What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** Official 2015 College Football Thread *** (1 Viewer)

I'd I predict they (Georgia) will lose two of Florida, GT and Auburn. They shouldn't lose to any of them but Florida.
Have you seen Auburn play this year (except for the LSU game)?
Ga Tech has no shot at UGA. Talent gap is night and day and Tech has no defense. Only shot would be 56-55 game which I don't foresee.
I figured this but don't want to comment on Tech as I haven't seen a game of theirs this year.
 
ASU could easily beat Oregon in the heat on Thursday.ASU should be ranked and would beat a team like Ohio State on a neutral field, would give Notre Dame everything they could handle too.
Everytime I think of Mizzou as being total dog#### this year, I remember they did beat ASU. :shrug:
:lmao:
 
I'd I predict they (Georgia) will lose two of Florida, GT and Auburn. They shouldn't lose to any of them but Florida.
Have you seen Auburn play this year (except for the LSU game)?
Ga Tech has no shot at UGA. Talent gap is night and day and Tech has no defense. Only shot would be 56-55 game which I don't foresee.
I figured this but don't want to comment on Tech as I haven't seen a game of theirs this year.
And to your point, Auburn has no chance. Chizik can't beat any rivals without Cam....and normally gets blown out.
 
'The Commish said:
'prefontaine said:
'The Commish said:
'prefontaine said:
'The Commish said:
'Dickie Dunn said:
'Premier said:
Not that FSU deserves anything after blowing a gasket at NCSU...but unranked in like 6 computer polls?
Consider who is among Florida State's six wins:1. Murray State ... FCS team, 3-4 record

2. Savannah State ... FCS team, 0-6 record

3. Boston College ... 1-5 record, only win against FCS Maine, Sagarin ELO rank of 114

4. Wake Forest ... 3-3, but ranked in the bottom half of FBS teams (Sagarin ELO of 76)

That's what happens when the BCS doesn't allow you to take into account Margin of Victory. Your ranking gets heavily "biased" by how good (or how bad) your opponents are. It's the argument we've been using for the past few years for teams like Boise, TCU and Utah.
Something else to remember regarding FL. They haven't played all their OOC games. I'm not sure they hold on to #2 even if they don't lose.
what? One of their OOC games is @FSU. They still have South Carolina and Georgia to play plus the SEC championship. They won't hold onto #2 if they win out. They will be #1 with a bullet.
They haven't played all their FCS teams yet...if the gap's close between them and the next person, two games like that left will hurt them a good deal, especially in the computers. This shouldn't be news. I understand what they have left, but you're overhyping UGA imo. That game shouldn't be an issue for them. USC is trying not to let the LSU loss turn into two. And lastly, my comments were about their regular season. I can see how a win against Alabama in the SECCG could put them over the top, but they might have to do that from the #3 spot depending on how things play out (especially if there are multiple undefeated teams). That's all.
They only have one FCS game. Florida will have beaten (per current BCS rank) #6 LSU, #7 South Carolina, #11 Georgia, #14 Florida State, and #18 Texas A&M. All before the SEC title game. And you honestly think there is any chance they get jumped? And your rationale for it is SOS? Come on man. I get that you are anti-SEC but that's just silly.
I'm not anti-SEC at all. I love their brand of football...especially LSU and Alabama. They go back to the Bo days. Unfortunately, the media treats them the way they do. Anything I say against the SEC is always framed in the BCS era. Has nothing to do with the conference itself. I'd say the same things about any other conference.Back to your comment about the rankings. I'm not sure where those come from. You're using the polls as they are today and that's not how the BCS works. What if FSU goes into the pooper and loses a couple more games? Same with Georgia (which is almost a guarantee IMO). I'm willing to bet LSU loses again as well. So yeah, I think it's possible that if Florida is close to the number three team (especially if it's another undefeated ND/Oregon) that when they get to Jacksonville State and La-Lafayette and ND/Oregon are playing Oklahoma, Pitt etc (in the case of ND) or USC, Cal, Stanford (in the case of Oregon) those teams can close the gap during that time and possibly overtake them.
Hmmm....if you think it's even possible, you really don't understand how the BCS rankings work. Oregon will never pass an undefeated UF in a million years due to math. UF could fall to 5th in both human polls (they are actually 3/4) and they would still be ahead of Oregon right now. The lead is massive and the computers all think UF has the hardest remaining schedule of the 3. From your example of games you trumpeted vs what you consider turds on UF's schedule.

Sagarin ratings:

Pitt #86

Cal #53

ULaLa #70

Mizzou #38

because we mostly are in the closed loop portion of the schedule for the remainder, computer rankings aren't going to change much within conferences (if A&M beats LSU, that diminishes UF's win over LSU but increases the value of the A&M win). The SEC has 7 ranked teams and they are a combined 40-4 with all 4 losses coming vs each other. Barring something like UK beating UGA or Auburn beating Bama, you just aren't going to see negative movement like you are suggesting.
:confused: Where are the rest of the teams during that stretch, like OU, USC, Stanford etc? Look...it's an opinion and I'm basing it on what I've seen in the past. It's a guess. You can disagree with it if you like, but at least read it and understand it completely. If you don't think there is opportunity for ND to gain ground on Florida when they are playing the likes of Oklahoma and Pitt or Oregon closing the gap playing USC, Stanford and Cal knock yourself out. Those two games that I pointed out about Florida aren't part of the "loop" you are referring too and ND isn't part of any "loop" so that's apples to oranges. The last thing I'll say on this is that my whole premise is based on IF the gap is close. My assumption is the power teams that Florida has left will stumble a little bit bringing that gap closer than it is today. I already acknowledged that if Florida wins out and all the teams they play take care of business (except for when they actually play Florida) there's no sweat for Florida getting in. I'm not focused on the improbable scenario. I'm focused on the more likely (where a few teams stumble) and what might happen under those circumstances.We can move on...

 
I'd I predict they (Georgia) will lose two of Florida, GT and Auburn. They shouldn't lose to any of them but Florida.
Have you seen Auburn play this year (except for the LSU game)?
Ga Tech has no shot at UGA. Talent gap is night and day and Tech has no defense. Only shot would be 56-55 game which I don't foresee.
There's hope RW....to date, I don't think UGA ranks in the top 50 in rush defense. Their defense sucks too...A shootout at 35-34 is what I predict only because GT will hold the ball for 40 minutes :D
 
I'd I predict they (Georgia) will lose two of Florida, GT and Auburn. They shouldn't lose to any of them but Florida.
Have you seen Auburn play this year (except for the LSU game)?
I've been told ad nauseum that going on the road in the SEC is the tough...no gimmies :shrug:
Auburn and Kentucky are embarassingly bad. Neither is going to win an SEC game this year.
Agreed (they shouldn't anyway)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Florida gets 5 starters back from injury for Saturday. I don't see USC avoiding being worn down like LSU.

A lot has been made of the shape Meyer left UF in, but its not like we're talking Chizik levels of attrition....this team is still loaded with talent, and the new OC seems like the perfect fit.

 
'The Commish said:
:confused: Where are the rest of the teams during that stretch, like OU, USC, Stanford etc? Look...it's an opinion and I'm basing it on what I've seen in the past. It's a guess. You can disagree with it if you like, but at least read it and understand it completely. If you don't think there is opportunity for ND to gain ground on Florida when they are playing the likes of Oklahoma and Pitt or Oregon closing the gap playing USC, Stanford and Cal knock yourself out. Those two games that I pointed out about Florida aren't part of the "loop" you are referring too and ND isn't part of any "loop" so that's apples to oranges. The last thing I'll say on this is that my whole premise is based on IF the gap is close. My assumption is the power teams that Florida has left will stumble a little bit bringing that gap closer than it is today. I already acknowledged that if Florida wins out and all the teams they play take care of business (except for when they actually play Florida) there's no sweat for Florida getting in. I'm not focused on the improbable scenario. I'm focused on the more likely (where a few teams stumble) and what might happen under those circumstances.
You've back-tracked on this pretty hard. You'd save a lot more face by just admitting that you made an assumption because you saw an FCS team on Florida's schedule, and that assumption ended up being completely wrong when someone dug into the numbers. Wins against OU, USC, Stanford, etc won't look any better to the computers than wins against South Carolina, Georgia, etc. UF's "gimme" games that you're counting against them won't look any worse to the computers than the "gimme" games on ND/Oregon's schedules, barring the one FCS game that won't even come close to making up the difference that already exists. The big games will cancel everyone out and you're ignoring how bad teams like Pitt, BC, Wake, and Colorado are in the computers.Here are the Sagarin rankings of the teams left on each schedule:http://imageshack.us/a/img825/7343/lefttoplay.pngYou're coming off a lot worse by sticking to this and slowly backtracking to the point where you're basically arguing that it's mathematically possible for an undefeated UF to drop down if 7 crazy upsets happen. That's no more relevant than me telling you that Iowa State is a legitimate NC contender because mathematically there are scenarios that make it possible.
 
