UCLA had a great performance that followed 3 mediocre performances. They don't deserve to be ranked above FSU.
I would probably agree, but remember two weeks ago they beat Texas in Texas with Jerry Neuheisel at QB with very little practice reps. They beat UVA at UVA without their starting C, Jake Brendel, and it was a horrible offensive performance. They've been excellent since with Hundley and Brendel both playing.
Their current wins seem mediocre, but UCLA played 3 road games out of 4, and their non-conference opponents have a combined record of 10-3 in games not played against UCLA (Virginia 3-1, Memphis 2-1, and Texas 2-1). Those other 3 losses by the Bruin opponents all came against teams in the Top 25. Texas and Virginia both lost to #18 BYU, and Memphis just lost to #11 Ole Miss.
So, UCLA's non-conference opponents have lost 7 total games -- 4 of the losses were in games against UCLA (kinda hard to hold that against them), and the other 3 were all to Top 25 teams.
The ESPN Football Power Index has UCLA's opponents ranked as follows: Virginia (39), Memphis (46), Texas (30) and throw in ASU, who UCLA just destroyed (29).
The teams they've played just might be a lot better than many, including me, thought prior to the season and makes a lackluster start look a little better.
On the flip side, FSU deserves some goodwill from last season, but would you say they've performed great in all games thus far? Their schedule hasn't been more difficult than UCLA's, either (using ESPN FPI): OSU (26), Citadel (NR - FCS), Clemson (16), NC State (47).
And, ESPN has UCLA's team efficiencies (how each unit has performed adjusted for competition) ranking at #9 significantly above FSU's at #30.