*** Official 2015 College Football Thread *** (1 Viewer)

[Slapdash]

Well, as usual the SEC teams have their annual chicken#### non-conference schedule of lower division opponents. Let's see who's on tap this year:

Alabama: Georgia State, Chattanooga

Florida: Toledo, Georgia Southern

LSU: Furman (LSU decided this year it was so shameful to play these lower division teams that they only scheduled one- instead, they face powerhouses like Kent State and UAB.)

Would be much better to schedule a powerhouse like New Mexico St.

New Mexico St. is an FBS school and it's a lot more palatable to have them on the schedule when you also play Nevada and @Nebraska in the other two OOC games.

Do you want to trade with Florida so you can play cupcakes like FSU and Miami instead?

It wouldn't fit on UCLA's schedule. The Pac-12 plays 9 regular season conference games compared to the SEC's 8.

Florida wouldn't do it anyway. They don't leave the state unless the SEC forces them to.

Maybe you'd rather switch the whole thing then?

There are a couple problems with this. UCLA doesn't play FCS teams. Florida doesn't leave Florida.

But, other than that, sure. UCLA's schedule is very difficult this year. It would be nice to have a bye at the end of November prior to a big game.

Florida doesn't have a bye in November. Looking forward to see the Bruins visit Death Valley.

 

[General Malaise]

And look, Oregon is playing Nichols State to open the season, so you can find cupcakes all over the landscape for major players. I donated my tickets for that one and it's the home opener.

Not UCLA or USC. They don't schedule non FBS opponents.

But, UCLA won't hesitate to schedule Rice or San Jose State...

 

[Slapdash]

Well, as usual the SEC teams have their annual chicken#### non-conference schedule of lower division opponents. Let's see who's on tap this year:

Alabama: Georgia State, Chattanooga

Florida: Toledo, Georgia Southern

LSU: Furman (LSU decided this year it was so shameful to play these lower division teams that they only scheduled one- instead, they face powerhouses like Kent State and UAB.)

Would be much better to schedule a powerhouse like New Mexico St.

New Mexico St. is an FBS school and it's a lot more palatable to have them on the schedule when you also play Nevada and @Nebraska in the other two OOC games.

Do you want to trade with Florida so you can play cupcakes like FSU and Miami instead?

What on earth has Miami done in the last few years to garner that sort of treatment? FSU? Okay...but Miami? They ain't what they used to be...

Well they were tied for the division in the ####ty ACC. But I'd put money on them beating a team like Nevada easily.

I'd say the Colin Kapernick era Wolf Pack would have beaten any iteration of the Randy Shannon Hurricanes, but as far as this year, I'd say you're probably correct.

Kapernick's Nevada was fun to watch. They're upset over Boise a few years back was crazy.

I think Duke Johnson is going to have a big year in Miami.

 

[prefontaine]

And look, Oregon is playing Nichols State to open the season, so you can find cupcakes all over the landscape for major players. I donated my tickets for that one and it's the home opener.

Not UCLA or USC. They don't schedule non FBS opponents.

But, UCLA won't hesitate to schedule Rice or San Jose State...

Rice went to and won a bowl game last year btw

 

[prefontaine]

A&M backing out of a home 'n' home with Oregon is bush league.

I thought that this was a mistake and the series was still on. It's still listed in the Oregon future opponents

 

[GDogg]

Well, as usual the SEC teams have their annual chicken#### non-conference schedule of lower division opponents. Let's see who's on tap this year:

Alabama: Georgia State, Chattanooga

Florida: Toledo, Georgia Southern

LSU: Furman (LSU decided this year it was so shameful to play these lower division teams that they only scheduled one- instead, they face powerhouses like Kent State and UAB.)

Would be much better to schedule a powerhouse like New Mexico St.

New Mexico St. is an FBS school and it's a lot more palatable to have them on the schedule when you also play Nevada and @Nebraska in the other two OOC games.

Do you want to trade with Florida so you can play cupcakes like FSU and Miami instead?

It wouldn't fit on UCLA's schedule. The Pac-12 plays 9 regular season conference games compared to the SEC's 8.

Florida wouldn't do it anyway. They don't leave the state unless the SEC forces them to.

Maybe you'd rather switch the whole thing then?