'The Commish said:
:confused: Where are the rest of the teams during that stretch, like OU, USC, Stanford etc? Look...it's an opinion and I'm basing it on what I've seen in the past. It's a guess. You can disagree with it if you like, but at least read it and understand it completely. If you don't think there is opportunity for ND to gain ground on Florida when they are playing the likes of Oklahoma and Pitt or Oregon closing the gap playing USC, Stanford and Cal knock yourself out. Those two games that I pointed out about Florida aren't part of the "loop" you are referring too and ND isn't part of any "loop" so that's apples to oranges. The last thing I'll say on this is that my whole premise is based on IF the gap is close. My assumption is the power teams that Florida has left will stumble a little bit bringing that gap closer than it is today. I already acknowledged that if Florida wins out and all the teams they play take care of business (except for when they actually play Florida) there's no sweat for Florida getting in. I'm not focused on the improbable scenario. I'm focused on the more likely (where a few teams stumble) and what might happen under those circumstances.
You've back-tracked on this pretty hard. You'd save a lot more face by just admitting that you made an assumption because you saw an FCS team on Florida's schedule, and that assumption ended up being completely wrong when someone dug into the numbers. Wins against OU, USC, Stanford, etc won't look any better to the computers than wins against South Carolina, Georgia, etc. UF's "gimme" games that you're counting against them won't look any worse to the computers than the "gimme" games on ND/Oregon's schedules, barring the one FCS game that won't even come close to making up the difference that already exists. The big games will cancel everyone out and you're ignoring how bad teams like Pitt, BC, Wake, and Colorado are in the computers.Here are the Sagarin rankings of the teams left on each schedule:http://imageshack.us/a/img825/7343/lefttoplay.pngYou're coming off a lot worse by sticking to this and slowly backtracking to the point where you're basically arguing that it's mathematically possible for an undefeated UF to drop down if 7 crazy upsets happen. That's no more relevant than me telling you that Iowa State is a legitimate NC contender because mathematically there are scenarios that make it possible.
I haven't gone back on anything I've said. I still think that if it's close having these crappy teams at the end of the Florida schedule while battling with Oregon and ND for that spot could hurt them. Read my initial post. I've only attempted to clarify it. It's clear you disagree with me and don't think having these teams on the schedule will hurt Florida. That's ok. You're entitled to your opinion. It's clear we are basing our opinions on completely different sets of criteria though. You seem to think that all the teams Florida plays will hold serve. I don't. You also seem to think that .0099 is a "large gap" and I don't buy that either. That's the current gap between Oregon and Florida and I'm willing to bet that had Florida put all their cupcakes at the front of their schedule, the first BCS poll would have had Oregon at #2 instead of Florida.ETA: For sanity sake...this is my initial comment on the whole thing:
Something else to remember regarding FL. They haven't played all their OOC games. I'm not sure they hold on to #2 even if they don't lose.
To make that clearer, I probably should have made clear with this comment I'm assuming both Oregon and Florida don't lose. That was my mistake.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
just stop. Unless Florida falls to 6th in one of the human polls (and right now LSU, who they beat is in 6th in both polls), or 5th with Oregon jumping Bama, it isn't going to happen.

