unckeyherb
Footballguy
To be clear, I'm not saying Foles is better than Wentz. I'm looking at this pragmatically and for fun discussion. We can't trade Foles (unless we do some sign and trade, but that's not happening). So we either can keep Wentz and let Foles walk (which BTW I think they will do and I'm fine with). Or we can sign Foles and trade Wentz for a big-time impact player and picks.
The only way I see us even entertaining Foles as the long term option is if we get to and/or win the Super Bowl-not sure how you let him walk if that happens. IF that happens, we did it with the team as currently constructed. So all we'd be doing is trading Wentz (not a part of the made-up-for-the-sake-of-this-argument Super Bowl winning team) for an upgrade to 1-3 spots on the Super Bowl Winning roster.
The only way I see us even entertaining Foles as the long term option is if we get to and/or win the Super Bowl-not sure how you let him walk if that happens. IF that happens, we did it with the team as currently constructed. So all we'd be doing is trading Wentz (not a part of the made-up-for-the-sake-of-this-argument Super Bowl winning team) for an upgrade to 1-3 spots on the Super Bowl Winning roster.
Last edited by a moderator: