So?I see it exactly the opposite. With more teams in the playoff yesterday doesn't matter as much.If yesterday wasn't enough to shelve this convo, I'm not sure what is. There is a ton of football left to played.This year's playoff definitely looks to be littered with debate of one and two loss teams. I'm not sure anyone will go undefeated and it'll leave us/the committee to debate losses, so I'm curious to ask now:
Do you view head to head more telling or strength of schedule/loss?
Ex. Do you rank Oregon ahead of Michigan State because of the head to head win or do you punish Oregon more because they lost to an unbanked team and put Sparty ahead of them?
The only thing that is clear is that 4 teams is way too few.