 
I haven't gone back on anything I've said. I still think that if it's close having these crappy teams at the end of the Florida schedule while battling with Oregon and ND for that spot could hurt them. Read my initial post. I've only attempted to clarify it. It's clear you disagree with me and don't think having these teams on the schedule will hurt Florida. That's ok. You're entitled to your opinion. It's clear we are basing our opinions on completely different sets of criteria though. You seem to think that all the teams Florida plays will hold serve. I don't. You also seem to think that .0099 is a "large gap" and I don't buy that either. That's the current gap between Oregon and Florida and I'm willing to bet that had Florida put all their cupcakes at the front of their schedule, the first BCS poll would have had Oregon at #2 instead of Florida.ETA: For sanity sake...this is my initial comment on the whole thing:

Something else to remember regarding FL. They haven't played all their OOC games. I'm not sure they hold on to #2 even if they don't lose.
To make that clearer, I probably should have made clear with this comment I'm assuming both Oregon and Florida don't lose. That was my mistake.
And you followed that up with a comment that Florida still had two FCS games left that would clearly hurt them too badly, when in fact ULaLa is not only not an FCS team, but they're actually ranked higher in the computers than FOUR of the teams on Oregon/ND's remaining schedule.Further, your comment explicitly mentioned that Florida couldn't keep pace while playing teams like ULaLa while ND was playing teams like Pitt, when in fact Pitt is ranked worse in the computers than ULaLa.It wasn't until this blunder was pointed out to you that you backed into the argument that you think Georgia, etc could be upset and lose "several" more games. If anything, the teams on OU/ND's schedule are at least as likely, if not more likely to drop a disappointing loss, since several of them have already done it once this year. Georgia is going to be a much larger favorite over Auburn than those teams are in several games they have left on their schedules.You would have been much better off just saying that you didn't realize how high ULaLa was in the computer pools, or how low Pitt/Colorado/etc were. No one would have thought less of you for it. I didn't realize it myself until I looked it up. But trying to stick with this, and backing down to the argument that your use of the word "could" meant that even the tiny chance that FSU and Georgia lose 6 more games this year still fit into that definition just implies that you're one of those guys that will stick to an argument just to be stubborn.
 
I haven't gone back on anything I've said. I still think that if it's close having these crappy teams at the end of the Florida schedule while battling with Oregon and ND for that spot could hurt them. Read my initial post. I've only attempted to clarify it. It's clear you disagree with me and don't think having these teams on the schedule will hurt Florida. That's ok. You're entitled to your opinion. It's clear we are basing our opinions on completely different sets of criteria though. You seem to think that all the teams Florida plays will hold serve. I don't. You also seem to think that .0099 is a "large gap" and I don't buy that either. That's the current gap between Oregon and Florida and I'm willing to bet that had Florida put all their cupcakes at the front of their schedule, the first BCS poll would have had Oregon at #2 instead of Florida.ETA: For sanity sake...this is my initial comment on the whole thing:

Something else to remember regarding FL. They haven't played all their OOC games. I'm not sure they hold on to #2 even if they don't lose.
To make that clearer, I probably should have made clear with this comment I'm assuming both Oregon and Florida don't lose. That was my mistake.
And you followed that up with a comment that Florida still had two FCS games left that would clearly hurt them too badly, when in fact ULaLa is not only not an FCS team, but they're actually ranked higher in the computers than FOUR of the teams on Oregon/ND's remaining schedule.Further, your comment explicitly mentioned that Florida couldn't keep pace while playing teams like ULaLa while ND was playing teams like Pitt, when in fact Pitt is ranked worse in the computers than ULaLa.It wasn't until this blunder was pointed out to you that you backed into the argument that you think Georgia, etc could be upset and lose "several" more games. If anything, the teams on OU/ND's schedule are at least as likely, if not more likely to drop a disappointing loss, since several of them have already done it once this year. Georgia is going to be a much larger favorite over Auburn than those teams are in several games they have left on their schedules.You would have been much better off just saying that you didn't realize how high ULaLa was in the computer pools, or how low Pitt/Colorado/etc were. No one would have thought less of you for it. I didn't realize it myself until I looked it up. But trying to stick with this, and backing down to the argument that your use of the word "could" meant that even the tiny chance that FSU and Georgia lose 6 more games this year still fit into that definition just implies that you're one of those guys that will stick to an argument just to be stubborn.
I made a mistake saying two FCS teams...I thought they played ULM when I made my initial comment. That's really not material to what I was trying to say, but you guys don't seem to care, so we're good. I'm wrong, you guys are right. There's no way that if Florida wins out and Oregon wins out that Oregon can over come the .0099 points they are down right now. I give up.
 
