the ball up the gut and into the teeth of the Arizona defense? I mean, it was just head spinningly stupid.Why? Nobody's given Brett Hundley a pass the past 2+ years when he's lost 3-4 starting OL per year and had true frosh starting in their place. Injuries are part of the game.timschochet said:I think Oregon has a bunch of injuries to their offensive line. Tough to rip Mariota too much if he's running for his life.
Well, it's good they moved the NCC to mid-October. Getting chilly out here.They don't play each other tomorrow. That's how.Ummm...how can Bama and Auburn both be undefeated if they play each other?Ummm, Baylor over FSU?If the remaining top 10 wins out tomorrow and factoring strength of schedule and giving added weight to victories over opponents currently ranked in Top 25 my 5 would be as follows:
1. Alabama
2. Oklahoma
3. Texas A&M
4. Auburn
5. Baylor
I'm a state fan too and just don't see how the black rebel bears can even hang around. Bo will have to have a career game. They're too one dimensional, no running game. I hate rooting for bama but don't even want to think about having to put up with the OM friends I have if they won.In the state vs a&m game I hope we show up. Memories of UAB throwing all over the field scare me.Still don't see OM hanging with them. They have a great D, no doubt about that. They've struggled to pull away from Memphis and Boise this year.if both defenses are that good it sure doesn't sound like a barn burner. It sounds like a 10-6 game. Hope I'm wrong.gump said:Wallace and Sims. Sims first big road test...vs a very good D. His mobility may be the difference.The Ds have only given up 5 TDs total, minus turnovers and ST....3 by Bama.[icon] said:Man my bama-fan friends are wayyyyyyy too overconfident heading into this game. This meme is running rampant.
This is Ole Miss' superbowl. Despite the relatively early kickoff for a game of this caliber, the crowd will be well-lubricated with bourbon and should make for a solid environment despite the small stadium.
Statfox has the true line at Ole Miss -2![]()
Bama is 1-2-1 ATS this year.. Ole Miss is 4-0
Bama Defense has allowed 56 points against
Ole Miss Defense has allowed 34 points against
Surprising given Bama's SOS is on par with Ole Miss's (29.7 vs 29.3 opponent power rating)
Not that this isn't obvious, but Bo Wallace is the lynchpin of this whole thing. Should be one hell of a game.
A lot of experts picking Ole Miss and the points...agree it'll be a barn burner.
Without a run game they become one dimensional quick and I don't think Bo can handle it. They always talk about good Bo and bad Bo....Good Bo rarely shows up against a good team. If OM is forced to throw the ball they're in trouble.
I'm sure yall heard Katy Perry is the guest picker. Rumor is Ole miss wanted Shep Smith for guest picker but switched to Katy Perry because they wanted someone that had kissed a girl and liked it.
zingggggggggggggggggggg
I agree this system is terrible like the old system. It is less terrible, though. Until we get to 8 team playoff it will pretty much suck IMO.Edit. 12 feels like too many teams IMO. It would drag the season out longer than necessary. I like 8 so you can give the 5 power conference champs auto bids and then 3 at large teams based on highest ranking non champs via committee. That seems sufficient to me.I look at it this way. Say both teams entering the Iron Bowl are undefeated. Auburn loses and now is Idle with 1 loss. Say a 1 loss Stanford plays an Undefeated Arizona for the PAC Championship. Arizona ends up losing and they end up out of the playoffs to an idle 1 loss SEC Team. Before that game no team who is undefeated and wins there half of the conference should be denied a spot in the Playoffs. With a loss in the championship game that can create question marks.
This whole system is flawed still because it does not address all the scenarios that can occur.
I did read of one proposition but with bowl implications don't know how it would play out but the scenario was all 11 conference champions get an invite and then you invite the top 5 remaining programs based on Strength of Schedule and the Coaches Poll (removing any bias from the public by not including the AP Poll) and you would have a 16 team playoff. To me that sounds lke a great suggestion but pulling it off would be tough.
Voters only look at non-conference schedules now?well, they do have 6 teams in the top 15 in the country in one side of the conference.![]()
![]()
Do people really wonder why the SEC is hated? So arrogant.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Here are those teams non-conf. wins too.
Alabama - WVU, FAU, Southern Miss
Auburn - K-State, San Jose, La Tech
Texas A&M - Lamar, Rice, SMU
Ole Miss - Boise, La Lafayette, Memphis
LSU - Wisconsin, New Mex St, La Monroe, Sam Houston St
Miss St - Southern Miss, UAB, South Alabama
So those 6 teams have combined to beat three teams basically (Wisconsin, WVU, K-State). I'm sure SEC reputation has NOTHING to do with a bunch of voters making up a top 25 list.