There are a couple problems with this. UCLA doesn't play FCS teams. Florida doesn't leave Florida.

But, other than that, sure. UCLA's schedule is very difficult this year. It would be nice to have a bye at the end of November prior to a big game.

Florida doesn't have a bye in November. Looking forward to see the Bruins visit Death Valley.

Sure they do. On November 23.

And...me, too on Death Valley. But, Florida doesn't play Clemson this year...

Looking forward to seeing the Gators visit Autzen and Stanford in back to back weeks. The look of confusion on their faces should be hilarious.

 

[GDogg]

And look, Oregon is playing Nichols State to open the season, so you can find cupcakes all over the landscape for major players. I donated my tickets for that one and it's the home opener.

Not UCLA or USC. They don't schedule non FBS opponents.

But, UCLA won't hesitate to schedule Rice or San Jose State...

Why would they? They are FBS programs in talent-rich areas. And, both of them were bowl teams last year.

 

[prefontaine]

Oh, yep, here's the article. Notice the correction

The Texas A&M-Oregon series is still on. See update at bottom.

 

[timschochet]

And look, Oregon is playing Nichols State to open the season, so you can find cupcakes all over the landscape for major players. I donated my tickets for that one and it's the home opener.

Not UCLA or USC. They don't schedule non FBS opponents.

But, UCLA won't hesitate to schedule Rice or San Jose State...

Really not comparable. Either team would beat the crap of Georgia State or Furman...

 

[Slapdash]

Well, as usual the SEC teams have their annual chicken#### non-conference schedule of lower division opponents. Let's see who's on tap this year:

Alabama: Georgia State, Chattanooga

Florida: Toledo, Georgia Southern

LSU: Furman (LSU decided this year it was so shameful to play these lower division teams that they only scheduled one- instead, they face powerhouses like Kent State and UAB.)

Would be much better to schedule a powerhouse like New Mexico St.

New Mexico St. is an FBS school and it's a lot more palatable to have them on the schedule when you also play Nevada and @Nebraska in the other two OOC games.

Do you want to trade with Florida so you can play cupcakes like FSU and Miami instead?

It wouldn't fit on UCLA's schedule. The Pac-12 plays 9 regular season conference games compared to the SEC's 8.

Florida wouldn't do it anyway. They don't leave the state unless the SEC forces them to.

Maybe you'd rather switch the whole thing then?

There are a couple problems with this. UCLA doesn't play FCS teams. Florida doesn't leave Florida.

But, other than that, sure. UCLA's schedule is very difficult this year. It would be nice to have a bye at the end of November prior to a big game.

Florida doesn't have a bye in November. Looking forward to see the Bruins visit Death Valley.

Sure they do. On November 23.

And...me, too on Death Valley. But, Florida doesn't play Clemson this year...

Looking forward to seeing the Gators visit Autzen and Stanford in back to back weeks. The look of confusion on their faces should be hilarious.

 

[prefontaine]

Well, as usual the SEC teams have their annual chicken#### non-conference schedule of lower division opponents. Let's see who's on tap this year:

Alabama: Georgia State, Chattanooga

Florida: Toledo, Georgia Southern

LSU: Furman (LSU decided this year it was so shameful to play these lower division teams that they only scheduled one- instead, they face powerhouses like Kent State and UAB.)

Would be much better to schedule a powerhouse like New Mexico St.

New Mexico St. is an FBS school and it's a lot more palatable to have them on the schedule when you also play Nevada and @Nebraska in the other two OOC games.

Do you want to trade with Florida so you can play cupcakes like FSU and Miami instead?

It wouldn't fit on UCLA's schedule. The Pac-12 plays 9 regular season conference games compared to the SEC's 8.

Florida wouldn't do it anyway. They don't leave the state unless the SEC forces them to.

Maybe you'd rather switch the whole thing then?

There are a couple problems with this. UCLA doesn't play FCS teams. Florida doesn't leave Florida.

But, other than that, sure. UCLA's schedule is very difficult this year. It would be nice to have a bye at the end of November prior to a big game.

Florida doesn't have a bye in November. Looking forward to see the Bruins visit Death Valley.

Sure they do. On November 23.

And...me, too on Death Valley. But, Florida doesn't play Clemson this year...

Looking forward to seeing the Gators visit Autzen and Stanford in back to back weeks. The look of confusion on their faces should be hilarious.

I think you are looking at the wrong schedule. Florida plays UGA, Vandy, South Car, Ga South, and Florida State in November. There is no bye. if you are trying to call Ga Southern a bye, it's fair to say it's a patsy game but I'm not sure there are many schools that could even pretend to have a tougher November slate. Three of those games were vs teams that finished in the top 10 last year and Vandy also finished ranked.

 

[General Malaise]

A&M backing out of a home 'n' home with Oregon is bush league.

I thought that this was a mistake and the series was still on. It's still listed in the Oregon future opponents

It was a pretty major story up here (in a land absent many major stories) so unless I'm terribly mistaken, A&M backed out of it.

 

[General Malaise]

Oh, yep, here's the article. Notice the correction

The Texas A&M-Oregon series is still on. See update at bottom.

Then I stand corrected.

 

[The Commish]

Sporting News: Current athletic directors will be used on the playoff committee, an industry source told Sporting News Wednesday a direct reversal from public statements made in May by CFP executive director Bill Hancock.

It now appears as the though the selection committee will consist of one athletic director from each of the five power conferences, former coaches and players and possibly former media members.

http://www.sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/story/2013-07-17/college-football-playoff-selection-committee-athletic-directors-bill-hancock

Wonder how many people end up on the committee. I'm very encouraged by the final comments:

While current polls won’t be used in the process, there is concern among some in the working CFP group that failing to release a weekly ranking will allow the Associated Press and coaches polls – two polls that had defined the game for decades – to direct the narrative and therefore minimize the CFP poll.

But I'm not sure how it would minimize the committee. It doesn't matter how frequently they release a poll compared to the others. What they say goes. I think most would be fine with letting the CFP poll coming out beginning - mid October and going weekly from there.

Well, the scenario I thought of is some team like Houston going through the regular season undefeated even though their SOS is nothing to write home about. There could be pressure (applied through polls) to include them in the NCC.

If they can do this transparently, it shouldn't be an issue. If they are upfront with their criteria and apply it the way they say they will, I'm fine with completely ignoring the AP and Coaches Polls....wouldn't be able to care less what they said

 

[General Malaise]

And look, Oregon is playing Nichols State to open the season, so you can find cupcakes all over the landscape for major players. I donated my tickets for that one and it's the home opener.

Not UCLA or USC. They don't schedule non FBS opponents.

But, UCLA won't hesitate to schedule Rice or San Jose State...

Why would they? They are FBS programs in talent-rich areas. And, both of them were bowl teams last year.

Well, they aren't Furman or Georgia State, but neither program has had a history of success, bowl games last year excluded. And while Rice may be in a talent rich area, academics keep the bulk of the talent at bay.

 

[Slapdash]

Well, as usual the SEC teams have their annual chicken#### non-conference schedule of lower division opponents. Let's see who's on tap this year:

Alabama: Georgia State, Chattanooga

Florida: Toledo, Georgia Southern

LSU: Furman (LSU decided this year it was so shameful to play these lower division teams that they only scheduled one- instead, they face powerhouses like Kent State and UAB.)

Would be much better to schedule a powerhouse like New Mexico St.

New Mexico St. is an FBS school and it's a lot more palatable to have them on the schedule when you also play Nevada and @Nebraska in the other two OOC games.

Do you want to trade with Florida so you can play cupcakes like FSU and Miami instead?

It wouldn't fit on UCLA's schedule. The Pac-12 plays 9 regular season conference games compared to the SEC's 8.

Florida wouldn't do it anyway. They don't leave the state unless the SEC forces them to.

Maybe you'd rather switch the whole thing then?

There are a couple problems with this. UCLA doesn't play FCS teams. Florida doesn't leave Florida.

But, other than that, sure. UCLA's schedule is very difficult this year. It would be nice to have a bye at the end of November prior to a big game.

Florida doesn't have a bye in November. Looking forward to see the Bruins visit Death Valley.

Sure they do. On November 23.

And...me, too on Death Valley. But, Florida doesn't play Clemson this year...