I wish I had the Longhorn Network so I could watch the replay of the OU-Texas game.
Mack Brown's presser this week was the first time I was ever happy that I have it. I'm going to record the Mack Brown show or whatever the hell they call it this week.
 
Florida gets 5 starters back from injury for Saturday. I don't see USC avoiding being worn down like LSU. A lot has been made of the shape Meyer left UF in, but its not like we're talking Chizik levels of attrition....this team is still loaded with talent, and the new OC seems like the perfect fit.
Muschamp says all the time that he inherited a lot of young talent. There was just very little experienced talent on last year's team.
 
:goodposting: Lot's of bad teams in the SEC which no one ever wants to discuss. Alabama is the clear class of the nation, the rest of the conference has a bunch of flawed teams just like everywhere else. LSU barely beat an Auburn team which might not win a conference game, and might win only two total (New Mexico State and ULM in OT). Auburn also got housed by Ole Miss who lost by 35 at home to Texas (66-31). Texas just lost to Oklahoma by 40. Also I normally like LSU fans but GT is terrible, has to be embarrassing for other LSU fans.
:rolleyes: I'm terrible? Really? Maybe you should look in the mirror big guy. All I do is defend the SEC from attacks made by you cats because you think the SEC is the "media darling". The SEC has a couple of bad teams but it also has the best teams in the country.And LSU deserves to be where they are. They just man handled one of the best defenses in the county in South Carolina. 4 of the top 6 teams in the BCS are from the SEC.But keep on hating, OU boy. :thumbup:
 
Now that we're halfway thru October, what school makes the first coaching fire? May be 4 jockeying for position soon in the SEC alone.
I would have said Arkansas a week ago but they seem to be turning it around. Smith will be gone after the season but I think he rides the season out.Dooley is in trouble.
 
Florida gets 5 starters back from injury for Saturday. I don't see USC avoiding being worn down like LSU. A lot has been made of the shape Meyer left UF in, but its not like we're talking Chizik levels of attrition....this team is still loaded with talent, and the new OC seems like the perfect fit.
I agree. I think Florida wins by about 10. That would be 2 tough road trips in consecutive weeks for the Cocks.
 
:goodposting: Lot's of bad teams in the SEC which no one ever wants to discuss. Alabama is the clear class of the nation, the rest of the conference has a bunch of flawed teams just like everywhere else. LSU barely beat an Auburn team which might not win a conference game, and might win only two total (New Mexico State and ULM in OT). Auburn also got housed by Ole Miss who lost by 35 at home to Texas (66-31). Texas just lost to Oklahoma by 40. Also I normally like LSU fans but GT is terrible, has to be embarrassing for other LSU fans.
:rolleyes: I'm terrible? Really? Maybe you should look in the mirror big guy. All I do is defend the SEC from attacks made by you cats because you think the SEC is the "media darling". The SEC has a couple of bad teams but it also has the best teams in the country.And LSU deserves to be where they are. They just man handled one of the best defenses in the county in South Carolina. 4 of the top 6 teams in the BCS are from the SEC.But keep on hating, OU boy. :thumbup:
I guess you are t-shirt LSU fan. Get some good Walmart 2 for 1 deals on LSU wifebeaters?
 
:goodposting: Lot's of bad teams in the SEC which no one ever wants to discuss. Alabama is the clear class of the nation, the rest of the conference has a bunch of flawed teams just like everywhere else. LSU barely beat an Auburn team which might not win a conference game, and might win only two total (New Mexico State and ULM in OT). Auburn also got housed by Ole Miss who lost by 35 at home to Texas (66-31). Texas just lost to Oklahoma by 40. Also I normally like LSU fans but GT is terrible, has to be embarrassing for other LSU fans.
:rolleyes: I'm terrible? Really? Maybe you should look in the mirror big guy. All I do is defend the SEC from attacks made by you cats because you think the SEC is the "media darling". The SEC has a couple of bad teams but it also has the best teams in the country.And LSU deserves to be where they are. They just man handled one of the best defenses in the county in South Carolina. 4 of the top 6 teams in the BCS are from the SEC.But keep on hating, OU boy. :thumbup:
Only the little people defend conferences.
 