Well it's just a big circlejerk if you judge SEC teams on SEC wins alone.Voters only look at non-conference schedules now?well, they do have 6 teams in the top 15 in the country in one side of the conference.![]()
![]()
Do people really wonder why the SEC is hated? So arrogant.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Here are those teams non-conf. wins too.
Alabama - WVU, FAU, Southern Miss
Auburn - K-State, San Jose, La Tech
Texas A&M - Lamar, Rice, SMU
Ole Miss - Boise, La Lafayette, Memphis
LSU - Wisconsin, New Mex St, La Monroe, Sam Houston St
Miss St - Southern Miss, UAB, South Alabama
So those 6 teams have combined to beat three teams basically (Wisconsin, WVU, K-State). I'm sure SEC reputation has NOTHING to do with a bunch of voters making up a top 25 list.
Pretty sure Oklahoma and Baylor play each other.If the remaining top 10 wins out tomorrow and factoring strength of schedule and giving added weight to victories over opponents currently ranked in Top 25 my 5 would be as follows:
1. Alabama
2. Oklahoma
3. Texas A&M
4. Auburn
5. Baylor
Honestly I think we treated the UAB game truly like an exhibition game. Preston and Jones never played on the same play. We never even tried to pressure the QB. Could be wrong, but I feel like we'll be a little more prepared. We'll definitely try and control the ball on offense.I'm a state fan too and just don't see how the black rebel bears can even hang around. Bo will have to have a career game. They're too one dimensional, no running game. I hate rooting for bama but don't even want to think about having to put up with the OM friends I have if they won.In the state vs a&m game I hope we show up. Memories of UAB throwing all over the field scare me.
Oh so if you beat a quality team in conference it is meaningless. Interesting.Well it's just a big circlejerk if you judge SEC teams on SEC wins alone.Voters only look at non-conference schedules now?well, they do have 6 teams in the top 15 in the country in one side of the conference.![]()
![]()
Do people really wonder why the SEC is hated? So arrogant.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Here are those teams non-conf. wins too.
Alabama - WVU, FAU, Southern Miss
Auburn - K-State, San Jose, La Tech
Texas A&M - Lamar, Rice, SMU
Ole Miss - Boise, La Lafayette, Memphis
LSU - Wisconsin, New Mex St, La Monroe, Sam Houston St
Miss St - Southern Miss, UAB, South Alabama
So those 6 teams have combined to beat three teams basically (Wisconsin, WVU, K-State). I'm sure SEC reputation has NOTHING to do with a bunch of voters making up a top 25 list.
They did get it together for the first real game so hopefully you're right. Man I can't imagine rooting for ole miss but yeah, we have a W already when they start I really won't care!Honestly I think we treated the UAB game truly like an exhibition game. Preston and Jones never played on the same play. We never even tried to pressure the QB. Could be wrong, but I feel like we'll be a little more prepared. We'll definitely try and control the ball on offense.I'm a state fan too and just don't see how the black rebel bears can even hang around. Bo will have to have a career game. They're too one dimensional, no running game. I hate rooting for bama but don't even want to think about having to put up with the OM friends I have if they won.
In the state vs a&m game I hope we show up. Memories of UAB throwing all over the field scare me.
I still think we win. Hating the 11am kick.
Come time for Bama OM we might should be rooting for OM???? I can't do it though, way too early.
I said "alone" to signify that it's important to judge both imo.Oh so if you beat a quality team in conference it is meaningless. Interesting.Well it's just a big circlejerk if you judge SEC teams on SEC wins alone.Voters only look at non-conference schedules now?well, they do have 6 teams in the top 15 in the country in one side of the conference.![]()
![]()
Do people really wonder why the SEC is hated? So arrogant.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Here are those teams non-conf. wins too.
Alabama - WVU, FAU, Southern Miss
Auburn - K-State, San Jose, La Tech
Texas A&M - Lamar, Rice, SMU
Ole Miss - Boise, La Lafayette, Memphis
LSU - Wisconsin, New Mex St, La Monroe, Sam Houston St
Miss St - Southern Miss, UAB, South Alabama
So those 6 teams have combined to beat three teams basically (Wisconsin, WVU, K-State). I'm sure SEC reputation has NOTHING to do with a bunch of voters making up a top 25 list.
I said this years ago, except with 6 conferences and a few wild cards and was laughed away on this board b/c I said it would create all sorts of crazy realignment.I mean if they really wanted to do it "right" they'd have only 4 Power Conferences with a huge realignment, and the 4 conference winners play the bowl playoffs.