Looking forward to seeing the Gators visit Autzen and Stanford in back to back weeks. The look of confusion on their faces should be hilarious.

I think you are looking at the wrong schedule. Florida plays UGA, Vandy, South Car, Ga South, and Florida State in November. There is no bye. if you are trying to call Ga Southern a bye, it's fair to say it's a patsy game but I'm not sure there are many schools that could even pretend to have a tougher November slate. Three of those games were vs teams that finished in the top 10 last year and Vandy also finished ranked.

Florida plays more teams that finished ranked in November than UCLA plays all year....

 

[timschochet]

Ohio State should be in the National Championship game this year. Their non-conference schedule:

Buffalo

San Diego State

at Califonia

Florida A & M

Three of those teams shouldn't be on the schedule, frankly. Cal is decent but had a really bad year and has a new coach, and the Buckeyes should win that game fairly easily.

Conference wise, they avoid Nebraska, at home against Wisconsin. They do face Michigan on the road. And that's it.

 

[Moe.]

Ohio State should be in the National Championship game this year. Their non-conference schedule:

Buffalo

San Diego State

at Califonia

Florida A & M

Three of those teams shouldn't be on the schedule, frankly. Cal is decent but had a really bad year and has a new coach, and the Buckeyes should win that game fairly easily.

Conference wise, they avoid Nebraska, at home against Wisconsin. They do face Michigan on the road. And that's it.

Coming from a fan of a team that's playing New Mexico State this year you sure have a lot of nerve saying OSU shouldn't schedule Buffalo or SDSU.

 

[timschochet]

Ohio State should be in the National Championship game this year. Their non-conference schedule:

Buffalo

San Diego State

at Califonia

Florida A & M

Three of those teams shouldn't be on the schedule, frankly. Cal is decent but had a really bad year and has a new coach, and the Buckeyes should win that game fairly easily.

Conference wise, they avoid Nebraska, at home against Wisconsin. They do face Michigan on the road. And that's it.

Coming from a fan of a team that's playing New Mexico State this year you sure have a lot of nerve saying OSU shouldn't schedule Buffalo or SDSU.

Ohio State is on a different level than UCLA. Hopefully we can get to the Buckeye's level, with a year in and year out goal of a national championship, and then I will complain more about scheduling easy opponents.

 

[Premier]

In the world of college football, nobody cares about UCLA. At all. They are almost completely irrelevant.

Miami should be good-ish this year. I think they beat Florida.

 

[Moe.]

Ohio State should be in the National Championship game this year. Their non-conference schedule:

Buffalo

San Diego State

at Califonia

Florida A & M

Three of those teams shouldn't be on the schedule, frankly. Cal is decent but had a really bad year and has a new coach, and the Buckeyes should win that game fairly easily.

Conference wise, they avoid Nebraska, at home against Wisconsin. They do face Michigan on the road. And that's it.

Coming from a fan of a team that's playing New Mexico State this year you sure have a lot of nerve saying OSU shouldn't schedule Buffalo or SDSU.

Ohio State is on a different level than UCLA. Hopefully we can get to the Buckeye's level, with a year in and year out goal of a national championship, and then I will complain more about scheduling easy opponents.

I don't see anything wrong with scheduling MAC or MWC schools under any circumstances. If you want to complain about Florida A&M, fine, but nothing wrong with playing teams like Buffalo, SDSU, Northern Illinois, San Jose St., Tulsa, etc.

 

[GDogg]

Well, as usual the SEC teams have their annual chicken#### non-conference schedule of lower division opponents. Let's see who's on tap this year:

Alabama: Georgia State, Chattanooga

Florida: Toledo, Georgia Southern

LSU: Furman (LSU decided this year it was so shameful to play these lower division teams that they only scheduled one- instead, they face powerhouses like Kent State and UAB.)

Would be much better to schedule a powerhouse like New Mexico St.

New Mexico St. is an FBS school and it's a lot more palatable to have them on the schedule when you also play Nevada and @Nebraska in the other two OOC games.

Do you want to trade with Florida so you can play cupcakes like FSU and Miami instead?

It wouldn't fit on UCLA's schedule. The Pac-12 plays 9 regular season conference games compared to the SEC's 8.