I made a mistake saying two FCS teams...I thought they played ULM when I made my initial comment.
ULM is 4-2 and in the Sun Belt as well
:bag: Clearly I don't know my Sun Belt teams. Either way, that they are FCS teams or not really had nothing to do with my point, but I digress.
I follow 4 conferences really - C-USA, Big 12, SEC, and Sun Belt ;) It's impossible to keep up with all of them so I stick with the local ones. If you ask me who's in the MAC I'd have to look it up but I imagine you'd know with CMU, EMU, etc are where. It doesn't help with the constant shuffling. WAC is dead next year and the C-USA teams are reshuffling (yet again). No one on this board much cares about that but me it seems though
 
MAC might be the most stable conference in the country. Added UMass, lost Temple, but aside from losing Marshall and UCF after 2005, the rest of the current membership has been in place since 1998 (when Buffalo joined).

 
:goodposting: Lot's of bad teams in the SEC which no one ever wants to discuss. Alabama is the clear class of the nation, the rest of the conference has a bunch of flawed teams just like everywhere else. LSU barely beat an Auburn team which might not win a conference game, and might win only two total (New Mexico State and ULM in OT). Auburn also got housed by Ole Miss who lost by 35 at home to Texas (66-31). Texas just lost to Oklahoma by 40. Also I normally like LSU fans but GT is terrible, has to be embarrassing for other LSU fans.
:rolleyes: I'm terrible? Really? Maybe you should look in the mirror big guy. All I do is defend the SEC from attacks made by you cats because you think the SEC is the "media darling". The SEC has a couple of bad teams but it also has the best teams in the country.And LSU deserves to be where they are. They just man handled one of the best defenses in the county in South Carolina. 4 of the top 6 teams in the BCS are from the SEC.But keep on hating, OU boy. :thumbup:
I guess you are t-shirt LSU fan. Get some good Walmart 2 for 1 deals on LSU wifebeaters?
T-shirt LSU fan? Please explain. Do I buy LSU clothes? Yes I do. So do all fans. What's your point.
 
:goodposting: Lot's of bad teams in the SEC which no one ever wants to discuss. Alabama is the clear class of the nation, the rest of the conference has a bunch of flawed teams just like everywhere else. LSU barely beat an Auburn team which might not win a conference game, and might win only two total (New Mexico State and ULM in OT). Auburn also got housed by Ole Miss who lost by 35 at home to Texas (66-31). Texas just lost to Oklahoma by 40. Also I normally like LSU fans but GT is terrible, has to be embarrassing for other LSU fans.
:rolleyes: I'm terrible? Really? Maybe you should look in the mirror big guy. All I do is defend the SEC from attacks made by you cats because you think the SEC is the "media darling". The SEC has a couple of bad teams but it also has the best teams in the country.And LSU deserves to be where they are. They just man handled one of the best defenses in the county in South Carolina. 4 of the top 6 teams in the BCS are from the SEC.But keep on hating, OU boy. :thumbup:
I guess you are t-shirt LSU fan. Get some good Walmart 2 for 1 deals on LSU wifebeaters?
T-shirt LSU fan? Please explain. Do I buy LSU clothes? Yes I do. So do all fans. What's your point.
He's insinuating, correctly I'm assuming, you've never set foot into a classroom in Baton Rouge.
 
:goodposting: Lot's of bad teams in the SEC which no one ever wants to discuss. Alabama is the clear class of the nation, the rest of the conference has a bunch of flawed teams just like everywhere else. LSU barely beat an Auburn team which might not win a conference game, and might win only two total (New Mexico State and ULM in OT). Auburn also got housed by Ole Miss who lost by 35 at home to Texas (66-31). Texas just lost to Oklahoma by 40. Also I normally like LSU fans but GT is terrible, has to be embarrassing for other LSU fans.
:rolleyes: I'm terrible? Really? Maybe you should look in the mirror big guy. All I do is defend the SEC from attacks made by you cats because you think the SEC is the "media darling". The SEC has a couple of bad teams but it also has the best teams in the country.And LSU deserves to be where they are. They just man handled one of the best defenses in the county in South Carolina. 4 of the top 6 teams in the BCS are from the SEC.But keep on hating, OU boy. :thumbup:
I guess you are t-shirt LSU fan. Get some good Walmart 2 for 1 deals on LSU wifebeaters?
T-shirt LSU fan? Please explain. Do I buy LSU clothes? Yes I do. So do all fans. What's your point.
He's insinuating, correctly I'm assuming, you've never set foot into a classroom in Baton Rouge.
That is ridiculous to think that you can only be a fan of a team if you went to school there. I bet half of all the large school fan bases never graduated from their favorite school. And its not like I dont have any connection to LSU. I grew up 30 minutes outside of Baton Rouge and had many friends that went to LSU. Only reason i didnt go was because I got a basketball scholarship to a D-III school and went their instead. Its not like Im from Wyoming and was a band wagon jumper and started rooting for the Tigers after they got good.
 