Hasn't someone here been posting his projected mythical 16-team playoffs the past couple of years?I look at it this way. Say both teams entering the Iron Bowl are undefeated. Auburn loses and now is Idle with 1 loss. Say a 1 loss Stanford plays an Undefeated Arizona for the PAC Championship. Arizona ends up losing and they end up out of the playoffs to an idle 1 loss SEC Team. Before that game no team who is undefeated and wins there half of the conference should be denied a spot in the Playoffs (especially with the resume Arizona will have). With a loss in the championship game that can create question marks.
This whole system is flawed still because it does not address all the scenarios that can occur.
I did read of one proposition but with bowl implications don't know how it would play out but the scenario was all 11 conference champions get an invite and then you invite the top 5 remaining programs based on Strength of Schedule and the Coaches Poll (removing any bias from the public by not including the AP Poll) and you would have a 16 team playoff. To me that sounds lke a great suggestion but pulling it off would be tough.
UCLA had trouble with Memphis and you think they're one of the top four programs in the nation?UCLA
Oklahoma
Alabama
Florida State
Ole Miss is counting Memphis as a HIGH QUALITY non-conference win imo.UCLA had trouble with Memphis and you think they're one of the top four programs in the nation?UCLA
Oklahoma
Alabama
Florida State
No they're not. They won and fell two spots in the polls. Memphis isn't good.Ole Miss is counting Memphis as a HIGH QUALITY non-conference win imo.UCLA had trouble with Memphis and you think they're one of the top four programs in the nation?UCLA
Oklahoma
Alabama
Florida State
We'll call it even.No they're not. They won and fell two spots in the polls. Memphis isn't good.Ole Miss is counting Memphis as a HIGH QUALITY non-conference win imo.UCLA had trouble with Memphis and you think they're one of the top four programs in the nation?UCLA
Oklahoma
Alabama
Florida State
I'm fully down with this idea. I'd like to see the schools get together and do it on their own and discard the NCAA altogether. I've talked about this for years with my friends actually.I said this years ago, except with 6 conferences and a few wild cards and was laughed away on this board b/c I said it would create all sorts of crazy realignment.I mean if they really wanted to do it "right" they'd have only 4 Power Conferences with a huge realignment, and the 4 conference winners play the bowl playoffs.
This is an interesting take. Care to expand on it? Seems to be the exact opposite of any theory I've ever heard on a playoff....especially one where the schedules are so significantly different with a 12 game sample size.I personally think the Selection Committee should select the 4 playoff teams prior to Championship weekend so none of the conference championships come into play.
Huh? Culdeus isn't even an SEC guy... have you seen this proposed by any SEC honks?Honestly, if you want the best 4 teams in the tournament you have to get 3 from SEC West. Somehow.
3 SEC teams and whomever is undefeated between FSU and Baylor/OU![]()
![]()
Do people really wonder why the SEC is hated? So arrogant.
Memphis' only other loss was a nail-biter to the pride of the PAC12 at home... and Ole Miss beat them much more handily than UCLA didOle Miss is counting Memphis as a HIGH QUALITY non-conference win imo.UCLA had trouble with Memphis and you think they're one of the top four programs in the nation?UCLA
Oklahoma
Alabama
Florida State
And then there's that... memphis are 3.5pt dogs to Cincinatti this weekendNo they're not. They won and fell two spots in the polls. Memphis isn't good.
I'm not giving anyone a "pass." But this morning ,as a result of last night's game, a few people here suggested that Mariota is ranked too high by NFL experts for the draft. All I'm saying is that under the circumstances, I don't think that's especially fair.Why? Nobody's given Brett Hundley a pass the past 2+ years when he's lost 3-4 starting OL per year and had true frosh starting in their place. Injuries are part of the game.timschochet said:I think Oregon has a bunch of injuries to their offensive line. Tough to rip Mariota too much if he's running for his life.
When did I say that? I was just listing teams randomly, for no reason, off the top of my head.UCLA had trouble with Memphis and you think they're one of the top four programs in the nation?UCLA
Oklahoma
Alabama
Florida State
I mentioned this last week, several pages back, but how would the P5 be able to "do it on their own" without the G5 or even FCS?I'm fully down with this idea. I'd like to see the schools get together and do it on their own and discard the NCAA altogether. I've talked about this for years with my friends actually.I said this years ago, except with 6 conferences and a few wild cards and was laughed away on this board b/c I said it would create all sorts of crazy realignment.I mean if they really wanted to do it "right" they'd have only 4 Power Conferences with a huge realignment, and the 4 conference winners play the bowl playoffs.