Florida wouldn't do it anyway. They don't leave the state unless the SEC forces them to.

Maybe you'd rather switch the whole thing then?

There are a couple problems with this. UCLA doesn't play FCS teams. Florida doesn't leave Florida.

But, other than that, sure. UCLA's schedule is very difficult this year. It would be nice to have a bye at the end of November prior to a big game.

Florida doesn't have a bye in November. Looking forward to see the Bruins visit Death Valley.

Sure they do. On November 23.

And...me, too on Death Valley. But, Florida doesn't play Clemson this year...

Looking forward to seeing the Gators visit Autzen and Stanford in back to back weeks. The look of confusion on their faces should be hilarious.

I think you are looking at the wrong schedule. Florida plays UGA, Vandy, South Car, Ga South, and Florida State in November. There is no bye. if you are trying to call Ga Southern a bye, it's fair to say it's a patsy game but I'm not sure there are many schools that could even pretend to have a tougher November slate. Three of those games were vs teams that finished in the top 10 last year and Vandy also finished ranked.

I'm looking at the correct schedule. I probably shouldn't call the "game" against Georgia Southern a bye. It's more of a scrimmage.

 

[Politician Spock]

Ohio State should be in the National Championship game this year. Their non-conference schedule:

Buffalo

San Diego State

at Califonia

Florida A & M

Three of those teams shouldn't be on the schedule, frankly. Cal is decent but had a really bad year and has a new coach, and the Buckeyes should win that game fairly easily.

Conference wise, they avoid Nebraska, at home against Wisconsin. They do face Michigan on the road. And that's it.

Coming from a fan of a team that's playing New Mexico State this year you sure have a lot of nerve saying OSU shouldn't schedule Buffalo or SDSU.

Ohio State is on a different level than UCLA. Hopefully we can get to the Buckeye's level, with a year in and year out goal of a national championship, and then I will complain more about scheduling easy opponents.

Schedules are made years in advance. This time last year OSU was coming off a 6-7 season, had a new coach for a second year in a row, and was penalized by the NCAA. That's not exactly the moment in time the AD wants to go out and schedule four top 25 teams for the non-conference portion of the season.

As an OSU fan, I'm in the minority in how well I expect OSU to do this year. I'm expecting 3 losses before a bowl game. Last year's 12 wins was awesome, but 3 of those games could have been easily been lost with one simple mistake, if not 4. OSU is overrated right now.

 

[GDogg]

And look, Oregon is playing Nichols State to open the season, so you can find cupcakes all over the landscape for major players. I donated my tickets for that one and it's the home opener.

Not UCLA or USC. They don't schedule non FBS opponents.

But, UCLA won't hesitate to schedule Rice or San Jose State...

Why would they? They are FBS programs in talent-rich areas. And, both of them were bowl teams last year.

Well, they aren't Furman or Georgia State, but neither program has had a history of success, bowl games last year excluded. And while Rice may be in a talent rich area, academics keep the bulk of the talent at bay.

I'm not suggesting that their areas help the Rices of the world in terms of getting the talent. Like UNC and Duke scheduling games against LMU or UCSB, etc., in basketball, it helps UCLA continue to recruit well in that area to be able to tell those recruits that they will be playing near their hometowns at least once during their 3-5 years at UCLA.

UCLA has always done well in Texas and part of the reason (supposedly) is they seemingly play in Texas against someone every other year or every few years.

 

[GDogg]

Florida plays more teams that finished ranked in November than UCLA plays all year....

To be fair, outside of LSU, all of the teams that finished ranked last year on Florida's schedule are November games.

Besides, why are you bringing up old ####? This is 2013, not 2012.

 

[Slapdash]

Florida plays more teams that finished ranked in November than UCLA plays all year....

To be fair, outside of LSU, all of the teams that finished ranked last year on Florida's schedule are November games.

Besides, why are you bringing up old ####? This is 2013, not 2012.

I'm sure Florida will have a tougher schedule when all is said and done this year too.

 

[GDogg]

Ohio State should be in the National Championship game this year. Their non-conference schedule:

Buffalo

San Diego State

at Califonia

Florida A & M

Three of those teams shouldn't be on the schedule, frankly. Cal is decent but had a really bad year and has a new coach, and the Buckeyes should win that game fairly easily.