:goodposting: Lot's of bad teams in the SEC which no one ever wants to discuss. Alabama is the clear class of the nation, the rest of the conference has a bunch of flawed teams just like everywhere else. LSU barely beat an Auburn team which might not win a conference game, and might win only two total (New Mexico State and ULM in OT). Auburn also got housed by Ole Miss who lost by 35 at home to Texas (66-31). Texas just lost to Oklahoma by 40. Also I normally like LSU fans but GT is terrible, has to be embarrassing for other LSU fans.
:rolleyes: I'm terrible? Really? Maybe you should look in the mirror big guy. All I do is defend the SEC from attacks made by you cats because you think the SEC is the "media darling". The SEC has a couple of bad teams but it also has the best teams in the country.And LSU deserves to be where they are. They just man handled one of the best defenses in the county in South Carolina. 4 of the top 6 teams in the BCS are from the SEC.But keep on hating, OU boy. :thumbup:
I guess you are t-shirt LSU fan. Get some good Walmart 2 for 1 deals on LSU wifebeaters?
T-shirt LSU fan? Please explain. Do I buy LSU clothes? Yes I do. So do all fans. What's your point.
He's insinuating, correctly I'm assuming, you've never set foot into a classroom in Baton Rouge.
That is ridiculous to think that you can only be a fan of a team if you went to school there. I bet half of all the large school fan bases never graduated from their favorite school. And its not like I dont have any connection to LSU. I grew up 30 minutes outside of Baton Rouge and had many friends that went to LSU. Only reason i didnt go was because I got a basketball scholarship to a D-III school and went their instead. Its not like Im from Wyoming and was a band wagon jumper and started rooting for the Tigers after they got good.
How did you become a fan of 15 teams?
 
:goodposting: Lot's of bad teams in the SEC which no one ever wants to discuss. Alabama is the clear class of the nation, the rest of the conference has a bunch of flawed teams just like everywhere else. LSU barely beat an Auburn team which might not win a conference game, and might win only two total (New Mexico State and ULM in OT). Auburn also got housed by Ole Miss who lost by 35 at home to Texas (66-31). Texas just lost to Oklahoma by 40. Also I normally like LSU fans but GT is terrible, has to be embarrassing for other LSU fans.
:rolleyes: I'm terrible? Really? Maybe you should look in the mirror big guy. All I do is defend the SEC from attacks made by you cats because you think the SEC is the "media darling". The SEC has a couple of bad teams but it also has the best teams in the country.And LSU deserves to be where they are. They just man handled one of the best defenses in the county in South Carolina. 4 of the top 6 teams in the BCS are from the SEC.But keep on hating, OU boy. :thumbup:
I guess you are t-shirt LSU fan. Get some good Walmart 2 for 1 deals on LSU wifebeaters?
T-shirt LSU fan? Please explain. Do I buy LSU clothes? Yes I do. So do all fans. What's your point.
He's insinuating, correctly I'm assuming, you've never set foot into a classroom in Baton Rouge.
That is ridiculous to think that you can only be a fan of a team if you went to school there. I bet half of all the large school fan bases never graduated from their favorite school. And its not like I dont have any connection to LSU. I grew up 30 minutes outside of Baton Rouge and had many friends that went to LSU. Only reason i didnt go was because I got a basketball scholarship to a D-III school and went their instead. Its not like Im from Wyoming and was a band wagon jumper and started rooting for the Tigers after they got good.
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
 
Marcus Lattimore could miss the Florida game this Saturday.

Out?

The defensive line is banged up as well and Kelsey Quarles could be facing some sort of suspension.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top