Early on it would be tough for the teams outside the current P5. Over time it would help grow competitiveness IMO, though. The revenue sharing model would balance out and the teams outside of those P5 could add a feather in their cap for recruiting. Which is why it will likely never happen. The P5 schools like their stranglehold, relatively speaking, on the college football world and money.I mentioned this last week, several pages back, but how would the P5 be able to "do it on their own" without the G5 or even FCS?I'm fully down with this idea. I'd like to see the schools get together and do it on their own and discard the NCAA altogether. I've talked about this for years with my friends actually.I said this years ago, except with 6 conferences and a few wild cards and was laughed away on this board b/c I said it would create all sorts of crazy realignment.I mean if they really wanted to do it "right" they'd have only 4 Power Conferences with a huge realignment, and the 4 conference winners play the bowl playoffs.
Sure it would be great for a four-team playoff, but how do you factor the bowls into the equation? Right now, P5 teams are 134-15 against non-P5 teams this season. Take those away and force P5 schools to play each other exclusively in the nonconference (or as part of 16-team mega conferences) and you're looking at a net loss of ~ 60 wins so far this season. Those wins have to come from somewhere.
So what happens when the 7-5 and 6-6 teams that are just squeezing out bowl eligibility (many of them getting 1 W against FCS and maybe 1-2 others from playing Sun Belt, MAC, AAC, C-USA, etc.) suddenly find themselves finishing 5-7 or 4-8? Who fills all of those bowl slots? And while it might be great to keep all of that playoff money to themselves, what happens when some of that other bowl money starts to go away?
I haven't been this excited about a day of college football probably ever. I even opened an account to wager on some of them!So...anyone want to talk about this weekend's awesome slate of games? I'm sure there's gotta be a few of you that don't want to just menstruate about the playoff that starts more than two months from now that will not involve several of the teams currently being discussed because this is college football and upsets happen.
Please?
I need something to do between innings and it isn't going to be work.
The bowls need the P5 conferences more than the other way around. If the P5 conferences committed to an expanded playoff, the TV money would dwarf the bowl money and the bowls would either go away entirely or be treated with the disdain that English Premier League teams treat the Capiatl One (nee Carling) Cup.I mentioned this last week, several pages back, but how would the P5 be able to "do it on their own" without the G5 or even FCS?I'm fully down with this idea. I'd like to see the schools get together and do it on their own and discard the NCAA altogether. I've talked about this for years with my friends actually.I said this years ago, except with 6 conferences and a few wild cards and was laughed away on this board b/c I said it would create all sorts of crazy realignment.I mean if they really wanted to do it "right" they'd have only 4 Power Conferences with a huge realignment, and the 4 conference winners play the bowl playoffs.
Sure it would be great for a four-team playoff, but how do you factor the bowls into the equation? Right now, P5 teams are 134-15 against non-P5 teams this season. Take those away and force P5 schools to play each other exclusively in the nonconference (or as part of 16-team mega conferences) and you're looking at a net loss of ~ 60 wins so far this season. Those wins have to come from somewhere.
So what happens when the 7-5 and 6-6 teams that are just squeezing out bowl eligibility (many of them getting 1 W against FCS and maybe 1-2 others from playing Sun Belt, MAC, AAC, C-USA, etc.) suddenly find themselves finishing 5-7 or 4-8? Who fills all of those bowl slots? And while it might be great to keep all of that playoff money to themselves, what happens when some of that other bowl money starts to go away?
It is kind of ridiculous how much talk this thing gets. Last weekend I'm watching Michigan State obliterate Wyoming and Matt Millen starts babbling about how MSU needs to win big to impress the committee. Really?So...anyone want to talk about this weekend's awesome slate of games? I'm sure there's gotta be a few of you that don't want to just menstruate about the playoff that starts more than two months from now that will not involve several of the teams currently being discussed because this is college football and upsets happen.
Please?
I need something to do between innings and it isn't going to be work.
That's my kinda day.I'm shooting assault rifles at the range at 10am, then heading to a breastaurant, then most likely will need uber at some point. I wonder if he'll be cool with all the firepower.
Agreed. My experience in Knoxville for the last two UT/UF games has been that Tennessee fans have largely given up. Everyone I've talked to or hung out with there has mostly been "you guys are going to kick our ### but let's have a good time".Nobody will mess with your food. The rivalry between FL and UT has died down considerably since the Fulmer/Spurrier era, and it wasn't really an issue then.Premier said:No but the wife is. If they're going to crap in our food I'll just eat at the hotel.
You're good to go![]()
Fans in Knoxville are pretty hospitable, nothing to worry about here.![]()
It is kind of ridiculous how much talk this thing gets. Last weekend I'm watching Michigan State obliterate Wyoming and Matt Millen starts babbling about how MSU needs to win big to impress the committee. Really?So...anyone want to talk about this weekend's awesome slate of games? I'm sure there's gotta be a few of you that don't want to just menstruate about the playoff that starts more than two months from now that will not involve several of the teams currently being discussed because this is college football and upsets happen.
Please?
I need something to do between innings and it isn't going to be work.