Conference wise, they avoid Nebraska, at home against Wisconsin. They do face Michigan on the road. And that's it.

Why shouldn't three of those teams be on the schedule? The only one I see is Florida A&M.

Not that they need any help in recruiting, but scheduling Cal and SDSU makes a lot of sense.

And, Cal is terrible.

 

[GDogg]

Florida plays more teams that finished ranked in November than UCLA plays all year....

To be fair, outside of LSU, all of the teams that finished ranked last year on Florida's schedule are November games.

Besides, why are you bringing up old ####? This is 2013, not 2012.

I'm sure Florida will have a tougher schedule when all is said and done this year too.

I'm not. And, even if they do, it won't be appreciably tougher. UCLA has a particularly brutal road schedule this season.

 

[Slapdash]

Florida plays more teams that finished ranked in November than UCLA plays all year....

To be fair, outside of LSU, all of the teams that finished ranked last year on Florida's schedule are November games.

Besides, why are you bringing up old ####? This is 2013, not 2012.

I'm sure Florida will have a tougher schedule when all is said and done this year too.

I'm not. And, even if they do, it won't be appreciably tougher. UCLA has a particularly brutal road schedule this season.

ok

 

[GDogg]

Florida plays more teams that finished ranked in November than UCLA plays all year....

To be fair, outside of LSU, all of the teams that finished ranked last year on Florida's schedule are November games.

Besides, why are you bringing up old ####? This is 2013, not 2012.

I'm sure Florida will have a tougher schedule when all is said and done this year too.

I'm not. And, even if they do, it won't be appreciably tougher. UCLA has a particularly brutal road schedule this season.

ok

 

[PlasmaDogPlasma]

Florida plays more teams that finished ranked in November than UCLA plays all year....

To be fair, outside of LSU, all of the teams that finished ranked last year on Florida's schedule are November games.

Besides, why are you bringing up old ####? This is 2013, not 2012.

Well then, maybe Ga Southern is going to be MFing powerhouse this year!

Seriously though, Florida's SOS at the end of the year will be at least 15 spots ahead of UCLA's.

 

[PlasmaDogPlasma]

Phil Steele has Florida's schedule rated as the toughest in the nation for 2013. He has UCLA 22nd.

Using the NCAA's method of just calculating opponents W/L%, UF is 7th. UCLA is 24th.

 

[GDogg]

Phil Steele has Florida's schedule rated as the toughest in the nation for 2013. He has UCLA 22nd.

Using the NCAA's method of just calculating opponents W/L%, UF is 7th. UCLA is 24th.

Phil Steele apparently smoked some mean peyote before doing his rankings this year. He also has Southern Cal ranked #6.

 

[GDogg]

Florida plays more teams that finished ranked in November than UCLA plays all year....

To be fair, outside of LSU, all of the teams that finished ranked last year on Florida's schedule are November games.

Besides, why are you bringing up old ####? This is 2013, not 2012.

Well then, maybe Ga Southern is going to be MFing powerhouse this year!

Seriously though, Florida's SOS at the end of the year will be at least 15 spots ahead of UCLA's.

Maybe. But, why do you say that? Have you looked at UCLA's schedule or is this just "SEC, SEC, SEC!!" schtick?

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

Well, as usual the SEC teams have their annual chicken#### non-conference schedule of lower division opponents. Let's see who's on tap this year:

Alabama: Georgia State, Chattanooga

Florida: Toledo, Georgia Southern

LSU: Furman (LSU decided this year it was so shameful to play these lower division teams that they only scheduled one- instead, they face powerhouses like Kent State and UAB.)

You ever seen Georgia Southern play?

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

Well, as usual the SEC teams have their annual chicken#### non-conference schedule of lower division opponents. Let's see who's on tap this year:

Alabama: Georgia State, Chattanooga

Florida: Toledo, Georgia Southern

LSU: Furman (LSU decided this year it was so shameful to play these lower division teams that they only scheduled one- instead, they face powerhouses like Kent State and UAB.)

Would be much better to schedule a powerhouse like New Mexico St.

New Mexico St. is an FBS school and it's a lot more palatable to have them on the schedule when you also play Nevada and @Nebraska in the other two OOC games.

Do you want to trade with Florida so you can play cupcakes like FSU and Miami instead?

It wouldn't fit on UCLA's schedule. The Pac-12 plays 9 regular season conference games compared to the SEC's 8.

Florida wouldn't do it anyway. They don't leave the state unless the SEC forces them to.

Maybe you'd rather switch the whole thing then?

There are a couple problems with this. UCLA doesn't play FCS teams. Florida doesn't leave Florida.

But, other than that, sure. UCLA's schedule is very difficult this year. It would be nice to have a bye at the end of November prior to a big game.

Florida doesn't have a bye in November. Looking forward to see the Bruins visit Death Valley.

Sure they do. On November 23.

And...me, too on Death Valley. But, Florida doesn't play Clemson this year...

Looking forward to seeing the Gators visit Autzen and Stanford in back to back weeks. The look of confusion on their faces should be hilarious.

Damn, that might have been the worst college football post in the history of football guys. Wow.

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

GDogg, Tim, and GM decided to team up today and fight to see who could be the next LHUCKS?

 

[GDogg]

Sure they do. On November 23.

And...me, too on Death Valley. But, Florida doesn't play Clemson this year...

Looking forward to seeing the Gators visit Autzen and Stanford in back to back weeks. The look of confusion on their faces should be hilarious.

Damn, that might have been the worst college football post in the history of football guys. Wow.

Really? Looks good to me.

 

[GDogg]

GDogg, Tim, and GM decided to team up today and fight to see who could be the next LHUCKS?

I don't think any of us went anywhere near that. Hell, I'm still not sure Tim isn't some closet Southern Cal fan with his UCLA self-loathing. GM knocked UCLA's scheduling of NM State.

 

[Premier]

OFFICIAL: There has been no lhucksian measures in here.

Carry on.

 

[PlasmaDogPlasma]

Florida plays more teams that finished ranked in November than UCLA plays all year....

To be fair, outside of LSU, all of the teams that finished ranked last year on Florida's schedule are November games.

Besides, why are you bringing up old ####? This is 2013, not 2012.

Well then, maybe Ga Southern is going to be MFing powerhouse this year!

Seriously though, Florida's SOS at the end of the year will be at least 15 spots ahead of UCLA's.

Maybe. But, why do you say that? Have you looked at UCLA's schedule or is this just "SEC, SEC, SEC!!" schtick?

No it's really more a case of hearing multiple analysts, in addition to Steele, saying that UF has the toughest schedule in the nation this year.

 

[GDogg]

Florida plays more teams that finished ranked in November than UCLA plays all year....

To be fair, outside of LSU, all of the teams that finished ranked last year on Florida's schedule are November games.

Besides, why are you bringing up old ####? This is 2013, not 2012.

Well then, maybe Ga Southern is going to be MFing powerhouse this year!

Seriously though, Florida's SOS at the end of the year will be at least 15 spots ahead of UCLA's.

Maybe. But, why do you say that? Have you looked at UCLA's schedule or is this just "SEC, SEC, SEC!!" schtick?

No it's really more a case of hearing multiple analysts, in addition to Steele, saying that UF has the toughest schedule in the nation this year.

Florida does have tough schedule on paper. I'm not denying that at all. So does UCLA. But, "at least 15 spots" ahead? I don't know about that. And, I'll always knock a program that is as good as Florida or Alabama for playing one or multiple FCS opponents. It's unnecessary.

Phil Steele also had Notre Dame with the toughest schedule prior to 2012. Sagarin had them at 21 to end the season.

 

[timschochet]

GDogg, Tim, and GM decided to team up today and fight to see who could be the next LHUCKS?

I don't think any of us went anywhere near that. Hell, I'm still not sure Tim isn't some closet Southern Cal fan with his UCLA self-loathing. GM knocked UCLA's scheduling of NM State.

Actually, you always cheer me up when I get down on the Bruins. It's a tough schedule this year, but I haven't been this excited in years. Hundley and Anthony Barr.

 

[Dickie Dunn]

Well, as usual the SEC teams have their annual chicken#### non-conference schedule of lower division opponents. Let's see who's on tap this year:

Alabama: Georgia State, Chattanooga

Florida: Toledo, Georgia Southern

LSU: Furman (LSU decided this year it was so shameful to play these lower division teams that they only scheduled one- instead, they face powerhouses like Kent State and UAB.)

You must have missed it last year when Kent State was ranked in the top 25 of the AP poll in November.

 

[timschochet]

Well, as usual the SEC teams have their annual chicken#### non-conference schedule of lower division opponents. Let's see who's on tap this year:

Alabama: Georgia State, Chattanooga

Florida: Toledo, Georgia Southern

LSU: Furman (LSU decided this year it was so shameful to play these lower division teams that they only scheduled one- instead, they face powerhouses like Kent State and UAB.)

You must have missed it last year when Kent State was ranked in the top 25 of the AP poll in November.

I guess I did. You expecting them to give LSU a game? I'll bet $100 and give you 20 points right now. I have no idea what the spread will be.

 

[timschochet]

BTW, is your name taken from the Bryce Courtenay novel? It's on my list, now that all of his works are available on Kindle (they used to be impossible to get).

 

[Tiger Fan]

Well, as usual the SEC teams have their annual chicken#### non-conference schedule of lower division opponents. Let's see who's on tap this year:

Alabama: Georgia State, Chattanooga

Florida: Toledo, Georgia Southern

LSU: Furman (LSU decided this year it was so shameful to play these lower division teams that they only scheduled one- instead, they face powerhouses like Kent State and UAB.)

You must have missed it last year when Kent State was ranked in the top 25 of the AP poll in November.

I guess I did. You expecting them to give LSU a game? I'll bet $100 and give you 20 points right now. I have no idea what the spread will be.

I guess you also missed the fact that LSU is playing TCU to open the season. In Dallas.

 

[Dickie Dunn]

Well, as usual the SEC teams have their annual chicken#### non-conference schedule of lower division opponents. Let's see who's on tap this year:

Alabama: Georgia State, Chattanooga

Florida: Toledo, Georgia Southern

LSU: Furman (LSU decided this year it was so shameful to play these lower division teams that they only scheduled one- instead, they face powerhouses like Kent State and UAB.)

You must have missed it last year when Kent State was ranked in the top 25 of the AP poll in November.

I guess I did. You expecting them to give LSU a game? I'll bet $100 and give you 20 points right now. I have no idea what the spread will be.

Nope, just saying that I wouldn't exactly put them in the category of a UAB. They were better than several Big Ten teams last season -- such as Minnesota, Iowa, Indiana and Purdue -- and also handily beat a ranked Rutgers team on the road.

LSU probably would be at least 20-point favorites at home against half the teams in FBS. They're already -18 vs. Auburn and -17 vs. Arkansas.

 

[Dickie Dunn]

Well, as usual the SEC teams have their annual chicken#### non-conference schedule of lower division opponents. Let's see who's on tap this year:

Alabama: Georgia State, Chattanooga

Florida: Toledo, Georgia Southern

LSU: Furman (LSU decided this year it was so shameful to play these lower division teams that they only scheduled one- instead, they face powerhouses like Kent State and UAB.)

You must have missed it last year when Kent State was ranked in the top 25 of the AP poll in November.

I guess I did. You expecting them to give LSU a game? I'll bet $100 and give you 20 points right now. I have no idea what the spread will be.

I missed the fact that you also think Toledo is a "lower division" team ... since they're in the same league as Kent State, and had a win against Big East co-champ Cincinnati last season. (I'll give you a pass on Georgia State, since they just moved up for this season.)

 

[timschochet]

Well, as usual the SEC teams have their annual chicken#### non-conference schedule of lower division opponents. Let's see who's on tap this year:

Alabama: Georgia State, Chattanooga

Florida: Toledo, Georgia Southern

LSU: Furman (LSU decided this year it was so shameful to play these lower division teams that they only scheduled one- instead, they face powerhouses like Kent State and UAB.)

You must have missed it last year when Kent State was ranked in the top 25 of the AP poll in November.

I guess I did. You expecting them to give LSU a game? I'll bet $100 and give you 20 points right now. I have no idea what the spread will be.

I guess you also missed the fact that LSU is playing TCU to open the season. In Dallas.

You gotta play somebody tough once in a while. They can't all be Furman.